Your question Is it like that in science? surprises me. It was in
fact the writings of your father which brought me back to science
after I got tired of what mostly was said to be science. He
introduced for me the concept of the Art of Science. Indeed, science
is one of the arts for me. The tools are rigorous thinking and logic:
this leads to some elegant creations as the set-theoretic approach to
the VSM and the VSM itself. The products of this rigour and logic are
what are named models (theories and laws are nothing else than
models) for interacting with the abundant material of reality.
Another exemplar of the art of science, which are more known as
artists, are Christo and Jeanne-Claude. They master also the
political process. Because as creative human activities the art of
politics is also an art. For me, all activity which takes the risk to
confront ones "dream" or desire with "reality" and explore the
boundaries of its own tools and dreams can be labeled art. I learned
also from Joseph Beuys this extended meaning of art. Also he was a
scientific artist, knowledgeable of all kind of physico-chemical
processes, with which he was experimenting.
Op 20-mrt-07, om 10:13 heeft Vanilla Beer het volgende geschreven:
> Enrique - so many thanks for this site, its marvellous....
> the art debate as you and Luc say, is rooted in knowledge of the
> tools, like any other discipline, and from the engagement of the
> practitioner and the subject arises the outcome, to whatever level
> of sucess. The strength of art - as I use the term, visual and
> dependant on hand/eye interaction - is that it can access space
> rooted in the artist as a member of his/her society that is
> hitherto unknown. You can calll this base space the unconcious but
> I dont think it is; you can call it the noossphere, the collective
> unconcious, the ether, the place that Sheldrake talks about whos
> name escapes me, but I dont think its any of those. Picasso
> described it as possession by all the dead artists that had
> preceeded him. It feels like possession (ask anyone- time changes,
> you become absent; things change without your volition) Lorenzo del
> Medicii thought that artists were gods messengers and should be
> treated accordingly. I go with that, not surprisingly.
> So, whats it like to 'do' science? Is it as easily measurable, in
> that I have a blank space on paper and then I dont, ergo, something
> has happened and can be spoken of. Is it like that in science?
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "enrique rivera"
> <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:44 AM
> Subject: Re: knowledge art or interactive art?
>> Dear Luc,
>> thanks for the feedback,
>> Recently I visit Belgium for different reason,
>> too bad that we dont meet to chat in person this matters...
>> When I visit the web site www.visualcomplexity.com, and surf into the
>> map coleection, it's like to be in a virtual art gallery.
>> One amazing discovery was the web site made about the chilean thinker
>> Fanisco Varela www.franciscovarela.nl
>> artsciencephilosophy apears like a single word for me when i think in
>> this convergence.
>> Medialabs are the spaces for investigation, production and
>> representations, where theorist programmers, scientist and artist can
>> work together in multipurpose.
>> Hope that metaphorum will become in a proactive space for this
>> necessary structural connection.
>> For more information go to: www.metaphorum.org
>> For the Metaphorum Collaborative Working Environment (MCWE) go to:
> For more information go to: www.metaphorum.org
> For the Metaphorum Collaborative Working Environment (MCWE) go to:
For more information go to: www.metaphorum.org
For the Metaphorum Collaborative Working Environment (MCWE) go to: www.platformforchange.org