Peter Flynn wrote:
> No, you're being very generous. My reaction was to look at
> the subject line and suggest reading the Spec, especially
> the validity constraint underneath production 46, which
> explicitly forbids defining the same element more than once.
I wouldn't have a problem with that, but I would prefer to also see something
that indicates that the same result can be achieved by other means - even if
it was only one sentence to point them in the right direction. Otherwise, the
poster and perhaps others relatively new to XML might waste a lot of time
going down the wrong track for want of a little bit more information,
especially when a number of people reply and nobody mentions the
Off my soapbox...
Marcus Carr email: [log in to unmask]
Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."