LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HTML-WG Archives


HTML-WG Archives

HTML-WG Archives


February 1996


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

(SC29WG12.597) ISO/IEC 13522-2 redefined as RFC 1866 + I18N + tables (1 message)
A query about SPAN... (1 message)
A query about SPAN... and the loss of RANGE, SPOT, and MD (1 message)
An open letter to the HTML WG (1 message)
Bracketed URLs (9 messages)
Change bars [was:] Re: A query about SPAN... and the loss of RANGE, SPOT, and MD (2 messages)
Class inheritance or do we need html/class? (5 messages)
Comments on <INSERT> spec (1 message)
Dictionaries in HTML (5 messages)
Do we have a rough ... Where *do* we agree? (2 messages)
Do we have a rough consensus on html/style? (112 messages)
Doctype (1 message)
Document Action: HTML Tables to Experimental (1 message)
don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ] (9 messages)
Embed/Insert/Compound Docs/Active Objects (1 message)
Error flags should not be in HTML standard (1 message)
Extra! Microsoft beats Netscape in the race for non-conformance! (3 messages)
Fixing browser discrepencies (2 messages)
Fixing browser discrepencies - followup (3 messages)
Flag error conditions! (26 messages)
Forcing good markup? (11 messages)
FORM, PRE and INPUT (11 messages)
FW: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style? (1 message)
Group charter (7 messages)
Group charter .. Conditional ?? (1 message)
Help ! (1 message)
How to encourage conformance (3 messages)
How to I make a submission ? (1 message)
HTML created by WYSIWYG tools (2 messages)
HTML Development Version Numbers (4 messages)
HTML inclusion and its verification (2 messages)
HTML-3 and Netscape DTD (11 messages)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-04.txt (1 message)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-05.txt (1 message)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-06.txt (2 messages)
Internet Draft: "data:" URL scheme (2 messages)
ISO/IEC 13522-2 redefined as RFC 1866 + I18N + tables (2 messages)
Last Call: HTML Tables to Experimental (1 message)
Last Call: HTML Tables... default width (1 message)
Misc Chair things (1 message)
More comments on <INSERT> spec (1 message)
Netscape and stylesheets (1 message)
New i18n draft (1 message)
new TABLEs implementation - opinions solicited (3 messages)
Oddity in lists (4 messages)
Please advise: EMBED vs. Active Objects ? (2 messages)
Question about HTML (1 message)
Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage. (1 message)
Siren Announcement (1 message)
STYLE and the Tables Draft (2 messages)
Style Sheets, step 1 (2 messages)
Table Draft Ready? Hang On (4 messages)
tables.06: Suggest/Example not Recommend Layout Algorithms (3 messages)
text/html (1 message)
Timeslots for HTML WG (1 message)
Using styles to change the charset. (13 messages)
Where is the browser human factors forum? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HTML-WG Home

HTML-WG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

(SC29WG12.597) ISO/IEC 13522-2 redefined as RFC 1866 + I18N + tables

Re: (SC29WG12.597) ISO/IEC 13522-2 redefined as RFC 1866 + I18N + tables

Thomas J Casey Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 02:47:53 GMT

87 lines

New Thread

A query about SPAN...

A query about SPAN...

Martin Kiff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 14:08 UT

31 lines

New Thread

A query about SPAN... and the loss of RANGE, SPOT, and MD

A query about SPAN... and the loss of RANGE, SPOT, and MD

Evan Kirshenbaum <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 09 Feb 1996 11:23:00 PST

121 lines

New Thread

An open letter to the HTML WG

An open letter to the HTML WG

John C Klensin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Feb 1996 12:08:00 -0500

84 lines

New Thread

Bracketed URLs

Re: Bracketed URLs

Benjamin Franz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 12:24:53 -0800 (PST)

45 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Pete Resnick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 13:17:28 -0600

50 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Benjamin Franz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 11:19:04 -0800 (PST)

36 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Pete Resnick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 10:52:44 -0600

76 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Owen Rees <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 13:41:57 +0000

52 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Gerald Oskoboiny <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 02:33:37 -0700 (MST)

59 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Pete Resnick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 21:55:38 -0600

81 lines

Re: Bracketed URLs

Harold A. Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 1996 02:45:15 +0000

52 lines

Bracketed URLs

Pete Resnick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 19:21:47 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

Change bars [was:] Re: A query about SPAN... and the loss of RANGE, SPOT, and MD

Re: Change bars [was:] Re: A query about SPAN... and the loss of RANGE, SPOT, and MD

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 96 16:24:47 -0500

24 lines

Change bars [was:] Re: A query about SPAN... and the loss of RANGE, SPOT, and MD

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 12:42:45 -0800 (PST)

51 lines

New Thread

Class inheritance or do we need html/class?

Re: Class inheritance or do we need html/class?

Francois Yergeau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 20:51:39 -0500

24 lines

Re: Class inheritance or do we need html/class?

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 96 15:34:57 -0500

36 lines

Re: Class inheritance or do we need html/class?

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 15:22:56 -0500 (EST)

51 lines

Re: Class inheritance or do we need html/class?

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 96 14:06:01 -0500

33 lines

Class inheritance or do we need html/class?

Marcus E. Hennecke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 96 10:26:24 -0800

72 lines

New Thread

Comments on <INSERT> spec

Comments on <INSERT> spec

Gordon Irlam <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 22:06:27 -0800 (PST)

158 lines

New Thread

Dictionaries in HTML

Re: Dictionaries in HTML

Bob Rosenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 1996 22:09:08 +0000

165 lines

Re: Dictionaries in HTML

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 18:00:20 -0800 (PST)

25 lines

Re: Dictionaries in HTML

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:32:14 PST

28 lines

Re: Dictionaries in HTML

Gary Adams - Sun Microsystems Labs BOS <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 10:57:18 -0500

50 lines

Re: Dictionaries in HTML

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 03:17:55 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

Do we have a rough ... Where *do* we agree?

Re: Do we have a rough ... Where *do* we agree?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 96 08:25:00 PST

23 lines

Re: Do we have a rough ... Where *do* we agree?

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:24:18 -0500 (EST)

56 lines

New Thread

Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 96 08:17:00 PST

56 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 14:03:09 PST

92 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 12:48:17 -0800

66 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Keith M. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 15:20:14 -0500

32 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Keith M. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 15:20:15 -0500

44 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 16:41:07 PST

20 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 15:53:06 -0800 (PST)

72 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Hollander <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 14:03:22 -0700

56 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 96 06:06:00 PST

25 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 11 Feb 1996 09:20:54 -0500 (EST)

44 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 23:41:57 PST

19 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 22:52:44 +0100

50 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 11:41:27 PST

34 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 09 Feb 96 08:21:00 PST

42 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 02:17:20 -0500 (EST)

54 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 00:33:12 -0400

49 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 20:08:26 -0500 (EST)

55 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Keith M. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Feb 1996 18:14:01 -0500

43 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 15:44:20 PST

39 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 15:04:18 -0800

48 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 15:18:53 -0800 (PST)

58 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 15:13:08 PST

52 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 14:46:05 PST

57 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 14:26:51 -0800

47 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Tim Berners-Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 96 17:17:36 -0500

76 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 08:20:24 -0600

110 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 05:07:30 PST

66 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 1996 20:33:44 PST

26 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 11:57:33 -0500

75 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 11:57:39 -0500

37 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 96 07:16:00 PST

46 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 96 06:52:00 PST

38 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 01:44:19 -0800 (PST)

43 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 17:50:54 -0500

22 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:32:07 PST

23 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 1996 16:18:44 -0500

47 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:28:57 -0600

38 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

William C. Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 1996 14:19:40 -0500

48 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:03:25 -0500

40 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 18:37:29 +0000 (GMT)

53 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 18:18:31 +0000 (GMT)

44 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 09:59:31 -0500 (EST)

85 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

William C. Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 1996 09:51:41 -0500

48 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 96 09:42:39 EST

25 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 96 09:38:45 EST

25 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Hakon Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:29:37 +0100

54 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 96 08:29:00 PST

22 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

03 Feb 1996 16:16:29 +0000 (GMT)

32 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

03 Feb 1996 19:44:19 +0000 (GMT)

39 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 21:34:32 -0600

39 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:55:33 -0400

81 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 04 Feb 1996 16:25:31 -0500

67 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 04 Feb 1996 16:05:45 -0500

40 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 96 19:16:08 -0500

38 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 18:04:48 -0500

27 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 17:57:55 -0500

21 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 17:31:45 -0500

28 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 16:46:51 -0400

49 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 16:42:44 -0500 (EST)

39 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

William C. Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 16:18:52 -0500

66 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 15:21:37 -0500

26 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:01:16 -0600

45 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 13:48:40 -0600

51 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:35:45 -0500 (EST)

56 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Feb 96 14:24:02 EST

23 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

William C. Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 14:00:08 -0500

67 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

William C. Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 14:03:50 -0500

38 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 13:53:48 -0500 (EST)

34 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Benjamin C. W. Sittler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:07:01 -0700 (MST)

28 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

James Tauber SunLabs - SML <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 12:42:57 -0500

42 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:43:20 -0600

47 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 10:50:42 -0600

44 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Gary Adams - Sun Microsystems Labs BOS <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:42:01 -0500

64 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 10:19:02 -0600

67 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:13:35 -0500

34 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Tim Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 96 08:12 PST

34 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:06:45 -0400

48 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

William C. Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 11:04:12 -0500

53 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 96 10:35:21 EST

37 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 09:34:16 -0600

109 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 96 09:55:23 EST

75 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 09:27:43 -0500

50 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 09:00:45 -0500

40 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 96 22:15:32 EST

54 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 18:47:47 -0500 (EST)

90 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Benjamin Franz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 13:52:07 -0800 (PST)

64 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 96 16:35:51 -0500

30 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 15:54:10 -0500

31 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Keith M. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 14:50:19 -0500

68 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 15:44:32 -0500

31 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 96 15:00:07 EST

25 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 11:37:14 -0800

44 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 13:59:44 -0500 (EST)

34 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 10:44:58 -0800

53 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Stan Friesen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 96 10:14:46 PST

39 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 12:00:20 -0500

24 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:17:02 PST

77 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 10:49:04 -0500

50 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 10:26:13 -0500

46 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 09:55:54 -0500

40 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:50:23 -0600

49 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 09:40:36 -0500

37 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:36:25 -0600

51 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 09:30:18 -0500

24 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:21:33 -0600

101 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 09:01:12 -0500 (EST)

28 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:35:54 -0500 (EST)

44 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 02:15:56 -0800 (PST)

52 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 01:34:14 -0800 (PST)

32 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Hakon Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 09:34:37 +0100

32 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 00:03:42 PST

18 lines

Re: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 02:15:27 -0400

76 lines

New Thread

Doctype

Re: Doctype

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:52:59 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

Document Action: HTML Tables to Experimental

Document Action: HTML Tables to Experimental

The IESG <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 96 15:19:26 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 09:26:51 -0500

32 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Jeffrey Mogul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 96 11:52:55 PST

98 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 18:13:15 PST

43 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:47:03 -0800 (PST)

83 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 16:11:36 PST

75 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 15:33:51 -0800 (PST)

43 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 14:24:38 PST

48 lines

Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:23:07 -0500

19 lines

don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 04 Feb 1996 15:52:29 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Embed/Insert/Compound Docs/Active Objects

Re: Embed/Insert/Compound Docs/Active Objects

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Feb 1996 11:21:39 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

Error flags should not be in HTML standard

Error flags should not be in HTML standard

Ben Combee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 10:13:34 -0600 (CST)

38 lines

New Thread

Extra! Microsoft beats Netscape in the race for non-conformance!

Extra! Microsoft beats Netscape in the race for non-conformance!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 19:34:19 -0500 (EST)

41 lines

Re: Extra! Microsoft beats Netscape in the race for non-conformance!

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 10:56:07 +0100 (MET)

30 lines

Re: Extra! Microsoft beats Netscape in the race for non-conformance!

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 1996 18:41:55 +0000 (GMT)

72 lines

New Thread

Fixing browser discrepencies

Re: Fixing browser discrepencies

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:04:23 +0000 (GMT)

67 lines

Fixing browser discrepencies

Philip Trauring <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 1996 13:30:12 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

Fixing browser discrepencies - followup

Re: Fixing browser discrepencies - followup

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Feb 1996 12:02:55 +0000 (GMT)

78 lines

Re: Fixing browser discrepencies - followup

Marcus E. Hennecke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 1996 14:52:16 -0800 (PST)

65 lines

Fixing browser discrepencies - followup

Philip Trauring <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 1996 16:25:36 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

Flag error conditions!

Re: Flag error conditions!

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 20:18:48 -0400

57 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Benjamin C. W. Sittler <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 1996 16:44:42 -0700 (MST)

40 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 07:18:27 -0500 (EST)

153 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ferdinand Soethe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 1996 09:15:00 +0100

57 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 1996 17:02:39 -0500

48 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Harold A. Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 07 Feb 1996 05:23:21 +0000

91 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 17:40:52 -0400

55 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 17:18:51 -0500

36 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:52:50 -0800 (PST)

83 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ben Combee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:32:45 -0600 (CST)

55 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:27:27 -0600

37 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:53:26 -0500

25 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 11:42:09 -0600

70 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 11:47:44 -0500 (EST)

91 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 09:37:46 -0600

58 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 08:06:42 -0500 (EST)

47 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 96 08:01:00 PST

28 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 06:51:40 -0600 (CST)

31 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 96 07:22:00 PST

40 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:45:30 -0500 (EST)

70 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:30:24 -0500

37 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:09:12 -0600

62 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:03:48 -0500

42 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:43:47 -0500 (EST)

66 lines

Re: Flag error conditions!

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 10:05:14 -0600

43 lines

Flag error conditions!

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 10:36:51 -0500 (EST)

50 lines

New Thread

Forcing good markup?

Re: Forcing good markup?

Keith M. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Feb 1996 18:14:02 -0500

62 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

06 Feb 1996 11:45:32 +0000 (GMT)

23 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 96 08:33:00 PST

26 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

03 Feb 1996 19:31:44 +0000 (GMT)

38 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 15:04:11 -0600

62 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Feb 96 15:18:30 EST

24 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:21:35 -0800

45 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 13:42:03 -0500

37 lines

Re: Forcing good markup?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 13:17:56 -0500

27 lines

Forcing good markup?

Hakon Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 17:31:11 +0100

29 lines

Forcing good markup?

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 10:48:10 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

FORM, PRE and INPUT

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Scott Bigham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 20:32:51 -0500

41 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 20:31:44 -0500

48 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Paul Grosso <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 96 17:23:55 CST

99 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Abigail <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:43:19 +0100 (MET)

105 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 18:15:42 -0500

27 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Foteos Macrides <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:57:56 -0500 (EST)

56 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:42:50 -0500 (EST)

63 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:19:07 -0500

40 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

James Tauber SunLabs - SML <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 13:40:13 -0500

33 lines

Re: FORM, PRE and INPUT

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 1996 10:03:28 PST

59 lines

FORM, PRE and INPUT

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 26 Feb 1996 16:36:59 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

FW: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

FW: Do we have a rough consensus on html/style?

Chris Wilson (PSD) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 09:11:16 -0800

90 lines

New Thread

Group charter

Re: Group charter

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

03 Feb 1996 20:09:57 +0000 (GMT)

37 lines

Re: Group charter

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 20:21:10 -0600

45 lines

Re: Group charter

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 18:01:55 -0800 (PST)

96 lines

Re: Group charter

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 16:14:34 PST

70 lines

Re: Group charter

M. Hedlund <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 15:49:47 -0800 (PST)

44 lines

Re: Group charter

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 15:03:10 PST

36 lines

Group charter

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 16:31:57 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

Group charter .. Conditional ??

Re: Group charter .. Conditional ??

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 23:00:00 -0800 (PST)

67 lines

New Thread

Help !

Help !

Iordachescu Ionut - Alexandru <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:29:27 +0200 (GMT+0200)

22 lines

New Thread

How to encourage conformance

Re: How to encourage conformance

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 13:43:12 -0500

49 lines

Re: How to encourage conformance

Ben Combee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 09:28:40 -0600 (CST)

55 lines

How to encourage conformance

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 07:18:37 -0500 (EST)

167 lines

New Thread

How to I make a submission ?

How to I make a submission ?

Fergus Reilly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 12:59:34 +1100 (EST)

23 lines

New Thread

HTML created by WYSIWYG tools

RE: HTML created by WYSIWYG tools

Chris Wilson (PSD) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 10:55:46 -0800

63 lines

HTML created by WYSIWYG tools

Paul Prescod <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 13:17:59 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

HTML Development Version Numbers

Re: HTML Development Version Numbers

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 21:59:40 -0400

119 lines

Re: HTML Development Version Numbers

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 96 21:49:44 -0500

35 lines

Re: HTML Development Version Numbers

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:50:04 PST

54 lines

HTML Development Version Numbers

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 20:30:49 -0400

87 lines

New Thread

HTML inclusion and its verification

Re: HTML inclusion and its verification

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 05:58:43 -0500 (EST)

124 lines

HTML inclusion and its verification

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 10:47:43 -0500 (EST)

66 lines

New Thread

HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Ka-Ping Yee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 19:38:24 -0500 (EST)

189 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Stan Friesen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 96 13:20:33 PST

38 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Foteos Macrides <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Feb 1996 14:41:32 -0500 (EST)

77 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Stan Friesen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 96 10:02:26 PST

55 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 96 00:08:46 -0500

39 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 96 23:24:53 -0500

34 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Foteos Macrides <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 04 Feb 1996 23:20:31 -0500 (EST)

80 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 19:10:46 PST

44 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Foteos Macrides <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 04 Feb 1996 21:55:31 -0500 (EST)

95 lines

Re: HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:09:46 PST

46 lines

HTML-3 and Netscape DTD

Ferdinand Soethe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 04 Feb 1996 11:32:00 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-04.txt

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-04.txt

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 1996 12:19:00 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-05.txt

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-05.txt

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 18:00:22 -0500 (EST)

41 lines

New Thread

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-06.txt

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-06.txt

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 09:34:31 -0600

25 lines

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-tables-06.txt

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 05 Feb 96 09:50:58 -0500

113 lines

New Thread

Internet Draft: "data:" URL scheme

Re: Internet Draft: "data:" URL scheme

Foteos Macrides <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 1996 15:21:42 -0500 (EST)

46 lines

Internet Draft: "data:" URL scheme

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 1996 22:10:26 PST

109 lines

New Thread

ISO/IEC 13522-2 redefined as RFC 1866 + I18N + tables

Re: ISO/IEC 13522-2 redefined as RFC 1866 + I18N + tables

Roger Price <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:09:27 -0500

39 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 13522-2 redefined as RFC 1866 + I18N + tables

Roger Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 22:41:13 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

Last Call: HTML Tables to Experimental

Last Call: HTML Tables to Experimental

IESG Secretary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 09 Feb 96 15:39:56 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Last Call: HTML Tables... default width

Re: Last Call: HTML Tables... default width

Matt Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 1996 21:54:01 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

Misc Chair things

Misc Chair things

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 01 Feb 1996 08:56:12 -0600

52 lines

New Thread

More comments on <INSERT> spec

More comments on <INSERT> spec

Gordon Irlam <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 19:12:16 -0800 (PST)

111 lines

New Thread

Netscape and stylesheets

Netscape and stylesheets

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 11 Feb 1996 14:55:52 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

New i18n draft

New i18n draft

Francois Yergeau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 1996 17:45:09 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

new TABLEs implementation - opinions solicited

Re: new TABLEs implementation - opinions solicited

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 1996 21:42:51 -0800 (PST)

73 lines

Re: new TABLEs implementation - opinions solicited

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 1996 14:50:51 +0000 (GMT)

69 lines

new TABLEs implementation - opinions solicited

Tom Magliery <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 1996 15:36:49 -0600

89 lines

New Thread

Oddity in lists

Re: Oddity in lists

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:12:35 PST

23 lines

Re: Oddity in lists

David Baron <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 10:42:59 GMT+0200

31 lines

Re: Oddity in lists

Jonathan S. Shapiro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 02 Feb 1996 23:10:22 -0500

17 lines

Oddity in lists

Jonathan S. Shapiro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 19:39:30 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Please advise: EMBED vs. Active Objects ?

Re: Please advise: EMBED vs. Active Objects ?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 05 Feb 1996 10:43:33 -0500

43 lines

Re: Please advise: EMBED vs. Active Objects ?

Foteos Macrides <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 03 Feb 1996 14:13:52 -0500 (EST)

64 lines

New Thread

Question about HTML

Question about HTML

Theodore R. McKendall <[log in to unmask]>

14 Feb 96 10:40:42 EDT

37 lines

New Thread

Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.

Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 08 Feb 96 13:15:00 PST

32 lines

New Thread

Siren Announcement

Siren Announcement

Customer Service <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 96 21:19:56 PST

47 lines

New Thread

STYLE and the Tables Draft

Re: STYLE and the Tables Draft

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 96 13:29:48 EST

18 lines

STYLE and the Tables Draft

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 1996 06:29:22 PST

29 lines

New Thread

Style Sheets, step 1

Style Sheets, step 1

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:18:54 PST

129 lines

Style Sheets, step 1

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:20:10 PST

132 lines

New Thread

Table Draft Ready? Hang On

Re: Table Draft Ready? Hang On

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:27:23 -0600

224 lines

Re: Table Draft Ready? Hang On

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 1996 14:33:02 PST

23 lines

Re: Table Draft Ready? Hang On

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 1996 16:19:36 -0600

36 lines

Re: Table Draft Ready? Hang On

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 22:41:43 -0800 (PST)

29 lines

New Thread

tables.06: Suggest/Example not Recommend Layout Algorithms

Re: tables.06: Suggest/Example not Recommend Layout Algorithms

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 1996 17:26:26 -0600

47 lines

Re: tables.06: Suggest/Example not Recommend Layout Algorithms

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 18:35:49 -0500

36 lines

tables.06: Suggest/Example not Recommend Layout Algorithms

David W. Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 1996 13:05:44 -0800 (PST)

56 lines

New Thread

text/html

text/html

Tom Magliery <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 96 09:32:54 CST

16 lines

New Thread

Timeslots for HTML WG

Timeslots for HTML WG

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 29 Feb 1996 11:16:33 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Using styles to change the charset.

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 1996 15:41:14 +0100 (MET)

80 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:30:38 -0500

30 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 18:05:29 +0100 (MET)

70 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:51:12 +0100

57 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 18:35:16 -0400

89 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 4 Feb 96 14:35:24 EST

23 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 4 Feb 1996 00:39:08 -0500

28 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 1996 16:06:43 -0600

49 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 3 Feb 96 12:56:42 EST

65 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 3 Feb 1996 01:38:22 -0500

33 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 20:02:00 PST

46 lines

Re: Using styles to change the charset.

Scott E. Preece <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:08:11 -0600

35 lines

Using styles to change the charset.

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:54:07 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Where is the browser human factors forum?

Where is the browser human factors forum?

Keith Instone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 1996 15:04:56 -0500

32 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager