Amy Hale wrote:
> Additionally, regardless of the spam issue, we should be encouraging
> diversity and tolerance, not slagging off other people's sacred
> texts. It's
> just not cool.
All due respect Ma'am, but I couldn't disagree more. While I can agree
that "... personal religious beliefs are better discussed other places."
I can't agree with the rest of your statement. I used to be a radical,
left leaning, liberal SOB but I've gotten to question the wisdom of that
position in the detritus of human dispair, blood and guts left by these
people practicing their brand of extreme passive aggression as posted by
this "female". They have nothing but intolerance, ridicule and
condemnation for any dissenters. They use your passivity as a weapon
against you and you propose to be nice to them and thank them for using
a sharp knife to slit your throat. THAT is not "cool". So, no, I cannot
Tolerance should in the very least be reserved for those who are capable
of exhibiting it. Islamists of all kinds have shown not only a total
lack of anything resembling tolerance for any other members of humanity,
but they have wholeheartedly embraced a rhetoric which includes
encouraging the literal wholesale slaughter of children, the handicapped
and other helpless and defenseless peoples to gain mere publicity for
their warped, twisted, intolerant, venomous view of their vile, diseased
belief system. THAT is not "cool". So, hell no, I cannot concede a
single shred of respect for any "sacred text" or its messenger who would
encourage the slaughter of my peoples and the wholesale destruction of
our entire civilization. Sacred my ass. I sincerely invite them all to
burn in hell.
How's that Mr. Mungall?
Bruce L. Jones
The Mojave Desert - The Geographic Center of Nowhere