LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for UCD-STAFFORDBEER Archives


UCD-STAFFORDBEER Archives

UCD-STAFFORDBEER Archives


September 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

'successful tools' - culture and human creativity (2 messages)
A fishy story! (9 messages)
a new mantra for the forum (11 messages)
A systems approach to Pakistan Flood Crisis (8 messages)
anecdote (plus ca change....) (1 message)
anecdote - Stuart Kauffman (3 messages)
anecdote - von Neumann, Wiener and McCulloch (1 message)
Another Blind Man? (4 messages)
Anyone Heard of Kent D. Palmer?? (1 message)
anyone heard of?? (26 messages)
autonomy, autopoiesis and organizational closure (1 message)
autopoiesis and philosophical tradition (1 message)
Barry Clemson has forwarded an article to you from CommonDreams.org: Rising Energy Demand Hits Water Scarcity 'Choke Point' (2 messages)
Bridging gaps to other societies (10 messages)
call for papers (1 message)
Chinese Ecological Potemkin Village? (2 messages)
Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology (13 messages)
Consciousness & Info theory (2 messages)
cybernetic genesis (1 message)
Cybernetics History (1 message)
Cybernetics of cybernetics (95 messages)
Cybernetics of cybernetics (autism) (5 messages)
Cybernetics of cybernetics (religious systems and systems) (3 messages)
Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski (62 messages)
Cybernetics of Cybernetics in Practice (2 messages)
Cybernetics of cybernetics: Specialized Channel(s) (2 messages)
cynism (11 messages)
darwinian models and technology (17 messages)
For Nick re UHF (1 message)
For Nick re UHF (sub-ELF!) (9 messages)
For Nick's Earh/Moon enclosing wave (2 messages)
Fw: CONFIDENTIAL: WCSA Declaration of Bologna 4 Dec 2010 (1 message)
Fwd: Science.eu.com Call 2010 (1 message)
Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions (58 messages)
Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions (use of language) (8 messages)
hello there, Vladimir (5 messages)
hello there, Vladimir (Varela) (6 messages)
I am a pathocybernetician (1 message)
Kent Palmer (4 messages)
last anecdote of day - RATHER WONDERFUL - ~Norbert Wiener reflects on his book (2 messages)
Leonid Ototsky wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn (1 message)
Lessons for us (2 messages)
Luhmann (5 messages)
Neuroscience Research 10 year Most cited articles (1 message)
new web page for the Metaphorum (3 messages)
Nick - resting state of atoms? (2 messages)
Precis (3 messages)
Recognition for VSM (2 messages)
Saving the world with cybernetics and systemsh (4 messages)
Science Can Answer Moral Questions (2 messages)
Science.eu.com Call 2010 (1 message)
singularity due to networking not AI (1 message)
sorry guys - undisciplined tails...... (4 messages)
Stafford's Theory of Models in practice (4 messages)
System 4 for Islam? (15 messages)
the early history of cybernetics (2 messages)
UCD-STAFFORDBEER Digest - 23 Sep 2010 to 27 Sep 2010 (#2010-200) (1 message)
US politics and bionics (1 message)
War and Robotics (2 messages)
WOSC in Nanjing 2011- First Call (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

UCD-STAFFORDBEER Home

UCD-STAFFORDBEER Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

Date

Size

New Thread

'successful tools' - culture and human creativity

Re: 'successful tools' - culture and human creativity

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:47:10 +0100

63 lines

'successful tools' - culture and human creativity

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:09:22 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

A fishy story!

Re: A fishy story!

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:17:52 +0100

545 lines

Re: A fishy story!

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:21:19 +0100

319 lines

Re: A fishy story!

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:33:47 +0100

470 lines

Re: A fishy story!

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:16:08 +0100

263 lines

Re: A fishy story!

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:12:25 +0100

312 lines

Re: A fishy story!

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:11:51 +0100

382 lines

Re: A fishy story!

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:45:07 +0100

214 lines

Re: A fishy story!

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:31:59 +0100

314 lines

Re: A fishy story!

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:13:29 +0100

165 lines

New Thread

a new mantra for the forum

Re: a new mantra for the forum

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:48:57 +0100

26 lines

Re: a new mantra for the forum

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:55:17 +0100

491 lines

Re: a new mantra for the forum

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:36:37 -0400

507 lines

Re: a new mantra for the forum

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:29:23 +0100

439 lines

Re: a new mantra for the forum

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:25:19 +0800

466 lines

Re: a new mantra for the forum

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:24:35 -0400

472 lines

Re: a new mantra for the forum

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:21:35 +0800

387 lines

Re: a new mantra for the forum

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:21:32 -0400

396 lines

Re: a new mantra for the forum

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:15:01 -0400

323 lines

Re: a new mantra for the forum

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:08:52 +0100

277 lines

a new mantra for the forum

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:03:08 -0400

254 lines

New Thread

A systems approach to Pakistan Flood Crisis

Re: A systems approach to Pakistan Flood Crisis

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:21:02 +0100

486 lines

Re: A systems approach to Pakistan Flood Crisis

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:40:40 -0400

547 lines

Re: A systems approach to Pakistan Flood Crisis

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:51:56 +0100

458 lines

Re: A systems approach to Pakistan Flood Crisis

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:51:40 -0400

411 lines

Re: A systems approach to Pakistan Flood Crisis

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:54:10 +0100

281 lines

Re: A systems approach to Pakistan Flood Crisis

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:26:19 +0400

233 lines

Re: A systems approach to Pakistan Flood Crisis

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:53:52 +0100

122 lines

A systems approach to Pakistan Flood Crisis

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:34:21 -0400

227 lines

New Thread

anecdote (plus ca change....)

anecdote (plus ca change....)

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:15:09 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

anecdote - Stuart Kauffman

Re: anecdote - Stuart Kauffman

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:07:24 +0100

257 lines

Re: anecdote - Stuart Kauffman

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:52:27 -0400

228 lines

anecdote - Stuart Kauffman

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:42:36 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

anecdote - von Neumann, Wiener and McCulloch

anecdote - von Neumann, Wiener and McCulloch

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:53:58 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

Another Blind Man?

Re: Another Blind Man?

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:24:43 +0100

332 lines

Re: Another Blind Man?

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:29:38 +0100

179 lines

Re: Another Blind Man?

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 18:04:52 -0400

148 lines

Another Blind Man?

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 17:31:51 +0100

310 lines

New Thread

Anyone Heard of Kent D. Palmer??

Re: Anyone Heard of Kent D. Palmer??

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:45:15 -0400

1247 lines

New Thread

anyone heard of??

Re: anyone heard of??

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:16:30 -0700

1457 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:45:36 -0700

1078 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:29:03 -0400

1792 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:19:53 -0400

2418 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:00:03 +0100

1981 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:10:53 -0400

2077 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:15:01 -0700

1111 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 06:28:22 -0700

961 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 02:12:09 +0200

1382 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:30:49 -0400

1578 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:35:21 +0100

1490 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:01:48 -0700

973 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:41:56 +0100

1262 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:33:14 -0700

942 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:47:44 -0400

1477 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:56:49 -0400

1206 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:51:33 +0100

1152 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 05:22:00 +0800

825 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:42:05 -0700

623 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:10:07 +0100

26 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:33:22 +0100

658 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:08:49 +0100

597 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:03:27 +0100

551 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:57:53 +0800

450 lines

Re: anyone heard of??

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:47:33 +0100

562 lines

anyone heard of??

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:34:26 +0100

507 lines

New Thread

autonomy, autopoiesis and organizational closure

autonomy, autopoiesis and organizational closure

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:22:24 +0100

225 lines

New Thread

autopoiesis and philosophical tradition

autopoiesis and philosophical tradition

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:01:35 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Barry Clemson has forwarded an article to you from CommonDreams.org: Rising Energy Demand Hits Water Scarcity 'Choke Point'

Re: Barry Clemson has forwarded an article to you from CommonDreams.org: Rising Energy Demand Hits Water Scarcity 'Choke Point'

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:51:05 +0100

82 lines

Barry Clemson has forwarded an article to you from CommonDreams.org: Rising Energy Demand Hits Water Scarcity 'Choke Point'

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:15:24 -0500

94 lines

New Thread

Bridging gaps to other societies

Re: Bridging gaps to other societies

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:51:29 +0400

244 lines

Re: Bridging gaps to other societies

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:18:41 +0400

179 lines

Re: Bridging gaps to other societies

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:18:33 +0400

179 lines

Re: Bridging gaps to other societies

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:42:04 -0400

370 lines

Bridging gaps to other societies

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:51:47 +0200

183 lines

Re: bridging gaps to other societies

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:01:23 -0400

502 lines

Re: bridging gaps to other societies

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:19:00 -0700

315 lines

Re: bridging gaps to other societies

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:41:46 +0700

525 lines

Re: bridging gaps to other societies

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:31:13 -0700

185 lines

bridging gaps to other societies

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:41:55 -0400

185 lines

New Thread

call for papers

call for papers

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:25:27 +0100

375 lines

New Thread

Chinese Ecological Potemkin Village?

Re: Chinese Ecological Potemkin Village?

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:45:38 +0800

118 lines

Chinese Ecological Potemkin Village?

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:19:27 +0100

92 lines

New Thread

Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Re: Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:09:36 -0700

250 lines

Re: Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:46:43 +0100

28 lines

Re: Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:42:58 +0100

83 lines

Re: Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:31:56 +0800

259 lines

Re: Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:14:43 -0700

137 lines

Re: Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:43:51 +0800

292 lines

Re: Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:33:19 -0400

249 lines

Re: Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:45:16 +0100

360 lines

Re: Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:35:11 +0800

286 lines

Re: Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:31:24 +0100

261 lines

Re: Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:18:08 +0800

223 lines

Re: Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:06:29 +0100

172 lines

Chiropractic Visits & Organisational Anthropology

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:43:14 +0800

125 lines

New Thread

Consciousness & Info theory

Re: Consciousness & Info theory

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:31:21 +0400

201 lines

Consciousness & Info theory

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:52:08 -0400

192 lines

New Thread

cybernetic genesis

cybernetic genesis

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:38:22 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Cybernetics History

Cybernetics History

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:33:53 -0700

90 lines

New Thread

Cybernetics of cybernetics

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:39:08 +0100

1020 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:29:05 +0100

975 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:21:31 -0400

1178 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:58:01 +0100

698 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:26:08 +0100

893 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:18:41 +0100

842 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:16:45 +0100

757 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:15:37 +0100

594 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:27:33 +0100

923 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:14:15 -0400

1067 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:03:08 +0100

810 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:00:06 +0100

751 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:50:16 +0100

800 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:46:34 -0400

926 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:39:42 -0400

821 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:28:48 -0400

823 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:39:00 +0100

641 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:36:55 +0100

596 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:46:37 +0100

629 lines

Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sat, 11 Sep 2010 21:11:10 -0400

616 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:24:37 +0100

601 lines

Cybernetics of cybernetics

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:57:23 +0200

523 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 01:40:10 +0400

116 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 21:57:54 +0100

1221 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 21:12:10 +0100

195 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:18:27 +0100

335 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 13:26:03 -0400

1164 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:10:07 +0100

1009 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:52:01 +0100

120 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:47:13 -0400

977 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:28:58 -0600

320 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:30:49 +0100

109 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:52:07 +0400

129 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:27:04 +0100

857 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:52:12 +0400

451 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:25:38 +0100

505 lines

Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:54:13 +0200

422 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 08:39:15 +0100

143 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 08:25:54 +0100

277 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:35:54 +0400

80 lines

Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 07:49:53 +0200

224 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:59:43 +0100

134 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 01:53:38 +0400

93 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:43:56 +0100

170 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 01:36:30 +0400

119 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:03:59 +0100

719 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 21:52:24 +0100

172 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 19:04:26 +0400

119 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:45:35 +0400

150 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:48:46 +0100

191 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 12:57:29 +0400

185 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:50:21 +0100

136 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:47:58 +0400

91 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 23:05:25 -0400

476 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:59:04 -0400

467 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:52:37 -0400

393 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:07:11 -0400

375 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 06:46:44 +0800

294 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 06:38:51 +0800

390 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 23:20:36 +0100

199 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 23:16:51 +0100

125 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 23:15:40 +0100

272 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 06:14:47 +0800

295 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 18:17:44 -0400

311 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 02:08:15 +0400

89 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:59:35 +0100

155 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 05:52:40 +0800

209 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:21:53 +0100

252 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 15:42:29 -0400

176 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:54:59 -0400

612 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:33:37 +0100

660 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 18:44:34 +0100

545 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 18:39:07 +0100

1357 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 18:20:40 +0100

503 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 13:12:40 -0400

393 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 17:27:58 +0100

1314 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 17:23:14 +0100

815 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 23:32:56 +0800

264 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 23:27:51 +0800

1315 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:19:52 -0400

249 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:08:54 +0100

148 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 09:50:03 +0100

732 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 09:36:15 +0100

991 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 08:51:48 +0100

1031 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 5 Sep 2010 23:02:22 +0200

2172 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:41:50 +0200

989 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 00:37:20 +0400

287 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 5 Sep 2010 07:11:34 -0800

1025 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 5 Sep 2010 15:52:01 +0100

852 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:32:30 +0800

791 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:55:20 +0100

679 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 5 Sep 2010 21:20:48 +0800

539 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Sun, 5 Sep 2010 11:08:15 +0100

437 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:12:37 +0100

338 lines

Cybernetics of cybernetics

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:46:17 +0200

296 lines

New Thread

Cybernetics of cybernetics (autism)

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics (autism)

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:47:52 +0100

250 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics (autism)

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:42:23 +0100

292 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics (autism)

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:25:21 +0100

165 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics (autism)

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:09:53 +0700

450 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics (autism)

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 21:47:11 +0100

395 lines

New Thread

Cybernetics of cybernetics (religious systems and systems)

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics (religious systems and systems)

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:45:59 +0100

176 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics (religious systems and systems)

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:25:40 +0100

175 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics (religious systems and systems)

