LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


May 2003


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TYPO-L Home

TYPO-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re: 'That' rule?

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 09:27:12 EDT

28 lines

Re: 'That' rule?

Patsy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 23:48:34 -0600

50 lines

Re: 'That' rule?

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 21:12:21 +0100

15 lines

Re: 'That' rule?

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 15:31:54 -0400

31 lines

Re: 'That' rule?

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 15:44:44 EDT

47 lines

Re: 'That' rule?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 15:23:44 -0400

28 lines

'That' rule?

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 19:42:12 +0100

17 lines

Re: 24 May

Erich Alb <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 May 2003 07:54:51 +0200

28 lines

24 May

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 May 2003 21:03:24 +0100

21 lines

29-May-2003: you might enjoy these two articles on handwriting, from a Canadian newspaper

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 14:04:39 -0400

33 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 08:05:13 -0700

27 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 14:05:19 -0400

21 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 09:24:41 -0700

37 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 09:00:10 -0700

37 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Jean F Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 17:41:19 +0200

38 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 07:00:02 -0700

22 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 11:34:33 -0700

26 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 11:25:05 -0700

39 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Adam Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 12:47:58 -0400

118 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Kathleen Tinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 15:58:05 -0400

64 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 12:21:57 EDT

33 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 12:11:46 -0400

23 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 10:51:52 -0400

28 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 16:37:35 +0200

22 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 10:36:36 -0400

88 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 07:34:44 -0700

21 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

toby stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 15:31:33 +0100

21 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 16:09:44 +0200

30 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 09:57:48 -0400

28 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Wells Book Arts Center <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 09:34:09 -0400

44 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 08:27:47 -0400

32 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

kai bernau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 14:21:23 +0200

38 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 09:56:26 +0200

54 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 12:27:21 -0700

36 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 15:13:40 -0400

29 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Fabrizio Serra <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 May 2003 05:57:00 +0100

33 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 23:34:22 -0300

29 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Fabrizio Serra <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 May 2003 01:03:07 +0200

41 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Jean F Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 21:55:40 +0000

51 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 12:46:05 -0700

42 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 15:30:37 -0400

20 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 15:31:27 -0400

29 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 15:25:40 -0500

25 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 15:21:07 -0400

24 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

L.A. Book Arts, Inc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 12:05:31 -0700

18 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 15:04:29 -0400

17 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Martin L'Allier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 14:52:51 -0400

78 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 15:03:50 -0400

20 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

minikin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 12:59:27 -0600

17 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 11:53:34 -0700

26 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 14:54:31 -0400

41 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 12:49:13 -0600

29 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 11:43:07 -0700

19 lines

Re: 5 most famous type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 14:32:00 -0400

50 lines

5 most famous type designers

Ilise Benun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 13:53:56 -0400

17 lines

Re: 5 most wanted type designers

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 14:37:47 -0700

65 lines

Re: 5 most wanted type designers

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 15:48:45 -0400

44 lines

<no subject>

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 08:44:38 -0400

28 lines

<no subject>

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 10:33:22 -0400

14 lines

Re: Acrobat 5 & Font Issues

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 May 2003 22:40:01 -0700

49 lines

Re: Acrobat 5 & Font Issues

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 May 2003 07:49:34 -0400

44 lines

Acrobat 5 & Font Issues

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 22:21:18 -0700

31 lines

Annoying question

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:49:34 -0700

29 lines

Re: ATypI Conference

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 09:00:43 -0700

33 lines

Re: ATypI Conference

minikin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 10:19:07 -0600

34 lines

ATypI Conference

Michael Stillwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 23:16:06 +1000

24 lines

Re: Augereau

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 May 2003 09:16:23 -0600

24 lines

Re: Augereau

Thierry Bouche <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 May 2003 14:22:44 +0200

23 lines

Re: Augereau

Thierry Bouche <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 May 2003 12:20:32 +0200

25 lines

Re: Beatrice Ward quote

Zeina El Abed <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 18:10:06 +0200

53 lines

Re: Beatrice Ward quote

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 10:50:05 -0400

30 lines

Re: Beatrice Ward quote

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 10:47:53 -0400

26 lines

Beatrice Ward quote

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 16:23:16 +0200

20 lines

Re: beatrice warde

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 15:49:46 +0200

30 lines

Re: beatrice warde

minikin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 12:39:13 -0600

23 lines

Re: beatrice warde

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 12:20:39 -0400

54 lines

Re: beatrice warde

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 17:03:56 +0200

42 lines

beatrice warde

shelley gruendler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 08:01:48 +0000

31 lines

Re: bitmap font

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 08:42:01 -0700

30 lines

Re: bitmap font

Jim Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 08:04:14 -0700

30 lines

Re: bitmap font

Rajiv Chandrabhanu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 10:14:30 +0530

37 lines

Re: bitmap font

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 22:56:24 +0100

17 lines

Re: bitmap font

Jim Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 14:28:12 -0700

36 lines

bitmap font

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 13:32:56 -0700

28 lines

Charles Skaggs books at Smith College

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 May 2003 16:53:31 -0400

28 lines

Re: Dutch type, half-famous?

Jan Middendorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 15:48:28 +0100

51 lines

Re: Dutch type, half-famous?

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 22:39:41 +0200

26 lines

Re: Dutch type, half-famous?

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 12:31:27 -0700

27 lines

Re: Dutch type, half-famous?

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 20:48:56 +0200

33 lines

Dutch type, half-famous?

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 10:47:07 -0700

35 lines

Re: El Aparecido

Carlos Carpintero <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 16:23:24 -0300

39 lines

Re: El Aparecido

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:11:42 -0700

37 lines

El Aparecido

Carlos Carpintero <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 11:18:28 -0300

40 lines

Re: Font Awards Categories

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 20:05:19 -0500

25 lines

Re: Font Awards Categories

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 17:46:44 -0700

33 lines

Font Awards Categories

Arthur <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 02:39:21 +0800

24 lines

Re: Font Lab question...

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 May 2003 07:04:54 +0100

30 lines

Re: Font Lab question...

Yuri Yarmola <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 May 2003 17:21:08 +0300

19 lines

Font Lab question...

JAZZ - Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 May 2003 10:05:19 +0200

21 lines

Re: FotoStar

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 12:21:13 EDT

31 lines

Re: FotoStar

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 12:08:08 EDT

33 lines

Re: FotoStar

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 20:48:24 -0400

24 lines

Re: FotoStar

Silver MayKitten <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 16:10:54 -0700

73 lines

Re: FotoStar

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 23:07:06 +0200

28 lines

Re: FotoStar

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 17:04:39 -0400

31 lines

Re: FotoStar

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 17:04:20 -0400

28 lines

Re: FotoStar

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 16:57:16 EDT

38 lines

FotoStar

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 13:14:50 -0700

33 lines

Fw: Re: 5 most famous type designers

Fabrizio Serra <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 May 2003 00:31:03 +0200

34 lines

Re: google away

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 18:21:06 -0700

28 lines

Re: google away

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 19:26:02 -0300

29 lines

Re: google away

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 14:32:46 -0700

24 lines

Re: google away

Fraser, Jay S <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 15:17:25 -0600

44 lines

Re: google away

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 13:53:49 -0700

21 lines

Re: google away

MacKinnon Simpson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:42:48 -1000

39 lines

Re: google away

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 15:38:38 -0400

34 lines

Re: google away

Martin L'Allier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 15:28:24 -0400

26 lines

Re: google away

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 12:17:04 -0700

34 lines

google away

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 13:33:01 -0400

17 lines

Re: google away (Warde + invisible goblin)

Jan Middendorp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 01:46:08 +0200

42 lines

Grant me this

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 15:49:00 -0400

12 lines

Graphion's Online Type Museum-gone?

Ryan, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 May 2003 12:22:35 +0100

21 lines

Greek characters in Hoefler Text Roman Alt

Yateendra Joshi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 May 2003 15:03:52 +0530

18 lines

Re: Handel Gothic

Kathleen Tinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 21:50:57 -0400

33 lines

Re: Handel Gothic

Rafael Iskin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 21:18:31 -0300

24 lines

Handel Gothic

Rafael Iskin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 16:37:13 -0300

22 lines

Help needed: font not printing in Word

Roger M Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 10:18:58 +0100

34 lines

Here's a nice site on typography

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 May 2003 09:50:03 -0400

20 lines

Hermann Zapf to speak in Chicago, Tues. May 20

Tamye Riggs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 11:12:49 -0700

28 lines

Re: Intriguing font

Ryan, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 09:33:25 +0100

44 lines

Re: Intriguing font

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 10:22:09 -0400

35 lines

Re: Intriguing font

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 07:09:43 -0700

30 lines

Re: Intriguing font

Rag & Bone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 09:56:20 -0400

29 lines

Intriguing font

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 09:42:46 -0400

38 lines

Re: Les Dix

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 07:14:05 +0100

24 lines

Re: Les Dix

Silver MayKitten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:58:04 -0700

46 lines

Re: Les Dix

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 12:42:41 -0400

26 lines

Les Dix

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:58:11 -0400

26 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 May 2003 14:51:21 +0200

53 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 20:29:15 -0700

50 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 23:16:02 -0400

22 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 19:49:03 -0700

25 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 16:37:55 -0400

26 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 16:31:56 -0400

50 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 16:15:57 EDT

25 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 16:00:11 EDT

28 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 15:05:09 -0400

48 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 14:12:43 -0400

42 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 13:47:47 -0400

32 lines

Re: Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 13:37:09 -0400

28 lines

Let's talk dirty in Hawai'ian

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 10:30:07 -0700

30 lines

Libre no so mellow*

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 12:35:47 -0400

20 lines

LT Gianotten, half-famous?

Henk Gianotten <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 23:03:30 +0200

47 lines

Re: LT Gianotten, half-famous?

Diederik Corvers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 14:07:43 +0200

56 lines

Re: LT Gianotten, half-famous?

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 21:15:38 -0700

37 lines

LT Gianotten, half-famous?

Henk Gianotten <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 01:32:52 +0200

21 lines

new & help

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Johan_Sj=F6strand?= <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 09:25:30 +0200

24 lines

Re: on-line typographers vanish

Jared Benson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 May 2003 20:06:52 -0700

18 lines

on-line typographers vanish

plain*clothes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 May 2003 11:10:01 -0700

17 lines

Re: Origin of Papyrus font?

Delve Withrington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 09:14:34 -0700

59 lines

Re: Origin of Papyrus font?

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 11:35:41 -0400

48 lines

Re: Origin of Papyrus font?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 11:10:06 -0400

38 lines

orthotypograhy

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 00:17:00 +0200

31 lines

OT: making quality PDFs (was Re: Annoying question)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 12:59:14 -0400

44 lines

Re: Possibly OT - Designing on Mac Cinema and Studio plasma displays

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 May 2003 13:59:33 -0500

41 lines

Re: Possibly OT - Designing on Mac Cinema and Studio plasma displays

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 May 2003 11:24:01 -0700

37 lines

Re: Possibly OT - Designing on Mac Cinema and Studio plasma displays

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 May 2003 12:08:35 -0400

24 lines

Re: Possibly OT - Designing on Mac Cinema and Studio plasma displays

Arthur <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 May 2003 08:41:31 +0800

20 lines

Possibly OT - Designing on Mac Cinema and Studio plasma displays

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 May 2003 18:42:18 -0400

30 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

Jean F Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 15:50:42 +0200

36 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 09:46:57 -0400

37 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 09:40:44 -0500

30 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 08:53:54 -0400

62 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 07:45:06 -0500

29 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

Ryan, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 11:35:04 +0100

32 lines

Re: Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

ben <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 13:00:45 -0600

17 lines

Quark XTension for automatic ligature placement

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 14:44:29 -0400

29 lines

Re: Spell check perils

Jorge de Buen U. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 May 2003 16:51:23 -0700

17 lines

Re: Spell check perils

Jim Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 May 2003 16:12:02 -0700

24 lines

Spell check perils

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 May 2003 16:04:56 -0700

32 lines

Tap dancing potatoes and rotten tomatoes.

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 10:19:19 -0400

15 lines

Re: The 10 best (was Re: what type trends are you seeing?)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 06:53:19 -0700

34 lines

The 10 best (was Re: what type trends are you seeing?)

Jan Middendorp <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 11:33:03 +0200

48 lines

Re: the search is on

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 10:43:29 -0600

25 lines

Re: the search is on

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 10:32:51 -0700

38 lines

the search is on

Chris Shaddock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 May 2003 16:03:03 -0600

30 lines

Re: truetype?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 May 2003 02:59:08 -0400

44 lines

Re: truetype?

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 May 2003 12:40:10 -700

65 lines

truetype?

Dustin Norlander <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 May 2003 17:20:19 -0400

24 lines

unsubscribe typo-l

Cathryn Magee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 07:35:16 -0700

15 lines

Re: Utopia

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 07:30:14 -0700

42 lines

Utopia

Thierry Bouche <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 15:31:27 +0200

29 lines

Re: web page listing free e-texts

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 17:13:59 +0200

55 lines

Re: web page listing free e-texts on typography - comments and critique requested

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 13:51:45 -0400

110 lines

Re: web page listing free e-texts on typography - comments and critique requested

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 00:46:19 -0600

31 lines

web page listing free e-texts on typography - comments and critique requested

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 23:07:51 -0400

39 lines

Re: web page listing free e-texts on typography - comments andcritique requested

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 14:00:49 -0400

45 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:26:50 -0700

30 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 12:10:27 -0400

134 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 08:59:45 -0700

54 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 09:25:48 +0100

56 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 00:56:40 -0700

52 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 May 2003 08:12:46 +0100

42 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

toby stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 19:48:54 +0100

67 lines

Re: what type trends are you seeing?

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 09:22:23 -0400

53 lines

what type trends are you seeing?

Ilise Benun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 09:01:25 -0400

24 lines

Re: What's up with Typographica?

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 May 2003 21:28:06 -0600

26 lines

Re: What's up with Typographica?

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 May 2003 09:42:15 -0500

26 lines

What's up with Typographica?

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 May 2003 08:27:53 -0500

18 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
February 1994
January 1994
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager