LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave TYPO-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject: Helvomita
From: "Hrant H. Papazian" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Discussion of Type and Typographic Design <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Wed, 17 Nov 1999 13:10:30 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain (22 lines)


Andre Hanegraaf wrote:
> There are laws for readability

And these are what Helvetica violates, in many ways.
The different versions in different amounts, but still.

> there is no such thing as absolute good or wrong in design

In terms of aesthetics, I agree.
But in terms of *function*, no.

BTW, I've noticed something about these
types of passionate discussions about
loving this type or hating that type:

Typographers tend to be neutral, saying: "All type is
equal, it's a matter of appropriateness"; whereas type
*designers* willfully engage in heated discussion about
"inherent merit". I think both perspectives are valid,
and make perfect sense in their contexts.

hhp

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main TYPO-L Page

Permalink



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager