LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for HTML-WG Archives


HTML-WG Archives

HTML-WG Archives


February 1996


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave HTML-WG
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re: (SC29WG12.597) ISO/IEC 13522-2 redefined as RFC 1866 + I18N + tables

Thomas J Casey Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 02:47:53 GMT

87 lines

A query about SPAN...

Martin Kiff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 14:08 UT

31 lines

A query about SPAN... and the loss of RANGE, SPOT, and MD

Evan Kirshenbaum <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 09 Feb 1996 11:23:00 PST

121 lines

An open letter to the HTML WG

John C Klensin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Feb 1996 12:08:00 -0500

84 lines

Bracketed URLs

Pete Resnick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 19:21:47 -0600

40 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Harold A. Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 02:45:15 +0000

52 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Pete Resnick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 21:55:38 -0600

81 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Gerald Oskoboiny <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 02:33:37 -0700 (MST)

59 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Owen Rees <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 13:41:57 +0000

52 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Pete Resnick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 10:52:44 -0600

76 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Benjamin Franz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 11:19:04 -0800 (PST)

36 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Pete Resnick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 13:17:28 -0600

50 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Benjamin Franz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 12:24:53 -0800 (PST)

45 lines

Change bars [was:] Re: A query about SPAN... and the loss of RANGE, SPOT, and MD

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 12:42:45 -0800 (PST)

51 lines

Re: Change bars [was:] Re: A query about SPAN... and the loss of RANGE, SPOT, and MD

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 96 16:24:47 -0500

24 lines

Class inheritance or do we need html/class?

Marcus E. Hennecke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 96 10:26:24 -0800

72 lines

Re: Class inheritance or do we need html/class?

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 96 14:06:01 -0500

33 lines

Re: Class inheritance or do we need html/class?

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 15:22:56 -0500 (EST)

51 lines

Re: Class inheritance or do we need html/class?

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 96 15:34:57 -0500

36 lines

Re: Class inheritance or do we need html/class?

Francois Yergeau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 20:51:39 -0500

24 lines

Comments on <INSERT> spec

Gordon Irlam <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 22:06:27 -0800 (PST)

158 lines

Re: Dictionaries in HTML

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 03:17:55 -0500

43 lines

Re: Dictionaries in HTML

Gary Adams - Sun Microsystems Labs BOS <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 10:57:18 -0500

50 lines

Re: Dictionaries in HTML

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:32:14 PST

28 lines

Re: Dictionaries in HTML

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 18:00:20 -0800 (PST)

25 lines

Re: Dictionaries in HTML

Bob Rosenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 1996 22:09:08 +0000

165 lines

Re: Do we have a rough ... Where *do* we agree?

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:24:18 -0500 (EST)

56 lines

Re: Do we have a rough ... Where *do* we agree?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 96 08:25:00 PST

23 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 02:15:27 -0400

76 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 00:03:42 PST

18 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Hakon Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 09:34:37 +0100

32 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 01:34:14 -0800 (PST)

32 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 02:15:56 -0800 (PST)

52 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:35:54 -0500 (EST)

44 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 09:01:12 -0500 (EST)

28 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:21:33 -0600

101 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 09:30:18 -0500

24 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:36:25 -0600

51 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 09:40:36 -0500

37 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:50:23 -0600

49 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 09:55:54 -0500

40 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 10:26:13 -0500

46 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 10:49:04 -0500

50 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:17:02 PST

77 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 12:00:20 -0500

24 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Stan Friesen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 96 10:14:46 PST

39 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 10:44:58 -0800

53 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 13:59:44 -0500 (EST)

34 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 11:37:14 -0800

44 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 96 15:00:07 EST

25 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 15:44:32 -0500

31 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Keith M. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 14:50:19 -0500

68 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 15:54:10 -0500

31 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 96 16:35:51 -0500

30 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Benjamin Franz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 13:52:07 -0800 (PST)

64 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 18:47:47 -0500 (EST)

90 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 96 22:15:32 EST

54 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 09:00:45 -0500

40 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 09:27:43 -0500

50 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 96 09:55:23 EST

75 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 09:34:16 -0600

109 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 96 10:35:21 EST

37 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

William C. Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 11:04:12 -0500

53 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:06:45 -0400

48 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Tim Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 96 08:12 PST

34 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:13:35 -0500

34 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 10:19:02 -0600

67 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Gary Adams - Sun Microsystems Labs BOS <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:42:01 -0500

64 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 10:50:42 -0600

44 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:43:20 -0600

47 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

James Tauber SunLabs - SML <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 12:42:57 -0500

42 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Benjamin C. W. Sittler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:07:01 -0700 (MST)

28 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 13:53:48 -0500 (EST)

34 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

William C. Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 14:03:50 -0500

38 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

William C. Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 14:00:08 -0500

67 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Feb 96 14:24:02 EST

23 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:35:45 -0500 (EST)

56 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 13:48:40 -0600

51 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:01:16 -0600

45 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 15:21:37 -0500

26 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

William C. Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 16:18:52 -0500

66 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 16:42:44 -0500 (EST)

39 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 16:46:51 -0400

49 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 17:31:45 -0500

28 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 17:57:55 -0500

21 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 18:04:48 -0500

27 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 96 19:16:08 -0500

38 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 04 Feb 1996 16:05:45 -0500

40 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 04 Feb 1996 16:25:31 -0500

67 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:55:33 -0400

81 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 21:34:32 -0600

39 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

03 Feb 1996 19:44:19 +0000 (GMT)

39 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

03 Feb 1996 16:16:29 +0000 (GMT)

32 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 96 08:29:00 PST

22 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Hakon Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:29:37 +0100

54 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 96 09:38:45 EST

25 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 96 09:42:39 EST

25 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

William C. Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 1996 09:51:41 -0500

48 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 09:59:31 -0500 (EST)

85 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 18:18:31 +0000 (GMT)

44 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 18:37:29 +0000 (GMT)

53 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:03:25 -0500

40 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

William C. Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 1996 14:19:40 -0500

48 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:28:57 -0600

38 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 1996 16:18:44 -0500

47 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:32:07 PST

23 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 17:50:54 -0500

22 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 01:44:19 -0800 (PST)

43 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 96 06:52:00 PST

38 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 96 07:16:00 PST

46 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 11:57:39 -0500

37 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 11:57:33 -0500

75 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 1996 20:33:44 PST

26 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 05:07:30 PST

66 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 08:20:24 -0600

110 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Tim Berners-Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 96 17:17:36 -0500

76 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 14:26:51 -0800

47 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 14:46:05 PST

57 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 15:13:08 PST

52 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 15:18:53 -0800 (PST)

58 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 15:04:18 -0800

48 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 15:44:20 PST

39 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Keith M. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Feb 1996 18:14:01 -0500

43 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 20:08:26 -0500 (EST)

55 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 00:33:12 -0400

49 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 02:17:20 -0500 (EST)

54 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 09 Feb 96 08:21:00 PST

42 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 11:41:27 PST

34 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 22:52:44 +0100

50 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 23:41:57 PST

19 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 11 Feb 1996 09:20:54 -0500 (EST)

44 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 96 06:06:00 PST

25 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Hollander <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 14:03:22 -0700

56 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 15:53:06 -0800 (PST)

72 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 16:41:07 PST

20 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Keith M. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 15:20:15 -0500

44 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Keith M. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 15:20:14 -0500

32 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 12:48:17 -0800

66 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 14:03:09 PST

92 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 96 08:17:00 PST

56 lines

Re: Doctype

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:52:59 -0400

55 lines

Document Action: HTML Tables to Experimental

The IESG <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 96 15:19:26 -0500

19 lines

don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 04 Feb 1996 15:52:29 -0500

52 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:23:07 -0500

19 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 14:24:38 PST

48 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 15:33:51 -0800 (PST)

43 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 16:11:36 PST

75 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:47:03 -0800 (PST)

83 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 18:13:15 PST

43 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Jeffrey Mogul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 96 11:52:55 PST

98 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 09:26:51 -0500

32 lines

Re: Embed/Insert/Compound Docs/Active Objects

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Feb 1996 11:21:39 -0500

63 lines

Error flags should not be in HTML standard

Ben Combee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 10:13:34 -0600 (CST)

38 lines

Re: Extra! Microsoft beats Netscape in the race for non-conformance!

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 1996 18:41:55 +0000 (GMT)

72 lines

Re: Extra! Microsoft beats Netscape in the race for non-conformance!

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 10:56:07 +0100 (MET)

30 lines

Extra! Microsoft beats Netscape in the race for non-conformance!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 19:34:19 -0500 (EST)

41 lines

Fixing browser discrepencies

Philip Trauring <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 1996 13:30:12 -0500

65 lines

Re: Fixing browser discrepencies

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:04:23 +0000 (GMT)

67 lines

Fixing browser discrepencies - followup

Philip Trauring <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 1996 16:25:36 -0500

57 lines

Re: Fixing browser discrepencies - followup

Marcus E. Hennecke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 1996 14:52:16 -0800 (PST)

65 lines

Re: Fixing browser discrepencies - followup

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Feb 1996 12:02:55 +0000 (GMT)

78 lines

Flag error conditions!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 10:36:51 -0500 (EST)

50 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 10:05:14 -0600

43 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:43:47 -0500 (EST)

66 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:03:48 -0500

42 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:09:12 -0600

62 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:30:24 -0500

37 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:45:30 -0500 (EST)

70 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 96 07:22:00 PST

40 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 06:51:40 -0600 (CST)

31 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 96 08:01:00 PST

28 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 08:06:42 -0500 (EST)

47 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 09:37:46 -0600

58 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 11:47:44 -0500 (EST)

91 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 11:42:09 -0600

70 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:53:26 -0500

25 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:27:27 -0600

37 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ben Combee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:32:45 -0600 (CST)

55 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:52:50 -0800 (PST)

83 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 17:18:51 -0500

36 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 17:40:52 -0400

55 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Harold A. Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 07 Feb 1996 05:23:21 +0000

91 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 1996 17:02:39 -0500

48 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ferdinand Soethe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 1996 09:15:00 +0100

57 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 07:18:27 -0500 (EST)

153 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Benjamin C. W. Sittler <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 1996 16:44:42 -0700 (MST)

40 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 20:18:48 -0400

57 lines

Forcing good markup?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 10:48:10 -0500

28 lines

Forcing good markup?

Hakon Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 17:31:11 +0100

29 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 13:17:56 -0500

27 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 13:42:03 -0500

37 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:21:35 -0800

45 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Feb 96 15:18:30 EST

24 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 15:04:11 -0600

62 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

03 Feb 1996 19:31:44 +0000 (GMT)

38 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 96 08:33:00 PST

26 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

06 Feb 1996 11:45:32 +0000 (GMT)

23 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Keith M. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Feb 1996 18:14:02 -0500

62 lines

FORM, PRE and INPUT

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 26 Feb 1996 16:36:59 -0500

45 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 10:03:28 PST

59 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

James Tauber SunLabs - SML <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 13:40:13 -0500

33 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:19:07 -0500

40 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:42:50 -0500 (EST)

63 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Foteos Macrides <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:57:56 -0500 (EST)

56 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 18:15:42 -0500

27 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Abigail <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:43:19 +0100 (MET)

105 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Paul Grosso <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 96 17:23:55 CST

99 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 20:31:44 -0500

48 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Scott Bigham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 20:32:51 -0500

41 lines

FW: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Chris Wilson (PSD) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 09:11:16 -0800

90 lines

Group charter

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 16:31:57 -0600

43 lines

Re: Group charter

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 15:03:10 PST

36 lines

Re: Group charter

M. Hedlund <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 15:49:47 -0800 (PST)

44 lines

Re: Group charter

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 16:14:34 PST

70 lines

Re: Group charter

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 18:01:55 -0800 (PST)

96 lines

Re: Group charter

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 20:21:10 -0600

45 lines

Re: Group charter

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

03 Feb 1996 20:09:57 +0000 (GMT)

37 lines

Re: Group charter .. Conditional ??

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 23:00:00 -0800 (PST)

67 lines

Help !

Iordachescu Ionut - Alexandru <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:29:27 +0200 (GMT+0200)

22 lines

How to encourage conformance

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 07:18:37 -0500 (EST)

167 lines

Re: How to encourage conformance

Ben Combee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 09:28:40 -0600 (CST)

55 lines

Re: How to encourage conformance

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 13:43:12 -0500

49 lines

How to I make a submission ?

Fergus Reilly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 12:59:34 +1100 (EST)

23 lines

HTML created by WYSIWYG tools

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 13:17:59 -0500

32 lines

RE: HTML created by WYSIWYG tools

Chris Wilson (PSD) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 10:55:46 -0800

63 lines

HTML Development Version Numbers

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 20:30:49 -0400

87 lines

Re: HTML Development Version Numbers

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:50:04 PST

54 lines

Re: HTML Development Version Numbers

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 96 21:49:44 -0500

35 lines

Re: HTML Development Version Numbers

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 21:59:40 -0400

119 lines

HTML inclusion and its verification

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 10:47:43 -0500 (EST)

66 lines

Re: HTML inclusion and its verification

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 05:58:43 -0500 (EST)

124 lines

HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Ferdinand Soethe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 04 Feb 1996 11:32:00 +0100

51 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:09:46 PST

46 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Foteos Macrides <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 04 Feb 1996 21:55:31 -0500 (EST)

95 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 19:10:46 PST

44 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Foteos Macrides <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 04 Feb 1996 23:20:31 -0500 (EST)

80 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 96 23:24:53 -0500

34 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 96 00:08:46 -0500

39 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Stan Friesen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 96 10:02:26 PST

55 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Foteos Macrides <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 1996 14:41:32 -0500 (EST)

77 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Stan Friesen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 96 13:20:33 PST

38 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 19:38:24 -0500 (EST)

189 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-04.txt

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 1996 12:19:00 -0500

34 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-05.txt

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 18:00:22 -0500 (EST)

41 lines

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-06.txt

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 05 Feb 96 09:50:58 -0500

113 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-06.txt

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 09:34:31 -0600

25 lines

Internet Draft: "data:" URL scheme

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 22:10:26 PST

109 lines

Re: Internet Draft: "data:" URL scheme

Foteos Macrides <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 1996 15:21:42 -0500 (EST)

46 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 13522-2 redefined as RFC 1866 + I18N + tables

Roger Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 22:41:13 -0500

56 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 13522-2 redefined as RFC 1866 + I18N + tables

Roger Price <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:09:27 -0500

39 lines

Last Call: HTML Tables to Experimental

IESG Secretary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 09 Feb 96 15:39:56 -0500

20 lines

Re: Last Call: HTML Tables... default width

Matt Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 1996 21:54:01 -0800

31 lines

Misc Chair things

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 08:56:12 -0600

52 lines

More comments on <INSERT> spec

Gordon Irlam <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 19:12:16 -0800 (PST)

111 lines

Netscape and stylesheets

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 11 Feb 1996 14:55:52 -0500

22 lines

New i18n draft

Francois Yergeau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 17:45:09 -0500

47 lines

new TABLEs implementation - opinions solicited

Tom Magliery <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 1996 15:36:49 -0600

89 lines

Re: new TABLEs implementation - opinions solicited

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 1996 14:50:51 +0000 (GMT)

69 lines

Re: new TABLEs implementation - opinions solicited

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 1996 21:42:51 -0800 (PST)

73 lines

Oddity in lists

Jonathan S. Shapiro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 19:39:30 -0500

21 lines

Re: Oddity in lists

Jonathan S. Shapiro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 23:10:22 -0500

17 lines

Re: Oddity in lists

David Baron <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 10:42:59 GMT+0200

31 lines

Re: Oddity in lists

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:12:35 PST

23 lines

Re: Please advise: EMBED vs. Active Objects ?

Foteos Macrides <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 03 Feb 1996 14:13:52 -0500 (EST)

64 lines

Re: Please advise: EMBED vs. Active Objects ?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 1996 10:43:33 -0500

43 lines

Question about HTML

Theodore R. McKendall <[log in to unmask]>

14 Feb 96 10:40:42 EDT

37 lines

Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Feb 96 13:15:00 PST

32 lines

Siren Announcement

Customer Service <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 96 21:19:56 PST

47 lines

STYLE and the Tables Draft

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 06:29:22 PST

29 lines

Re: STYLE and the Tables Draft

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 96 13:29:48 EST

18 lines

Style Sheets, step 1

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:20:10 PST

132 lines

Style Sheets, step 1

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:18:54 PST

129 lines

Re: Table Draft Ready? Hang On

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 22:41:43 -0800 (PST)

29 lines

Re: Table Draft Ready? Hang On

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 1996 16:19:36 -0600

36 lines

Re: Table Draft Ready? Hang On

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 1996 14:33:02 PST

23 lines

Re: Table Draft Ready? Hang On

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:27:23 -0600

224 lines

tables.06: Suggest/Example not Recommend Layout Algorithms

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 13:05:44 -0800 (PST)

56 lines

Re: tables.06: Suggest/Example not Recommend Layout Algorithms

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 18:35:49 -0500

36 lines

Re: tables.06: Suggest/Example not Recommend Layout Algorithms

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 17:26:26 -0600

47 lines

text/html

Tom Magliery <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 96 09:32:54 CST

16 lines

Timeslots for HTML WG

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 29 Feb 1996 11:16:33 -0800

25 lines

Using styles to change the charset.

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:54:07 -0500

30 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:08:11 -0600

35 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 20:02:00 PST

46 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 3 Feb 1996 01:38:22 -0500

33 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 3 Feb 96 12:56:42 EST

65 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 1996 16:06:43 -0600

49 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 00:39:08 -0500

28 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 4 Feb 96 14:35:24 EST

23 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 18:35:16 -0400

89 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:51:12 +0100

57 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 18:05:29 +0100 (MET)

70 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:30:38 -0500

30 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 15:41:14 +0100 (MET)

80 lines

Where is the browser human factors forum?

Keith Instone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 1996 15:04:56 -0500

32 lines


Back to: Main HTML-WG Page



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager