On Thu, 23 Nov 1995 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> I'm confused -- how does your <FRAME> proposal relate to the Netscape <FRAME>
I knew that this would become a problem :-(
The fact of the matter is that what I propose for the FRAME construct
differs from the Netscape proposal in the following way:
1. My frame proposal allows flow around a frame construct.
2. My frame construct is NOT stationary on the screen (The BANNER tag in
HTML 3.0 can do that to my satisfaction)
3. Most importantly: My proposal allows for TWO _NEW_ features
i. Free positioning of objects (and by objects I mean ALL parts
of the HTML 3.0 %body.content) at an offset from the top-left of
ii. My proposal suggests a mechanism for OVERLAYING of images and
text (the most important feature in my opinion)
It is unfortunate that Netscape has implemented a feature with this name
and the name for this one is not really the main concern. Primarily, the
name FRAME comes to mind for this because of it allowing a frame within
an existing window and just seemed appropriate to ME :-).
Any better name is welcome. It is not an immediate concern.
The key issue is the functionality itself. How far is it implementable?
Is it feasible? I would have thought so because the overlaying of images
and text is ALREADY possible in Netscape misusing a bug or an oversight in
the TABLE feature of the browser (see the demonstration of that at:
Moreover, the offset for overlays was already understood to be acceptable
for the FIG construct.
I felt the need for the exact positioning of data on a page to be an
increasingly necessary facility but the prime motivation for the FRAME
construct as proposed by me is the need for overlaying text and images
seamlessly. In fact, because of the content of the FL element, the
content of the layer can be just about anything that is acceptable in a
normal HTML document's body.
I will be sending a suggested rendering algorithm to the group sometime
in the next two days.
Democracy can learn some things from Communism: for example, when
a Communist politician is through, he is through.