On Mon, 4 Mar 1996, Charles Ross wrote:
> >The question was legitimate and thoughtful.
> The question is indeed legitimate, was probably arrived at thoughtfully, is
> certainly very interesting and wholly worthy of debate. I was refering to
> the premise, which stikes me as being a bit dubious.
Many things in the handwriting such as variations in thickness,
proportions, curves, as well as the general shape of the few letters
given could inspire a whole new type face in the right person at the
right time. All that should come from the writing on the paper bag is
inspiration and suggestion not a prototype.
> However, I should have
> behaved with more maturity and kept my skepticism to myself. I regret my
> indulgence, hope I incurred but minor ill-feelings. Let's pretend it never
I too sometimes shoot off at the keyboard.
> *SIGNATURE!* http://www.islandnet.com/~cross/Chas.html