LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HTML-WG Archives


HTML-WG Archives

HTML-WG Archives


May 1995


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HTML-WG Home

HTML-WG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re: (Fwd) Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:21:10 EDT

39 lines

(Fwd) Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Anoosh Hosseini <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 15:50:51 EDT

92 lines

(no subject)

John newton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 95 17:49:30 EDT

14 lines

(no subject)

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 12:07:04 EDT

15 lines

(no subject)

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 May 95 18:08:54 EDT

15 lines

(Third? lost count) revised Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 17:01:45 EDT

95 lines

<No subject>

Tom Casey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 05:06:00 EDT

14 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:05:44 EDT

68 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 17:21:09 EDT

19 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 16:45:02 EDT

58 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 15:54:38 EDT

65 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 09:51:05 EDT

38 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

H&kon W Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 06:11:47 EDT

65 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

Debbie Sinmao <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:39:48 EDT

105 lines

A question from another list on META

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 08:09:08 EDT

120 lines

Re: A User's Opinion

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 08:44:29 EDT

25 lines

A User's Opinion

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 May 95 15:30:44 EDT

48 lines

Re: ALT text without an <IMG>? Proposal for new <ALT> tag

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 13:59:40 EDT

22 lines

Re: ALT text without an <IMG>? Proposal for new <ALT> tag

Keith M. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 11:50:20 EDT

21 lines

ALT text without an <IMG>? Proposal for new <ALT> tag

Philip Trauring <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 11:25:14 EDT

45 lines

apology

Philip Trauring <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 14:58:34 EDT

33 lines

Re: backward compatibility for links

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 95 02:09:52 EDT

45 lines

backward compatibility for links

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 14:45:02 EDT

44 lines

Re: backward compatibility for links + more random thoughts

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 15:29:40 EDT

75 lines

Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 20:10:18 EDT

44 lines

Re: case sensitivity in tags?

Tim Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 12:10:18 EDT

108 lines

Re: case sensitivity in tags?

Paul Grosso <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 07:14:22 EDT

107 lines

Re: case sensitivity in tags?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 15:57:49 EDT

68 lines

Re: case sensitivity in tags?

Paul Grosso <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 15:08:03 EDT

45 lines

case sensitivity in tags?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 14:20:48 EDT

83 lines

Character markup in HTML3 vs. HTML[012]

Mike Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 19:05:06 EDT

22 lines

Character sets: the last straw.

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 18:41:57 EDT

19 lines

Re: charset labelling [was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set]

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:39:12 EDT

30 lines

Re: charset labelling [was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set]

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 01:54:59 EDT

33 lines

charset labelling [was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:07:07 EDT

70 lines

Re: color text?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:43:40 EDT

30 lines

Re: color text?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 20:55:51 EDT

42 lines

Re: color text?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 20:30:51 EDT

47 lines

Re: color text?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:55:12 EDT

42 lines

Re: color text?

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 20:36:42 EDT

62 lines

Re: color text?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:35:44 EDT

45 lines

Re: color text?

Tim Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:32:08 EDT

19 lines

Re: color text?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:03:21 EDT

36 lines

Re: color text?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 18:23:58 EDT

40 lines

Re: color text?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 May 95 10:22:24 EDT

25 lines

Re: color text?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:21:31 EDT

37 lines

Re: color text?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 May 95 10:17:15 EDT

50 lines

Re: color text?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:08:55 EDT

30 lines

Re: color text?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 09:57:58 EDT

31 lines

Re: color text?

H&kon W Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 09:58:46 EDT

69 lines

Re: color text?

H&kon W Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 09:39:02 EDT

64 lines

Re: color text?

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 05:39:48 EDT

55 lines

Re: color text?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 01:35:50 EDT

56 lines

Re: color text?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 01:32:25 EDT

53 lines

Re: color text?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 21:42:29 EDT

21 lines

Re: color text?

Corp Reed <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 19:26:19 EDT

73 lines

Re: color text?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 19:04:33 EDT

33 lines

Re: color text?

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 18:39:18 EDT

57 lines

Re: color text?

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 18:22:38 EDT

45 lines

Re: color text?

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 17:11:27 EDT

60 lines

Re: color text?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 May 95 16:24:27 EDT

30 lines

Re: color text?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 15:56:28 EDT

49 lines

Re: color text?

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 15:09:39 EDT

35 lines

Re: color text?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 May 95 09:32:36 EDT

58 lines

Re: color text?

ts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 01:10:35 EDT

29 lines

Re: color text?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 00:48:50 EDT

28 lines

Re: color text?

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 00:21:07 EDT

66 lines

Re: color text?

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 21:42:40 EDT

53 lines

Re: color text?

Tim Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 20:41:26 EDT

43 lines

Re: color text?

Corp Reed <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 20:22:47 EDT

32 lines

Re: color text?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 19:48:31 EDT

29 lines

Re: color text?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 1 May 95 19:35:47 EDT

51 lines

Re: color text?

Christian Mogensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 18:58:07 EDT

35 lines

Re: color text?

Tim Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 18:35:36 EDT

31 lines

Re: color text?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 18:07:10 EDT

40 lines

Re: color text?

H&kon W Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 17:22:48 EDT

77 lines

Re: color text?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 16:58:59 EDT

38 lines

Re: color text?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 16:02:45 EDT

35 lines

Re: color text?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 13:26:10 EDT

29 lines

Re: color text? [and the cache]

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 1 May 95 20:53:52 EDT

35 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 12:58:35 EDT

38 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 30 May 95 16:10:20 EDT

41 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 95 15:41:14 EDT

41 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 30 May 95 12:36:25 EDT

54 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 95 01:09:08 EDT

84 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Paul Grosso <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 11:11:06 EDT

57 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Dieter Baron <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 09:20:25 EDT

29 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 11:41:43 EDT

18 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 95 15:37:00 EDT

26 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Paul Grosso <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 95 13:33:33 EDT

176 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 95 11:45:59 EDT

124 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 17:17:23 EDT

32 lines

Re: Definition List Headers

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:29:43 EDT

26 lines

Re: Definition List Headers

Dave Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 07:38:54 EDT

43 lines

Re: Definitions of semantic format elements

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 95 03:32:39 EDT

29 lines

Re: Definitions of semantic format elements

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 14:46:49 EDT

54 lines

Definitions of semantic format elements

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 14:00:35 EDT

54 lines

Deployment of Format negociation [was: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:31:26 EDT

52 lines

Re: Displaying HEAD info

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 09:53:23 EDT

49 lines

Re: Displaying HEAD info

Mike Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 01:26:29 EDT

40 lines

Re: Displaying HEAD info

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 20:46:58 EDT

36 lines

Re: Displaying HEAD info

Michael J Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 18:00:53 EDT

37 lines

Re: Displaying HEAD info

Ron Daniel Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 13:24:40 EDT

28 lines

Displaying HEAD info

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 11 May 95 12:19:32 EDT

26 lines

Displaying HEAD info [was REL/REV/links]

Michael J Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:19:28 EDT

36 lines

Re: ENQIREY

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 18:28:53 EDT

23 lines

Re: ENQIREY

Ron Daniel Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 13:59:29 EDT

20 lines

ENQIREY

eugene.carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 13:19:30 EDT

33 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 14:07:29 EDT

33 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 13:17:24 EDT

31 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 11:31:32 EDT

25 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 11:20:50 EDT

38 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 11:10:54 EDT

22 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 17:33:22 EDT

45 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 17:23:17 EDT

33 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 16:42:37 EDT

26 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 16:33:02 EDT

39 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 15:55:44 EDT

89 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 14:36:10 EDT

52 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 13:25:41 EDT

23 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 12:17:43 EDT

35 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 11:40:24 EDT

44 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 11:06:32 EDT

43 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 10:50:49 EDT

59 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 09:54:59 EDT

30 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 09:32:06 EDT

129 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 03:04:29 EDT

70 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 02:39:31 EDT

21 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 23:51:25 EDT

23 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 23:21:01 EDT

38 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 22:44:23 EDT

120 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 20:43:07 EDT

89 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 19:44:26 EDT

94 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 19:12:26 EDT

59 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 14:37:17 EDT

28 lines

format nego in HTML/10646?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 10:54:58 EDT

55 lines

Further on new "spec-02"

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:22:21 EDT

54 lines

FYI - Dave's move to Boston ...

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:40:10 EDT

18 lines

GET vs POST

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 17:02:16 EDT

41 lines

GIFs

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 08:27:56 EDT

16 lines

Re: Handling unknown ISO/IEC 10646 numeric char refs

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 02:36:08 EDT

27 lines

Handling unknown ISO/IEC 10646 numeric char refs

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 01:22:57 EDT

38 lines

How can we prohibit...

Roger Price <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 19:53:18 EDT

37 lines

How far should HTML go (functionally)?

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:28:46 EDT

54 lines

Re: How to specify 10646 as document char set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 13:41:43 EDT

29 lines

Re: How to specify 10646 as document char set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 13:10:55 EDT

46 lines

Re: How to specify 10646 as document char set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:47:49 EDT

19 lines

How to specify 10646 as document char set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 11:46:41 EDT

135 lines

Re: HR and RE

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 21:03:20 EDT

47 lines

HR and RE

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 15 May 95 20:29:09 EDT

38 lines

Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 16:41:34 EDT

53 lines

Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 16:01:44 EDT

58 lines

Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 15:24:15 EDT

33 lines

Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 15:02:42 EDT

35 lines

HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 12:52:07 EDT

164 lines

Re: HTML 3.0

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 05:17:58 EDT

62 lines

Re: HTML 3.0

Brian Exelbierd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 03:24:23 EDT

39 lines

Re: HTML 3.0

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 17:20:44 EDT

40 lines

HTML 3.0

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 May 95 16:33:42 EDT

45 lines

Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:33:17 EDT

24 lines

Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:35:59 EDT

62 lines

Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?

Dave Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 09:25:56 EDT

60 lines

Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 06:43:38 EDT

24 lines

Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 May 95 04:10:49 EDT

38 lines

Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:51:54 EDT

31 lines

HTML Code List

Ceyonswami <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 13:06:58 EDT

20 lines

HTML Documentation

Peter Bowen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 19:34:05 EDT

24 lines

Re: HTML Documents

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 16:19:05 EDT

31 lines

HTML Documents

Vuong Nguyen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 09:56:58 EDT

22 lines

Re(2): HTML Documents (SGML text)

James D Mason <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 12:12:47 EDT

36 lines

Re: HTML Documents (SGML text)

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 11:38:20 EDT

68 lines

Re: HTML Documents (SGML text)

James D Mason <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 10:49:09 EDT

36 lines

HTML draft -02 not on ds.internic.net

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 19:52:58 EDT

28 lines

HTML form architecture ? review of DECFORMS/ANSI/ISO FIMS

Craig Hubley of CH&A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 06:45:42 EDT

275 lines

HTML form feature list ? DECFORMS/ANSI FIMS features in detail

Craig Hubley of CH&A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 06:46:05 EDT

241 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 04:15:10 EDT

48 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 03:52:36 EDT

177 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 03:15:34 EDT

30 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 95 00:35:11 EDT

67 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 95 00:10:22 EDT

165 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 18:35:28 EDT

27 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 13:10:34 EDT

66 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 12:15:06 EDT

14 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 10:55:38 EDT

243 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 10:45:57 EDT

31 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 03:59:20 EDT

121 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 02:55:18 EDT

108 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 01:06:06 EDT

24 lines

HTML Link Type Model

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 21:00:32 EDT

267 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 95 00:06:48 EDT

287 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 95 11:01:15 EDT

114 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 95 23:30:40 EDT

66 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 17:20:26 EDT

106 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 16:33:30 EDT

69 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 14:51:45 EDT

34 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 13:12:47 EDT

194 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 11:08:28 EDT

96 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model - where to standardize ?

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 18:48:49 EDT

35 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:39:32 EDT

41 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:35:59 EDT

34 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:29:29 EDT

44 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 14:39:47 EDT

16 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 13:47:13 EDT

38 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Michael J Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 13:37:40 EDT

41 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 11:55:36 EDT

173 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 08:35:27 EDT

80 lines

HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 04:30:55 EDT

100 lines

Re: HTML link types - implied behavior of specific REL vlaues

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 03:12:12 EDT

301 lines

Re: HTML link types - implied behavior of specific REL vlaues

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 17:11:54 EDT

210 lines

HTML link types - implied behavior of specific REL vlaues

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 05:51:42 EDT

135 lines

HTML link types - treatment of nonstandard / documentary REL values

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 04:52:46 EDT

79 lines

Re: HTML Link types - user hint? or hardwired internal browser call ?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 95 14:38:15 EDT

35 lines

HTML Link types - user hint? or hardwired internal browser call ?

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 95 00:23:13 EDT

45 lines

Re: HTML Links and Paths

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 95 00:02:51 EDT

71 lines

Re: HTML Links and Paths

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 95 19:18:20 EDT

106 lines

HTML Links and Paths

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 95 16:49:41 EDT

47 lines

HTML style sheets mailing list

H&kon W Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 95 15:11:02 EDT

39 lines

Re: HTML tables - trying to reach consensus

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 09:20:44 EDT

652 lines

HTML tables - trying to reach consensus

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 08:52:34 EDT

620 lines

Re: HTML v2.0 focus and closure

Francois Yergeau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 11:14:38 EDT

34 lines

HTML v2.0 focus and closure

Keith Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 09:18:42 EDT

45 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 20:47:19 EDT

241 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 14:55:41 EDT

151 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 03:59:25 EDT

64 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 15:53:41 EDT

51 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 14:40:00 EDT

62 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 14:17:57 EDT

31 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 12:58:01 EDT

205 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 07:37:31 EDT

127 lines

Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 16:03:18 EDT

554 lines

HyTime Application Development Guide

Ralph Ferris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 12:59:21 EDT

43 lines

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-charset-harmful-00.txt

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 May 95 13:28:45 EDT

110 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 17:45:36 EDT

68 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 17:02:29 EDT

38 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:46:07 EDT

55 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:25:57 EDT

39 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:09:04 EDT

261 lines

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 16 May 95 14:31:29 EDT

116 lines

Re: IETF HTML/CALS/ICADD table proposal notes, 5Apr95

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:24:57 EDT

125 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 19:43:01 EDT

54 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Robert A. Lentz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 15:26:35 EDT

24 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 12:17:58 EDT

28 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 05:55:18 EDT

33 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 23:15:29 EDT

22 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 23:08:45 EDT

34 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 18:18:13 EDT

43 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 18:14:31 EDT

28 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Tom Magliery <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:40:25 EDT

34 lines

IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:32:21 EDT

28 lines

INFO: NEW AND IMPROVED!

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 May 95 09:09:59 EDT

171 lines

Integrating STYLE to cover most functional needs

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 18:38:37 EDT

119 lines

Re: Interim meeting?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 12:25:11 EDT

20 lines

Interim meeting?

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 10:45:51 EDT

33 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

James Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 95 09:38:22 EDT

72 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 01:05:43 EDT

63 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

James Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 08:09:56 EDT

85 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 02:39:53 EDT

51 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 13:28:48 EDT

57 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Charles F. Goldfarb <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 01:21:49 EDT

65 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

James Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 14:15:31 EDT

64 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 13:23:40 EDT

36 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 13:17:26 EDT

45 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

James Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 11:31:38 EDT

42 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

James Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 11:31:23 EDT

41 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 10:09:19 EDT

24 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 00:30:24 EDT

74 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 23:47:21 EDT

19 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 23:35:00 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 23:28:45 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 23:16:23 EDT

23 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 19:12:46 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 5 May 95 19:03:02 EDT

55 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 18:02:08 EDT

42 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 18:02:47 EDT

40 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:55:38 EDT

38 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:35:49 EDT

52 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:25:37 EDT

54 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:12:35 EDT

31 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:02:40 EDT

83 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 16:29:57 EDT

73 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 15:45:40 EDT

66 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 12:26:22 EDT

76 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 12:13:51 EDT

48 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 11:26:30 EDT

37 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 11:17:48 EDT

58 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 10:36:28 EDT

20 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 10:35:58 EDT

65 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:54:56 EDT

21 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:51:24 EDT

33 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:47:49 EDT

122 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:38:17 EDT

76 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:02:16 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 07:20:20 EDT

23 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 07:10:51 EDT

55 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 06:42:14 EDT

108 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Maurizio Codogno <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 03:09:20 EDT

13 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 02:01:59 EDT

24 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Anoosh Hosseini <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 22:10:45 EDT

66 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:51:20 EDT

27 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:47:48 EDT

28 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:41:12 EDT

26 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:37:32 EDT

16 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:34:06 EDT

19 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:30:33 EDT

30 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 19:30:27 EDT

55 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 18:58:58 EDT

72 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 18:16:07 EDT

41 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 17:34:20 EDT

15 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 17:34:51 EDT

31 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 17:21:32 EDT

64 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 16:50:14 EDT

28 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 16:45:40 EDT

36 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 16:11:21 EDT

16 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 16:07:46 EDT

83 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 15:40:44 EDT

48 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 15:21:18 EDT

24 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 14:32:11 EDT

21 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 14:26:28 EDT

15 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 14:21:18 EDT

52 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:53:36 EDT

17 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:33:49 EDT

25 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:23:49 EDT

32 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:10:25 EDT

86 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:00:44 EDT

34 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 12:57:09 EDT

53 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 12:34:08 EDT

27 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 12:34:33 EDT

32 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 12:24:19 EDT

45 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 11:59:10 EDT

26 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 11:52:34 EDT

42 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 11:45:53 EDT

37 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 11:36:04 EDT

34 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 11:00:57 EDT

42 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 10:26:01 EDT

28 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 09:54:36 EDT

17 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 09:44:21 EDT

26 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 09:40:37 EDT

112 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

"35 1995"@LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

Thu, 4 May 95 08:01:49 EDT

33 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 05:43:40 EDT

93 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:30:41 EDT

19 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:25:50 EDT

21 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:21:59 EDT

27 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:14:52 EDT

54 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 03:26:05 EDT

55 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 03:15:06 EDT

43 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 03:04:36 EDT

108 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:45:31 EDT

20 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:04:56 EDT

36 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:47:50 EDT

60 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:39:45 EDT

27 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:11:14 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 22:45:47 EDT

24 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:28:08 EDT

56 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 01:58:34 EDT

23 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 21:36:58 EDT

44 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 01:18:01 EDT

39 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:01:32 EDT

71 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 22:30:12 EDT

76 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:52:50 EDT

25 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 22:11:24 EDT

48 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:43:25 EDT

38 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 20:47:02 EDT

109 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:21:58 EDT

51 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 18:56:48 EDT

88 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:02:15 EDT

28 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 18:37:37 EDT

53 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 18:07:08 EDT

33 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 17:39:46 EDT

36 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 09:32:33 EDT

25 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 May 95 04:44:12 EDT

20 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 22:07:11 EDT

67 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 14:25:55 EDT

71 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 13:34:22 EDT

41 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 13:03:15 EDT

38 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:24:53 EDT

14 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:21:20 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 11:10:16 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 09:31:17 EDT

35 lines

Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX....

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:23:02 EDT

191 lines

Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX....

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 May 95 12:45:58 EDT

75 lines

Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX....

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 11:55:14 EDT

44 lines

Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX....

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 10:40:10 EDT

59 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:27:53 EDT

31 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:44:16 EDT

32 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Steven Fought <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:15:55 EDT

40 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:05:22 EDT

34 lines

RE: keyword tag?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 May 95 16:51:50 EDT

55 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 12:17:48 EDT

45 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 11:35:41 EDT

49 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Dirk Herr-Hoyman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 08:18:48 EDT

45 lines

RE: keyword tag?

Steven Fought <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 07:05:05 EDT

57 lines

RE: keyword tag?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 06:40:13 EDT

28 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 05:15:11 EDT

38 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 17:45:17 EDT

29 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 17:09:51 EDT

46 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 13:49:37 EDT

23 lines

Re: keyword tag?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 1 May 95 12:34:34 EDT

45 lines

keyword tag?

Ofer Inbar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:14:37 EDT

51 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 19:20:46 EDT

38 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 18:10:45 EDT

30 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 18:02:26 EDT

40 lines

Re(2): Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

James D Mason <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 11:17:02 EDT

33 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Walter Pienciak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:22:06 EDT

52 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 07:01:28 EDT

72 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Daniel Shields <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 02:54:02 EDT

64 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 22:04:08 EDT

51 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 18:58:23 EDT

38 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 17:51:50 EDT

39 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Greg Kostello <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 14:03:02 EDT

56 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 12:44:15 EDT

152 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 11:32:29 EDT

127 lines

Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 08:32:52 EDT

1097 lines

Re: Link style sheets

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 18:26:41 EDT

51 lines

Re: Link style sheets

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 08:46:25 EDT

90 lines

Re: Link style sheets

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:40:58 EDT

76 lines

Re: Link style sheets

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:16:05 EDT

77 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 08:14:24 EDT

29 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 06:07:01 EDT

153 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 01:33:17 EDT

79 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Mike Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 19:27:26 EDT

40 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 18:23:24 EDT

129 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 17:53:04 EDT

54 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Mike Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 15:56:57 EDT

39 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 15:56:35 EDT

80 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 08:06:59 EDT

53 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Mike Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 16:37:06 EDT

29 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 15:53:40 EDT

41 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 14:41:55 EDT

86 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 14:26:01 EDT

80 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 14:16:21 EDT

161 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:27:53 EDT

62 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:24:12 EDT

52 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:40:51 EDT

81 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 10:57:06 EDT

76 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 09:27:56 EDT

42 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 03:16:16 EDT

121 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 10 May 95 23:13:52 EDT

79 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 22:26:54 EDT

59 lines

Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 20:36:57 EDT

90 lines

Re: Links and Interactivity

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 23:28:35 EDT

136 lines

Re: Links and Interactivity

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 12:05:15 EDT

124 lines

Links and Interactivity

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 03:30:46 EDT

117 lines

Looking for help.....HTML Questions\Feedback

H&kon W Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 09:19:53 EDT

36 lines

Looking for help.....HTML Questions\Feedback

Wallace, Jonathan M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 09:52:49 EDT

57 lines

Mail failure

MS Mail Connector <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 20:43:56 EDT

71 lines

Mail failure

MS Mail Connector <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 16:33:41 EDT

57 lines

minimal link typing mechanism

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:38:55 EDT

47 lines

moderating this list

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 5 May 95 16:49:10 EDT

33 lines

Re: My x-dead x-body [was] Re: HTML Link Type Model

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 20:00:52 EDT

39 lines

My x-dead x-body [was] Re: HTML Link Type Model

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 14:24:24 EDT

38 lines

need BNF for HTML2.0

Todd Littell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:22:45 EDT

16 lines

Re: New functions

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 5 May 95 08:43:26 EDT

39 lines

Re: New functions

Christian Mogensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 04:34:43 EDT

39 lines

New functions

Herve Muyal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 02:53:47 EDT

28 lines

Re: new Postscript: 8.5x11 [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking,

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 19:48:07 EDT

27 lines

Re: new Postscript: 8.5x11 [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking,

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 16:46:17 EDT

35 lines

new Postscript: 8.5x11 [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements ]

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 15:40:57 EDT

32 lines

Newbie has a question (New idea or old?)

Charlie Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 18:08:05 EDT

39 lines

Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 12:37:05 EDT

28 lines

Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 18:25:54 EDT

36 lines

Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 18:19:29 EDT

29 lines

Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 17:20:50 EDT

56 lines

Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 18:31:34 EDT

53 lines

Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al

Michael J Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 13:12:43 EDT

55 lines

Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 04:18:05 EDT

77 lines

Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 03:55:53 EDT

19 lines

on Why= with keyword REV= et al

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 20:04:23 EDT

44 lines

Re: Our Friends REL and REV

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 09:46:00 EDT

64 lines

Re: Our Friends REL and REV

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 17:41:54 EDT

209 lines

Re: Our Friends REL and REV

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 16:24:47 EDT

160 lines

Our Friends REL and REV

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 14:33:22 EDT

108 lines

Re: PIs and deployment

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 10:18:04 EDT

45 lines

PIs and deployment

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 16:17:44 EDT

44 lines

Re: Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?]

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:13:55 EDT

29 lines

Posting to this list

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 5 May 95 12:41:52 EDT

41 lines

Re: Postscript woes: help with TeXinfo printing?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 18:56:41 EDT

41 lines

Postscript woes: help with TeXinfo printing?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:16:00 EDT

31 lines

Re: Presentation info in HTML? [was: color text?]

Alan Karben <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:58:00 EDT

44 lines

Re: Presentation info in HTML? [was: color text?] [LONG. Sorry]

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:00:22 EDT

91 lines

Presentation info in HTML? [was: color text?] [LONG. Sorry]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 21:49:43 EDT

168 lines

Prologue Support [was: SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 16:58:24 EDT

91 lines

Proposals for new features

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 May 95 10:48:46 EDT

41 lines

Re:PUT?

Daniel Glazman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 03:25:29 EDT

39 lines

PUT?

Philip Trauring <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:16:38 EDT

41 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 10:58:53 EDT

219 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 10:05:21 EDT

53 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 95 09:50:43 EDT

58 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 19:56:44 EDT

69 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 17:51:22 EDT

34 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 17:23:52 EDT

164 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 16:07:57 EDT

221 lines

Re REL/REV links

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 95 23:22:14 EDT

160 lines

Re: Re(2): HTML Documents (SGML text)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 02:17:25 EDT

32 lines

Re: Re(2): Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 05:18:56 EDT

19 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 22:25:52 EDT

102 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 18:27:51 EDT

149 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 16:49:41 EDT

118 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 16:48:19 EDT

71 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 10 May 95 16:06:32 EDT

82 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 13:51:11 EDT

102 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 10 May 95 12:11:03 EDT

45 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 20:20:21 EDT

32 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Michael J Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 19:21:18 EDT

85 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 20:12:11 EDT

20 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 05:08:47 EDT

23 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Daniel Shields <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 02:57:45 EDT

55 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 14:22:01 EDT

62 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:09:57 EDT

32 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 11:36:13 EDT

60 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:12:53 EDT

231 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 17:59:13 EDT

133 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 12:38:55 EDT

131 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 11:23:04 EDT

23 lines

REL/REV Link ideas

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 03:19:17 EDT

25 lines

Re: REL="LinkAs:...", supporting link type names as a full URL/URI

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 17:37:27 EDT

72 lines

REL="LinkAs:...", supporting link type names as a full URL/URI

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 03:45:36 EDT

107 lines

Revised Draft [was: character sets harmful?]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 01:20:27 EDT

882 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 07:56:01 EDT

36 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 09:45:54 EDT

48 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 23:56:01 EDT

56 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Bob Jung <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 21:46:12 EDT

61 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 18:01:25 EDT

20 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:57:47 EDT

22 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:53:38 EDT

24 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 10:34:46 EDT

56 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 10:09:35 EDT

50 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 09:38:47 EDT

33 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 09:28:24 EDT

31 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 09:06:21 EDT

50 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 07:08:27 EDT

83 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 06:16:26 EDT

99 lines

Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 01:36:15 EDT

85 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 08:54:09 EDT

24 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 17:10:32 EDT

35 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 23:18:32 EDT

28 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 21:50:33 EDT

86 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 21:46:45 EDT

61 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 19:48:33 EDT

26 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 17:03:24 EDT

88 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 16:18:19 EDT

34 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 14:52:49 EDT

73 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 13:25:16 EDT

52 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:56:27 EDT

24 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:31:27 EDT

22 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:20:48 EDT

32 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:20:14 EDT

41 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:47:29 EDT

34 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:36:48 EDT

23 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:26:50 EDT

49 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:23:08 EDT

40 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:19:02 EDT

22 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 23:42:23 EDT

80 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 21:23:54 EDT

117 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 20:02:12 EDT

129 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 19:37:00 EDT

25 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 18:24:11 EDT

91 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 16:56:54 EDT

86 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 09:43:49 EDT

34 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 09:34:04 EDT

64 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 02:41:35 EDT

49 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 00:34:07 EDT

89 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 22:19:55 EDT

66 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 21:45:44 EDT

39 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Michael J Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 19:28:10 EDT

42 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 18:59:10 EDT

47 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 May 95 17:26:44 EDT

18 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 16:42:21 EDT

61 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 16:20:34 EDT

39 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 16:13:54 EDT

91 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 15:44:27 EDT

109 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 15:23:59 EDT

109 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 14:49:02 EDT

43 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 14:00:43 EDT

25 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 13:54:03 EDT

26 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 13:53:29 EDT

21 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 13:23:25 EDT

66 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 12:52:03 EDT

32 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Maurizio Codogno <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 12:19:36 EDT

30 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 12:19:13 EDT

22 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 11:54:11 EDT

20 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 11:35:19 EDT

24 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 10:55:18 EDT

61 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 09:25:57 EDT

41 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 07:50:32 EDT

69 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 06:22:33 EDT

49 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 17:26:49 EDT

31 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 02:43:11 EDT

34 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 22:10:53 EDT

32 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 16:08:52 EDT

35 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 7 May 95 14:23:18 EDT

71 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 7 May 95 13:19:29 EDT

42 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 21:40:31 EDT

47 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 19:22:33 EDT

43 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 19:15:54 EDT

45 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 19:05:53 EDT

37 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 18:16:02 EDT

23 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 10:39:41 EDT

40 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 09:48:03 EDT

139 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 22:15:28 EDT

27 lines

Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 21:45:02 EDT

85 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 30 May 95 20:13:28 EDT

26 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

Walt Houser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 09:20:47 EDT

45 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 23 May 95 12:07:44 EDT

57 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 23 May 95 12:07:18 EDT

45 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 13:50:54 EDT

60 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 12:40:41 EDT

83 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 15:57:20 EDT

16 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

Walter Houser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 09:43:53 EDT

48 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

Scott W Brim <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 20:39:41 EDT

18 lines

RFC's In HTML Format

Walter Houser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 17:31:44 EDT

44 lines

Re: Scope of the HTML 2.0 document

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:32:08 EDT

35 lines

Re: Security Considerations re: Forms and PASSWORD input fields

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 20:13:34 EDT

28 lines

Re: Security Considerations re: Forms and PASSWORD input fields

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 13:40:35 EDT

39 lines

Security Considerations re: Forms and PASSWORD input fields

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 16:11:14 EDT

23 lines

Re: SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration

James Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 11:55:59 EDT

40 lines

SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 16:25:56 EDT

99 lines

SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 13:22:25 EDT

57 lines

Re: Status of WG documents -- 23 May 1995

Francois Yergeau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 11:10:22 EDT

31 lines

Re: Status of WG documents -- 23 May 1995

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 09:19:07 EDT

18 lines

Status of WG documents -- 23 May 1995

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 11:35:57 EDT

63 lines

Re: Style/content separation (was: color text?)

Dave Hollander <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 19:06:25 EDT

43 lines

Re: Style/content separation (was: color text?)

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 14:52:27 EDT

26 lines

Style/content separation (was: color text?)

Bruce F. Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 21:26:45 EDT

63 lines

Re: Sublists for focused topics

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 19:54:36 EDT

29 lines

Re: Sublists for focused topics

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 14:20:20 EDT

24 lines

Sublists for focused topics [Was} Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 13:29:51 EDT

35 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:24:24 EDT

47 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 10:39:04 EDT

30 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 09:54:55 EDT

46 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 May 95 07:37:23 EDT

23 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:26:31 EDT

65 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 03:11:14 EDT

77 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 02:41:20 EDT

57 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:42:16 EDT

33 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:23:54 EDT

41 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 18:00:18 EDT

100 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 18:01:26 EDT

49 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 17:45:46 EDT

60 lines

Re: text in the <HR> tag

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 5 May 95 23:07:05 EDT

31 lines

text in the <HR> tag

Philip Trauring <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 00:30:44 EDT

36 lines

Text version of the draft (Was: Revised language on: ISO/IEC...)

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 19:50:33 EDT

33 lines

The Challenge

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:55:19 EDT

36 lines

Thinking about style sheets

Kevin Hughes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 05:12:03 EDT

610 lines

Typed Links for Glossary [Was: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:02:51 EDT

29 lines

Typed links in HTML 2.0 document: done

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:55:04 EDT

39 lines

Re: UL & OL: labels

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 11:06:35 EDT

34 lines

UL & OL: labels

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 17:19:37 EDT

16 lines

Re: Undeclared entities, wierd numeric character references

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 01:56:28 EDT

84 lines

Undeclared entities, wierd numeric character references

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 19:46:31 EDT

80 lines

Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 22:43:56 EDT

40 lines

Usability of HTML 2.0/3.0 specs -- element names in TOC

361 Lauritsen, x8379 <"Michael H.Kelsey (361 Lauritsen, x8379)"@oclc.org>

Thu, 25 May 95 09:21:15 EDT

53 lines

Using the HTML format for e-mail messages and Usenet News articles

Jacob Palme <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 03:55:31 EDT

136 lines

Wet blankets

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 11:21:53 EDT

54 lines

Re: WG Citation Attribution - a Plea!

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 03:59:26 EDT

25 lines

WG Citation Attribution - a Plea!

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 20:38:45 EDT

31 lines

Re: Where are we on ISO/IEC 10646?

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 12:11:37 EDT

24 lines

Where are we on ISO/IEC 10646?

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 11:22:55 EDT

32 lines

Re: WISE NASA WWW Project Management... (my mistake)

John F. Stitzinger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 12:57:24 EDT

12 lines

Yet another table proposal for HTML 2.1

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 07:10:54 EDT

285 lines

[ANNOUNCE] Pre-Release of WISE: A WWW-Based Software Metrics Tool

Jack R. Callahan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 16:58:53 EDT

77 lines

[Q] Links inside maths in HTML3

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 14 May 95 10:17:19 EDT

38 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager