On Wed, 26 Jul 1995, Angie Hamner wrote:
> In fact the argument is not invalid a bit exagerated maybe I'll admit. I
> received far more non-english no translation recently than I have
> translated traffic from this list.
If this is truly the case for you, Angie, then you are not referring to
the CELTIC-L list, because there have not, in fact, been more (much less
"far more") non-english no translation messages than English lately.
There were about 6 in French and 2 in Dutch. I know there have been
more than 8 other posts in English (not to mention the fact that a few of
those French and one of the Dutch posts were translated into English).
University of Maryland University College
College Park, Maryland, USA
[log in to unmask]