LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for XML-L Archives


XML-L Archives

XML-L Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave XML-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject: Re: tables and meta-languages
From: Guillaume Rouchy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:General discussion of Extensible Markup Language <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Wed, 31 Mar 1999 10:53:15 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain (21 lines)


> Richard Lander wrote:
> 1. Do we need tables anymore? I have stopped using tables for information
> capturing but describe content as I best see fit, in groups. These groups,
> which could be thought of as rows, always have the same content, so why
> generalize them to rows? I provide each member with a descriptive name
> and avoid the complexity of tables for authoring. I use XSL and DSSSL,
> depending on output format, to convert these groups of well-named elements

> into tabular form, using either HTML or DSSSL tables. I've come to the
> conclusion that tables are a bad choice for predictable information but good
> for
> unpredicatable sorts, allowing users to pick the number of rows and columns
> they wish to use. The information that I am using always has the same
> number of columns, so I can hardcode the table dimensions in my stylesheet.
> Does
> this idea make sense?

Is it possible to have a look at the DTD you use to replace tables ? Any
example too ?

Thanks a lot.

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main XML-L Page

Permalink



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager