LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for UCD-STAFFORDBEER Archives


UCD-STAFFORDBEER Archives

UCD-STAFFORDBEER Archives


UCD-STAFFORDBEER@LISTSERV.HEANET.IE


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

UCD-STAFFORDBEER Home

UCD-STAFFORDBEER Home

UCD-STAFFORDBEER  October 2008

UCD-STAFFORDBEER October 2008

Subject:

Re: criminality

From:

Paul Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Paul Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:31:20 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (106 lines)

I should add that because there is no such thing as vacuum, 'criminality' 
reigns when states or the 'rule of law' breaks down. That is when 
'universal' or 'abstract' rules do not hold.

This is the case in all failures of social system building.

Regards,

Paul

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger Harnden" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:53 PM
Subject: criminality


> Russell, to pick up your and Allenna's  'failed notice' thread. This  is 
> Roger-speak and is not intended to interrupt the flow of your very 
> positive interaction with Allenna. Hence the new thread.
>
> Did Stafford ever define criminality, Allenna? I never heard him do  so, 
> and it's pretty hard to do. Unless we define it as something like  'a 
> person who undermines the status quo' - which isn't very  satisfactory. 
> But sure as damnit there's no objective definition. Even  'evil', Russell, 
> has problems. It is almost totally relative to a  viewpoint or a culture's 
> dominant logic. If we take the systems'  approach that Allenna writes 
> about, then we end up talking about the  failure of the system - the point 
> I raised in my previous message. All  very well if you believe the system 
> is not constituted through human  actions, but is somehow a reification - 
> but then please define it.
>
> And when, following Ern, we attempt to make a distinction between 
> 'ourselves as human beings' and 'ourselves as social beings' we arrive  at 
> the hub of the issue. It's bloody difficult to make such a  distinction in 
> practice, though the words make it sound simple.
>
> However, I believe we can, impeccably, make a distinction between our 
> shifting and changing subjective and indeterminate sense of self, and  the 
> self that we ascribe to others. Hence my use of the terms ethics  and 
> morals.
>
> Of course, outside this territory we have 'systems', but they are 
> constituted by human interactions, and I believe, their nature largely 
> determined consensually through recurrent exchanges of generalisations  of 
> mind rather than by the interactions themselves in isolation. In  other 
> words, they are judgements about what is the case, where the  case itself 
> can only be the case. They are exchanges at the S5 level  of the 
> individuals. And, perhaps following Luhmann or Foucault,  individual human 
> beings can be described as 'relays' for the dynamics  of the emerging 
> systems. But, if this is the case (and with reference  to Spencer Brown), 
> the human as a relay has a choice to close or  fracture a 'circuit' or to 
> provide closure to the system pattern (as  did many individuals concerned 
> with the concentration camps or the  banking crisis. Neither Foucault nor 
> Luhmann appear to embrace such an  option. In Foucault's conclusions there 
> is a fatalistic inescapability  to what he calls the 'microphysics of 
> power'. No-one can step outside  it.
>
> However, I am deeply suspicious of the notion that we have to leave an 
> 'enactive' individual out of the picture. What von Foerster, Maturana  and 
> others intend by the concept of 'responsibility' is surely  correct. Or 
> haver I got this wrong? In other words, whatever the  system, the 
> individual has choice over which relays they open and  which they break. 
> And the decision taken defines the ethical nature of  that individual to 
> him or her self, and defines their moral status in  their social context. 
> The individual may or may not amplify a given  flow of power/knowledge, 
> through his or her decision about engagement  or disengagement from any 
> network of social relations.
>
> I suppose, Russell, that it might be interesting to see 'where' 
> criminality exists in terms of the VSM. But I am not sure we would  'find' 
> it. The model has been used by a whole variety of people, and  attracted 
> many, some of whom have an authoritarian perspective, some a  democratic 
> one. Each extreme fits the model to their own world- picture, in many 
> cases quite satisfactorily for their own purposes.  Which is probably OK. 
> Claims that a model is intrinsically 'moral'  or  'ethical' are surely a 
> contradictinction in terms. Models are surely,  triumphantly, about 
> systems, and not about human individuals. What we  might choose to do is 
> to define that class of individual who seeks to  undermine 'our' model of 
> reality (whether that model is VSM or  something else), 'criminal'. And, 
> then. low and behold, we will call  them 'immoral'. We could not say 
> anything about their ethical being,  though.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> For more information go to: www.metaphorum.org
>
> For the Metaphorum Collaborative Working Environment (MCWE) go to: 
> www.platformforchange.org
>
> METAPHORUM eList Archive available at - 
> https://listserv.heanet.ie/ucd-staffordbeer.html
>
> Archive of CYBCOM eList available at - 
> http://hermes.circ.gwu.edu/archives/cybcom.html
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For more information go to: www.metaphorum.org

For the Metaphorum Collaborative Working Environment (MCWE) go to:  www.platformforchange.org

METAPHORUM eList Archive available at - https://listserv.heanet.ie/ucd-staffordbeer.html

Archive of CYBCOM eList available at - http://hermes.circ.gwu.edu/archives/cybcom.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2017
May 2017
November 2016
October 2016
July 2016
June 2016
March 2016
November 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager