Print

Print


On 20/4/05 11:09, "David Stifter" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> But "laged" in E is
> not such a trivial case: The palatalised "g" there, which has no
> place in "lacad", could tip the scales in favour of "lagat" with its
> by-forms "laiget, loiget".


OK, but I seem to be reading the very same "laged" in H. (yours of 18 April)
or is that already restored text from E?

M