What I said ('oh that is a different system and office from what we are
doing so do not worry') was not meant as a quote but a summation of your
statement "How USAID is coping with Y2K problems pertaining to its
contractors and grantees in Africa and elsewhere is, it seems to me, a
completely separate issue, since that activity is managed by a
completely separate department with completely different people." That
is because that is what it seemed like was being said.
My point is that even though it may be different departments with
different problems, the perception still arises as outsiders do not
necessarily make the distinctions that insiders would, and that is why
it is germane to this list. It is also germane that if USAID is pushing
internet and other network development in Africa or any other part of
the world, they best get their own IT house in order.
And for the record, I never said that they got low marks for their work
in Africa but spoke specifically to their ability (or in this case their
inability) to get their own act together so that they can effectively
manage their programs in all areas.
Jeff Cochrane 205 wrote:
> Greetings Afrik-ITes!
> Christopher Byrne writes:
> > This is important because in an earlier message, Jeff Cochrane stated
> > that 'oh that is a different system and office from what we are doing so
> > do not worry'.
> Mr. Byrne substantively misquotes me. His assertion about my
> statement is highly misleading.
> For the record, I pointed out that the US Congressional critique of
> USAID's Y2K performance was likely based on USAID's "New Management
> System" as covered in the press. USAID's Y2K activities in Africa
> and elsewhere with grantees, contractors, and others are quite a
> separate matter. I certainly did not say whether anyone should or
> should not worry about USAID's Y2K program activities.
> My intent was to suggest that it would be a misinterpretation to
> imply that the US Congress has given USAID a low rating for its Y2K
> activities in Africa. I do not believe that the US Congress or the
> press has focused on that aspect of USAID's work.
> I have no comment on Mr. Byrne's other remarks. Those who would care
> to hear my views are welcome to write to me privately, since what
> USAID does or does not do with its Web site, etc., hardly seems
> germane to Afrik-IT.
> Jeff @ Washington