LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CELTIC-L Archives


CELTIC-L Archives

CELTIC-L Archives


February 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

<listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out? (14 messages)
<listowner> Re: To Bernard (was: Posting on Celtic-L - Oct 5th, 2006) (1 message)
<listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other! (15 messages)
Boar as a chthonic symbol (2 messages)
Branching Out? (16 messages)
English God of Love - (was Re: Etymology of Lugh) (7 messages)
Etymology of Lugh (22 messages)
Flagging the bollox - (was Warning: please don't flame each other!) (1 message)
For information and interest... (2 messages)
Gromoviti znaci (1 message)
Gromoviti znaci - number of pictures attached. (3 messages)
Help on Cernunnous? (6 messages)
Help on Gigantes? (1 message)
Help on Ogma? (39 messages)
Help on Sucellus? (2 messages)
I have met my goal, thank you. (19 messages)
Is the 'Cattle Raid of Fraech' literary tale to match the Jupiter Tree sc... (1 message)
Is the 'Cattle Raid of Fraech' literary tale to match the Jupiter Tree scenes? (3 messages)
Meeting goals. flaming and Kumbayaa (6 messages)
Persians (1 message)
Supplemental: Miranda Green and the idenitification of those venerated all over the Celtic world (2 messages)
The Celtic god Neton from Spain? (5 messages)
The Celtic god Noten from Spain? (1 message)
The Cunedag 'migration' (1 message)
To Bernard (was: Posting on Celtic-L - Oct 5th, 2006) (5 messages)
weirdly-spelled neo-pagan names and neo-pagan Trolls was Etymology of Lugh and discusison of argument etc (1 message)
{Spam?} Re: To Bernard (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CELTIC-L Home

CELTIC-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

<listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

Raimund Karl

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:50:10 +0000

189 lines

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:27:22 +0930

144 lines

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

Bruce E. Wright

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:59:54 -0800

142 lines

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

Raimund Karl

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:18:27 +0000

933 lines

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:43:42 +0930

7119 lines

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:35:34 +0930

747 lines

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

James Mathieson

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:44:18 -0800

315 lines

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:12:04 +0930

488 lines

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

James Mathieson

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:15:52 -0800

141 lines

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:35:56 +0000

33 lines

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

Raimund Karl

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:00:00 +0000

1498 lines

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:37:35 +0930

4404 lines

Re: <listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

Bruce E. Wright

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:59:53 -0800

706 lines

<listowner> discussion of argument and long example how to proceed properly, was Re: Branching Out?

Raimund Karl

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:39:59 +0000

600 lines

New Thread

<listowner> Re: To Bernard (was: Posting on Celtic-L - Oct 5th, 2006)

<listowner> Re: To Bernard (was: Posting on Celtic-L - Oct 5th, 2006)

Raimund Karl

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:00:59 +0000

127 lines

New Thread

<listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:03:58 +0000

37 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:57:09 +0930

107 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:43:24 +0930

70 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Paulo Rodrigues

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:54:35 +0000

251 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Paulo Rodrigues

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:54:33 +0000

251 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Raimund Karl

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:47:57 +0000

131 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Jez

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:46:14 +0000

73 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:17:04 -0600

102 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Jez

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:55:00 +0000

48 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:34:14 -0600

38 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:25:11 -0600

96 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Raimund Karl

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:53:56 +0000

76 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Paulo Rodrigues

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:31:16 +0000

149 lines

Re: <listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:21:21 -0600

50 lines

<listowner> Warning: please don't flame each other!

Raimund Karl

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:02:00 +0000

75 lines

New Thread

Boar as a chthonic symbol

Re: Boar as a chthonic symbol

John Hooker

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:15:35 -0700

55 lines

Boar as a chthonic symbol

Bill B.

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:38:58 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

Branching Out?

Re: Branching Out?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:36:57 +0930

479 lines

Re: Branching Out?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:09:43 +0930

1283 lines

Re: Branching Out?

Muiris Mag Ualghairg

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:35:54 +0000

128 lines

Re: Branching Out?

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:07:01 -0500

37 lines

Re: Branching Out?

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:00:24 -0500

283 lines

Re: Branching Out?

Muiris Mag Ualghairg

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:29:31 +0000

579 lines

Re: Branching Out?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:03:13 +0930

936 lines

Re: Branching Out?

Bernard Morgan

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:23:22 +0000

262 lines

Re: Branching Out?

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:18:45 -0600

70 lines

Re: Branching Out?

Charles DeVane

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:48:58 +0000

27 lines

Re: Branching Out?

Bernard Morgan

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:53:13 +0000

103 lines

Re: Branching Out?

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:59:41 -0600

58 lines

Re: Branching Out?

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:09:29 -0600

89 lines

Re: Branching Out?

Bernard Morgan

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:30:42 +0000

111 lines

Re: Branching Out?

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:27:29 +0000

108 lines

Branching Out?

Bernard Morgan

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:20:55 +0000

235 lines

New Thread

English God of Love - (was Re: Etymology of Lugh)

Re: English God of Love - (was Re: Etymology of Lugh)

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:34:38 +0930

136 lines

Re: English God of Love - (was Re: Etymology of Lugh)

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:07:35 GMT

97 lines

Re: English God of Love - (was Re: Etymology of Lugh)

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:49:51 +0930

44 lines

Re: English God of Love - (was Re: Etymology of Lugh)

Raimund Karl

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:14:27 +0000

128 lines

Re: English God of Love - (was Re: Etymology of Lugh)

Jez

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:57:59 +0000

30 lines

Re: English God of Love - (was Re: Etymology of Lugh)

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:02:15 +0930

99 lines

English God of Love - (was Re: Etymology of Lugh)

Jez

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:55:27 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

Etymology of Lugh

Re: Etymology of Lugh

Raimund Karl

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:33:24 +0000

287 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:54:26 +0930

857 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

Stacey Weinberger

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:07:02 -0800

188 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:43:09 +0930

152 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

Stacey Weinberger

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:19:31 -0800

84 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

invisibleplanet

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:28:13 +0000

115 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

Raimund Karl

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:56:43 +0000

59 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:26:07 +0930

58 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

invisibleplanet

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:15:54 +0000

43 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:04:07 +0930

63 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:53:36 GMT

606 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

Raimund Karl

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:24:57 +0000

361 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:09:51 -0600

43 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:12:04 +0930

891 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:12:04 +0930

243 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

Raimund Karl

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:56:46 +0000

136 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

Kevin Tolley

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:14:15 -0800

274 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:10:11 +0930

54 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:18:18 +0000

38 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:37:35 +0930

467 lines

Re: Etymology of Lugh

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:56:49 -0500

91 lines

Etymology of Lugh

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:35:43 -0500

260 lines

New Thread

Flagging the bollox - (was Warning: please don't flame each other!)

Flagging the bollox - (was Warning: please don't flame each other!)

Jez

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:31:22 +0000

73 lines

New Thread

For information and interest...

Re: For information and interest...

Paulo Rodrigues

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:45:56 +0000

184 lines

For information and interest...

Jez

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:41:15 +0000

171 lines

New Thread

Gromoviti znaci

Gromoviti znaci

Bernard Morgan

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 00:00:27 +0000

93 lines

New Thread

Gromoviti znaci - number of pictures attached.

Re: Gromoviti znaci - number of pictures attached.

Bernard Morgan

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 23:13:14 +0000

233 lines

Re: Gromoviti znaci - number of pictures attached.

Alison Pacuska

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:11:38 -0500

160 lines

Re: Gromoviti znaci - number of pictures attached.

Bernard Morgan

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 01:17:42 +0000

474 lines

New Thread

Help on Cernunnous?

Re: Help on Cernunnous?

Bernard Morgan

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 01:22:03 +0000

183 lines

Re: Help on Cernunnous?

john welch

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:48:34 -0800

20 lines

Re: Help on Cernunnous?

Bernard Morgan

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 00:28:26 +0000

126 lines

Re: Help on Cernunnous?

Bernard Morgan

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:47:43 +0000

212 lines

Re: Help on Cernunnous?

john welch

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:06:51 -0800

50 lines

Re: Help on Cernunnous?

Bernard Morgan

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 03:35:34 +0000

120 lines

New Thread

Help on Gigantes?

Re: Help on Gigantes?

Bernard Morgan

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:29:47 +0000

123 lines

New Thread

Help on Ogma?

Re: Help on Ogma?

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:51:06 +0000

31 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Bernard Morgan

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:25:00 +0000

62 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

vickicohen.shaw

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:29:15 -0600

182 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Alison Pacuska

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:10:06 -0500

118 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

James Mathieson

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 06:13:15 -0800

106 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

john welch

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 23:00:06 -0800

55 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Bernard Morgan

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 02:02:13 +0000

78 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:51:55 +0930

187 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:13:21 -0500

161 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:26:08 +0930

497 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Alison Pacuska

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:36:51 -0500

149 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Alison Pacuska

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:17:49 -0500

181 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Alison Pacuska

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:05:45 -0500

283 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

john welch

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 02:55:25 -0800

49 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:55:15 +0930

309 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:44:43 +0930

72 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Bernard Morgan

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:46:05 +0000

192 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

john welch

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:38:02 -0800

32 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Alison Pacuska

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:39:19 -0500

211 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Alison Pacuska

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:14:44 -0500

330 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Alison Pacuska

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:11:27 -0500

107 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Alison Pacuska

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:10:02 -0500

84 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Alison Pacuska

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:59:55 -0500

89 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

john welch

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:47:25 -0800

24 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Ambrois Mooney

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:30:01 +1300

27 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:49:50 +0930

41 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

john welch

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:11:59 -0800

22 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:08:39 +0930

326 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

john welch

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:18:37 -0800

205 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Bernard Morgan

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:59:52 +0000

101 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

john welch

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:57:29 -0800

84 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Muiris Mag Ualghairg

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:12:53 +0000

153 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

James Mathieson

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:56:18 -0800

57 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

john welch

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:08:48 -0800

25 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Alison Pacuska

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:59:41 -0500

319 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

john welch

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:33:44 -0800

26 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:13:07 +0930

73 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

john welch

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:23:06 -0800

29 lines

Re: Help on Ogma?

Bernard Morgan

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:48:58 +0000

260 lines

New Thread

Help on Sucellus?

Re: Help on Sucellus?

Alison Pacuska

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:07:22 -0500

232 lines

Re: Help on Sucellus?

Bernard Morgan

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 00:31:29 +0000

152 lines

New Thread

I have met my goal, thank you.

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

Bernard Morgan

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:30:12 +0000

107 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

John Hooker

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:44:32 -0700

29 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

John Hooker

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:33:31 -0700

34 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

Bernard Morgan

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:40:04 +0000

306 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

John Hooker

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:29:51 -0700

95 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

Bernard Morgan

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:19:25 +0000

1083 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

Charles DeVane

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:11:06 +0000

61 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:18:29 GMT

72 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

Raimund Karl

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:38:21 +0000

254 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

John Hooker

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:44:21 -0700

41 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:19:43 -0600

92 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

Bernard Morgan

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:58:36 +0000

128 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:01:29 -0500

31 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:59:16 -0500

47 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

Bruce E. Wright

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:52:49 -0800

556 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

Bernard Morgan

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:25:27 +0000

241 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:11:10 +0930

58 lines

Re: I have met my goal, thank you.

Stiof MacAmhalghaidh

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:07:05 +0000

31 lines

I have met my goal, thank you.

Bernard Morgan

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:04:53 +0000

466 lines

New Thread

Is the 'Cattle Raid of Fraech' literary tale to match the Jupiter Tree sc...

Re: Is the 'Cattle Raid of Fraech' literary tale to match the Jupiter Tree sc...

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:10:43 EST

65 lines

New Thread

Is the 'Cattle Raid of Fraech' literary tale to match the Jupiter Tree scenes?

Re: Is the 'Cattle Raid of Fraech' literary tale to match the Jupiter Tree scenes?

Bernard Morgan

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:07:26 +0000

61 lines

Re: Is the 'Cattle Raid of Fraech' literary tale to match the Jupiter Tree scenes?

Jez

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:40:32 +0000

79 lines

Is the 'Cattle Raid of Fraech' literary tale to match the Jupiter Tree scenes?

Bernard Morgan

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:41:29 +0000

699 lines

New Thread

Meeting goals. flaming and Kumbayaa

Re: Meeting goals. flaming and Kumbayaa

Bruce E. Wright

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:47:28 -0800

154 lines

Re: Meeting goals. flaming and Kumbayaa

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:04:05 +0000

197 lines

Re: Meeting goals. flaming and Kumbayaa

Searles O'Dubhain

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:12:02 +0000

204 lines

Re: Meeting goals. flaming and Kumbayaa

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:25:37 +0000

86 lines

Re: Meeting goals. flaming and Kumbayaa

Searles O'Dubhain

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:22:33 +0000

54 lines

Meeting goals. flaming and Kumbayaa

Kathleen O'Brien Blair

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:18:14 -0800

343 lines

New Thread

Persians

Persians

john welch

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:12:08 -0800

69 lines

New Thread

Supplemental: Miranda Green and the idenitification of those venerated all over the Celtic world

Re: Supplemental: Miranda Green and the idenitification of those venerated all over the Celtic world

=?windows-1252?Q?=22Teresa_Conner_=28Treasa_N=ED_Conchobhai?= =?windows-1252?Q?r=29=22?=

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:49:50 -0600

32 lines

Supplemental: Miranda Green and the idenitification of those venerated all over the Celtic world

Bernard Morgan

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:12:51 +0000

123 lines

New Thread

The Celtic god Neton from Spain?

Re: The Celtic god Neton from Spain?

invisibleplanet

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:30:30 +0000

21 lines

Re: The Celtic god Neton from Spain?

Jez

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:38:58 +0000

97 lines

Re: The Celtic god Neton from Spain?

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:53:13 -0600

169 lines

Re: The Celtic god Neton from Spain?

vyvyan ogma wyverne

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:36:18 +0930

197 lines

Re: The Celtic god Neton from Spain?

invisibleplanet

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:48:12 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

The Celtic god Noten from Spain?

The Celtic god Noten from Spain?

Bernard Morgan

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:39:29 +0000

125 lines

New Thread

The Cunedag 'migration'

The Cunedag 'migration'

Mak Wilson

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:49:35 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

To Bernard (was: Posting on Celtic-L - Oct 5th, 2006)

Re: To Bernard (was: Posting on Celtic-L - Oct 5th, 2006)

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:07:39 -0600

49 lines

Re: To Bernard (was: Posting on Celtic-L - Oct 5th, 2006)

Bernard Morgan

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:22:40 +0000

79 lines

Re: To Bernard (was: Posting on Celtic-L - Oct 5th, 2006)

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:56:49 -0600

70 lines

Re: To Bernard (was: Posting on Celtic-L - Oct 5th, 2006)

Bernard Morgan

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:18:38 +0000

113 lines

To Bernard (was: Posting on Celtic-L - Oct 5th, 2006)

Tearlach Roibeard Luder

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:32:33 +0000

230 lines

New Thread

weirdly-spelled neo-pagan names and neo-pagan Trolls was Etymology of Lugh and discusison of argument etc

weirdly-spelled neo-pagan names and neo-pagan Trolls was Etymology of Lugh and discusison of argument etc

Kathleen O'Brien Blair

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:58:35 -0800

214 lines

New Thread

{Spam?} Re: To Bernard

Re: {Spam?} Re: To Bernard

Desmond Swords

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:38:17 +0000

25 lines

Re: {Spam?} Re: To Bernard

Raimund Karl

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:58:29 +0000

234 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
August 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
March 2015
February 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
February 2014
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994
December 1993
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
July 1993
June 1993
May 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993
January 1993
December 1992
November 1992
October 1992
September 1992
August 1992
July 1992
June 1992
May 1992
April 1992
March 1992
February 1992
January 1992
December 1991
November 1991
October 1991
September 1991
August 1991
July 1991
June 1991
May 1991

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager