LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for HTML-WG Archives


HTML-WG Archives

HTML-WG Archives


May 1995


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave HTML-WG
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

(Fwd) Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Anoosh Hosseini <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 15:50:51 EDT

92 lines

Re: (Fwd) Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:21:10 EDT

39 lines

(no subject)

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 May 95 18:08:54 EDT

15 lines

(no subject)

Murray Altheim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 12:07:04 EDT

15 lines

(no subject)

John newton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 95 17:49:30 EDT

14 lines

(Third? lost count) revised Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 17:01:45 EDT

95 lines

<No subject>

Tom Casey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 05:06:00 EDT

14 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

Debbie Sinmao <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:39:48 EDT

105 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

H&kon W Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 06:11:47 EDT

65 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 09:51:05 EDT

38 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 15:54:38 EDT

65 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 16:45:02 EDT

58 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 17:21:09 EDT

19 lines

Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:05:44 EDT

68 lines

A question from another list on META

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 08:09:08 EDT

120 lines

A User's Opinion

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 May 95 15:30:44 EDT

48 lines

Re: A User's Opinion

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 08:44:29 EDT

25 lines

ALT text without an <IMG>? Proposal for new <ALT> tag

Philip Trauring <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 11:25:14 EDT

45 lines

Re: ALT text without an <IMG>? Proposal for new <ALT> tag

Keith M. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 11:50:20 EDT

21 lines

Re: ALT text without an <IMG>? Proposal for new <ALT> tag

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 13:59:40 EDT

22 lines

apology

Philip Trauring <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 14:58:34 EDT

33 lines

backward compatibility for links

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 14:45:02 EDT

44 lines

Re: backward compatibility for links

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 95 02:09:52 EDT

45 lines

Re: backward compatibility for links + more random thoughts

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 15:29:40 EDT

75 lines

Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 20:10:18 EDT

44 lines

case sensitivity in tags?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 14:20:48 EDT

83 lines

Re: case sensitivity in tags?

Paul Grosso <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 15:08:03 EDT

45 lines

Re: case sensitivity in tags?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 15:57:49 EDT

68 lines

Re: case sensitivity in tags?

Paul Grosso <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 07:14:22 EDT

107 lines

Re: case sensitivity in tags?

Tim Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 12:10:18 EDT

108 lines

Character markup in HTML3 vs. HTML[012]

Mike Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 19:05:06 EDT

22 lines

Character sets: the last straw.

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 18:41:57 EDT

19 lines

charset labelling [was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:07:07 EDT

70 lines

Re: charset labelling [was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set]

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 01:54:59 EDT

33 lines

Re: charset labelling [was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set]

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:39:12 EDT

30 lines

Re: color text?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 13:26:10 EDT

29 lines

Re: color text?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 16:02:45 EDT

35 lines

Re: color text?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 16:58:59 EDT

38 lines

Re: color text?

H&kon W Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 17:22:48 EDT

77 lines

Re: color text?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 18:07:10 EDT

40 lines

Re: color text?

Tim Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 18:35:36 EDT

31 lines

Re: color text?

Christian Mogensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 18:58:07 EDT

35 lines

Re: color text?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 1 May 95 19:35:47 EDT

51 lines

Re: color text?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 19:48:31 EDT

29 lines

Re: color text?

Corp Reed <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 20:22:47 EDT

32 lines

Re: color text?

Tim Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 20:41:26 EDT

43 lines

Re: color text?

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 21:42:40 EDT

53 lines

Re: color text?

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 00:21:07 EDT

66 lines

Re: color text?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 00:48:50 EDT

28 lines

Re: color text?

ts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 01:10:35 EDT

29 lines

Re: color text?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 May 95 09:32:36 EDT

58 lines

Re: color text?

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 15:09:39 EDT

35 lines

Re: color text?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 15:56:28 EDT

49 lines

Re: color text?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 May 95 16:24:27 EDT

30 lines

Re: color text?

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 17:11:27 EDT

60 lines

Re: color text?

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 18:22:38 EDT

45 lines

Re: color text?

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 18:39:18 EDT

57 lines

Re: color text?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 19:04:33 EDT

33 lines

Re: color text?

Corp Reed <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 19:26:19 EDT

73 lines

Re: color text?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 21:42:29 EDT

21 lines

Re: color text?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 01:32:25 EDT

53 lines

Re: color text?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 01:35:50 EDT

56 lines

Re: color text?

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 05:39:48 EDT

55 lines

Re: color text?

H&kon W Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 09:39:02 EDT

64 lines

Re: color text?

H&kon W Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 09:58:46 EDT

69 lines

Re: color text?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 09:57:58 EDT

31 lines

Re: color text?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:08:55 EDT

30 lines

Re: color text?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 May 95 10:17:15 EDT

50 lines

Re: color text?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:21:31 EDT

37 lines

Re: color text?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 May 95 10:22:24 EDT

25 lines

Re: color text?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 18:23:58 EDT

40 lines

Re: color text?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:03:21 EDT

36 lines

Re: color text?

Tim Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:32:08 EDT

19 lines

Re: color text?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:35:44 EDT

45 lines

Re: color text?

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 20:36:42 EDT

62 lines

Re: color text?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:55:12 EDT

42 lines

Re: color text?

Luke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 20:30:51 EDT

47 lines

Re: color text?

Lou Montulli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 20:55:51 EDT

42 lines

Re: color text?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:43:40 EDT

30 lines

Re: color text? [and the cache]

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 1 May 95 20:53:52 EDT

35 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 17:17:23 EDT

32 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 95 11:45:59 EDT

124 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Paul Grosso <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 95 13:33:33 EDT

176 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 95 15:37:00 EDT

26 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 11:41:43 EDT

18 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Dieter Baron <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 09:20:25 EDT

29 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Paul Grosso <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 11:11:06 EDT

57 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 95 01:09:08 EDT

84 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 30 May 95 12:36:25 EDT

54 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 95 15:41:14 EDT

41 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 30 May 95 16:10:20 EDT

41 lines

Re: Comment Declarations

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 12:58:35 EDT

38 lines

Re: Definition List Headers

Dave Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 07:38:54 EDT

43 lines

Re: Definition List Headers

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:29:43 EDT

26 lines

Definitions of semantic format elements

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 14:00:35 EDT

54 lines

Re: Definitions of semantic format elements

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 14:46:49 EDT

54 lines

Re: Definitions of semantic format elements

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 95 03:32:39 EDT

29 lines

Deployment of Format negociation [was: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:31:26 EDT

52 lines

Displaying HEAD info

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 11 May 95 12:19:32 EDT

26 lines

Re: Displaying HEAD info

Ron Daniel Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 13:24:40 EDT

28 lines

Re: Displaying HEAD info

Michael J Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 18:00:53 EDT

37 lines

Re: Displaying HEAD info

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 20:46:58 EDT

36 lines

Re: Displaying HEAD info

Mike Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 01:26:29 EDT

40 lines

Re: Displaying HEAD info

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 09:53:23 EDT

49 lines

Displaying HEAD info [was REL/REV/links]

Michael J Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:19:28 EDT

36 lines

ENQIREY

eugene.carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 13:19:30 EDT

33 lines

Re: ENQIREY

Ron Daniel Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 13:59:29 EDT

20 lines

Re: ENQIREY

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 18:28:53 EDT

23 lines

format nego in HTML/10646?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 10:54:58 EDT

55 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 14:37:17 EDT

28 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 19:12:26 EDT

59 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 19:44:26 EDT

94 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 20:43:07 EDT

89 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 22:44:23 EDT

120 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 23:21:01 EDT

38 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 23:51:25 EDT

23 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 02:39:31 EDT

21 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 03:04:29 EDT

70 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 09:32:06 EDT

129 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 09:54:59 EDT

30 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 10:50:49 EDT

59 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 11:06:32 EDT

43 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 11:40:24 EDT

44 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 12:17:43 EDT

35 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 13:25:41 EDT

23 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 14:36:10 EDT

52 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 15:55:44 EDT

89 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 16:33:02 EDT

39 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 16:42:37 EDT

26 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 17:23:17 EDT

33 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 17:33:22 EDT

45 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 11:10:54 EDT

22 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 11:20:50 EDT

38 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 11:31:32 EDT

25 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 13:17:24 EDT

31 lines

Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 14:07:29 EDT

33 lines

Further on new "spec-02"

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:22:21 EDT

54 lines

FYI - Dave's move to Boston ...

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:40:10 EDT

18 lines

GET vs POST

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 17:02:16 EDT

41 lines

GIFs

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 08:27:56 EDT

16 lines

Handling unknown ISO/IEC 10646 numeric char refs

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 01:22:57 EDT

38 lines

Re: Handling unknown ISO/IEC 10646 numeric char refs

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 02:36:08 EDT

27 lines

How can we prohibit...

Roger Price <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 19:53:18 EDT

37 lines

How far should HTML go (functionally)?

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:28:46 EDT

54 lines

How to specify 10646 as document char set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 11:46:41 EDT

135 lines

Re: How to specify 10646 as document char set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:47:49 EDT

19 lines

Re: How to specify 10646 as document char set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 13:10:55 EDT

46 lines

Re: How to specify 10646 as document char set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 13:41:43 EDT

29 lines

HR and RE

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 15 May 95 20:29:09 EDT

38 lines

Re: HR and RE

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 21:03:20 EDT

47 lines

HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 12:52:07 EDT

164 lines

Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 15:02:42 EDT

35 lines

Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 15:24:15 EDT

33 lines

Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 16:01:44 EDT

58 lines

Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 16:41:34 EDT

53 lines

HTML 3.0

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 May 95 16:33:42 EDT

45 lines

Re: HTML 3.0

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 17:20:44 EDT

40 lines

Re: HTML 3.0

Brian Exelbierd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 03:24:23 EDT

39 lines

Re: HTML 3.0

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 05:17:58 EDT

62 lines

Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:51:54 EDT

31 lines

Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 May 95 04:10:49 EDT

38 lines

Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 06:43:38 EDT

24 lines

Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?

Dave Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 09:25:56 EDT

60 lines

Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:35:59 EDT

62 lines

Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:33:17 EDT

24 lines

HTML Code List

Ceyonswami <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 13:06:58 EDT

20 lines

HTML Documentation

Peter Bowen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 19:34:05 EDT

24 lines

HTML Documents

Vuong Nguyen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 09:56:58 EDT

22 lines

Re: HTML Documents

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 16:19:05 EDT

31 lines

Re: HTML Documents (SGML text)

James D Mason <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 10:49:09 EDT

36 lines

Re: HTML Documents (SGML text)

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 11:38:20 EDT

68 lines

Re(2): HTML Documents (SGML text)

James D Mason <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 12:12:47 EDT

36 lines

HTML draft -02 not on ds.internic.net

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 19:52:58 EDT

28 lines

HTML form architecture ? review of DECFORMS/ANSI/ISO FIMS

Craig Hubley of CH&A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 06:45:42 EDT

275 lines

HTML form feature list ? DECFORMS/ANSI FIMS features in detail

Craig Hubley of CH&A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 06:46:05 EDT

241 lines

HTML Link Type Model

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 21:00:32 EDT

267 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 01:06:06 EDT

24 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 02:55:18 EDT

108 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 03:59:20 EDT

121 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 10:45:57 EDT

31 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 10:55:38 EDT

243 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 12:15:06 EDT

14 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 13:10:34 EDT

66 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 18:35:28 EDT

27 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 95 00:10:22 EDT

165 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 95 00:35:11 EDT

67 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 03:15:34 EDT

30 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 03:52:36 EDT

177 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 04:15:10 EDT

48 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 11:08:28 EDT

96 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 13:12:47 EDT

194 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 14:51:45 EDT

34 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 16:33:30 EDT

69 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 17:20:26 EDT

106 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 95 23:30:40 EDT

66 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 95 11:01:15 EDT

114 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 95 00:06:48 EDT

287 lines

Re: HTML Link Type Model - where to standardize ?

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 18:48:49 EDT

35 lines

HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 04:30:55 EDT

100 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 08:35:27 EDT

80 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 11:55:36 EDT

173 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Michael J Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 13:37:40 EDT

41 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 13:47:13 EDT

38 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 14:39:47 EDT

16 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:29:29 EDT

44 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:35:59 EDT

34 lines

Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ?

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:39:32 EDT

41 lines

HTML link types - implied behavior of specific REL vlaues

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 05:51:42 EDT

135 lines

Re: HTML link types - implied behavior of specific REL vlaues

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 17:11:54 EDT

210 lines

Re: HTML link types - implied behavior of specific REL vlaues

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 03:12:12 EDT

301 lines

HTML link types - treatment of nonstandard / documentary REL values

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 04:52:46 EDT

79 lines

HTML Link types - user hint? or hardwired internal browser call ?

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 95 00:23:13 EDT

45 lines

Re: HTML Link types - user hint? or hardwired internal browser call ?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 95 14:38:15 EDT

35 lines

HTML Links and Paths

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 95 16:49:41 EDT

47 lines

Re: HTML Links and Paths

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 95 19:18:20 EDT

106 lines

Re: HTML Links and Paths

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 95 00:02:51 EDT

71 lines

HTML style sheets mailing list

H&kon W Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 95 15:11:02 EDT

39 lines

HTML tables - trying to reach consensus

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 08:52:34 EDT

620 lines

Re: HTML tables - trying to reach consensus

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 09:20:44 EDT

652 lines

HTML v2.0 focus and closure

Keith Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 09:18:42 EDT

45 lines

Re: HTML v2.0 focus and closure

Francois Yergeau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 11:14:38 EDT

34 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 14:55:41 EDT

151 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 20:47:19 EDT

241 lines

Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 16:03:18 EDT

554 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 07:37:31 EDT

127 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 12:58:01 EDT

205 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 14:17:57 EDT

31 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 14:40:00 EDT

62 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 15:53:41 EDT

51 lines

Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 03:59:25 EDT

64 lines

HyTime Application Development Guide

Ralph Ferris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 12:59:21 EDT

43 lines

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-charset-harmful-00.txt

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 May 95 13:28:45 EDT

110 lines

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 16 May 95 14:31:29 EDT

116 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:09:04 EDT

261 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:25:57 EDT

39 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 15:46:07 EDT

55 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 17:02:29 EDT

38 lines

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 17:45:36 EDT

68 lines

Re: IETF HTML/CALS/ICADD table proposal notes, 5Apr95

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:24:57 EDT

125 lines

IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:32:21 EDT

28 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Tom Magliery <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:40:25 EDT

34 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 18:14:31 EDT

28 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 18:18:13 EDT

43 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 23:08:45 EDT

34 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 23:15:29 EDT

22 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 05:55:18 EDT

33 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 12:17:58 EDT

28 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Robert A. Lentz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 15:26:35 EDT

24 lines

Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 19:43:01 EDT

54 lines

INFO: NEW AND IMPROVED!

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 May 95 09:09:59 EDT

171 lines

Integrating STYLE to cover most functional needs

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 18:38:37 EDT

119 lines

Interim meeting?

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 10:45:51 EDT

33 lines

Re: Interim meeting?

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 12:25:11 EDT

20 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 09:31:17 EDT

35 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 11:10:16 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:21:20 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:24:53 EDT

14 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 13:03:15 EDT

38 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 13:34:22 EDT

41 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 14:25:55 EDT

71 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 22:07:11 EDT

67 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 May 95 04:44:12 EDT

20 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 09:32:33 EDT

25 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 17:39:46 EDT

36 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 18:07:08 EDT

33 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 18:37:37 EDT

53 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:02:15 EDT

28 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 18:56:48 EDT

88 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:21:58 EDT

51 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 20:47:02 EDT

109 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:43:25 EDT

38 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 22:11:24 EDT

48 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:52:50 EDT

25 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 22:30:12 EDT

76 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:01:32 EDT

71 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 01:18:01 EDT

39 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 21:36:58 EDT

44 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 01:58:34 EDT

23 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:28:08 EDT

56 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 22:45:47 EDT

24 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:11:14 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:39:45 EDT

27 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:47:50 EDT

60 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:04:56 EDT

36 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 19:45:31 EDT

20 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 03:04:36 EDT

108 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 03:15:06 EDT

43 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 03:26:05 EDT

55 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:14:52 EDT

54 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:21:59 EDT

27 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:25:50 EDT

21 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:30:41 EDT

19 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 05:43:40 EDT

93 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

"35 1995"@[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 May 95 08:01:49 EDT

33 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 09:40:37 EDT

112 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 09:44:21 EDT

26 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 09:54:36 EDT

17 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 10:26:01 EDT

28 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 11:00:57 EDT

42 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 11:36:04 EDT

34 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 11:45:53 EDT

37 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 11:52:34 EDT

42 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 11:59:10 EDT

26 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 12:24:19 EDT

45 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 12:34:33 EDT

32 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 12:34:08 EDT

27 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 12:57:09 EDT

53 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:00:44 EDT

34 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:10:25 EDT

86 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:23:49 EDT

32 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:33:49 EDT

25 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:53:36 EDT

17 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 14:21:18 EDT

52 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 14:26:28 EDT

15 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 14:32:11 EDT

21 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 15:21:18 EDT

24 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 15:40:44 EDT

48 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 16:07:46 EDT

83 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 16:11:21 EDT

16 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 16:45:40 EDT

36 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 16:50:14 EDT

28 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 17:21:32 EDT

64 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 17:34:51 EDT

31 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 17:34:20 EDT

15 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 18:16:07 EDT

41 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 18:58:58 EDT

72 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 19:30:27 EDT

55 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:30:33 EDT

30 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:34:06 EDT

19 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:37:32 EDT

16 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:41:12 EDT

26 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:47:48 EDT

28 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 21:51:20 EDT

27 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Anoosh Hosseini <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 22:10:45 EDT

66 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 02:01:59 EDT

24 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Maurizio Codogno <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 03:09:20 EDT

13 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 06:42:14 EDT

108 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 07:10:51 EDT

55 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 07:20:20 EDT

23 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:02:16 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:38:17 EDT

76 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:47:49 EDT

122 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:51:24 EDT

33 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:54:56 EDT

21 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 10:35:58 EDT

65 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 10:36:28 EDT

20 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 11:17:48 EDT

58 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 11:26:30 EDT

37 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 12:13:51 EDT

48 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 12:26:22 EDT

76 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 15:45:40 EDT

66 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 16:29:57 EDT

73 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:02:40 EDT

83 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:12:35 EDT

31 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:25:37 EDT

54 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:35:49 EDT

52 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:55:38 EDT

38 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 18:02:47 EDT

40 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 18:02:08 EDT

42 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 5 May 95 19:03:02 EDT

55 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 19:12:46 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 23:16:23 EDT

23 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 23:28:45 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 23:35:00 EDT

29 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 23:47:21 EDT

19 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 00:30:24 EDT

74 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 10:09:19 EDT

24 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

James Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 11:31:23 EDT

41 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

James Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 11:31:38 EDT

42 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 13:17:26 EDT

45 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 13:23:40 EDT

36 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

James Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 14:15:31 EDT

64 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Charles F. Goldfarb <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 01:21:49 EDT

65 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 13:28:48 EDT

57 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 02:39:53 EDT

51 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

James Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 08:09:56 EDT

85 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Roy T. Fielding <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 01:05:43 EDT

63 lines

Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

James Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 95 09:38:22 EDT

72 lines

Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX....

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 10:40:10 EDT

59 lines

Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX....

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 11:55:14 EDT

44 lines

Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX....

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 May 95 12:45:58 EDT

75 lines

Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX....

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:23:02 EDT

191 lines

keyword tag?

Ofer Inbar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:14:37 EDT

51 lines

Re: keyword tag?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 1 May 95 12:34:34 EDT

45 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 13:49:37 EDT

23 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Marc Salomon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 17:09:51 EDT

46 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 17:45:17 EDT

29 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 05:15:11 EDT

38 lines

RE: keyword tag?

Fisher Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 06:40:13 EDT

28 lines

RE: keyword tag?

Steven Fought <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 07:05:05 EDT

57 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Dirk Herr-Hoyman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 08:18:48 EDT

45 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 11:35:41 EDT

49 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 12:17:48 EDT

45 lines

RE: keyword tag?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 May 95 16:51:50 EDT

55 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:05:22 EDT

34 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Steven Fought <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:15:55 EDT

40 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:44:16 EDT

32 lines

Re: keyword tag?

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:27:53 EDT

31 lines

Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 08:32:52 EDT

1097 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 11:32:29 EDT

127 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 12:44:15 EDT

152 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Greg Kostello <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 14:03:02 EDT

56 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 17:51:50 EDT

39 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 18:58:23 EDT

38 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 22:04:08 EDT

51 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Daniel Shields <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 02:54:02 EDT

64 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 07:01:28 EDT

72 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Walter Pienciak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:22:06 EDT

52 lines

Re(2): Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

James D Mason <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 11:17:02 EDT

33 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 18:02:26 EDT

40 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 18:10:45 EDT

30 lines

Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 19:20:46 EDT

38 lines

Re: Link style sheets

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:16:05 EDT

77 lines

Re: Link style sheets

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:40:58 EDT

76 lines

Re: Link style sheets

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 08:46:25 EDT

90 lines

Re: Link style sheets

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 18:26:41 EDT

51 lines

Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 20:36:57 EDT

90 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 22:26:54 EDT

59 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 10 May 95 23:13:52 EDT

79 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 03:16:16 EDT

121 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 09:27:56 EDT

42 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 10:57:06 EDT

76 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:40:51 EDT

81 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:24:12 EDT

52 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:27:53 EDT

62 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 14:16:21 EDT

161 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 14:26:01 EDT

80 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 14:41:55 EDT

86 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 15:53:40 EDT

41 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Mike Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 16:37:06 EDT

29 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 08:06:59 EDT

53 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 15:56:35 EDT

80 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Mike Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 15:56:57 EDT

39 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 17:53:04 EDT

54 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 18:23:24 EDT

129 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Mike Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 19:27:26 EDT

40 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 01:33:17 EDT

79 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 06:07:01 EDT

153 lines

Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV]

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 08:14:24 EDT

29 lines

Links and Interactivity

Paul Burchard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 03:30:46 EDT

117 lines

Re: Links and Interactivity

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 12:05:15 EDT

124 lines

Re: Links and Interactivity

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 23:28:35 EDT

136 lines

Looking for help.....HTML Questions\Feedback

Wallace, Jonathan M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 09:52:49 EDT

57 lines

Looking for help.....HTML Questions\Feedback

H&kon W Lie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 09:19:53 EDT

36 lines

Mail failure

MS Mail Connector <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 16:33:41 EDT

57 lines

Mail failure

MS Mail Connector <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 20:43:56 EDT

71 lines

minimal link typing mechanism

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 00:38:55 EDT

47 lines

moderating this list

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 5 May 95 16:49:10 EDT

33 lines

My x-dead x-body [was] Re: HTML Link Type Model

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 14:24:24 EDT

38 lines

Re: My x-dead x-body [was] Re: HTML Link Type Model

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 95 20:00:52 EDT

39 lines

need BNF for HTML2.0

Todd Littell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:22:45 EDT

16 lines

New functions

Herve Muyal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 02:53:47 EDT

28 lines

Re: New functions

Christian Mogensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 04:34:43 EDT

39 lines

Re: New functions

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 5 May 95 08:43:26 EDT

39 lines

Re: new Postscript: 8.5x11 [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking,

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 16:46:17 EDT

35 lines

Re: new Postscript: 8.5x11 [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking,

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 19:48:07 EDT

27 lines

new Postscript: 8.5x11 [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements ]

Daniel W. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 95 15:40:57 EDT

32 lines

Newbie has a question (New idea or old?)

Charlie Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 18:08:05 EDT

39 lines

Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 12:37:05 EDT

28 lines

Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 17:20:50 EDT

56 lines

Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 18:19:29 EDT

29 lines

Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 18:25:54 EDT

36 lines

on Why= with keyword REV= et al

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 20:04:23 EDT

44 lines

Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 03:55:53 EDT

19 lines

Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 04:18:05 EDT

77 lines

Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al

Michael J Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 13:12:43 EDT

55 lines

Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 18:31:34 EDT

53 lines

Our Friends REL and REV

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 14:33:22 EDT

108 lines

Re: Our Friends REL and REV

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 16:24:47 EDT

160 lines

Re: Our Friends REL and REV

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 17:41:54 EDT

209 lines

Re: Our Friends REL and REV

Ian Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 09:46:00 EDT

64 lines

PIs and deployment

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 16:17:44 EDT

44 lines

Re: PIs and deployment

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 10:18:04 EDT

45 lines

Re: Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?]

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:13:55 EDT

29 lines

Posting to this list

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 5 May 95 12:41:52 EDT

41 lines

Postscript woes: help with TeXinfo printing?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:16:00 EDT

31 lines

Re: Postscript woes: help with TeXinfo printing?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 18:56:41 EDT

41 lines

Re: Presentation info in HTML? [was: color text?]

Alan Karben <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:58:00 EDT

44 lines

Presentation info in HTML? [was: color text?] [LONG. Sorry]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 21:49:43 EDT

168 lines

Re: Presentation info in HTML? [was: color text?] [LONG. Sorry]

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:00:22 EDT

91 lines

Prologue Support [was: SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 16:58:24 EDT

91 lines

Proposals for new features

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 May 95 10:48:46 EDT

41 lines

PUT?

Philip Trauring <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 10:16:38 EDT

41 lines

Re:PUT?

Daniel Glazman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 03:25:29 EDT

39 lines

Re REL/REV links

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 95 23:22:14 EDT

160 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 16:07:57 EDT

221 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 17:23:52 EDT

164 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 17:51:22 EDT

34 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 95 19:56:44 EDT

69 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 95 09:50:43 EDT

58 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 10:05:21 EDT

53 lines

Re: Re REL/REV links

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 10:58:53 EDT

219 lines

Re: Re(2): HTML Documents (SGML text)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 02:17:25 EDT

32 lines

Re: Re(2): Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 05:18:56 EDT

19 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 11:36:13 EDT

60 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 12:09:57 EDT

32 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 14:22:01 EDT

62 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Daniel Shields <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 02:57:45 EDT

55 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 05:08:47 EDT

23 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 20:12:11 EDT

20 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Michael J Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 19:21:18 EDT

85 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 20:20:21 EDT

32 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 10 May 95 12:11:03 EDT

45 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 13:51:11 EDT

102 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 10 May 95 16:06:32 EDT

82 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 16:48:19 EDT

71 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 16:49:41 EDT

118 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 18:27:51 EDT

149 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 22:25:52 EDT

102 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 11:23:04 EDT

23 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 12:38:55 EDT

131 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 17:59:13 EDT

133 lines

Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:12:53 EDT

231 lines

REL/REV Link ideas

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 03:19:17 EDT

25 lines

REL="LinkAs:...", supporting link type names as a full URL/URI

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 03:45:36 EDT

107 lines

Re: REL="LinkAs:...", supporting link type names as a full URL/URI

Craig Hubley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 17:37:27 EDT

72 lines

Revised Draft [was: character sets harmful?]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 95 01:20:27 EDT

882 lines

Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 01:36:15 EDT

85 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 06:16:26 EDT

99 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 07:08:27 EDT

83 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 09:06:21 EDT

50 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 09:28:24 EDT

31 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 09:38:47 EDT

33 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 10:09:35 EDT

50 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 10:34:46 EDT

56 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:53:38 EDT

24 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 17:57:47 EDT

22 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 18:01:25 EDT

20 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Bob Jung <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 21:46:12 EDT

61 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 23:56:01 EDT

56 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 09:45:54 EDT

48 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 07:56:01 EDT

36 lines

Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 21:45:02 EDT

85 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 22:15:28 EDT

27 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 09:48:03 EDT

139 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 10:39:41 EDT

40 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 18:16:02 EDT

23 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 19:05:53 EDT

37 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 19:15:54 EDT

45 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 19:22:33 EDT

43 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 21:40:31 EDT

47 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 7 May 95 13:19:29 EDT

42 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 7 May 95 14:23:18 EDT

71 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 16:08:52 EDT

35 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 95 22:10:53 EDT

32 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 02:43:11 EDT

34 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 17:26:49 EDT

31 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

lilley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 06:22:33 EDT

49 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 07:50:32 EDT

69 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 09:25:57 EDT

41 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 10:55:18 EDT

61 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 11:35:19 EDT

24 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 11:54:11 EDT

20 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 12:19:13 EDT

22 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Maurizio Codogno <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 12:19:36 EDT

30 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 12:52:03 EDT

32 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 13:23:25 EDT

66 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 13:53:29 EDT

21 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 13:54:03 EDT

26 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 14:00:43 EDT

25 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 14:49:02 EDT

43 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 15:23:59 EDT

109 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 15:44:27 EDT

109 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 16:13:54 EDT

91 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 16:20:34 EDT

39 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 16:42:21 EDT

61 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 May 95 17:26:44 EDT

18 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 18:59:10 EDT

47 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Michael J Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 19:28:10 EDT

42 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 21:45:44 EDT

39 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 22:19:55 EDT

66 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Erik van der Poel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 00:34:07 EDT

89 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 02:41:35 EDT

49 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 09:34:04 EDT

64 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 09:43:49 EDT

34 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 16:56:54 EDT

86 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 18:24:11 EDT

91 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 19:37:00 EDT

25 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 20:02:12 EDT

129 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 21:23:54 EDT

117 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 95 23:42:23 EDT

80 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:19:02 EDT

22 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:23:08 EDT

40 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:26:50 EDT

49 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:36:48 EDT

23 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 11:47:29 EDT

34 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:20:14 EDT

41 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:20:48 EDT

32 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:31:27 EDT

22 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 12:56:27 EDT

24 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 13:25:16 EDT

52 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 14:52:49 EDT

73 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 16:18:19 EDT

34 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Martin J Duerst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 17:03:24 EDT

88 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 19:48:33 EDT

26 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 21:46:45 EDT

61 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 21:50:33 EDT

86 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 23:18:32 EDT

28 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Ned Freed <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 17:10:32 EDT

35 lines

Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 08:54:09 EDT

24 lines

RFC's In HTML Format

Walter Houser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 17:31:44 EDT

44 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

Scott W Brim <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 95 20:39:41 EDT

18 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

Walter Houser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 09:43:53 EDT

48 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 95 15:57:20 EDT

16 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 12:40:41 EDT

83 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 13:50:54 EDT

60 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 23 May 95 12:07:18 EDT

45 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 23 May 95 12:07:44 EDT

57 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

Walt Houser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 09:20:47 EDT

45 lines

Re: RFC's In HTML Format

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 30 May 95 20:13:28 EDT

26 lines

Re: Scope of the HTML 2.0 document

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:32:08 EDT

35 lines

Security Considerations re: Forms and PASSWORD input fields

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 16:11:14 EDT

23 lines

Re: Security Considerations re: Forms and PASSWORD input fields

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 13:40:35 EDT

39 lines

Re: Security Considerations re: Forms and PASSWORD input fields

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 20:13:34 EDT

28 lines

SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration

Glenn Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 13:22:25 EDT

57 lines

SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 16:25:56 EDT

99 lines

Re: SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration

James Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 95 11:55:59 EDT

40 lines

Status of WG documents -- 23 May 1995

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 11:35:57 EDT

63 lines

Re: Status of WG documents -- 23 May 1995

Gavin Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 09:19:07 EDT

18 lines

Re: Status of WG documents -- 23 May 1995

Francois Yergeau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 11:10:22 EDT

31 lines

Style/content separation (was: color text?)

Bruce F. Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 21:26:45 EDT

63 lines

Re: Style/content separation (was: color text?)

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 14:52:27 EDT

26 lines

Re: Style/content separation (was: color text?)

Dave Hollander <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 19:06:25 EDT

43 lines

Re: Sublists for focused topics

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 14:20:20 EDT

24 lines

Re: Sublists for focused topics

Murray Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 19:54:36 EDT

29 lines

Sublists for focused topics [Was} Re: format nego in HTML/10646?

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 13:29:51 EDT

35 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 17:45:46 EDT

60 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 18:01:26 EDT

49 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 18:00:18 EDT

100 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Alex Hopmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:23:54 EDT

41 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Eric Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 23:42:16 EDT

33 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Brian Behlendorf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 02:41:20 EDT

57 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 03:11:14 EDT

77 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 04:26:31 EDT

65 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 May 95 07:37:23 EDT

23 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 09:54:55 EDT

46 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Terry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 10:39:04 EDT

30 lines

Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 95 13:24:24 EDT

47 lines

text in the <HR> tag

Philip Trauring <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 00:30:44 EDT

36 lines

Re: text in the <HR> tag

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 5 May 95 23:07:05 EDT

31 lines

Text version of the draft (Was: Revised language on: ISO/IEC...)

Joe English <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 95 19:50:33 EDT

33 lines

The Challenge

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:55:19 EDT

36 lines

Thinking about style sheets

Kevin Hughes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 05:12:03 EDT

610 lines

Typed Links for Glossary [Was: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections]

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 09:02:51 EDT

29 lines

Typed links in HTML 2.0 document: done

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 17:55:04 EDT

39 lines

UL & OL: labels

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 95 17:19:37 EDT

16 lines

Re: UL & OL: labels

Bert Bos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 95 11:06:35 EDT

34 lines

Undeclared entities, wierd numeric character references

Dan Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 95 19:46:31 EDT

80 lines

Re: Undeclared entities, wierd numeric character references

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 95 01:56:28 EDT

84 lines

Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered

Amanda Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 95 22:43:56 EDT

40 lines

Usability of HTML 2.0/3.0 specs -- element names in TOC

361 Lauritsen, x8379 <"Michael H.Kelsey (361 Lauritsen, x8379)"@[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 95 09:21:15 EDT

53 lines

Using the HTML format for e-mail messages and Usenet News articles

Jacob Palme <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 03:55:31 EDT

136 lines

Wet blankets

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 11:21:53 EDT

54 lines

WG Citation Attribution - a Plea!

David - Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 20:38:45 EDT

31 lines

Re: WG Citation Attribution - a Plea!

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 95 03:59:26 EDT

25 lines

Where are we on ISO/IEC 10646?

Albert Lunde <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 11:22:55 EDT

32 lines

Re: Where are we on ISO/IEC 10646?

Eric W. Sink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 12:11:37 EDT

24 lines

Re: WISE NASA WWW Project Management... (my mistake)

John F. Stitzinger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 95 12:57:24 EDT

12 lines

Yet another table proposal for HTML 2.1

Dave Raggett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 95 07:10:54 EDT

285 lines

[ANNOUNCE] Pre-Release of WISE: A WWW-Based Software Metrics Tool

Jack R. Callahan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 95 16:58:53 EDT

77 lines

[Q] Links inside maths in HTML3

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 14 May 95 10:17:19 EDT

38 lines


Back to: Main HTML-WG Page



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager