LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave TYPO-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Re: The quality of type
From: Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Discussion of Type and Typographic Design <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Nov 1999 01:00:05 -0500

text/plain (15 lines)

>> Or, plain old          ness?
>I like that one. Would future style manuals specify spelling--"[triple em
>space]ness" and would standard pronunciation be timed? Would that be a set
>time--"[1.5 seconds]ness"--or would it depend on context--"[two average
>And here I was ready to suggest "wardeaciousness."
Ha ha, and I was going to go back to the Big B for help: conveyancy,
effacing, transferent; ya know, referring more to the functioning than to
the appearance of a readably transparent face. But         ness is ok too.

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main TYPO-L Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager