LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CELTIC-L Archives


CELTIC-L Archives

CELTIC-L Archives


CELTIC-L@LISTSERV.HEANET.IE


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CELTIC-L Home

CELTIC-L Home

CELTIC-L  October 2006

CELTIC-L October 2006

Subject:

Re: Pursuing the treasure-bearing dragon to his Welsh lair ...

From:

"R.Karl" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

CELTIC-L - The Celtic Culture List.

Date:

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:05:12 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (217 lines)

Hi again,

and while I'm at it, did't I just say something about dinosaurs being 
off topic and mails to be sent in plain text? I'll make some points on 
both subjects:

Mel Erskine-Richmond wrote:
> (This leaves my hands in font size 14pt Ariel)

It shoul, however, left you computer as plain text only. A further 
reason you will see explained below. But first to your starting sentences:

> If Welsh-descent Celts may share their enthusiasm for dinosaurs,

Of course they may, but, please, on Dinosaur-L, not on Celtic-L. That 
someone of Welsh descent is enthusiastic about dinosaurs does not 
establish a valid connection between dinosaurs and Celtic culture.

 > and to  discuss the possible origins of this interest,

Again, you may do so, but please do so on Dinosaur-L

 > it may
 > be somewhat mind-blowing to examine the collected Ica stones
 > assemblage made by Dr. Javier Cabrera of Ica, Peru.

Why? I had a look at the page you've referenced below and fail to see 
any 'Celtic' connection.

> Cabrera spent over 40 years collecting the stones he held, and
 > reported that he had 11,000 carved stones in his Collection.
 > --- http://www.labyrinthina.com/cabrera2.htm .

So it is claimed. However, one just needs to have a look at some other 
parts of the labyrinthina web site to see the angle where all this is 
coming from. I just quote from http://www.labyrinthina.com/ica.htm: "THE 
ICA STONES OF PERU. An ancient stone library left by a space-faring 
civilization!".
Now, one may think of this what one likes, and if you want to believe in 
spacefaring civilisations fighting dinosaurs on earth and leaving a 
stone library behind as a document to their exploits, so be it. However, 
what I don't see at all is any connection to Celtic culture. So, what is 
it's place on this list?

> Is it likely that such a vast array of stones of such intricate 
> workmanship were all created by him, and for the soul purpose of 
> tricking the archaeological community! Rather an impossible amount of 
> time would go into such prodigious artistic creativity, as should be 
> noted by any independently thinking person whether or not an 
> archaeologist, towards such a beautiful and meticulously designed 
> gallery of art in stone.

So of course it's the stupid, arrogant archaeologists who simply are to 
stubborn and blind to see the plainly obvious, and they are trying to 
repress knowledge of this earth-shattering discoveries because it would 
threaten what?
Now, I've been an archaeologist for about 20 years now, and I actually 
want to find out about the past. I may be dumb, but generally speaking, 
archaeologists are on average rather bright, highly educated people who 
have been trained as scientists, which means that one of their core 
approaches is to question everything, including their own wisdom. That 
all archaeologists on this planet adre simply too stupid to see the 
importance of such a discovery, if it were for real, is extremely unlikely.
That leaves us only with the alternative option that there is a huge 
archaeological world conspiracy, that tries to hide the real past, 
probably for some sinister reason. If you are a fan of conspiracy 
theories, you may well believe in that, even though I fail to see what 
this archaeological world conspiracy would have as a motive to do this. 
And that leaves aside that I can't really imagine a conspiracy that 
successfully keeps well many thousands of professional and even more 
semi-professional members so tightly in line that in the 200 years that 
archaeology now exists, not a single whistleblower has made it into the 
press.

Now, that's all fine by me if you want to believe any of that, but still 
I don't see any connection to Celtic culture. Perhaps you'd care to 
explain the connection to us?

> I really don't want to talk about maths, but to draw your attention to 
> the Celtic-like design work within the craftsmanship. 

Now, this is something I can much better deal with. Perhaps you might 
point out, with examples and ideally with references to respectable 
literature, where you see Celtic-like design on these stones, because I 
see none of that. There's no spiral patterns, no interlace, no other 
patterns that are commonly to be found in Celtic art. The way the 
figures are carved on the stone isn't reminiscent of any Celtic art that 
I have ever seen either, other than in the sense that they are vaguely 
human looking figures, and vaguely human looking figures (which, 
however, don't look much like those on the stones shown at your link) 
also appear in Celtic art. But then, so do many figures in Japanese 
animated films, which also occasionally have humas riding on dinosaurs 
in them, so that then should be classed as 'Celtic' images too - so why 
don't we have discussions on Manga comics on this list?

> If, in addition  there is linguistic resonance to Middle Eastern-Celtic
 > terms,

Sorry, but what are 'middle eastern Celtic terms'? Do you mean Galatian? 
Or what?
And even if there were, how does this connect Peruvian stones to Celtic 
culture? Peru is in South America, not in the middle East (at least when 
last I looked).

> what might anyone conclude but they had either some commonality of
 > heritage, or cultural contact had been achieved?

Well, first of all, one might actually look at the evidence and analyse 
it in a systematic, methodical and sufficiently detailed way, not draw 
wide overarching connections based on some wild speculations and 
unfounded, ecclectic comparisons of surface similarities. Pictures of 
the human image, for instance, are by no means limited to Celtic art, 
but are something that is very common and needs no explanation that 
postulates a common origin, let alone a Celtic origin. And that leaves 
aside the rather high likelyhood that the images shown on the webpage 
you referred us to in fact are fakes, and blatantly obvious ones at that.
Rather than throwing around wld speculations about common origins and 
ancent spacefaring races establishing connections between opposite sides 
of the planet, with some million years of temporal discrepancy, we might 
have a look at actual Celtic culture-related evidence. For instance by 
having a look at Constanze Witt's homepage at 
http://www3.iath.virginia.edu/Barbarians/first.html, or some of the 
pages that show Celtic art and give reliable academic references, like 
e.g. http://www.gallica.co.uk/celts/art.htm. But that, probably, would 
be too boring, to restrictive, and too down to earth. No aliens in 
there, how sad.

<snipped the maths>
> And if you check the page listed here, which I just 
> found you might appreciate that these stones are of high craftsmanship, 
> and resonate with the intricate geometries of the Celt-Phoenican artisans.

What are Celto-Phoenician artisans? Do you mean Celtiberian artisans? Or 
Lusitanian ones? Are Celts and Phoenicians the same to you? If yes, get 
your facts straight, because they aren't generally accepted as the same, 
but rather as two quite distinct groups. But perhaps you might want to 
argue against that, too - but if, please with references. I know, 
referencing stuff is boring, but then, it allows others to check out 
what you've been saying, which empowers them in that they can see for 
themselves, and don't have to believe what you're claiming.

<snipped> 

Right, this now brings me to the second reason as to why no 
html-formatted mails should be sent to the list:
The stuff you copied from the web into your mail - apart from the fact 
that it is off topic - contained some javascript coding, and javascript 
can be used to do lots of funny things on your computer that you might 
not at all want to happen. Like infect your machine with viruses and 
such. As a result, some providers (like my university) have incoming 
javascripts disabled. In my copy of you mail, this results in the following:

> <java...peru-tomb-art.htm');>Mae'r MailScanner wedi canfod ymgais
 > bosibl i dwyllo o/MailScanner has detected a possible fraud
 > attempt from "JavaScript"< ...

So what you did, by sending the html-formatted mail, is clutter up my 
computer with links that wouldn't work. The same will have happened for 
some other of the 500odd people subscribed to this list. The rest (for 
whom those links were working) may have had their computer invaded by 
harmful code, thanks to your insistence to send html-formatted emails.

Now while you might find that jolly funny, someone whose machine doesn't 
work any more and who may be loosing all his/her daa, just because you 
can't be bothered to turn off your html-mail-function, might not find 
that funny at all. So - once again - please stop to send html-formatted 
mails to this list. If you can't or won't, I will have to block your 
address from sending further mails to this list.

Thanks,

RAY

-- 
_____________________________________________________

PD Mag.Dr. Raimund KARL FSA(Scot) MIFA
Senior Lecturer in Heritage and Archaeology
University of Wales Bangor
Department of History and Welsh History
Ogwen Building, Siliwen Road, LL57 2DG
Gwynedd, Cymru, UK
Email: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Phone: (+44 1248) 351151/2247
Mobile:(+44 7970) 993891
_____________________________________________________


-- 
Gall y neges e-bost hon, ac unrhyw atodiadau a anfonwyd gyda hi,
gynnwys deunydd cyfrinachol ac wedi eu bwriadu i'w defnyddio'n unig
gan y sawl y cawsant eu cyfeirio ato (atynt). Os ydych wedi derbyn y
neges e-bost hon trwy gamgymeriad, rhowch wybod i'r anfonwr ar
unwaith a dilwch y neges. Os na fwriadwyd anfon y neges atoch chi,
rhaid i chi beidio  defnyddio, cadw neu ddatgelu unrhyw wybodaeth a
gynhwysir ynddi. Mae unrhyw farn neu safbwynt yn eiddo i'r sawl a'i
hanfonodd yn unig  ac nid yw o anghenraid yn cynrychioli barn
Prifysgol Cymru, Bangor. Nid yw Prifysgol Cymru, Bangor yn gwarantu
bod y neges e-bost hon neu unrhyw atodiadau yn rhydd rhag firysau neu
100% yn ddiogel. Oni bai fod hyn wedi ei ddatgan yn uniongyrchol yn
nhestun yr e-bost, nid bwriad y neges e-bost hon yw ffurfio contract
rhwymol - mae rhestr o lofnodwyr awdurdodedig ar gael o Swyddfa
Cyllid Prifysgol Cymru, Bangor.  www.bangor.ac.uk

This email and any attachments may contain confidential material and
is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s).  If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately
and delete this email.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), you
must not use, retain or disclose any information contained in this
email.  Any views or opinions are solely those of the sender and do
not necessarily represent those of the University of Wales, Bangor.
The University of Wales, Bangor does not guarantee that this email or
any attachments are free from viruses or 100% secure.  Unless
expressly stated in the body of the text of the email, this email is
not intended to form a binding contract - a list of authorised
signatories is available from the University of Wales, Bangor Finance
Office.  www.bangor.ac.uk

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
March 2015
February 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
February 2014
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994
December 1993
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
July 1993
June 1993
May 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993
January 1993
December 1992
November 1992
October 1992
September 1992
August 1992
July 1992
June 1992
May 1992
April 1992
March 1992
February 1992
January 1992
December 1991
November 1991
October 1991
September 1991
August 1991
July 1991
June 1991
May 1991

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager