LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


October 2002


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TYPO-L Home

TYPO-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Most Recent First

From

Date

Size

"empastelar"

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:45:09 -0400

66 lines

Re: "empastelar"

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 05:40:47 +0100

34 lines

Re: "empastelar"

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 01:17:08 -0400

44 lines

Re: "empastelar"

Silver MayKitten <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 04:41:55 -0700

56 lines

"LeserInnen", "Allemannen" and Dutch beer

Henk Gianotten <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:30:51 +0200

38 lines

"old fart"????

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:58:28 -0700

58 lines

<No subject>

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:39:19 +0200

108 lines

<no subject>

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:04:08 -0500

31 lines

Re: <no subject>

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:24:05 -0000

49 lines

Re: <no subject>

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:18:35 -0500

43 lines

Re: <no subject>

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:39:55 EST

40 lines

Re: <no subject>

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:40:51 EST

23 lines

Re: <no subject>

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:16:13 -0500

29 lines

Re: <no subject>

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:49:43 EST

24 lines

??

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:54:19 -0700

26 lines

Re: ??

toby stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:06:17 +0100

18 lines

Re: ??

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 09:03:13 -0700

45 lines

American scripts

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:03:40 +0000

19 lines

Re: American scripts

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:49:38 -0500

33 lines

Any dutch type designer?

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 05:55:32 -0700

26 lines

Ape and Apenstaartje

Henk Gianotten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:46:03 +0100

28 lines

Re: Ape and Apenstaartje

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:11:44 -0500

25 lines

Re: Ape and Apenstaartje

Yuri Yarmola <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:44:16 +0300

15 lines

apocalypse now

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:52:03 +0100

33 lines

ATypI-Roma again

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:23:06 +0200

27 lines

B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:57:31 -0400

36 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:35:28 -0400

46 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:50:16 EDT

31 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:31:53 -0400

30 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:38:02 -0400

30 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:16:30 -0400

25 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:33:56 -0400

33 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 01:25:52 +0200

94 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

jeff borisch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:31:27 -0400

24 lines

bald jokes

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:55:57 -0700

26 lines

Re: bald jokes

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:15:29 -0700

29 lines

Barry McWilliams/O&M Los/OMG is out of the office.

Barry McWilliams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 02:42:06 -0700

37 lines

Barry McWilliams/O&M Los/OMG is out of the office.

Barry McWilliams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:44:06 -0700

37 lines

Beh

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:27:01 +0100

22 lines

Bread type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 19:46:43 +0200

21 lines

Re: Bread type

Fountain <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:47:30 +0200

28 lines

Re: Bread type

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:09:09 -0400

25 lines

Re: Bread type

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:17:25 -0400

41 lines

Re: Bread type

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:17:52 -0400

18 lines

Re: Bread type

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:26:16 -0400

36 lines

Re: Bread type

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:34:40 -0500

32 lines

Re: Bread type

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:57:56 +0100

32 lines

Re: Bread type

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 22:19:15 +0100

32 lines

Re: Bread type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:25:44 +0200

25 lines

Re: Bread type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:39:22 +0200

51 lines

Re: Bread type

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 00:44:59 +0100

15 lines

Re: Bread type

brid <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 13:21:05 +0930

17 lines

Re: Bread type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:06:25 +0200

17 lines

Re: Bread type

Jose Kazi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:43:26 -0700

32 lines

Re: Bread type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:47:18 +0200

35 lines

Re: Bread type

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:14:26 -0700

26 lines

Re: Bread type

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:02:55 -0300

59 lines

Re: Bread type

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:08:09 +0200

43 lines

Re: Bread type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:30:54 +0200

62 lines

Re: Bread type

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:27:12 -0300

35 lines

Re: Bread type

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:09:43 -0700

30 lines

Re: Bread type

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:05:49 -0400

36 lines

Re: Bread type

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:07:52 -0400

35 lines

Bread type and "pan de texto"

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:23:18 -0700

24 lines

Re: Bread type and "pan de texto"

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:28:54 +0200

34 lines

call for papers

shelley gruendler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:52:27 +0000

46 lines

Casing question

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:06:27 +0100

21 lines

Re: Casing question

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:46:24 EDT

31 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:58:09 -0400

37 lines

Casing question

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:09:20 +0100

38 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:15:42 -0400

28 lines

Re: Casing question

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:38:05 EDT

39 lines

Re: Casing question

toby stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:48:01 +0100

32 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:51:46 +0100

48 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:53:21 +0100

35 lines

Re: Casing question

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:28:14 +0100

68 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:37:48 +0100

29 lines

Re: Casing question

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:44:06 -0400

32 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:46:55 -0400

27 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:22:26 +0100

28 lines

Re: Casing question

Lucans, Gunars <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:36:35 -0500

23 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:46:12 -0400

26 lines

Re: Casing question

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:29:30 -0700

31 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:36:53 -0400

31 lines

Re: Casing question

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 03:25:42 +0100

41 lines

Re: Casing question

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:34:20 -0700

24 lines

Re: Casing question

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:34:36 -0700

29 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:50:00 -0400

28 lines

Re: Casing question

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:02:06 EDT

36 lines

Re: Casing question

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:08:56 +0100

39 lines

Re: Casing question

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:21:23 -0700

33 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:52:43 +0100

28 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:35:41 +0100

56 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:11:27 -0700

57 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:22:05 -0400

32 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:25:09 -0700

32 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Nikolai Razouvayev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:15:22 +1000

26 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Nikolai Razouvayev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:15:55 +1000

41 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:42:57 +0100

76 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:20:25 +0100

34 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:57:04 -0400

23 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:25:12 +0100

26 lines

Character nomenclature

Bill Tozier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:17:10 -0400

45 lines

character nomenclature

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:37:53 -0600

18 lines

Re: character nomenclature

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:33:03 -0400

34 lines

Re: character nomenclature

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:55:33 -0600

35 lines

Re: character nomenclature

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:24:10 -0500

39 lines

Conference de Roger Chartier (Lyon)

Alan Marshall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:09:46 +0200

80 lines

Re: Conference de Roger Chartier (Lyon)

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 06:42:16 -0400

20 lines

Cooper Black, The Movie

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:23:23 -0700

22 lines

Re: Coptic Visual Fluency

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:37:24 +0100

55 lines

Coptic Visual Fluency, was Re: Casing question gone Religious

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 14:33:21 -700

42 lines

Re: Coptic Visual Fluency, was Re: Casing question gone Religious

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:44:43 EDT

27 lines

Differents character's sets, differents .FOG?

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:50:25 -0700

25 lines

Re: Differents character's sets, differents .FOG?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:37:55 -0400

44 lines

Re: Differents character's sets, differents .FOG?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:52:48 -0400

19 lines

Differents character's sets, differents .FOG? What's about the kerning data?

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:08:03 -0700

55 lines

Re: Differents character's sets, differents .FOG? What's about the kerning data?

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:46:17 -0500

35 lines

Re: Differents character's sets, differents .FOG? What's about the kerning data?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:34:58 -0400

46 lines

Dingbats

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:31:51 +0200

20 lines

Re: Dingbats

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:59:50 -0400

31 lines

Re: Dingbats

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:26:33 -0500

39 lines

Re: Dingbats

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:04:46 +0100

31 lines

Re: Dingbats

brian sooy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:50:10 -0400

30 lines

Re: Dingbats

Federico Jordan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:25:35 -0700

31 lines

Re: Dingbats

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:16:40 -0400

28 lines

Re: Dingbats

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 07:48:36 -0400

52 lines

Re: Dingbats

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 07:41:29 -700

28 lines

Faux letterpress

Bill Tozier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:01:32 -0400

54 lines

Re: Faux letterpress

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 07:23:36 +0100

51 lines

Re: Faux letterpress

Ryan, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:55:29 +0100

152 lines

Re: Faux letterpress

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 06:19:49 -0700

17 lines

Re: Faux letterpress

Bill Tozier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:23:41 -0400

44 lines

Re: Faux letterpress

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 05:55:41 +0100

48 lines

Re: Faux letterpress

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 06:39:08 -0700

35 lines

Faux Pas - Faux Press

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:42:01 -0400

32 lines

Faux Pas - Faux Press

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:45:33 -0400

34 lines

Re: Faux Pas - Faux Press

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:12:21 -0500

20 lines

Re: Faux Pas - Faux Press

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:14:28 -0700

61 lines

Re: Faux Pas - Faux Press

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:50:57 +0100

19 lines

Female Honorifics, was Re: The character "@" and gender studies.

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:29:28 -700

48 lines

Fog custom font exporting woes

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 19:05:29 +0100

35 lines

Font Reserve / OSX doesn't see the bitmaps

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:17:11 -0400

42 lines

FontLab 4.5 for Windows

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:41:12 +0100

23 lines

FREE HRANT!

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:33:26 -0700

27 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:34:16 +0100

17 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:46:56 -0400

24 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:57:41 -0700

25 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:06:36 -0400

21 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:19:33 -0400

24 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:20:18 -0700

28 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:37:54 -0400

25 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:55:38 -0700

32 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:01:03 -0400

27 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:36:27 -0500

29 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:42:28 -0700

26 lines

FREE HRANT!, HOAX...

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:31:30 -0700

20 lines

Gaelic fonts

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:01:14 +0100

22 lines

Gaelic fonts

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:41:56 +0000

50 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:33:56 +0100

75 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:46:44 +0000

82 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:54:03 EST

30 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:56:35 -0600

32 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:30:50 +0000

39 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:31:37 +0100

33 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:40:21 +0100

26 lines

Gaelic fonts

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:17:01 +0000

141 lines

Gaelic fox and hound

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:22:13 +0100

30 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:30:44 +0200

34 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:48:43 +0100

37 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:41:09 +0200

68 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:45:43 +0100

51 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:57:05 -0400

38 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:34:18 +0100

42 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:35:47 -0400

26 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:47:22 +0100

24 lines

Gaelic typefaces

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:52:16 +0100

27 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:18:38 +0100

91 lines

garbled

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:32:08 +0200

34 lines

Re: Gender studies...

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:00:37 -0000

48 lines

Re: Gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:54:52 EST

23 lines

Re: Gender studies...

Teressa Terry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:22:33 -0800

28 lines

He's Armenian but he's proud anyway.

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:24:34 -0800

38 lines

High phonation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:12:04 -0400

52 lines

Re: High phonation

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:54:59 -0700

30 lines

Re: High phonation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:49:59 EDT

25 lines

Re: High phonation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:00:38 -0400

22 lines

Re: High phonation

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:00:47 +0200

60 lines

Re: High phonation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:36:17 -0400

31 lines

Re: High phonation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:50:54 EDT

25 lines

Re: High phonation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:56:29 EDT

35 lines

Re: High phonation

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:56:54 +0200

34 lines

Historical @ Sign

Ingo Preuss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:35:59 +0100

22 lines

Re: Historical @ Sign

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:20:03 -0400

38 lines

History of the Paragraph-Sign?

MiCHi Bundscherer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 04:59:49 +0200

29 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:28:18 -0400

29 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:11:17 -0400

37 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:23:56 -0400

40 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:34:15 -0400

31 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:57:13 +0100

18 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:43:32 -0700

71 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:50:24 -0700

22 lines

History of Writing Systems

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 08:10:51 -700

25 lines

Re: History of Writing Systems

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 22:40:49 +0000

33 lines

Re: History of Writing Systems

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:50:59 +0200

27 lines

Re: History of Writing Systems

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 06:16:22 -0600

61 lines

History of Writing Systems

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 05:26:47 -0700

29 lines

hybrid cyrillic

peter bilak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:40:25 +0200

37 lines

Hybrid Cyrillic

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:02:39 +0100

52 lines

Re: hybrid cyrillic

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 13:04:41 -0700

48 lines

Re: hybrid cyrillic

peter bilak <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 01:33:11 +0200

68 lines

Re: hybrid cyrillic

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 17:58:47 -0400

18 lines

Re: hybrid cyrillic

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 15:49:06 -0700

63 lines

Re: hybrid cyrillic

Nikolai Razouvayev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:15:58 +1000

40 lines

Hyphenation

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:52:55 +0200

19 lines

Re: Hyphenation

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:01:14 -0400

21 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:05:22 -0400

34 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:09:18 -0400

17 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:14:55 +0100

23 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:17:43 EDT

34 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:24:00 EDT

21 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:24:55 -0700

39 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:37:21 +0200

27 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:42:23 +0200

44 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:48:31 +0200

47 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:30:23 +0100

33 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:11:16 -0400

52 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:14:50 +0100

17 lines

Hyphenation

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 07:19:58 -0700

16 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:24:26 +0200

60 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:49:38 -0600

34 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:14:29 -700

59 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:53:50 -0400

34 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:29:39 -0700

26 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:00:32 -0400

56 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Lewis Kirk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:18:32 -0400

22 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:37:29 -0400

29 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:14:41 EDT

35 lines

Re: Hyphenation

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:30:01 +0200

30 lines

Re: Hyphenation

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:36:09 +0200

25 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 22:47:39 +0100

22 lines

Re: Hyphenation

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:58:46 +0200

27 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:42:46 -0700

26 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:46:09 -0700

28 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:25:20 +0100

41 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:21:03 +0100

25 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:35:33 +0100

44 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:47:11 +0100

23 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:07:21 EDT

23 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:33:28 -0400

22 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 02:55:02 +0100

28 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:28:05 EDT

27 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:15:09 -0400

22 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:10:32 -0700

23 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 13:13:28 -0700

100 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael S. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:12:07 +1000

57 lines

Re: Hyphenation to jump!

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:08:27 -0500

33 lines

Re: Hyphenation to jump!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:14:45 -0400

26 lines

I also use email, not carrier pigeons.

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:15:06 -0700

22 lines

Re: I also use email, not carrier pigeons.

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:08:08 +0100

18 lines

I'm just proud

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:10:28 +0100

68 lines

I'm not German but I'm proud anyway.

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:31:05 -0800

107 lines

I'm not Irish but I'm proud anyway

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:07:29 -0800

102 lines

Re: I'm not Irish but I'm proud anyway

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:36:02 +0100

21 lines

In too far

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:34:12 -0400

29 lines

Re: In too far

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:51:17 +0100

20 lines

Re: In too far

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:01:18 -0400

28 lines

Interesting dingbat 'font'...

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 06:43:44 -0700

18 lines

Re: Interesting dingbat 'font'...

Federico Jordan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:27:41 -0700

32 lines

Re: Interesting dingbat 'font'...

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:37:12 -0700

24 lines

Re: Interesting dingbat 'font'...

Federico Jordan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:46:14 -0700

32 lines

Interesting site, or, Pilcrow's Progress

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:51:56 -0400

24 lines

Irish mythology -- off subject (sorry)

Fraser, Jay S <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:57:57 -0600

30 lines

Re: Irish mythology -- off subject (sorry)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:03:51 -0400

25 lines

Re: Irish mythology -- off subject (sorry)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:01:27 +0100

18 lines

Re: Irish mythology -- off subject (sorry)

Fraser, Jay S <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:15:06 -0600

40 lines

Irish personal names

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:46:51 +0000

75 lines

Re: Irish personal names

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:22:36 -0000

35 lines

Re: Irish personal names

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:39:03 -0500

23 lines

Re: Irish personal names

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:59:50 +0100

46 lines

Re: Irish personal names

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:36:12 -0800

27 lines

Re: Irish personal names

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:15:52 EST

31 lines

Re: Irish personal names

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 01:43:08 +0100

25 lines

Re: Irish personal names

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:34:29 -700

36 lines

Janiszewski's Frothy

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:56:08 -0800

14 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

michaellynch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:37:24 -0800

25 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:59:01 -0400

35 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:58:46 -0600

25 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

michaellynch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:26:36 -0800

53 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

plain*clothes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:39:16 -0800

48 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:00:12 +0100

41 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:00:48 -0700

30 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

plain*clothes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:28:58 -0800

21 lines

Judging font quality by control points

Yateendra Joshi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:08:07 +0530

18 lines

Re: Judging font quality by control points

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:46:05 +0200

31 lines

Re: Judging font quality by control points

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:13:15 -0700

29 lines

Re: Judging font quality by control points

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 07:48:04 -700

61 lines

Re: Judging font quality by control points

Patrick Gundlach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:41:10 +0200

27 lines

Re: Judging font quality by control points

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:05:08 -0400

35 lines

Keyboards again, lobbying

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:55:48 +0200

92 lines

Re: Keyboards again, lobbying

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:48:55 +0100

26 lines

Re: Keyboards again, lobbying

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:00:58 -0400

33 lines

Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

R Larabie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 02:02:16 -0400

18 lines

Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 05:01:25 -0700

25 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:32:13 +0200

35 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:22:35 -0300

38 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:36:12 +0200

47 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:48:56 -0300

28 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 07:40:09 -0700

34 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:46:25 -0400

26 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:36:44 -0300

30 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Priscila Farias <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 11:49:19 -0300

25 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:33:57 -0700

21 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 21:57:26 -0300

44 lines

Latin letters - Letras Latinas (errors)

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 05:53:43 -0700

17 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas (errors)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:04:20 +0200

26 lines

Letraset

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:30:01 -0700

25 lines

Re: Letraset

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:08:36 EDT

30 lines

Re: Letraset

Tom Dolan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:03:19 -0700

42 lines

Re: Letraset

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:19:58 -0700

35 lines

Re: Letraset

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:51:39 -0700

32 lines

Like, a bunch of stuff

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:43:16 -0800

56 lines

Looking for information

Jen ... <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 19:40:49 +1000

25 lines

MacOS sans custom keyboarding?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:48:41 -0700

20 lines

Re: MacOS sans custom keyboarding?

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 17:00:37 -0400

51 lines

Re: MacOS sans custom keyboarding?

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:01:19 -0400

38 lines

Macs for Serifs; was: I'm not Irish but I'm proud anyway

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:37:21 -0800

30 lines

Monotype's "European" type contest...

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:48:46 +0100

109 lines

Re: Monotype's "European" type contest...

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:25:59 +0100

30 lines

More Gaelic fonts than you can shake a stick at

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:23:33 +0100

106 lines

mouse drawing vs tablet

Rolf Langenhuijzen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:53:58 -0700

26 lines

Re: mouse drawing vs tablet

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:24:53 +0100

14 lines

Re: mouse drawing vs tablet

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:34:26 -0500

57 lines

Re: mouse drawing vs tablet

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:01:51 +0000

53 lines

Re: mouse drawing vs tablet & tech. misc. (was Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic) +)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:27:55 -0400

90 lines

Ms.punctuations; was: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:58:47 -0800

41 lines

Re: Ms.punctuations; was: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:10:42 EST

31 lines

NA Indian Languages & Type, was Re: <no subject>

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:34:29 -700

51 lines

Re: NA Indian Languages & Type, was Re: <no subject>

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:50:21 +0000

24 lines

Neat type site, but kinda Flash-y

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:10:42 -0400

17 lines

new monograph

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:41:40 +0100

34 lines

Re: new monograph

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:52:36 -0600

26 lines

Re: new monograph

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:57:45 -0600

23 lines

Re: New sign

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 09:44:05 +0100

96 lines

Re: New sign

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:10:06 -0000

45 lines

New symbol

Henk Gianotten <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:30:43 +0200

24 lines

Re: New symbol

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 06:51:44 +0100

81 lines

Re: New symbol

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:14:24 -0500

26 lines

Non-Generic Subject Line...

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:48:50 -0700

93 lines

Nordic; was: TYPO-L Digest - 15 Oct 2002 to 16 Oct 2002 (#2002-208)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:16:11 -0700

31 lines

NYC

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 06:53:34 -0700

19 lines

Re: NYC

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:24:49 -0400

53 lines

Re: NYC

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 12:33:06 -0400

35 lines

Re: NYC Bookstores

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 15:02:23 -0700

48 lines

Obsessive typography in Building Accessible Websites

Joe Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:33:12 -0400

53 lines

Re: Obsessive typography in Building Accessible Websites

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:06:38 -0400

28 lines

Re: Obsessive typography in Building Accessible Websites

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:09:37 +0200

25 lines

Re: Obsessive typography in Building Accessible Websites

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:20:23 -0400

33 lines

Re: Obsessive typography in Building Accessible Websites

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:54:15 -0400

26 lines

OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:01:43 -0700

20 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:12:14 +0100

25 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:25:35 -0400

53 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Off White <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:27:17 -0400

23 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Matthew Mullenweg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:25:46 -0500

40 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:46:25 -0400

39 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Rolf Langenhuijzen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:39:52 +0200

40 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:40:37 +0100

63 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Yuri Yarmola <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:30:46 +0300

120 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:46:52 -0400

22 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:39:41 -0500

45 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:51:45 EDT

27 lines

OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:06:30 -0700

19 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:02:33 -0600

42 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:23:07 -0600

67 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:20:08 +0200

53 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 23:38:56 -0700

82 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:24:42 +0100

33 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:40:47 +0000

31 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:49:14 +0200

46 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:08:05 +0100

73 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:50:08 -0400

64 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:53:24 -0000

146 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic) +

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:14:46 -0700

59 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic) +

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:29:50 +0100

60 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic) +

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:01:21 -0700

45 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic) +

Alan Litchfield <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:41:17 +1300

57 lines

Re: OS Advice (not at all on-topic)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:56:12 +0100

24 lines

Re: OS Advice (not at all on-topic)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:08:34 -0400

35 lines

Re: OS Advice (not at all on-topic)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:32:56 +0000

21 lines

Re: OS Advice (not at all on-topic)

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:53:27 -0600

28 lines

Re: OS Advice (not at all on-topic)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:10:21 -0800

29 lines

Re: OS Advice (what was the topic??)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:56:55 +0100

32 lines

OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:22:21 -0700

53 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:34:10 +0000

28 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:00:32 -0500

59 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:21:22 -0700

60 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

R Larabie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:40:27 -0400

30 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:40:06 -0700

28 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:17:48 -0400

26 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:30:49 -0700

21 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:58:39 -0700

25 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:54:00 -0700

49 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:53:29 -0400

20 lines

Palatino Light, where are the kerning pairs?

plain*clothes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:49:17 -0700

29 lines

Palatino Light, where are the kerning pairs?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 23:41:44 -0700

18 lines

Re: Palatino Light, where are the kerning pairs?

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:31:22 -0700

48 lines

Re: Palatino Light, where are the kerning pairs?

plain*clothes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:41:54 -0700

34 lines

Pilcrow

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:09:29 -0400

19 lines

please share: info on one of two FREE handwriting-workshops in January

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 01:02:00 -0400

21 lines

Presets for size

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:23:59 -0400

29 lines

Pride in the name of love

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:29:50 +0100

40 lines

Re: Put your Gaelic fonts where the flowers grow

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:46:49 +0100

35 lines

Put your Gaelic fonts where your mouth is

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:43:06 +0100

45 lines

Re: Put your Gaelic fonts where your mouth is

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:53:04 +0000

17 lines

Re: Put your Gaelic fonts where your mouth is

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:06:53 +0100

51 lines

Re: Put your Gaelic fonts where your mouth is

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 01:19:55 +0000

17 lines

Query: FL or FOG

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:14:41 +0100

30 lines

Re: Query: FL or FOG

Yuri Yarmola <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:11:51 +0400

23 lines

Re: Query: FL or FOG

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:19:05 +0000

33 lines

Re: Query: FL or FOG

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:23:06 -0700

39 lines

Re: Query: FL or FOG

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:23:54 -0500

28 lines

Redundantly Thursday

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:43:02 -0800

98 lines

Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:39:48 -0700

25 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:53:10 +0200

29 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Kathleen Tinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:26:32 -0400

33 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:38:04 +0200

31 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:15:15 -0700

28 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:23:22 -0400

22 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 18:30:23 +0200

27 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:06:04 -0700

33 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:24:20 -0400

32 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:37:58 -0500

34 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:54:35 +0200

31 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:35:01 -0700

34 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:45:05 +0100

16 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:19:40 -0700

42 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:31:47 -0700

17 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:50:19 -0700

24 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

John Lockerbie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 07:19:49 +0100

22 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome (sexism)

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:06:33 -0700

46 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome (sexism)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:46:04 +0200

35 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome (sexism)

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 03:13:26 +0200

46 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome (sexism)

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:13:53 +0100

36 lines

Romans go home

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:11:07 +0100

29 lines

Re: screen fonts

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:40:51 -0700

37 lines

Re: screen fonts

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Sep 2002 20:17:44 -0700

55 lines

Re: screen fonts

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:47:29 -0400

60 lines

short shrift

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:36:23 -0400

63 lines

Re: short shrift

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 08:43:43 +0100

17 lines

Re: short shrift

Earl Cooley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 03:11:00 -0500

26 lines

Re: short shrift

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 06:31:38 -0600

46 lines

Re: short shrift

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 14:09:04 +0100

23 lines

Speaking of English

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:49:10 -0400

44 lines

Stressing out

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:07:37 -0400

58 lines

Re: Stressing out

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:36:56 +0100

45 lines

Stuff

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:59:11 -0700

90 lines

Re: Stuff

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:21:09 -0700

44 lines

Re: Stuff

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:06:22 +0100

22 lines

TDC2 Call (Multiposted)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 22:54:12 -0400

34 lines

teague ornaments

Wendy Ellerton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 15:28:09 +1000

20 lines

Re: teague ornaments

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 09:09:58 -0400

43 lines

The character "@" and gender studies...

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 05:31:12 -0700

22 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:06:06 +0200

26 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:12:05 +0100

23 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:24:05 EDT

29 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:03:59 -0700

50 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:16:04 -0700

45 lines

The character "@" and gender studies...

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:21:38 -0700

18 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:35:51 EDT

26 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:41:48 -0700

25 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:17:26 EDT

22 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:15:01 -0700

137 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Earl Cooley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:23:12 -0500

29 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:26:20 -0700

39 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:38:45 +0100

36 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:22:53 -0700

55 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:12:02 +0100

42 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:52:43 +0200

26 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 01:25:46 +0200

22 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:02:57 -0700

61 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:49:26 -0400

50 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 01:58:57 +0100

20 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:29:42 -0700

22 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:35:46 -0700

30 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:43:44 -0700

32 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Matthew Mullenweg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:06:32 -0500

18 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:53:26 +0200

57 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:51:41 +0200

28 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:29:10 -0400

38 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:17:00 -0400

34 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:47:03 +0200

25 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:53:08 EDT

25 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:55:15 -0400

27 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:21:38 EDT

34 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:26:09 +0200

28 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:44:34 -0700

34 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:03:05 +0200

30 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:41:46 -0700

67 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:16:08 EDT

54 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:53:29 -0400

31 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:24:05 EDT

41 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:50:14 -700

59 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:43:55 -0700

35 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:44:53 -0700

76 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:51:53 EDT

26 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:05:02 EDT

54 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:41:40 -0400

41 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:18:06 -0400

35 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:58:56 +0100

25 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:04:44 +0100

24 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:17:46 +0100

45 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:21:04 +0100

24 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:15:02 -0700

84 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:31:24 +0100

51 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 21:02:24 -0400

45 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 21:03:40 -0400

62 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:21:22 +0000

22 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 21:33:31 -0400

16 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:25:06 -0400

41 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:23:39 -0400

46 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:11:28 -0700

24 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 09:45:13 -0500

23 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:10:49 -0400

23 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:56:56 EST

32 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:00:56 EST

29 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:48:43 EST

41 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:04:47 -0500

19 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:15:36 -0400

25 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:02:29 -0500

23 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:39:03 -0800

80 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:46:02 EST

36 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:31:56 -0000

43 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:54:28 -0000

72 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:16:58 -0000

30 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:25:20 -0000

42 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:46:52 +0100

32 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:50:03 EST

31 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:55:43 EST

29 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:58:58 EST

26 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:51:07 -0500

33 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:13:28 -0000

47 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:08:50 -0500

25 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:36:33 -0300

40 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:45:24 +0100

64 lines

The character "@" and gender studies... (for Jorge de Buen)

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:08:34 -0700

29 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies... (for Jorge de Buen)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:25:18 +0100

33 lines

The character "@" and gender studies... (for Jorge de Buen)

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:16:41 -0700

41 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies... (for Jorge de Buen)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 02:28:32 +0100

43 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies... (for Jorge de Buen)

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:58:28 -0800

91 lines

Re: the gender of nations

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:27:49 +0100

38 lines

Re: the gender of nations

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:35:03 -0000

52 lines

Re: the gender of nations

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:42:28 -0800

32 lines

Re: the gender of nations

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:46:04 +0100

30 lines

Re: Tipoteca & "Lorem Ipsum"

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:45:53 +0200

35 lines

Re: Tipoteca & "Lorem Ipsum"

toby stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:58:08 +0100

42 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 10 Oct 2002 - Special issue (#2002-202)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:08:10 -0700

73 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 10 Oct 2002 - Special issue (#2002-202)

Alan Litchfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:19:56 +1300

28 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 10 Oct 2002 - Special issue (#2002-202)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:53:31 -0400

27 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 11 Oct 2002 to 12 Oct 2002 (#2002-204)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:45:16 -0700

26 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 11 Oct 2002 to 12 Oct 2002 (#2002-204)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 12:33:41 -0400

34 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 12 Oct 2002 to 13 Oct 2002 (#2002-205)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 23:40:56 -0700

65 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 13 Oct 2002 to 14 Oct 2002 (#2002-206)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 23:13:10 -0700

31 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 13 Oct 2002 to 14 Oct 2002 (#2002-206)

Alan Litchfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:37:46 +1300

28 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 15 Oct 2002 to 16 Oct 2002 (#2002-208)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:03:11 -0700

45 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 20 Oct 2002 to 21 Oct 2002 (#2002-214)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 01:09:57 -0700

74 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 6 Oct 2002 to 7 Oct 2002 (#2002-198)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 23:29:14 -0700

52 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 9 Oct 2002 to 10 Oct 2002 (#2002-201)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:33:15 -0700

34 lines

Unicode support

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:15:56 +0100

17 lines

Re: Unicode support (for Quark XPress v5)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:28:07 -0400

35 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:15:02 GMT

68 lines

Using @ in Irish

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:21:11 EST

24 lines

Re: Using @ in Irish

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:21:14 +0100

30 lines

Re: Using @ in Irish

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:02:41 EST

24 lines

Re: Using @ in Irish

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:10:10 +0000

19 lines

Re: Using @ in Irish

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:18:36 -0000

37 lines

Re: Using @ in Irish

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:21:34 -0000

33 lines

Re: Using @ in Irish

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:32:05 +0100

24 lines

visit this site for an article on doctors and penmanship (from the UK medical magazine HOSPITAL DOCTOR)

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 1970 02:30:57 -0500

23 lines

Re: visit this site for an article on doctors and penmanship (from the UK medical magazine HOSPITAL DOCTOR)

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 18:57:14 -0400

36 lines

we dont like your type around here

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:36:41 +0100

26 lines

Re: we dont like your type around here

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:31:49 EST

26 lines

Re: we dont like your type around here

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 01:45:30 +0100

27 lines

Wednesday

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:00:12 -0800

60 lines

Re: Wednesday

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:07:21 +0100

42 lines

Re: Wednesday corrected

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:08:09 +0100

43 lines

Re: Wednesday corrected

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:13:04 -0500

35 lines

Re: Wednesday corrected

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:12:26 +0000

39 lines

Re: Wednesday corrected

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 01:38:52 +0100

30 lines

Re: Wednesday corrected

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:02:36 -0500

34 lines

Re: Wednesday corrected

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:40:03 EST

28 lines

Wednesday II

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:20:21 -0800

40 lines

What is an alphabet?

=?iso-8859-1?q?Matha=20agus=20Isabelle=20Stand=FAn?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:47:39 +0100

29 lines

Re: What is an alphabet?

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:10:59 +0000

44 lines

Where ya @?

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:03:05 -0800

58 lines

Re: Where ya @?

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:18:53 EST

28 lines

Re: Where ya @?

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:24:29 -0700

35 lines

Re: Where ya @?

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:40:04 -0800

26 lines

Re: Where ya @?

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:39:27 -0300

25 lines

Re: Where ya @?

plain*clothes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:38:49 -0800

27 lines

XP Question

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:41:46 -0700

14 lines

Re: XP Question

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:15:10 -0600

38 lines

Re: XP Question

Mark Barratt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 23:42:03 +0100

26 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
February 1994
January 1994
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager