LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CELTIC-L Archives


CELTIC-L Archives

CELTIC-L Archives


CELTIC-L@LISTSERV.HEANET.IE


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CELTIC-L Home

CELTIC-L Home

CELTIC-L  April 1999

CELTIC-L April 1999

Subject:

Re: Irish History List?

From:

Neil McEwan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Neil McEwan <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 4 Apr 1999 04:56:14 -0300

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (118 lines)

At 08:29 AM 4/4/99 PDT, Gil Hardwick wrote:

>>     And look where the Celtic cultures are now, as a result.  For a small
>> people, to "merge" is to disappear.  But then, we're starting from
different
>> premises, you and I: I don't believe that such a thing as an overall
>> "Celtic" culture exists to begin with; I think that that word is used to
>> hide the reality of the endangered cultures of Ireland, Scotland, Wales
>> etc., as
>> if to say "you needn't worry about the future as long as Riverdance is
>> still selling out in New York".
>
>Ah Neil, I thought better of you than this. It is this outlook which is
self-pitying.


   It is not self-pitying to note that the "Celtic" cultures have gone into
a catastrophic state of decline during this century: and only recognition
of this fact can actually stop the decline.  "Self-pity" is pretending (for
example) that the English are set on crushing "Celtic" culture at all costs.


>You refer to the "endangered cultures of Ireland, Scotland, Wales etc."
>without bothering to acknowledge either their histories or their place in
the >global reality.


   And what does "the global reality" mean today?  Mass-marketing of "Celtic"
commodities to an internationally dispersed community of rootless consumers?
And never mind about the old folks with their memory of a fifteen-hundred-
year-old oral tradition, that's not sexy enough for the new age, is it?


>You also appear to view Celts as restricted to particular places, and so
>regard them as a "small people".


   They are small peoples, in fact they are *tiny* peoples.  Scotland is a
tiny country and in that country, 1% of the people speak Gaelic.  They mean
nothing to the world at large and that is just as it should be: the space
they have been allotted for the exercise of their cultural traditions is
space enough, and moreover that space is not just a "particular place":
in the real Celtic traditions "a particular place" like Skye or Donegal
or Inverness County is a foundation for the culture itself: it is unique
and irreplaceable.  Sacramento and Canberra are not adequate substitutes.


>Celts are not a "small people". They cover the planet.


   Those are not "Celts".  Those are the distant, anglicized descendants of
the Celtic peoples.  They are culturally almost indistinguishable from their
neighbours who are English by descent -- they have only a surname and perhaps
the odd Enya CD to set them apart.


>What I meant by intermarriage is that away from Ireland, Scotland, Wales
etc >they don't bother so much with limiting themselves to such
artificially >contrived boundaries, but proceed to mix back among
themselves and so
>stablise their circumstances and re-invigorate their characteristic
>attributes. That is what they always did before the boundaries were imposed.


   What this happy-clappy talk conceals is the fact that without a boundary
*there is no culture*.  An implication of knowing what belongs to your culture
is knowing what does not belong.  And ignoring what does belong in favour of
what does not leads you into a different culture altogether.  Your point of
view sums up pretty succinctly why the concept of "Celtic" is so dangerous:
it is not rooted in any particular place or tradition indigeneous to that
place, so it can afford to despise all the traditions at once: it can promote
itself as being progressive and forward-looking because it is not remotely
tied down to anything that would distinguish it from anything else, and
so we can get all groovy in projecting our wishes onto it.


>Further, it is only very recently that we have been able to prevent people
>from being beaten up in Australia for not speaking English, but we'll get
>there. There are more and more native Gaelic speakers living here now and
>making contact with us, so the renewal of the language here is
>only a matter of time.


   Australia will never have a genuine Gaelic-speaking community but even
leaving that aside, why should you care either way?  You mentioned
"artificially contrived boundaries" -- why isn't the linguistic component
of identity just one of those artificial contrivances too?  If the culture
is not necessarily bound to the land, why should it be bound to anything
else, including language?  Have the courage of your own convictions.



>What does concern me is that those relatively few still left in Ireland,
>Scotland, Wales etc, are prone to seeing themselves as the sole survivors.


    *They are*.  Apart from them all you have are a small fringe of
enthusiasts and, beyond that, the vast world of comfortably anglicized
and commodified "Celtica", which is a fake.  And when I say "fake" I
include your fifth-generation Australians who try to feel traumatized
about the Irish Famine.


>I have been unable to obtain a grip on that yet; perhaps it has something
to >do with your ongoing strife with the English administration still
>dominating your part of the planet, where we have been well able to
influence >and change the political scene here quite radically, and free
ourselves of that sort of stress.


    The English administration, if they actually cared about such matters
to begin with, could find no better way to eradicate the Celtic cultures
altogether than to adopt your viewpoint on this issue and apply it
consistently.


Neil
--

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
March 2015
February 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
February 2014
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994
December 1993
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
July 1993
June 1993
May 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993
January 1993
December 1992
November 1992
October 1992
September 1992
August 1992
July 1992
June 1992
May 1992
April 1992
March 1992
February 1992
January 1992
December 1991
November 1991
October 1991
September 1991
August 1991
July 1991
June 1991
May 1991

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager