At 14:09 31/01/99 Danielle wrote:
>>"Sure, why not?". Well, I could give you a list, but it would take about
>>30Mb to make it. Are you really that bent on violence Danielle
>I simply stated I could imagine such a scenario taking place under certain
Like Wales having 50 times the population of those times; like there being
an ocean between Wales and England; like there being a Welsh army and navy;
like the male population etc. etc.
>>not sure if you intended for your comments to be insulting, but I must admit
>>to feeling some contempt for an American (with limited knowledge of Welsh
>I said upfront that the model I was basing my comments on was probably not
>directly applicable to the Welsh experience. Spare me your 'contempt'.
To be fair, my contempt is against your comment - not you personally.
However, in that case, you have to admit that the beginning of your
paragraph ("sure, why not?") contradicts the remainder of it.
>>who gives the impression that Wales lacks or lacked a certain
>>something by not fighting England at the bequest of some nutter from the
>Some nutter from Scotland, wasn't he? :)
Well, the point is that he wasn't a Welsh nutter.
Hwyl -- Mike.