LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


October 2002


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave TYPO-L
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Most Recent First

From

Date

Size

Re: "empastelar"

Silver MayKitten <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 04:41:55 -0700

56 lines

Re: "empastelar"

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 01:17:08 -0400

44 lines

Re: "empastelar"

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 05:40:47 +0100

34 lines

"empastelar"

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:45:09 -0400

66 lines

"LeserInnen", "Allemannen" and Dutch beer

Henk Gianotten <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:30:51 +0200

38 lines

"old fart"????

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:58:28 -0700

58 lines

Re: <no subject>

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:49:43 EST

24 lines

Re: <no subject>

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:16:13 -0500

29 lines

Re: <no subject>

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:40:51 EST

23 lines

Re: <no subject>

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:39:55 EST

40 lines

Re: <no subject>

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:18:35 -0500

43 lines

Re: <no subject>

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:24:05 -0000

49 lines

<no subject>

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:04:08 -0500

31 lines

<No subject>

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:39:19 +0200

108 lines

Re: ??

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 09:03:13 -0700

45 lines

Re: ??

toby stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:06:17 +0100

18 lines

??

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:54:19 -0700

26 lines

Re: American scripts

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:49:38 -0500

33 lines

American scripts

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:03:40 +0000

19 lines

Any dutch type designer?

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 05:55:32 -0700

26 lines

Re: Ape and Apenstaartje

Yuri Yarmola <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:44:16 +0300

15 lines

Re: Ape and Apenstaartje

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:11:44 -0500

25 lines

Ape and Apenstaartje

Henk Gianotten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:46:03 +0100

28 lines

apocalypse now

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:52:03 +0100

33 lines

ATypI-Roma again

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:23:06 +0200

27 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

jeff borisch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:31:27 -0400

24 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 01:25:52 +0200

94 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:33:56 -0400

33 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:16:30 -0400

25 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:38:02 -0400

30 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:31:53 -0400

30 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:50:16 EDT

31 lines

Re: B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:35:28 -0400

46 lines

B-case, I love you (was: Casing question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:57:31 -0400

36 lines

Re: bald jokes

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:15:29 -0700

29 lines

bald jokes

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:55:57 -0700

26 lines

Barry McWilliams/O&M Los/OMG is out of the office.

Barry McWilliams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:44:06 -0700

37 lines

Barry McWilliams/O&M Los/OMG is out of the office.

Barry McWilliams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 02:42:06 -0700

37 lines

Beh

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:27:01 +0100

22 lines

Re: Bread type

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:07:52 -0400

35 lines

Re: Bread type

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:05:49 -0400

36 lines

Re: Bread type

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:09:43 -0700

30 lines

Re: Bread type

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:27:12 -0300

35 lines

Re: Bread type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:30:54 +0200

62 lines

Re: Bread type

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:08:09 +0200

43 lines

Re: Bread type

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:02:55 -0300

59 lines

Re: Bread type

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:14:26 -0700

26 lines

Re: Bread type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:47:18 +0200

35 lines

Re: Bread type

Jose Kazi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:43:26 -0700

32 lines

Re: Bread type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:06:25 +0200

17 lines

Re: Bread type

brid <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 13:21:05 +0930

17 lines

Re: Bread type

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 00:44:59 +0100

15 lines

Re: Bread type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:39:22 +0200

51 lines

Re: Bread type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:25:44 +0200

25 lines

Re: Bread type

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 22:19:15 +0100

32 lines

Re: Bread type

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:57:56 +0100

32 lines

Re: Bread type

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:34:40 -0500

32 lines

Re: Bread type

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:26:16 -0400

36 lines

Re: Bread type

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:17:52 -0400

18 lines

Re: Bread type

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:17:25 -0400

41 lines

Re: Bread type

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:09:09 -0400

25 lines

Re: Bread type

Fountain <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:47:30 +0200

28 lines

Bread type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 19:46:43 +0200

21 lines

Re: Bread type and "pan de texto"

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:28:54 +0200

34 lines

Bread type and "pan de texto"

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:23:18 -0700

24 lines

call for papers

shelley gruendler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:52:27 +0000

46 lines

Re: Casing question

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:21:23 -0700

33 lines

Re: Casing question

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:08:56 +0100

39 lines

Re: Casing question

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:02:06 EDT

36 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:50:00 -0400

28 lines

Re: Casing question

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:34:36 -0700

29 lines

Re: Casing question

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:34:20 -0700

24 lines

Re: Casing question

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 03:25:42 +0100

41 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:36:53 -0400

31 lines

Re: Casing question

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:29:30 -0700

31 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:46:12 -0400

26 lines

Re: Casing question

Lucans, Gunars <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:36:35 -0500

23 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:22:26 +0100

28 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:46:55 -0400

27 lines

Re: Casing question

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:44:06 -0400

32 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:37:48 +0100

29 lines

Re: Casing question

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:28:14 +0100

68 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:53:21 +0100

35 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:51:46 +0100

48 lines

Re: Casing question

toby stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:48:01 +0100

32 lines

Re: Casing question

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:38:05 EDT

39 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:15:42 -0400

28 lines

Casing question

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:09:20 +0100

38 lines

Re: Casing question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:58:09 -0400

37 lines

Re: Casing question

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:46:24 EDT

31 lines

Casing question

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:06:27 +0100

21 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:25:12 +0100

26 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:57:04 -0400

23 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:20:25 +0100

34 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:42:57 +0100

76 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Nikolai Razouvayev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:15:55 +1000

41 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Nikolai Razouvayev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:15:22 +1000

26 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:25:09 -0700

32 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:22:05 -0400

32 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:11:27 -0700

57 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:35:41 +0100

56 lines

Re: Casing question gone Religious

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:52:43 +0100

28 lines

Re: character nomenclature

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:24:10 -0500

39 lines

Re: character nomenclature

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:55:33 -0600

35 lines

Re: character nomenclature

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:33:03 -0400

34 lines

character nomenclature

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:37:53 -0600

18 lines

Character nomenclature

Bill Tozier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:17:10 -0400

45 lines

Re: Conference de Roger Chartier (Lyon)

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 06:42:16 -0400

20 lines

Conference de Roger Chartier (Lyon)

Alan Marshall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:09:46 +0200

80 lines

Cooper Black, The Movie

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:23:23 -0700

22 lines

Re: Coptic Visual Fluency

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:37:24 +0100

55 lines

Re: Coptic Visual Fluency, was Re: Casing question gone Religious

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:44:43 EDT

27 lines

Coptic Visual Fluency, was Re: Casing question gone Religious

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 14:33:21 -700

42 lines

Re: Differents character's sets, differents .FOG?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:52:48 -0400

19 lines

Re: Differents character's sets, differents .FOG?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:37:55 -0400

44 lines

Differents character's sets, differents .FOG?

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:50:25 -0700

25 lines

Re: Differents character's sets, differents .FOG? What's about the kerning data?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:34:58 -0400

46 lines

Re: Differents character's sets, differents .FOG? What's about the kerning data?

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:46:17 -0500

35 lines

Differents character's sets, differents .FOG? What's about the kerning data?

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:08:03 -0700

55 lines

Re: Dingbats

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 07:41:29 -700

28 lines

Re: Dingbats

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 07:48:36 -0400

52 lines

Re: Dingbats

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:16:40 -0400

28 lines

Re: Dingbats

Federico Jordan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:25:35 -0700

31 lines

Re: Dingbats

brian sooy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:50:10 -0400

30 lines

Re: Dingbats

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:04:46 +0100

31 lines

Re: Dingbats

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:26:33 -0500

39 lines

Re: Dingbats

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:59:50 -0400

31 lines

Dingbats

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:31:51 +0200

20 lines

Re: Faux letterpress

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 06:39:08 -0700

35 lines

Re: Faux letterpress

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 05:55:41 +0100

48 lines

Re: Faux letterpress

Bill Tozier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:23:41 -0400

44 lines

Re: Faux letterpress

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 06:19:49 -0700

17 lines

Re: Faux letterpress

Ryan, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:55:29 +0100

152 lines

Re: Faux letterpress

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 07:23:36 +0100

51 lines

Faux letterpress

Bill Tozier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:01:32 -0400

54 lines

Re: Faux Pas - Faux Press

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:50:57 +0100

19 lines

Re: Faux Pas - Faux Press

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:14:28 -0700

61 lines

Re: Faux Pas - Faux Press

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:12:21 -0500

20 lines

Faux Pas - Faux Press

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:45:33 -0400

34 lines

Faux Pas - Faux Press

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:42:01 -0400

32 lines

Female Honorifics, was Re: The character "@" and gender studies.

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:29:28 -700

48 lines

Fog custom font exporting woes

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 19:05:29 +0100

35 lines

Font Reserve / OSX doesn't see the bitmaps

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:17:11 -0400

42 lines

FontLab 4.5 for Windows

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:41:12 +0100

23 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:42:28 -0700

26 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:36:27 -0500

29 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:01:03 -0400

27 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:55:38 -0700

32 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:37:54 -0400

25 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:20:18 -0700

28 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:19:33 -0400

24 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:06:36 -0400

21 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:57:41 -0700

25 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:46:56 -0400

24 lines

Re: FREE HRANT!

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:34:16 +0100

17 lines

FREE HRANT!

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:33:26 -0700

27 lines

FREE HRANT!, HOAX...

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:31:30 -0700

20 lines

Gaelic fonts

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:17:01 +0000

141 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:40:21 +0100

26 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:31:37 +0100

33 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:30:50 +0000

39 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:56:35 -0600

32 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:54:03 EST

30 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:46:44 +0000

82 lines

Re: Gaelic fonts

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:33:56 +0100

75 lines

Gaelic fonts

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:41:56 +0000

50 lines

Gaelic fonts

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:01:14 +0100

22 lines

Gaelic fox and hound

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:22:13 +0100

30 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:18:38 +0100

91 lines

Gaelic typefaces

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:52:16 +0100

27 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:47:22 +0100

24 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:35:47 -0400

26 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:34:18 +0100

42 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:57:05 -0400

38 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:45:43 +0100

51 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:41:09 +0200

68 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:48:43 +0100

37 lines

Re: Gaelic typefaces

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:30:44 +0200

34 lines

garbled

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:32:08 +0200

34 lines

Re: Gender studies...

Teressa Terry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:22:33 -0800

28 lines

Re: Gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:54:52 EST

23 lines

Re: Gender studies...

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:00:37 -0000

48 lines

He's Armenian but he's proud anyway.

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:24:34 -0800

38 lines

Re: High phonation

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:56:54 +0200

34 lines

Re: High phonation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:56:29 EDT

35 lines

Re: High phonation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:50:54 EDT

25 lines

Re: High phonation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:36:17 -0400

31 lines

Re: High phonation

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:00:47 +0200

60 lines

Re: High phonation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:00:38 -0400

22 lines

Re: High phonation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:49:59 EDT

25 lines

Re: High phonation

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:54:59 -0700

30 lines

High phonation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:12:04 -0400

52 lines

Re: Historical @ Sign

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:20:03 -0400

38 lines

Historical @ Sign

Ingo Preuss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:35:59 +0100

22 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:50:24 -0700

22 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:43:32 -0700

71 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:57:13 +0100

18 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:34:15 -0400

31 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:23:56 -0400

40 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:11:17 -0400

37 lines

Re: History of the Paragraph-Sign?

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:28:18 -0400

29 lines

History of the Paragraph-Sign?

MiCHi Bundscherer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 04:59:49 +0200

29 lines

History of Writing Systems

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 05:26:47 -0700

29 lines

Re: History of Writing Systems

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 06:16:22 -0600

61 lines

Re: History of Writing Systems

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:50:59 +0200

27 lines

Re: History of Writing Systems

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 22:40:49 +0000

33 lines

History of Writing Systems

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 08:10:51 -700

25 lines

Re: hybrid cyrillic

Nikolai Razouvayev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:15:58 +1000

40 lines

Re: hybrid cyrillic

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 15:49:06 -0700

63 lines

Re: hybrid cyrillic

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 17:58:47 -0400

18 lines

Re: hybrid cyrillic

peter bilak <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 01:33:11 +0200

68 lines

Re: hybrid cyrillic

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 13:04:41 -0700

48 lines

Hybrid Cyrillic

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:02:39 +0100

52 lines

hybrid cyrillic

peter bilak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:40:25 +0200

37 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael S. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:12:07 +1000

57 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 13:13:28 -0700

100 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:10:32 -0700

23 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:15:09 -0400

22 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:28:05 EDT

27 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 02:55:02 +0100

28 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:33:28 -0400

22 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:07:21 EDT

23 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:47:11 +0100

23 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:35:33 +0100

44 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:21:03 +0100

25 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:25:20 +0100

41 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:46:09 -0700

28 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:42:46 -0700

26 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:58:46 +0200

27 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 22:47:39 +0100

22 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:36:09 +0200

25 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:30:01 +0200

30 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:14:41 EDT

35 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:37:29 -0400

29 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Lewis Kirk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:18:32 -0400

22 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:00:32 -0400

56 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:29:39 -0700

26 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:53:50 -0400

34 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:14:29 -700

59 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:49:38 -0600

34 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:24:26 +0200

60 lines

Hyphenation

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 07:19:58 -0700

16 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:14:50 +0100

17 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:11:16 -0400

52 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:30:23 +0100

33 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:48:31 +0200

47 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:42:23 +0200

44 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:37:21 +0200

27 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:24:55 -0700

39 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:24:00 EDT

21 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:17:43 EDT

34 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:14:55 +0100

23 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:09:18 -0400

17 lines

Re: Hyphenation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:05:22 -0400

34 lines

Re: Hyphenation

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:01:14 -0400

21 lines

Hyphenation

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:52:55 +0200

19 lines

Re: Hyphenation to jump!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:14:45 -0400

26 lines

Re: Hyphenation to jump!

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:08:27 -0500

33 lines

Re: I also use email, not carrier pigeons.

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:08:08 +0100

18 lines

I also use email, not carrier pigeons.

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:15:06 -0700

22 lines

I'm just proud

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:10:28 +0100

68 lines

I'm not German but I'm proud anyway.

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:31:05 -0800

107 lines

Re: I'm not Irish but I'm proud anyway

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:36:02 +0100

21 lines

I'm not Irish but I'm proud anyway

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:07:29 -0800

102 lines

Re: In too far

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:01:18 -0400

28 lines

Re: In too far

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:51:17 +0100

20 lines

In too far

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:34:12 -0400

29 lines

Re: Interesting dingbat 'font'...

Federico Jordan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:46:14 -0700

32 lines

Re: Interesting dingbat 'font'...

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:37:12 -0700

24 lines

Re: Interesting dingbat 'font'...

Federico Jordan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:27:41 -0700

32 lines

Interesting dingbat 'font'...

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 06:43:44 -0700

18 lines

Interesting site, or, Pilcrow's Progress

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:51:56 -0400

24 lines

Re: Irish mythology -- off subject (sorry)

Fraser, Jay S <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:15:06 -0600

40 lines

Re: Irish mythology -- off subject (sorry)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:01:27 +0100

18 lines

Re: Irish mythology -- off subject (sorry)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:03:51 -0400

25 lines

Irish mythology -- off subject (sorry)

Fraser, Jay S <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:57:57 -0600

30 lines

Re: Irish personal names

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:34:29 -700

36 lines

Re: Irish personal names

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 01:43:08 +0100

25 lines

Re: Irish personal names

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:15:52 EST

31 lines

Re: Irish personal names

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:36:12 -0800

27 lines

Re: Irish personal names

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:59:50 +0100

46 lines

Re: Irish personal names

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:39:03 -0500

23 lines

Re: Irish personal names

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:22:36 -0000

35 lines

Irish personal names

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:46:51 +0000

75 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

plain*clothes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:28:58 -0800

21 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:00:48 -0700

30 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:00:12 +0100

41 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

plain*clothes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:39:16 -0800

48 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

michaellynch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:26:36 -0800

53 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:58:46 -0600

25 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:59:01 -0400

35 lines

Re: Janiszewski's Frothy

michaellynch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:37:24 -0800

25 lines

Janiszewski's Frothy

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:56:08 -0800

14 lines

Re: Judging font quality by control points

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:05:08 -0400

35 lines

Re: Judging font quality by control points

Patrick Gundlach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:41:10 +0200

27 lines

Re: Judging font quality by control points

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 07:48:04 -700

61 lines

Re: Judging font quality by control points

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:13:15 -0700

29 lines

Re: Judging font quality by control points

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:46:05 +0200

31 lines

Judging font quality by control points

Yateendra Joshi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:08:07 +0530

18 lines

Re: Keyboards again, lobbying

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:00:58 -0400

33 lines

Re: Keyboards again, lobbying

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:48:55 +0100

26 lines

Keyboards again, lobbying

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:55:48 +0200

92 lines

Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

R Larabie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 02:02:16 -0400

18 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 21:57:26 -0300

44 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:33:57 -0700

21 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Priscila Farias <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 11:49:19 -0300

25 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:36:44 -0300

30 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:46:25 -0400

26 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 07:40:09 -0700

34 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:48:56 -0300

28 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:36:12 +0200

47 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:22:35 -0300

38 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:32:13 +0200

35 lines

Latin letters - Letras Latinas

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 05:01:25 -0700

25 lines

Re: Latin letters - Letras Latinas (errors)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:04:20 +0200

26 lines

Latin letters - Letras Latinas (errors)

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 05:53:43 -0700

17 lines

Re: Letraset

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:51:39 -0700

32 lines

Re: Letraset

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:19:58 -0700

35 lines

Re: Letraset

Tom Dolan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:03:19 -0700

42 lines

Re: Letraset

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:08:36 EDT

30 lines

Letraset

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:30:01 -0700

25 lines

Like, a bunch of stuff

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:43:16 -0800

56 lines

Looking for information

Jen ... <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 19:40:49 +1000

25 lines

Re: MacOS sans custom keyboarding?

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:01:19 -0400

38 lines

Re: MacOS sans custom keyboarding?

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 17:00:37 -0400

51 lines

MacOS sans custom keyboarding?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:48:41 -0700

20 lines

Macs for Serifs; was: I'm not Irish but I'm proud anyway

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:37:21 -0800

30 lines

Re: Monotype's "European" type contest...

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:25:59 +0100

30 lines

Monotype's "European" type contest...

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:48:46 +0100

109 lines

More Gaelic fonts than you can shake a stick at

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:23:33 +0100

106 lines

Re: mouse drawing vs tablet

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:01:51 +0000

53 lines

Re: mouse drawing vs tablet

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:34:26 -0500

57 lines

Re: mouse drawing vs tablet

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:24:53 +0100

14 lines

mouse drawing vs tablet

Rolf Langenhuijzen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:53:58 -0700

26 lines

Re: mouse drawing vs tablet & tech. misc. (was Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic) +)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:27:55 -0400

90 lines

Re: Ms.punctuations; was: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:10:42 EST

31 lines

Ms.punctuations; was: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:58:47 -0800

41 lines

Re: NA Indian Languages & Type, was Re: <no subject>

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:50:21 +0000

24 lines

NA Indian Languages & Type, was Re: <no subject>

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:34:29 -700

51 lines

Neat type site, but kinda Flash-y

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:10:42 -0400

17 lines

Re: new monograph

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:57:45 -0600

23 lines

Re: new monograph

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:52:36 -0600

26 lines

new monograph

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:41:40 +0100

34 lines

Re: New sign

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:10:06 -0000

45 lines

Re: New sign

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 09:44:05 +0100

96 lines

Re: New symbol

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:14:24 -0500

26 lines

Re: New symbol

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 06:51:44 +0100

81 lines

New symbol

Henk Gianotten <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:30:43 +0200

24 lines

Non-Generic Subject Line...

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:48:50 -0700

93 lines

Nordic; was: TYPO-L Digest - 15 Oct 2002 to 16 Oct 2002 (#2002-208)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:16:11 -0700

31 lines

Re: NYC

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 12:33:06 -0400

35 lines

Re: NYC

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:24:49 -0400

53 lines

NYC

Victor Caston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 06:53:34 -0700

19 lines

Re: NYC Bookstores

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 15:02:23 -0700

48 lines

Re: Obsessive typography in Building Accessible Websites

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:54:15 -0400

26 lines

Re: Obsessive typography in Building Accessible Websites

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:20:23 -0400

33 lines

Re: Obsessive typography in Building Accessible Websites

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:09:37 +0200

25 lines

Re: Obsessive typography in Building Accessible Websites

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:06:38 -0400

28 lines

Obsessive typography in Building Accessible Websites

Joe Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:33:12 -0400

53 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:53:24 -0000

146 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:50:08 -0400

64 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:08:05 +0100

73 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:49:14 +0200

46 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:40:47 +0000

31 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:24:42 +0100

33 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 23:38:56 -0700

82 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:20:08 +0200

53 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:23:07 -0600

67 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:02:33 -0600

42 lines

OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:06:30 -0700

19 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:51:45 EDT

27 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:39:41 -0500

45 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:46:52 -0400

22 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Yuri Yarmola <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:30:46 +0300

120 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:40:37 +0100

63 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Rolf Langenhuijzen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:39:52 +0200

40 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:46:25 -0400

39 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Matthew Mullenweg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:25:46 -0500

40 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Off White <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:27:17 -0400

23 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:25:35 -0400

53 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:12:14 +0100

25 lines

OS Advice (barely on-topic)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:01:43 -0700

20 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic) +

Alan Litchfield <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:41:17 +1300

57 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic) +

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:01:21 -0700

45 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic) +

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:29:50 +0100

60 lines

Re: OS Advice (barely on-topic) +

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:14:46 -0700

59 lines

Re: OS Advice (not at all on-topic)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:10:21 -0800

29 lines

Re: OS Advice (not at all on-topic)

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:53:27 -0600

28 lines

Re: OS Advice (not at all on-topic)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:32:56 +0000

21 lines

Re: OS Advice (not at all on-topic)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:08:34 -0400

35 lines

Re: OS Advice (not at all on-topic)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:56:12 +0100

24 lines

Re: OS Advice (what was the topic??)

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:56:55 +0100

32 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:53:29 -0400

20 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:54:00 -0700

49 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:58:39 -0700

25 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:30:49 -0700

21 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:17:48 -0400

26 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:40:06 -0700

28 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

R Larabie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:40:27 -0400

30 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:21:22 -0700

60 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:00:32 -0500

59 lines

Re: OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:34:10 +0000

28 lines

OT/TAN: anon; was: Larabie Fonts lame-ass forum

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:22:21 -0700

53 lines

Re: Palatino Light, where are the kerning pairs?

plain*clothes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:41:54 -0700

34 lines

Re: Palatino Light, where are the kerning pairs?

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:31:22 -0700

48 lines

Palatino Light, where are the kerning pairs?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 23:41:44 -0700

18 lines

Palatino Light, where are the kerning pairs?

plain*clothes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:49:17 -0700

29 lines

Pilcrow

Xtian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:09:29 -0400

19 lines

please share: info on one of two FREE handwriting-workshops in January

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 01:02:00 -0400

21 lines

Presets for size

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:23:59 -0400

29 lines

Pride in the name of love

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:29:50 +0100

40 lines

Re: Put your Gaelic fonts where the flowers grow

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:46:49 +0100

35 lines

Re: Put your Gaelic fonts where your mouth is

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 01:19:55 +0000

17 lines

Re: Put your Gaelic fonts where your mouth is

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:06:53 +0100

51 lines

Re: Put your Gaelic fonts where your mouth is

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:53:04 +0000

17 lines

Put your Gaelic fonts where your mouth is

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:43:06 +0100

45 lines

Re: Query: FL or FOG

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:23:54 -0500

28 lines

Re: Query: FL or FOG

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:23:06 -0700

39 lines

Re: Query: FL or FOG

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:19:05 +0000

33 lines

Re: Query: FL or FOG

Yuri Yarmola <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:11:51 +0400

23 lines

Query: FL or FOG

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:14:41 +0100

30 lines

Redundantly Thursday

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:43:02 -0800

98 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

John Lockerbie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 07:19:49 +0100

22 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:50:19 -0700

24 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:31:47 -0700

17 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:19:40 -0700

42 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:45:05 +0100

16 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:35:01 -0700

34 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:54:35 +0200

31 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:37:58 -0500

34 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:24:20 -0400

32 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:06:04 -0700

33 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 18:30:23 +0200

27 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:23:22 -0400

22 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:15:15 -0700

28 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:38:04 +0200

31 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Kathleen Tinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:26:32 -0400

33 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:53:10 +0200

29 lines

Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:39:48 -0700

25 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome (sexism)

Jean Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:13:53 +0100

36 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome (sexism)

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 03:13:26 +0200

46 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome (sexism)

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:46:04 +0200

35 lines

Re: Report & pictures from ATypI in Rome (sexism)

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:06:33 -0700

46 lines

Romans go home

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:11:07 +0100

29 lines

Re: screen fonts

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:47:29 -0400

60 lines

Re: screen fonts

Pilar Perez M <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Sep 2002 20:17:44 -0700

55 lines

Re: screen fonts

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:40:51 -0700

37 lines

Re: short shrift

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 14:09:04 +0100

23 lines

Re: short shrift

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 06:31:38 -0600

46 lines

Re: short shrift

Earl Cooley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 03:11:00 -0500

26 lines

Re: short shrift

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 08:43:43 +0100

17 lines

short shrift

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:36:23 -0400

63 lines

Speaking of English

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:49:10 -0400

44 lines

Re: Stressing out

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:36:56 +0100

45 lines

Stressing out

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:07:37 -0400

58 lines

Re: Stuff

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:06:22 +0100

22 lines

Re: Stuff

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:21:09 -0700

44 lines

Stuff

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:59:11 -0700

90 lines

TDC2 Call (Multiposted)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 22:54:12 -0400

34 lines

Re: teague ornaments

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 09:09:58 -0400

43 lines

teague ornaments

Wendy Ellerton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 15:28:09 +1000

20 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:45:24 +0100

64 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:36:33 -0300

40 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:08:50 -0500

25 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:13:28 -0000

47 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:51:07 -0500

33 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:58:58 EST

26 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:55:43 EST

29 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:50:03 EST

31 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:46:52 +0100

32 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:25:20 -0000

42 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:16:58 -0000

30 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:54:28 -0000

72 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:31:56 -0000

43 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:46:02 EST

36 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:39:03 -0800

80 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:02:29 -0500

23 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:15:36 -0400

25 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:04:47 -0500

19 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:48:43 EST

41 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:00:56 EST

29 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:56:56 EST

32 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:10:49 -0400

23 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 09:45:13 -0500

23 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:11:28 -0700

24 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:23:39 -0400

46 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:25:06 -0400

41 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 21:33:31 -0400

16 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:21:22 +0000

22 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 21:03:40 -0400

62 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 21:02:24 -0400

45 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:31:24 +0100

51 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:15:02 -0700

84 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:21:04 +0100

24 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:17:46 +0100

45 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:04:44 +0100

24 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:58:56 +0100

25 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:18:06 -0400

35 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:41:40 -0400

41 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:05:02 EDT

54 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:51:53 EDT

26 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:44:53 -0700

76 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:43:55 -0700

35 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:50:14 -700

59 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:24:05 EDT

41 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:53:29 -0400

31 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:16:08 EDT

54 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:41:46 -0700

67 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:03:05 +0200

30 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:44:34 -0700

34 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:26:09 +0200

28 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:21:38 EDT

34 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:55:15 -0400

27 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:53:08 EDT

25 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:47:03 +0200

25 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:17:00 -0400

34 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:29:10 -0400

38 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:51:41 +0200

28 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:53:26 +0200

57 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Matthew Mullenweg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:06:32 -0500

18 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:43:44 -0700

32 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:35:46 -0700

30 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:29:42 -0700

22 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 01:58:57 +0100

20 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:49:26 -0400

50 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:02:57 -0700

61 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 01:25:46 +0200

22 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:52:43 +0200

26 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:12:02 +0100

42 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:22:53 -0700

55 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:38:45 +0100

36 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:26:20 -0700

39 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Earl Cooley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:23:12 -0500

29 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:15:01 -0700

137 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:17:26 EDT

22 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:41:48 -0700

25 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:35:51 EDT

26 lines

The character "@" and gender studies...

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:21:38 -0700

18 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:16:04 -0700

45 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:03:59 -0700

50 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:24:05 EDT

29 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:12:05 +0100

23 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies...

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:06:06 +0200

26 lines

The character "@" and gender studies...

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 05:31:12 -0700

22 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies... (for Jorge de Buen)

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:58:28 -0800

91 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies... (for Jorge de Buen)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 02:28:32 +0100

43 lines

The character "@" and gender studies... (for Jorge de Buen)

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:16:41 -0700

41 lines

Re: The character "@" and gender studies... (for Jorge de Buen)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:25:18 +0100

33 lines

The character "@" and gender studies... (for Jorge de Buen)

Ramiro Espinoza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:08:34 -0700

29 lines

Re: the gender of nations

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:46:04 +0100

30 lines

Re: the gender of nations

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:42:28 -0800

32 lines

Re: the gender of nations

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:35:03 -0000

52 lines

Re: the gender of nations

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:27:49 +0100

38 lines

Re: Tipoteca & "Lorem Ipsum"

toby stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:58:08 +0100

42 lines

Re: Tipoteca & "Lorem Ipsum"

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:45:53 +0200

35 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 10 Oct 2002 - Special issue (#2002-202)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:53:31 -0400

27 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 10 Oct 2002 - Special issue (#2002-202)

Alan Litchfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:19:56 +1300

28 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 10 Oct 2002 - Special issue (#2002-202)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:08:10 -0700

73 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 11 Oct 2002 to 12 Oct 2002 (#2002-204)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 12:33:41 -0400

34 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 11 Oct 2002 to 12 Oct 2002 (#2002-204)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:45:16 -0700

26 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 12 Oct 2002 to 13 Oct 2002 (#2002-205)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 23:40:56 -0700

65 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 13 Oct 2002 to 14 Oct 2002 (#2002-206)

Alan Litchfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:37:46 +1300

28 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 13 Oct 2002 to 14 Oct 2002 (#2002-206)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 23:13:10 -0700

31 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 15 Oct 2002 to 16 Oct 2002 (#2002-208)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:03:11 -0700

45 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 20 Oct 2002 to 21 Oct 2002 (#2002-214)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 01:09:57 -0700

74 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 6 Oct 2002 to 7 Oct 2002 (#2002-198)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 23:29:14 -0700

52 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 9 Oct 2002 to 10 Oct 2002 (#2002-201)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:33:15 -0700

34 lines

Unicode support

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:15:56 +0100

17 lines

Re: Unicode support (for Quark XPress v5)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:28:07 -0400

35 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:15:02 GMT

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Re: Using @ in Irish

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:32:05 +0100

24 lines

Re: Using @ in Irish

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:21:34 -0000

33 lines

Re: Using @ in Irish

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:18:36 -0000

37 lines

Re: Using @ in Irish

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:10:10 +0000

19 lines

Re: Using @ in Irish

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:02:41 EST

24 lines

Re: Using @ in Irish

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:21:14 +0100

30 lines

Using @ in Irish

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:21:11 EST

24 lines

Re: visit this site for an article on doctors and penmanship (from the UK medical magazine HOSPITAL DOCTOR)

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 18:57:14 -0400

36 lines

visit this site for an article on doctors and penmanship (from the UK medical magazine HOSPITAL DOCTOR)

Kate Gladstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 1970 02:30:57 -0500

23 lines

Re: we dont like your type around here

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 01:45:30 +0100

27 lines

Re: we dont like your type around here

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:31:49 EST

26 lines

we dont like your type around here

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:36:41 +0100

26 lines

Re: Wednesday

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:07:21 +0100

42 lines

Wednesday

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:00:12 -0800

60 lines

Re: Wednesday corrected

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:40:03 EST

28 lines

Re: Wednesday corrected

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:02:36 -0500

34 lines

Re: Wednesday corrected

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 01:38:52 +0100

30 lines

Re: Wednesday corrected

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:12:26 +0000

39 lines

Re: Wednesday corrected

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:13:04 -0500

35 lines

Re: Wednesday corrected

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:08:09 +0100

43 lines

Wednesday II

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:20:21 -0800

40 lines

Re: What is an alphabet?

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:10:59 +0000

44 lines

What is an alphabet?

Matha agus Isabelle Standún <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:47:39 +0100

29 lines

Re: Where ya @?

plain*clothes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:38:49 -0800

27 lines

Re: Where ya @?

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:39:27 -0300

25 lines

Re: Where ya @?

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:40:04 -0800

26 lines

Re: Where ya @?

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:24:29 -0700

35 lines

Re: Where ya @?

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:18:53 EST

28 lines

Where ya @?

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:03:05 -0800

58 lines

Re: XP Question

Mark Barratt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 23:42:03 +0100

26 lines

Re: XP Question

Ivan Van Laningham <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:15:10 -0600

38 lines

XP Question

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:41:46 -0700

14 lines


Back to: Main TYPO-L Page



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager