LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for AFRIK-IT Archives


AFRIK-IT Archives

AFRIK-IT Archives


AFRIK-IT@LISTSERV.HEANET.IE


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

AFRIK-IT Home

AFRIK-IT Home

AFRIK-IT  December 2000

AFRIK-IT December 2000

Subject:

Re: bandwidth per user - Internet standards

From:

Dr Paulos Nyirenda <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:09:29 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (132 lines)

Thanks Brian for the info. This is well known and documented and we already have
enough info on it. Welcome to Malawi, once again. Paulos

On 17 Dec 00, at 7:24, Brian Longwe wrote:
>
> Greetings brother... One other way of purchasing required bandwidth in an
> economical manner and still get high performance is to use an asymmetrical
> model of bandwidth provisioning which mirrors the actual bandwidth demands
> on your network.
>
> Typical internet traffic is 20-40% upstream and 80-60% downstream. If you
> can negotiate with your upstream bandwidth provider to supply you with an
> asymmetrical link that is, say: 128k up and 512k down, you should be able
> to get a better cost/performance benefit than a symmetrical 512k link.
>
> This can even be taken further if your bandwidth is normally provided
> through an international leased line. The costs of terrestrial
> connectivity are much higher than satellite connectivity so what you can
> do is take a terrestrial line of 128k (symmetrical) and contract for a
> simplex (receive only) satellite downlink with a company such as
> Interpacket for the remaining bandwidth (512) at a much lower per K cost.
> This way you can monitor, manage and scale both links according to the
> actual growth patterns of your network.
>
> By the way, this is a model that is used by the majority of ISPs in Kenya
> and from my understanding by the majority of ISPs who depend on
> Intercontinental lines for their connectivity to the Internet.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Brian Longwe
>
> ps. I will be in Mzuzu from 23rd - 31st December, please tell William
> Chimsisi. I wouldn't mind meeting you guys again, it's been a long time
> since Inet99 :-)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: African Network of IT Experts and Professionals (ANITEP) List
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Dr Paulos Nyirenda
> > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 1:50 AM To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: bandwidth per user - Internet standards
> >
> >
> > On 25 Nov 00, at 16:36, George Sadowsky wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I understand the question.  Most people in developed
> > > countries have 56 Kbps modems, and there is a slow but sure migration
> > > to more bandwidth through broadband connectivity such as cable
> > models or DSL.
> > >
> > > I think that the practical answer for developing regions is "as much
> > > as you can get the telephone lines to support, up to 56K."
> > >
> > > Does this help?
> >
> > Thanks but, no actually it did not. The practical answer does not
> > give a good
> > estimate to design an optimal system in a developing or developed
> > region. Although the answer I was seeking should apply to design for
> > ISPs, I was looking for info for the design of an optimal system where
> > there is enough money to purchase all the required bandwidth but the
> > application also demands that there should be good bandwidth efficiency
> > (without excessive wastage) as well.
> >
> > I received some good answers and I have copied one below. I would
> > like to thank
> > those who answered and gave possibly good design criteria. Below
> > is one such
> > good answer that helped and I am posting for the benefit of
> > others who requested
> > the same. The information greatly helped in a project we are involved
> > in.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Paulos
> > ====================
> > Dr Paulos Nyirenda
> > Malawi SDNP Coordinator
> >
> > =0=
> >
> > From:                   "Barry Raveendran Greene" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To:                     <[log in to unmask]> Subject:
> >  RE: Capacity Planning Date sent:              Fri, 24 Nov 2000 08:59:52
> > -0800
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I used a formula of 1/3 of the dial-up capability plus 50% of the
> > dial-pool to figure out upstream capacity of the POP. For a 28.8Kbps
> > link with 50 dial ports that would be:
> >
> >  28.8/3 = 9.6
> >  50/2 = 25
> >
> >  25 * 9.6 = 240 Kbps.
> >
> > There are other ways of doing this. Try asking the question on the
> > following aliases:
> >
> >  [log in to unmask]
> >  [log in to unmask]
> >
> > That will get you some other points of view.
> >
> > Barry
> >
> >
> > =0=
> > > >What is the standard or optimum allocation for bandwidth
> > (kbps) per user
> > > >for Internet connections?
> > > >
> > > >It seems difficult to get a ball figure from the Internet Standards
> > > >Archive
> > > >
> > > >Where are such Internet data published other than searching through
> > > >RFC's?
> > > >
> > > >Where can I find best practices on actual operating networks?
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >
> > > >Paulos
> > > >======================
> > > >Dr Paulos Nyirenda
> > > >Malawi SDNP Coordinator
> > > >[log in to unmask]
> > > >Tel: +265-674979 / 824787
> >

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
August 2008
July 2008
April 2008
March 2008
November 2007
August 2007
July 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager