In message <199409081944.MAA05255@rock>, Terry Allen writes:
>There seems to be consensus that adding the elements is the way
I disagree. So much for consensus!
> so I say we might as well put them into 2.0 as wait for
I STRONGLY disagree. Show me three major browsers that support ICADD
documents, and I'll support a change to HTML 2.0.
> The documentation should make clear what their intended
>use is, and warn ordinary HTML users that their rendering may
>differ considerably from one WWW browser to another.
This would be a great disservice to the community.