LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave TYPO-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject:

Arial, shalom

From:

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion of Type and Typographic Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:36:47 -0500

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines)


> >On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, Michael Brady wrote:
> >
> >> It resembles Arial because Arial is a jot-for-tittle and tit-for-tat
> >>duplicate
> >> of Helvetica, just under another manufacturer's name.
> >
> >In fact, that's not the case, Michael. The designs are quite different:
> >just compare the lc 't', or uc 'G', for instance. AFAIK, Arial was
> >designed to fit into Helvetica's metrics, so that it would give the same
> >copy length, but the shapes themselves are different.

Sorry, I was being a little puckish about Arial, I admit.

And I admit also that I had not made a very close comparison. But when I saw
what Bill's boys up in Redmond had added to the Windows suite of fonts, I
immediately thought of all the Helvetica rip-offs of the old Compugraphic days,
fonts like Megaron and Helvetian ... and, I thought, Arial.

The differences are there, but to me the overall effect of Arial is that it is a
Helvetica wannabe.

-------------------
Michael Brady
16 Pedestal Rock Lane
Durham, NC 27712
Voice 919 471 9554 fax 919 962 2707
[log in to unmask] http://www.unc.edu/~jbrady/index.html


Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main TYPO-L Page

Permalink



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager