LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for HTML-WG Archives

HTML-WG Archives

HTML-WG Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave HTML-WG
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Re: Enhancements for HTML 2.1
From: Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Mar 1995 04:17:29 -0500

text/plain (30 lines)

>I'm personally a Unicode advocate (our client already has Unicode
>support designed and ready to implement as soon as I see a consensus
>on how Unicode pages will be labelled and encoded).

This is good to hear.

I think the encoding and labelling has already reached consensus: we
simply use the 

    text/html; charset=xxxxx

content type. For Unicode, xxxx could be replaced with:


and UTF-7 is also defined in an RFC somewhere. I should note that the
above come from the list for Internet documentation, not for the
registered names (anyone care to list the registered names?).

As such, the infrastructure is largely in place, but the real
remaining problem is making sure that non-Latin1 encoded HTML is also 
legal according to the SGML declaration etc. that HTML uses.

A question: was it really extremely difficult to implement Unicode
support, as many naysayers claim?

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main HTML-WG Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager