> It's very easy to misinterpret. I took several of your posts as
> highly critical. Later I took you at your word when you said they were not
> intended as such. So I think both you and Pamela Highety jumped to
> conclusions unncessarily, and perhaps the key is to take someone at their
> word instead of assuming that someone was being "catty."
And "Highety" typo *isn't* baiting, correct?
It would be "catty" of me to "assume" it is, correct?