LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for XML-L Archives

XML-L Archives

XML-L Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave XML-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Re: SGML to XML conversion with [in|ex]clusions
From: David Megginson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:General discussion of Extensible Markup Language <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Wed, 3 Jun 1998 20:45:29 -0400

text/plain (22 lines)

Eve L. Maler writes:

 > This is something the XML WG has taken up from time to time (but not solved
 > definitively, at least not yet).  WF processing is a subset of V
 > processing, but there's no requirement that WF processors do *only* WF --
 > there's a continuum, which makes it hard to rely on consistent behaviors
 > from parsers.  It would be better if we said: "If you implement any
 > validation behavior, you must implement all of it."

Does that mean that non-validating parsers would be forbidden from
expanding external text entities, or from reading the external DTD

All the best,


David Megginson                 [log in to unmask]

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main XML-L Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager