Harvey Fishman wrote:
> I subscribe to _The Economist_ and have noted that they do not even
> identify the writers of any of the contents.
/The Economist/ has been described as offering the equivalent of an Oxbridge
tutorial; the anonymity suggests that it offers timeless, unimpeachable wisdom, the
only possible opinion unsullied by the possibility that author or nationality
could influence that opinion. But they're human really -- just read the picture
 or the fact that its target demographic has an unquenchable need for tax havens,
Patek Philippe watches and reinsurance.