I know, I know...It's just that people sharing Conrad's general views
toward colonization here in Hawai'i pose a very real threat to the continued
survival of the Hawai'ian culture, language etc...It's all very immediate
and emotional here for those of us who care. Anyway, I'll do my best to
remember which Listserve I'm on, how many people are actually getting the
On Wed, 3 May 1995, Michael Helm wrote:
> On May 3, 11:25pm, Christine M. Walker wrote:
> > have a request. Personal attacks against another is very boring to me and
> > detracts from the argument. I request that everyone stay on the topic. I
> Too bad. But, as you will probably quickly find, Conrad is something
> of a blite himself. He does have his moments. I think he's just a
> wee bit of a joker, but then this particular topic brings out his
> serious side, & nothing much changes with it.
> > I do have a question about a point made. Everyone says that the celtic
> > culture in some way did not allow for easy industrialization. My question:
> > what in specific about celtic culture prevented or ignored industry? This
> Being on the losing side.
> They wound up being the people without capital, & without capital,
> your chances of making industries happen is much less.
> That being said, some of the more important developments of the
> industrial revolution occurred in Celtic-influenced regions. It looks
> like things like opportunity (coal mines), need (poor farming), & the
> Protestant religion (especially "dissenters") may have played a big
> role. I don't understand why the industrial revolution is associated
> with fundamentalist Protestants in Britain, but it does seem to be.
> Strong work/wealth ethic, maybe, or maybe it has something to do with
> the class system.