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:10:45 +0100

934 lines

New Thread

Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:15:54 -0700

2671 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:52:38 +0100

2609 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:49:07 +0100

3004 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:35:52 +0100

1864 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:34:56 +0100

112 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:09:08 -0400

4136 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:53:59 +0100

2410 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:47:58 -0400

2997 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:36:53 -0400

3535 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:02:07 +0100

1234 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:53:08 +0100

2312 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:20:40 -0400

2917 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:40:09 +0800

1669 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:06:48 +0400

80 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:52:17 +0100

1859 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:34:50 +0100

1501 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:32:37 +0100

1954 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:31:34 +0100

1760 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:10:05 -0400

1874 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:15:25 +0100

121 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:15:00 +0800

1591 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:09:39 +0800

134 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:54:13 +0400

90 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:14:47 +0100

1594 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:14:45 +0100

1325 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:08:33 +0100

1553 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:57:16 +0100

1439 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:55:52 -0700

1019 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:18:21 -0400

2573 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:20:23 +0800

1567 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:17:00 +0100

1680 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:57:14 +0100

1617 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:55:34 -0400

1551 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 06:31:53 +0800

1407 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:15:10 +0100

1424 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:07:21 +0100

1591 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:01:19 +0100

1582 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 05:41:14 +0800

1276 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:40:45 -0400

1526 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:17:27 -0400

2032 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:01:59 +0100

1431 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:00:16 -0400

1510 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:50:38 +0100

1334 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:46:52 +0100

1297 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:44:08 +0100

1129 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:37:50 +0100

1289 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:01:11 -0400

1755 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0700

825 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:44:59 -0700

768 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:13:04 -0400

1230 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:02:34 -0400

1284 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:58:42 -0400

1226 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:21:05 +0100

1213 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:10:31 +0100

955 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:01:40 +0100

1120 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:54:22 +0100

1062 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:40:46 +0100

1017 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:16:11 +0100

966 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:39:33 +0100

923 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:54:41 +0800

902 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:06:54 +0100

987 lines

Cybernetics of cybernetics - response to Stefan Wasilewski

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:40:52 +0200

817 lines

New Thread

Cybernetics of Cybernetics in Practice

Re: Cybernetics of Cybernetics in Practice

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:15:18 +0100

861 lines

Re: Cybernetics of Cybernetics in Practice

Sun, 5 Sep 2010 21:08:28 +0000

579 lines

New Thread

Cybernetics of cybernetics: Specialized Channel(s)

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics: Specialized Channel(s)

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:18:25 -0700

314 lines

Re: Cybernetics of cybernetics: Specialized Channel(s)

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:11:15 -0400

435 lines

New Thread

cynism

Re: cynism

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:13:46 -0400

385 lines

Re: cynism

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:21:15 +0100

247 lines

Re: cynism

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:27:34 -0400

177 lines

Re: cynism

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:28:10 +0400

67 lines

Re: cynism

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:26:11 +0400

76 lines

Re: cynism

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:20:32 +0800

273 lines

Re: cynism

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:16:58 -0400

225 lines

Re: cynism

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:12:31 +0100

198 lines

Re: cynism

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:07:27 +0400

110 lines

Re: cynism

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:04:24 +0100

188 lines

cynism

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:55:53 -0400

110 lines

New Thread

darwinian models and technology

Re: darwinian models and technology

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:09:20 -0400

277 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:02:09 +0100

153 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:19:26 -0400

726 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:07:40 +0400

200 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:54:03 -0400

512 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:20:02 +0100

439 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:30:15 +0400

70 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:23:10 +0100

438 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:19:56 +0100

495 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:08:29 +0100

384 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:05:00 +0100

428 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:59:10 +0100

334 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:46:00 +0100

362 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:44:13 +0100

469 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:37:46 +0100

282 lines

Re: darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:31:16 +0100

430 lines

darwinian models and technology

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:07:41 +0100

291 lines

New Thread

For Nick re UHF

For Nick re UHF

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:48:59 -0700

55 lines

New Thread

For Nick re UHF (sub-ELF!)

Re: For Nick re UHF (sub-ELF!)

Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:52:35 +0100

173 lines

Re: For Nick re UHF (sub-ELF!)

Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:37:02 +0100

97 lines

Re: For Nick re UHF (sub-ELF!)

Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:16:13 +0100

118 lines

Re: For Nick re UHF (sub-ELF!)

Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:04:49 +0100

161 lines

Re: For Nick re UHF (sub-ELF!)

Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:55:05 +0100

61 lines

Re: For Nick re UHF (sub-ELF!)

Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:30:37 +0100

133 lines

Re: For Nick re UHF (sub-ELF!)

Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:38:10 +0100

162 lines

Re: For Nick re UHF (sub-ELF!)

Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:24:33 +0100

135 lines

Re: For Nick re UHF (sub-ELF!)

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:06:25 +0100

89 lines

New Thread

For Nick's Earh/Moon enclosing wave

Re: For Nick's Earh/Moon enclosing wave

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 02:41:46 +0100

132 lines

For Nick's Earh/Moon enclosing wave

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:43:41 -0700

117 lines

New Thread

Fw: CONFIDENTIAL: WCSA Declaration of Bologna 4 Dec 2010

Fw: CONFIDENTIAL: WCSA Declaration of Bologna 4 Dec 2010

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 23:48:52 -0400

698 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Science.eu.com Call 2010

Fwd: Science.eu.com Call 2010

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:29:25 -0400

295 lines

New Thread

Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:57:58 +0100

81 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 03:24:26 +0100

84 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 01:47:55 +0100

121 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:21:43 -0400

467 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:15:00 +0100

202 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:02:49 +0100

165 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:07:58 +0100

57 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:30:27 +0100

153 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:21:55 +0100

40 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:18:55 +0100

590 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:42:40 +0100

124 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:39:34 +0100

404 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:36:51 +0100

103 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:07:20 +0100

373 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:52:48 +0100

456 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:33:34 +0100

77 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:04:12 +0100

157 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:00:01 +0100

285 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:54:59 +0100

306 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:50:01 +0100

310 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:31:29 +0100

114 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:32:47 +0100

696 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:04:34 +0100

310 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:18:54 -0400

704 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:11:05 +0100

259 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:31:30 +0100

351 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:11:21 +0100

335 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:54:08 +0100

236 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:44:47 +0100

218 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:36:54 +0100

244 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:33:18 +0100

146 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:00:48 +0100

508 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:03:16 +0100

381 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:57:09 +0200

989 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:41:19 +0100

434 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:36:43 +0400

364 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:13:47 +0100

298 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:17:25 +0100

74 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:25:05 +0100

63 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:09:05 +0100

90 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 02:58:01 +0400

123 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 02:53:48 +0400

129 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:52:15 +0100

153 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:46:11 +0100

318 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:51:42 +0100

127 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:51:46 +0400

67 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:21:04 +0100

108 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:13:23 +0100

251 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:50:19 +0400

149 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:47:08 +0400

149 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:28:33 +0100

224 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:50:21 +0100

57 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:00:21 +0100

246 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:46:39 +0100

159 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:29:43 +0100

110 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:53:06 +0100

229 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 09:25:55 +0100

271 lines

Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:11:26 +0100

163 lines

New Thread

Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions (use of language)

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions (use of language)

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:44:36 +0100

194 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions (use of language)

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:31:29 +0100

225 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions (use of language)

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:14:18 +0100

260 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions (use of language)

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:55:20 +0100

158 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions (use of language)

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:24:30 +0100

184 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions (use of language)

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 08:04:00 +0100

180 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions (use of language)

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 02:42:57 +0100

155 lines

Re: Harris: Science Can Answer Moral Questions (use of language)

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:24:18 +0100

107 lines

New Thread

hello there, Vladimir

Re: hello there, Vladimir

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:14:30 +0100

204 lines

Re: hello there, Vladimir

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 03:02:06 +0400

181 lines

Re: hello there, Vladimir

Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:04:50 +0100

301 lines

Re: hello there, Vladimir

Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:36:32 +0400

246 lines

hello there, Vladimir

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:29:21 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

hello there, Vladimir (Varela)

Re: hello there, Vladimir (Varela)

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:42:24 +0600

317 lines

Re: hello there, Vladimir (Varela)

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:22:43 +0400

60 lines

Re: hello there, Vladimir (Varela)

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:17:41 +0100

80 lines

Re: hello there, Vladimir (Varela)

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:11:21 +0400

70 lines

Re: hello there, Vladimir (Varela)

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:44:34 +0100

225 lines

Re: hello there, Vladimir (Varela)

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:14:13 +0100

245 lines

New Thread

I am a pathocybernetician

I am a pathocybernetician

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:56:19 +0400

90 lines

New Thread

Kent Palmer

Re: Kent Palmer

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:56:00 -0400

202 lines

Kent Palmer

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:14:16 +0100

41 lines

Kent Palmer

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:30:41 +0100

28 lines

Kent Palmer

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:02:51 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

last anecdote of day - RATHER WONDERFUL - ~Norbert Wiener reflects on his book

Re: last anecdote of day - RATHER WONDERFUL - ~Norbert Wiener reflects on his book

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:04:42 -0700

233 lines

last anecdote of day - RATHER WONDERFUL - ~Norbert Wiener reflects on his book

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:50:45 +0100

232 lines

New Thread

Leonid Ototsky wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn

Leonid Ototsky wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:53:53 -0700

107 lines

New Thread

Lessons for us

Re: Lessons for us

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:48:26 -0700

3026 lines

Lessons for us

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:56:02 -0400

3287 lines

New Thread

Luhmann

Luhmann

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:59:47 +0200

78 lines

Luhmann

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:47:51 +0100

161 lines

Re: Luhmann

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:53:00 +0200

2898 lines

Re: Luhmann

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:40:24 +0100

1254 lines

Luhmann

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:21:06 +0200

1545 lines

New Thread

Neuroscience Research 10 year Most cited articles

Neuroscience Research 10 year Most cited articles

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:01:51 -0700

69 lines

New Thread

new web page for the Metaphorum

Re: new web page for the Metaphorum

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:53:10 -0700

422 lines

Re: new web page for the Metaphorum

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:53:54 +0100

281 lines

new web page for the Metaphorum

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 05:15:50 -0700

378 lines

New Thread

Nick - resting state of atoms?

Re: Nick - resting state of atoms?

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:55:48 +0100

240 lines

Re: Nick - resting state of atoms?

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:03:32 +0100

231 lines

New Thread

Precis

Re: Precis

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:07:16 -0400

505 lines

Re: Precis

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:43:25 +0100

84 lines

Precis

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:32:42 +0200

307 lines

New Thread

Recognition for VSM

Recognition for VSM

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 02:41:41 +0200

217 lines

recognition for VSM

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:54:43 -0400

80 lines

New Thread

Saving the world with cybernetics and systemsh

Re: Saving the world with cybernetics and systemsh

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:53:25 +0100

441 lines

Re: Saving the world with cybernetics and systemsh

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:29:00 -0700

177 lines

Re: Saving the world with cybernetics and systemsh

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:05:37 +0100

235 lines

Saving the world with cybernetics and systemsh

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:44:30 -0700

82 lines

New Thread

Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Re: Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:01:13 -0400

174 lines

Science Can Answer Moral Questions

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:49:13 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

Science.eu.com Call 2010

Re: Science.eu.com Call 2010

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:08:43 +0100

192 lines

New Thread

singularity due to networking not AI

singularity due to networking not AI

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:40:33 -0400

200 lines

New Thread

sorry guys - undisciplined tails......

Re: sorry guys - undisciplined tails......

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:30:29 -0400

338 lines

Re: sorry guys - undisciplined tails......

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:18:07 -0700

134 lines

Re: sorry guys - undisciplined tails......

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:13:26 +0400

95 lines

sorry guys - undisciplined tails......

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:03:18 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Stafford's Theory of Models in practice

Re: Stafford's Theory of Models in practice

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:07:29 +0100

203 lines

Re: Stafford's Theory of Models in practice

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:12:05 +0400

181 lines

Re: Stafford's Theory of Models in practice

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:59:06 +0100

60 lines

Stafford's Theory of Models in practice

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:48:37 +0400

66 lines

New Thread

System 4 for Islam?

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Sat, 4 Sep 2010 08:37:03 +0800

565 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:20:37 -0400

193 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:09:37 +0100

163 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:43:20 +0100

72 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:15:05 -0400

80 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:24:06 -0400

1637 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 18:57:59 +0100

1410 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 22:55:47 +0800

1188 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 06:33:41 -0700

783 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:48:21 +0800

1328 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:08:37 -0400

984 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:59:38 +0100

786 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 23:23:34 +0800

628 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:57:34 +0100

156 lines

Re: System 4 for Islam?

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:55:55 +0100

317 lines

New Thread

the early history of cybernetics

Re: the early history of cybernetics

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:37:43 +0100

114 lines

the early history of cybernetics

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:15:42 -0400

77 lines

New Thread

UCD-STAFFORDBEER Digest - 23 Sep 2010 to 27 Sep 2010 (#2010-200)

Re: UCD-STAFFORDBEER Digest - 23 Sep 2010 to 27 Sep 2010 (#2010-200)

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:59:26 +0200

18094 lines

New Thread

US politics and bionics

US politics and bionics

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:16:05 -0700

71 lines

New Thread

War and Robotics

Re: War and Robotics

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:55:19 +0100

65 lines

War and Robotics

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 03:54:38 +0800

63 lines

New Thread

WOSC in Nanjing 2011- First Call

WOSC in Nanjing 2011- First Call

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:11:35 +0100

32 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2017
May 2017
November 2016
October 2016
July 2016
June 2016
March 2016
November 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager