LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave TYPO-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject: Re: Melior
From: William Adams <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Discussion of Type and Typographic Design <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Fri, 15 May 2009 09:44:34 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain (24 lines)


On May 15, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Thierry Bouche wrote:

> The fact that fonts are conceived with some goals in mind is
> interesting, but can't it happen that the process just fails and that
> we end up simply with a nonfunctional monster? (Or that times and
> aesthetics change, so that an elegant or fancy face of the 70s might
> look just plain flawed today?)


There are no intrinsically bad fonts (though some are technically done  
so poorly that their use is not worth the effort), only bad (or  
ignorant w/ uninformed opinion) designers who don't know when to use a  
given font and/or how to use it well.

Opinions are like buttocks. Only those which are well-formed should be  
shown in public.

William

-- 
William Adams
senior graphic designer
Fry Communications
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main TYPO-L Page

Permalink



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager