Very well said. The way Guru's try to change the world never worked. Sad
for Stafford c.s., but given it was even true for guys like Hitler
eventually, even the most powerful can't. 
So what works? Well, to me it seems that "bottom up" has a better
chance. Look at Gates/Microsoft. They started at the bottom, their stuff
spread worldwide quickly. They were no guru's until AFTER the fact and
NEVER managed to change the world they created again ....
I've said it more than once: why not start at the bottom: small tools,
small applications, WIDE diversity, let 100 zillion flowers grow in SMB
organizations. Forget the ugly behemoths, spread globally, become
viruslike, go grassroots, just like linux, xampp, but then for the
management of self-control. Document cases: no just technically, but
also process and spam it to find fertile ground elsewhere. Until we
reach the tipping point.
Open source is not just a technical trick for code, it can also be used
to build an application-network, zillions of places where people play
with the tools, the stories, improve, steal, borrow, give, etc. All that
knowledge needs to be open source too. Have a look at how approaches this.
Hey! We are the complexity masters right! If WE can't bring about change
to a small complex system like the world, who will believe us when we
say the world needs to change. We ARE the world, IN the world.


	From: Forum dedicated to the work of Stafford Beer
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of William
	Sent: maandag 6 oktober 2008 11:09
	To: [log in to unmask]
	Subject: Stafford Beer] and Oracle

	Thanks for providing another round of data points about the
sociology of inter-domain technology transfer. What is significant about
the vast collection of these experiences of passive/aggressive
rejections, over the ages, is that the creation of this ubiquitous
response remains undiscussed and unexamined. Where is the clarion call
saying "Hey, anybody see a pattern here? How come there are no contrary
examples?" None.


	Decades ago I made it a point to visit with the living greats in
systems think, including Stafford. Near the end all would say something
to the effect that - "Although my concepts have not yet taken hold to
any commensurate extent, in a hundred years or so society would
gradually get the message and the discipline of systems think would
become a cultural norm."  I noted these mentors, and their mentors, had
tormented endings - to a man. 


	There is absolutely no shred of evidence that, given time,
society will gravitate towards what's best for its survival and
advancement. There is no compelling force towards enlightenment-based
action. Anyone can find the same miserable pattern of sabotage in the
literature of a century ago - Thorstein Veblen being but one example.
What is striking is that the behavioral attributes of institutions are
exactly the same, century in and century out - oblivious to
circumstances. The institutional rejection of VSM, wholesale, is but one
instance of the institutional aversion to intelligence-informed
management. Friday, USA citizens bailed out Wall St. to the tune of a
trillion dollars without once investigating by what means this global
emergency manifested, unforeseeable, overnight. 


	"Oh, you had no idea on Friday when you reported solid financial
strength that by Monday your institution would be down $300 billion? No
problem. Here's money for you to keep doing whatever you were doing.
After all, your $400 trillion in unregulated derivatives makes out
national budget look parsimonious." 


	In view of this stunning measurement of institutional ideology,
it just doesn't seem likely that promoting VSM in the ways and means it
has been promoted will fare any better in the future. But, that's
another undiscussable.

For more information go to: For the Metaphorum
Collaborative Working Environment (MCWE) go to: METAPHORUM eList Archive available at - Archive of CYBCOM eList
available at -

This message and attachment(s) are intended solely for use by the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law.

If you are not the intended recipient or agent thereof responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and with a 'reply' message.

Thank you for your co-operation.

For more information go to:

For the Metaphorum Collaborative Working Environment (MCWE) go to:

METAPHORUM eList Archive available at -

Archive of CYBCOM eList available at -