LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for CELTIC-L Archives

CELTIC-L Archives

CELTIC-L Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave CELTIC-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Re: Celtic "invasions" and Picts
From: Jessica Lynn White <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:CELTIC-L - The Celtic Culture List.
Date:Wed, 28 Jun 1995 20:01:51 -0500

text/plain (16 lines)

Feel free to reply to this off the list because you all probably know the
distiction already, but, I am new to the Celtic history thing, and have
not yet figured out the difference between Celts and Picts, if there is
one. I had thought Picts were a branch of the Celts. What recent evidence
do you look at to get that point?
On Wed, 28 Jun 1995, Slaine MacCholuim. wrote:
> I am sorry but recent evidence points to the fact that the Picts and
> Attecotti were anything but Celts, like the transcriptions of ogham
> stones etc.....
> Slaine

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main CELTIC-L Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager