>Huh. I guess you mean things like the very thin
>connections of arch-to-stem in "n", for example.*
Ahaaa. One of my niggles with most faces! I'm always wanting to trim off
the excess of those little buggers. Open any type catalogue at random and
I'll guarantee you'll find a good 80% of the 'm' & 'n' connections
'visually' too thick.
Then again, my eyesight's not what it used to be ;-)