LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for HTML-WG Archives

HTML-WG Archives

HTML-WG Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave HTML-WG
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables)


lilley <[log in to unmask]>


[log in to unmask]


Thu, 22 Jun 95 11:59:07 EDT





text/plain (36 lines)

[log in to unmask] wrote:

> A great proportion of the bulk turns out to be due to the fact that
> the declaration of %block contains references to other parameter
> entities. If we could still get a change to the 2.0 DTD to have
> it declare:
> <!ENTITY % block.additions "">

That is moving the goalposts. Will you redefine the 2.0 DTD again to
make it easier to add the 2.2 or 2.3 additions? You would need to add
this sort of construct to each and every declaration.

No, I think it is better to leave 2.0 as it is, otherwise the damn
thing will never get out the door.

This is of course orthogonal to discussion about whether the 2.1 DTD
should be an edit of 2.0 or should include 2.0 by reference.

Chris Lilley, Technical Author
| Manchester and North HPC Training & Education Centre |
| Computer Graphics Unit, Email: [log in to unmask] |
| Manchester Computing Centre, Voice: +44 161 275 6045 |
| Oxford Road, Manchester, UK. Fax: +44 161 275 6040 |
| M13 9PL BioMOO: ChrisL |
| URI: |
| "The first W in WWW will not wait." François Yergeau |

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main HTML-WG Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager