LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


May 2003


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave TYPO-L
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

'That' rule?

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 19:42:12 +0100

17 lines

Re: 'That' rule?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 15:23:44 -0400

28 lines

Re: 'That' rule?

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 15:44:44 EDT

47 lines

Re: 'That' rule?

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 15:31:54 -0400

31 lines

Re: 'That' rule?

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 21:12:21 +0100

15 lines

Re: 'That' rule?

Patsy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 23:48:34 -0600

50 lines

Re: 'That' rule?

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 09:27:12 EDT

28 lines

24 May

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 May 2003 21:03:24 +0100

21 lines

Re: 24 May

Erich Alb <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 May 2003 07:54:51 +0200

28 lines

29-May-2003: you might enjoy these two articles on handwriting, from a Canadian newspaper

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 14:04:39 -0400

33 lines

5 most famous type designers

Ilise Benun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 13:53:56 -0400

17 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 14:32:00 -0400

50 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 11:43:07 -0700

19 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 12:49:13 -0600

29 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 14:54:31 -0400

41 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 11:53:34 -0700

26 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

minikin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 12:59:27 -0600

17 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 15:03:50 -0400

20 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Martin L'Allier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 14:52:51 -0400

78 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 15:04:29 -0400

17 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

L.A. Book Arts, Inc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 12:05:31 -0700

18 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 15:21:07 -0400

24 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 15:25:40 -0500

25 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 15:31:27 -0400

29 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 15:30:37 -0400

20 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 12:46:05 -0700

42 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Jean F Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 21:55:40 +0000

51 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Fabrizio Serra <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 May 2003 01:03:07 +0200

41 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 23:34:22 -0300

29 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Fabrizio Serra <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 May 2003 05:57:00 +0100

33 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 15:13:40 -0400

29 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 12:27:21 -0700

36 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 09:56:26 +0200

54 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

kai bernau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 14:21:23 +0200

38 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 08:27:47 -0400

32 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Wells Book Arts Center <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 09:34:09 -0400

44 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 09:57:48 -0400

28 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 16:09:44 +0200

30 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

toby stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 15:31:33 +0100

21 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 07:34:44 -0700

21 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 10:36:36 -0400

88 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 16:37:35 +0200

22 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 10:51:52 -0400

28 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 12:11:46 -0400

23 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 12:21:57 EDT

33 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Kathleen Tinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 15:58:05 -0400

64 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Adam Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 12:47:58 -0400

118 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 11:25:05 -0700

39 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 11:34:33 -0700

26 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 07:00:02 -0700

22 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Jean F Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 17:41:19 +0200

38 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 09:00:10 -0700

37 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 09:24:41 -0700

37 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 14:05:19 -0400

21 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 08:05:13 -0700

27 lines

Re: 5 most wanted type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 15:48:45 -0400

44 lines

Re: 5 most wanted type designers

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 14:37:47 -0700

65 lines

<no subject>

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 10:33:22 -0400

14 lines

<no subject>

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 08:44:38 -0400

28 lines

Acrobat 5 & Font Issues

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 22:21:18 -0700

31 lines

Re: Acrobat 5 & Font Issues

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 May 2003 07:49:34 -0400

44 lines

Re: Acrobat 5 & Font Issues

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 May 2003 22:40:01 -0700

49 lines

Annoying question

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:49:34 -0700

29 lines

ATypI Conference

Michael Stillwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 23:16:06 +1000

24 lines

Re: ATypI Conference

minikin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 10:19:07 -0600

34 lines

Re: ATypI Conference

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 09:00:43 -0700

33 lines

Re: Augereau

Thierry Bouche <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 May 2003 12:20:32 +0200

25 lines

Re: Augereau

Thierry Bouche <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 May 2003 14:22:44 +0200

23 lines

Re: Augereau

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 May 2003 09:16:23 -0600

24 lines

Beatrice Ward quote

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 16:23:16 +0200

20 lines

Re: Beatrice Ward quote

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 10:47:53 -0400

26 lines

Re: Beatrice Ward quote

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 10:50:05 -0400

30 lines

Re: Beatrice Ward quote

Zeina El Abed <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 18:10:06 +0200

53 lines

beatrice warde

shelley gruendler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 08:01:48 +0000

31 lines

Re: beatrice warde

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 17:03:56 +0200

42 lines

Re: beatrice warde

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 12:20:39 -0400

54 lines

Re: beatrice warde

minikin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 12:39:13 -0600

23 lines

Re: beatrice warde

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 15:49:46 +0200

30 lines

bitmap font

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 13:32:56 -0700

28 lines

Re: bitmap font

Jim Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 14:28:12 -0700

36 lines

Re: bitmap font

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 22:56:24 +0100

17 lines

Re: bitmap font

Rajiv Chandrabhanu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 10:14:30 +0530

37 lines

Re: bitmap font

Jim Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 08:04:14 -0700

30 lines

Re: bitmap font

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 08:42:01 -0700

30 lines

Charles Skaggs books at Smith College

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 16:53:31 -0400

28 lines

Dutch type, half-famous?

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 10:47:07 -0700

35 lines

Re: Dutch type, half-famous?

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 20:48:56 +0200

33 lines

Re: Dutch type, half-famous?

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 12:31:27 -0700

27 lines

Re: Dutch type, half-famous?

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 22:39:41 +0200

26 lines

Re: Dutch type, half-famous?

Jan Middendorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 15:48:28 +0100

51 lines

El Aparecido

Carlos Carpintero <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 11:18:28 -0300

40 lines

Re: El Aparecido

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:11:42 -0700

37 lines

Re: El Aparecido

Carlos Carpintero <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 16:23:24 -0300

39 lines

Font Awards Categories

Arthur <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 02:39:21 +0800

24 lines

Re: Font Awards Categories

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 17:46:44 -0700

33 lines

Re: Font Awards Categories

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 20:05:19 -0500

25 lines

Font Lab question...

JAZZ - Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 May 2003 10:05:19 +0200

21 lines

Re: Font Lab question...

Yuri Yarmola <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 May 2003 17:21:08 +0300

19 lines

Re: Font Lab question...

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 May 2003 07:04:54 +0100

30 lines

FotoStar

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 13:14:50 -0700

33 lines

Re: FotoStar

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 16:57:16 EDT

38 lines

Re: FotoStar

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 17:04:20 -0400

28 lines

Re: FotoStar

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 17:04:39 -0400

31 lines

Re: FotoStar

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 23:07:06 +0200

28 lines

Re: FotoStar

Silver MayKitten <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 16:10:54 -0700

73 lines

Re: FotoStar

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 20:48:24 -0400

24 lines

Re: FotoStar

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 12:08:08 EDT

33 lines

Re: FotoStar

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 12:21:13 EDT

31 lines

Fw: Re: 5 most famous type designers

Fabrizio Serra <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 May 2003 00:31:03 +0200

34 lines

google away

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 13:33:01 -0400

17 lines

Re: google away

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 12:17:04 -0700

34 lines

Re: google away

Martin L'Allier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 15:28:24 -0400

26 lines

Re: google away

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 15:38:38 -0400

34 lines

Re: google away

MacKinnon Simpson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:42:48 -1000

39 lines

Re: google away

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 13:53:49 -0700

21 lines

Re: google away

Fraser, Jay S <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 15:17:25 -0600

44 lines

Re: google away

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 14:32:46 -0700

24 lines

Re: google away

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 19:26:02 -0300

29 lines

Re: google away

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 18:21:06 -0700

28 lines

Re: google away (Warde + invisible goblin)

Jan Middendorp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 01:46:08 +0200

42 lines

Grant me this

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 15:49:00 -0400

12 lines

Graphion's Online Type Museum-gone?

Ryan, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 May 2003 12:22:35 +0100

21 lines

Greek characters in Hoefler Text Roman Alt

Yateendra Joshi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 May 2003 15:03:52 +0530

18 lines

Handel Gothic

Rafael Iskin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 16:37:13 -0300

22 lines

Re: Handel Gothic

Rafael Iskin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 21:18:31 -0300

24 lines

Re: Handel Gothic

Kathleen Tinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 21:50:57 -0400

33 lines

Help needed: font not printing in Word

Roger M Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 10:18:58 +0100

34 lines

Here's a nice site on typography

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 09:50:03 -0400

20 lines

Hermann Zapf to speak in Chicago, Tues. May 20

Tamye Riggs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 11:12:49 -0700

28 lines

Intriguing font

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 09:42:46 -0400

38 lines

Re: Intriguing font

Rag & Bone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 09:56:20 -0400

29 lines

Re: Intriguing font

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 07:09:43 -0700

30 lines

Re: Intriguing font

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 10:22:09 -0400

35 lines

Re: Intriguing font

Ryan, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 09:33:25 +0100

44 lines

Les Dix

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:58:11 -0400

26 lines

Re: Les Dix

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 12:42:41 -0400

26 lines

Re: Les Dix

Silver MayKitten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:58:04 -0700

46 lines

Re: Les Dix

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 07:14:05 +0100

24 lines

Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 10:30:07 -0700

30 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 13:37:09 -0400

28 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 13:47:47 -0400

32 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 14:12:43 -0400

42 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 15:05:09 -0400

48 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 16:00:11 EDT

28 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 16:15:57 EDT

25 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 16:31:56 -0400

50 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 16:37:55 -0400

26 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 19:49:03 -0700

25 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 23:16:02 -0400

22 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 20:29:15 -0700

50 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 May 2003 14:51:21 +0200

53 lines

Libre no so mellow*

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 12:35:47 -0400

20 lines

LT Gianotten, half-famous?

Henk Gianotten <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 01:32:52 +0200

21 lines

Re: LT Gianotten, half-famous?

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 21:15:38 -0700

37 lines

Re: LT Gianotten, half-famous?

Diederik Corvers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 14:07:43 +0200

56 lines

LT Gianotten, half-famous?

Henk Gianotten <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 23:03:30 +0200

47 lines

new & help

Johan Sjöstrand <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 09:25:30 +0200

24 lines

on-line typographers vanish

plain*clothes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 May 2003 11:10:01 -0700

17 lines

Re: on-line typographers vanish

Jared Benson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 20:06:52 -0700

18 lines

Re: Origin of Papyrus font?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 11:10:06 -0400

38 lines

Re: Origin of Papyrus font?

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 11:35:41 -0400

48 lines

Re: Origin of Papyrus font?

Delve Withrington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 09:14:34 -0700

59 lines

orthotypograhy

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 00:17:00 +0200

31 lines

OT: making quality PDFs (was Re: Annoying question)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 12:59:14 -0400

44 lines

Possibly OT - Designing on Mac Cinema and Studio plasma displays

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 May 2003 18:42:18 -0400

30 lines

Re: Possibly OT - Designing on Mac Cinema and Studio plasma displays

Arthur <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 May 2003 08:41:31 +0800

20 lines

Re: Possibly OT - Designing on Mac Cinema and Studio plasma displays

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 May 2003 12:08:35 -0400

24 lines

Re: Possibly OT - Designing on Mac Cinema and Studio plasma displays

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 May 2003 11:24:01 -0700

37 lines

Re: Possibly OT - Designing on Mac Cinema and Studio plasma displays

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 May 2003 13:59:33 -0500

41 lines

Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 14:44:29 -0400

29 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

ben <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 13:00:45 -0600

17 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

Ryan, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 11:35:04 +0100

32 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 07:45:06 -0500

29 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 08:53:54 -0400

62 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 09:40:44 -0500

30 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 09:46:57 -0400

37 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

Jean F Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 15:50:42 +0200

36 lines

Spell check perils

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 May 2003 16:04:56 -0700

32 lines

Re: Spell check perils

Jim Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 May 2003 16:12:02 -0700

24 lines

Re: Spell check perils

Jorge de Buen U. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 May 2003 16:51:23 -0700

17 lines

Tap dancing potatoes and rotten tomatoes.

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 10:19:19 -0400

15 lines

The 10 best (was Re: what type trends are you seeing?)

Jan Middendorp <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 11:33:03 +0200

48 lines

Re: The 10 best (was Re: what type trends are you seeing?)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 06:53:19 -0700

34 lines

the search is on

Chris Shaddock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 May 2003 16:03:03 -0600

30 lines

Re: the search is on

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 10:32:51 -0700

38 lines

Re: the search is on

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 10:43:29 -0600

25 lines

truetype?

Dustin Norlander <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 May 2003 17:20:19 -0400

24 lines

Re: truetype?

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 May 2003 12:40:10 -700

65 lines

Re: truetype?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 May 2003 02:59:08 -0400

44 lines

unsubscribe typo-l

Cathryn Magee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 07:35:16 -0700

15 lines

Utopia

Thierry Bouche <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 15:31:27 +0200

29 lines

Re: Utopia

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 07:30:14 -0700

42 lines

Re: web page listing free e-texts

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 17:13:59 +0200

55 lines

web page listing free e-texts on typography - comments and critique requested

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 23:07:51 -0400

39 lines

Re: web page listing free e-texts on typography - comments and critique requested

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 00:46:19 -0600

31 lines

Re: web page listing free e-texts on typography - comments and critique requested

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 13:51:45 -0400

110 lines

Re: web page listing free e-texts on typography - comments andcritique requested

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 14:00:49 -0400

45 lines

what type trends are you seeing?

Ilise Benun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 09:01:25 -0400

24 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 09:22:23 -0400

53 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

toby stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 19:48:54 +0100

67 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 08:12:46 +0100

42 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 00:56:40 -0700

52 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:25:48 +0100

56 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 08:59:45 -0700

54 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 12:10:27 -0400

134 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:26:50 -0700

30 lines

What's up with Typographica?

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 May 2003 08:27:53 -0500

18 lines

Re: What's up with Typographica?

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 May 2003 09:42:15 -0500

26 lines

Re: What's up with Typographica?

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 May 2003 21:28:06 -0600

26 lines


Back to: Main TYPO-L Page



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager