On 12 Jan 2012 at 15:23, Dennis King wrote:
> > The bad news first: using UV light did not help at all. The blotted
> > portion of the page stayed just as blotted under the UV lamp.
> Rats. But plain UV is still pretty low-tech, isn't it?
It is, indeed. But I thought it wise to use a cheap and easily
available technique first, to see if it yields any results, before I
bring in the heavy artillery, which - apart from requiring a bit of a
logistic effort - is also quite expensive.