Another strange copular usage is found in Eriu 25
(1974), Varia 1, by Eric Hamp:
This is Serglige Con Culainn: 19
Nitan-bi nach n-uall
'We will have any apple' (I think....)
....it occurs to me that this may be somehow connected
to the usage we've been talking about up to now, in
the sense that it is presumably possessive with the
--- Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> --- Dennis King <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Seán wrote:
> > > An t-éan úd is binn guth, murab ionann agus an
> > =
> > > That bird of sweet voice, unlike the jackdaw.
> > Excellent!
> > > It might help if you wrote a few words on the
> > of the
> > > copula as being the equivalent of the
> > sign =
> > No, you! :-) Tá tusa in ann aige sin. Agus
> > tú féin
> > agus Elliott in ann castachtaí na copaile a phlé
> > ansin.
> > The rest of us can chime in.
> > Dennis
> UH OH. I dont know if I ought to have spoken up.
> Well, I'm not entirely certain abot the usage of
> the copula as being the equivalent of the
> sign =. That seems a bit more semantic-y oriented.
> interested a lot in the syntax of it. Where Both in
> Old Irish (to some extent) and in Modern Irish, you
> have a sort of co-referential pronoun that agrees
> the predicate (in some instances)
> GOI gives the example: Crist didiu, is si in
> 'Christ,then, he is the city'. REALLY unsure why
> should be at the moment.
> Also, another instance that is puzzling, is the
> adverbial copula, which does not at all equal the
> mathematical sign =. An example from the Macgnimrada
> (Stories from the Tain) is: Is di Ultaib do (it is
> toward the beginning, I can't quote the line of
> Here, we have a adverbial phrase 'di Ultaib' (from
> Ulstermen), linked to a prepositional pronoun 'do'
> him) by the copula. It's unclear to me, how this
> works, if it's a 'mathematical sign'
> Um...please chime in!!
> Cheap talk?
> Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.