LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for XML-L Archives

XML-L Archives

XML-L Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave XML-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Re: Suggestion
From: Richard Lander <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Richard Lander <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Feb 1999 10:03:30 -0500

text/plain (56 lines)


Please don't say anything so utterly stupid and offensive to over half the
population. I would have thought that in 1999 that there were not so many of
your type left. Lets leave this newsgroup for intelligent general discussion
of XML, which I think Stuart was promoting. You on the other hand would be
better apt to visit some other newsgroup with your archane comments.

To the rest of XML-L subscribers. I'm sorry for the intrusion, but I'd
rather promote discussion of XML, which I enjoy reading, than watch my inbox
become cluttered.


-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Hill1 <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday, February 01, 1999 5:00 AM
Subject: Re: Suggestion

>Please don't come to us with your women troubles!!! :-)
>Java Technology Centre
>E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
>Ext:        +44 1 962 818 569
>Int:          7 / 248 569
>XML-L/47:28 AM
>Please respond to [log in to unmask]
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Suggestion
>Can those who post a new message on a fresh topic please enter a new
>instead of blindly hitting the reply button for a previous message (I know
>this is convenient). I have lost track of the various threads that are now
>running on the "Re: Shameless plug: "XML: The Annotated Specifications""
>confused and frustrated,

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main XML-L Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager