In a message dated 12/4/99 7:48:07 PM EST, [log in to unmask] writes:
> The fact that they haven't always done so is enough indication that the
Bill of Rights is seen by government as something provisional, to be ignored
if necessary or
> expedient, rather than as something untouchable and sacred.
Good Lord, Sir, you seem to have an answer for everything. Where did you
ever get the idea the our government views the Bill of Rights as
"Provisional". That is the most absurd statement I ever heard! No more
responses from me now that I know who you are.