LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for CELTIC-L Archives

CELTIC-L Archives

CELTIC-L Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave CELTIC-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: More on Roman Genocide
From: John Quinn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:CELTIC-L - The Celtic Culture List.
Date:Wed, 16 Feb 1994 11:45:13 +0000

text/plain (32 lines)

Caesar's conquest of Gaul was certainly not some
grand Roman design of genocide.  True, he played
up the fear of the Gauls present in the Roman
psyche from 390 B.C., and even from
the Celto-Germanic invasions of N. Italy (which
in fact was Gallic, "Gaul this side of the Alps")
of the end of the second century B.C.--and Cicero
fell (or pretended to fall) for it in his remark
"Let the Alps now fall, for we've no need of
them to protect us anymore."
BUT Caesar set about conquering Gaul to make
a military name for himself, to match the feats
of his colleagues/rivals for power.  Gaul was
chosen because:
a) it was not too far from Rome, so Caesar could keep
well abreast of politics there
b) much of Spain had already been conquered in the
second Punic War--Gaul kind of "evened out" the empire
c) there was a handy excuse for military intervention,
with the migration of the Helvetii.
I doubt that any Roman in the mid-1st century thought
the Gauls were a real threat (the botched intrigue of some
of them in the Catilinarian conspiracy was a figure of fun).
Why was Gaul conquered?  For reasons of ethnic purity?
No--it was there ready to be conquered, and an ambitious
man saw it as a venue for self-promotion.
[log in to unmask]
Waco, TX

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main CELTIC-L Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager