LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


January 2002


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

(ITC) Souvenir (1 message)
(ITC) Souvenir (was Re: Do this, don't do that!) (1 message)
AIGA: You’re Invited to Face Off for LIte racy (1 message)
Alphabet Reform Baby (was:readability study) (2 messages)
American Type-riding into the sunset (6 messages)
book recommendation (3 messages)
Bookman (1 message)
Bringhurst (2 messages)
Bringhurst, was Re: Potpourri (2 messages)
Capital, my capital... (1 message)
Capitalization (9 messages)
Comments on TypoL list discussion (1 message)
comp.fonts entire archive (1988 onwards) online (2 messages)
Definition sources (1 message)
Designs for the euro sign (1 message)
Dialup (1 message)
Do this, don't do that! (5 messages)
Don't hate me because I'm cross posting this message! (1 message)
Don't hate me... book reviews (2 messages)
Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today (10 messages)
Eurostile/style (1 message)
Eurostile/style (was Re: American Type-riding into the sunset) (3 messages)
fa.typography (3 messages)
Film credit/poster design (7 messages)
Film credit/poster design TAN (2 messages)
Follow up - Help I need a font (5 messages)
FontLab v Fog (11 messages)
Friz, the cat of the Baskervilles (1 message)
From TYPO-L (1 message)
Fwd: Comments on TypoL list discussion (1 message)
Greek pangrams online (5 messages)
Help I need a font! (5 messages)
Hobos and ho boys (3 messages)
Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question) (19 messages)
Legibility :: Readability (7 messages)
letterpress impression (3 messages)
letterpress impression (was Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today) (1 message)
matching Times 727 (1 message)
Need help with an old typographic pun (6 messages)
Need help with typo pun (2 messages)
Not-sign & URL (1 message)
Numbered among the elect (1 message)
Old guys and old type (8 messages)
organizing type libraries (7 messages)
Orthotypo : Url & non-division car. (2 messages)
Pangrams (5 messages)
Pangrams (Win by default). (1 message)
Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one! (34 messages)
Plotting typesetting solution--Fire two! (1 message)
polygraphic ? (1 message)
Potpourri (8 messages)
poygraphic ? (3 messages)
Pretzel change-o (1 message)
Readability studies - funding (5 messages)
Readability Study (29 messages)
Readability study - adaption (1 message)
Readability study - definitions again (2 messages)
Readability study - individuals (1 message)
readibility again (6 messages)
readibility vs legibility (10 & 5) (2 messages)
Readibily vs legibility (18 messages)
Readibily vs legibility TAN (5 messages)
readiblity again (1 message)
Reading is a monkey, not a river. (4 messages)
Rigidity, Gently (17 messages)
rrr, Lispingly (2 messages)
Serif Magazine (was Re: Potpourri) (1 message)
Simplification, Deeply (5 messages)
Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow (9 messages)
slash and burn (8 messages)
Stem Points? (2 messages)
syntax spacing (1 message)
syntax-antiqua (1 message)
Talking Typography (14 messages)
TDC2 2002 & TDC48 : Extended Extention (1 message)
Tea and Strumpets (3 messages)
Text for greeking text (1 message)
The Best of the Best: A Traveling Exhibition of the Guild of Book Workers - McCabe Library, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA - January 10 - February 20, 2002 (1 message)
The quick brown fox in Greek (6 messages)
The quick brown fox in Greek/Url & non-division car (3 messages)
The Royal Tenenbaums (4 messages)
The Royal Tennenbaums (4 messages)
The URLy-burly of linebreaks (1 message)
thin spaces (2 messages)
This just in : (1 message)
Two New Fonts (1 message)
Typeface ID and resources for same (was Re: The Royal Tenenbaums) (2 messages)
Types of 'Le Monde' (6 messages)
TYPO-L Digest - 12 Jan 2002 to 13 Jan 2002 (#2002-15) (2 messages)
TYPO-L Digest - 13 Jan 2002 to 14 Jan 2002 (#2002-16) (1 message)
TYPO-L Digest - 14 Jan 2002 to 15 Jan 2002 (#2002-17) (1 message)
TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21) (7 messages)
TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22) (9 messages)
TYPO-L Digest - 28 Jan 2002 to 29 Jan 2002 (#2002-32) (1 message)
typographical experimentation (1 message)
Typography Courses at Virginia (Mosley, Provan) (1 message)
Unger's Thoughts (1 message)
Unsubscribing from TYPO-L (2 messages)
Unwanted windows (was Film credit/poster design) (1 message)
Url & non-division car (1 message)
URL hyphens (1 message)
URL problems (30 messages)
URL problems (getting pretty TAN) (2 messages)
URL thank me for this (1 message)
URLs of wisdom (4 messages)
War on Pretzel (off topic) (1 message)
What do you want to know? was: readability study (10 messages)
X marks the spot (1 message)
[T-D] Film credit/poster design (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TYPO-L Home

TYPO-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

(ITC) Souvenir

Re: (ITC) Souvenir

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:09:35 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

(ITC) Souvenir (was Re: Do this, don't do that!)

(ITC) Souvenir (was Re: Do this, don't do that!)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:20:35 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

AIGA: You’re Invited to Face Off for LIte racy

AIGA: You’re Invited to Face Off for LIte racy

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:33:05 -0800

66 lines

New Thread

Alphabet Reform Baby (was:readability study)

Re: Alphabet Reform Baby (was:readability study)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 23:20:41 -0800

25 lines

Alphabet Reform Baby (was:readability study)

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:43:55 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

American Type-riding into the sunset

Re: American Type-riding into the sunset

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:53:10 -0800

44 lines

Re: American Type-riding into the sunset

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:14:59 -0500

19 lines

Re: American Type-riding into the sunset

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:39:51 -0500

27 lines

Re: American Type-riding into the sunset

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:43:36 +0000

40 lines

Re: American Type-riding into the sunset

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:27:19 -0500

35 lines

American Type-riding into the sunset

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:11:36 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

book recommendation

Re: book recommendation

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:37:00 +0100

42 lines

Re: book recommendation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:16:45 -0500

24 lines

book recommendation

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:08:54 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

Bookman

Bookman

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:45:33 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

Bringhurst

Re: Bringhurst

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 21:20:37 +0200

33 lines

Bringhurst

Wilkes, Don MSER:EX <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:32:04 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Bringhurst, was Re: Potpourri

Re: Bringhurst, was Re: Potpourri

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:57:25 -0500

25 lines

Bringhurst, was Re: Potpourri

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:05:01 -700

27 lines

New Thread

Capital, my capital...

Capital, my capital...

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:34:40 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Capitalization

Re: Capitalization

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:12:13 -0400

39 lines

Re: Capitalization

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 13:09:18 -0500

57 lines

Re: Capitalization

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:44:01 -0500

30 lines

Re: Capitalization

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:25:44 -0500

29 lines

Re: Capitalization

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 17:09:16 -0800

33 lines

Re: Capitalization

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:41:09 -0500

25 lines

Re: Capitalization

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:25:53 -0800

42 lines

Re: Capitalization

AudioEnz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 10:01:24 +1300

27 lines

Capitalization

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 20:48:27 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Comments on TypoL list discussion

Re: Comments on TypoL list discussion

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 07:08:15 -0800

64 lines

New Thread

comp.fonts entire archive (1988 onwards) online

Re: comp.fonts entire archive (1988 onwards) online

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:42:06 -0500

33 lines

comp.fonts entire archive (1988 onwards) online

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:53:04 -0000

29 lines

New Thread

Definition sources

Definition sources

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:17:29 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Designs for the euro sign

Designs for the euro sign

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:37:23 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

Dialup

Dialup

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:09:17 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Do this, don't do that!

Re: Do this, don't do that!

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:09:58 -0400

24 lines

Re: Do this, don't do that!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:07:30 EST

31 lines

Re: Do this, don't do that!

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:22:16 -0500

19 lines

Re: Do this, don't do that!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:14:43 EST

29 lines

Do this, don't do that!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:56:32 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Don't hate me because I'm cross posting this message!

Don't hate me because I'm cross posting this message!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:07:13 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Don't hate me... book reviews

Re: Don't hate me... book reviews

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:46:13 -0500

22 lines

Re: Don't hate me... book reviews

Delve Withrington <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:32:17 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 03:36:30 +0000

33 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:23:28 -0500

24 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:24:43 -0800

70 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:58:11 -0700

58 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:40:42 -0800

55 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:58:02 +0200

32 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:20:42 -0800

24 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:14:08 -0700

29 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 01:03:11 -0600

26 lines

Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:03:58 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Eurostile/style

Re: Eurostile/style

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:18:40 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Eurostile/style (was Re: American Type-riding into the sunset)

Re: Eurostile/style (was Re: American Type-riding into the sunset)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 23:26:57 +0200

32 lines

Re: Eurostile/style (was Re: American Type-riding into the sunset)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:40:57 -0500

20 lines

Eurostile/style (was Re: American Type-riding into the sunset)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:07:24 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

fa.typography

Re: fa.typography

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 19:18:52 -0800

25 lines

Re: fa.typography

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:16:39 -0400

21 lines

fa.typography

Lindsay Rollo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:59:05 +1300

19 lines

New Thread

Film credit/poster design

Re: Film credit/poster design

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:57:05 -0500

26 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 17:43:25 -0700

16 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 19:21:45 -0600

31 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design

Rui Duarte <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 18:38:07 GMT

64 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 12:48:27 -0400

17 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Dec 2001 21:25:39 -0700

45 lines

Film credit/poster design

Jason Babler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Dec 2001 21:14:02 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

Film credit/poster design TAN

Re: Film credit/poster design TAN

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 13:00:36 -0400

36 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design TAN

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 11:45:40 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

Follow up - Help I need a font

Re: Follow up - Help I need a font

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:37:51 -0600

23 lines

Re: Follow up - Help I need a font

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:20:46 -0600

45 lines

Re: Follow up - Help I need a font

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:40:53 -0800

25 lines

Re: Follow up - Help I need a font

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 16:01:55 -0600

28 lines

Follow up - Help I need a font

Alan Litchfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:28:26 +1300

17 lines

New Thread

FontLab v Fog

Re: FontLab v Fog

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:34:05 +0000

35 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:33:26 +0000

26 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:15:51 -0600

37 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:47:58 -0600

30 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:37:17 -0500

30 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Alexios Zavras <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:08:47 +0200

42 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:27:42 -0500

40 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 17:19:33 +0000

34 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:48:27 +0000

18 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:37:46 +0000

39 lines

FontLab v Fog

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:17:06 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

Friz, the cat of the Baskervilles

Friz, the cat of the Baskervilles

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:39:26 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

From TYPO-L

Re: From TYPO-L

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:45:06 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Comments on TypoL list discussion

Fwd: Comments on TypoL list discussion

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 06:53:17 -0800

60 lines

New Thread

Greek pangrams online

Re: Greek pangrams online

Alexios Zavras <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:32:30 +0200

34 lines

Re: Greek pangrams online

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:59:48 -0400

19 lines

Re: Greek pangrams online

Ramsey Margolis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:43:03 +1300

23 lines

Re: Greek pangrams online

Paula L. Guthat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 05:36:37 -0500

10 lines

Re: Greek pangrams online

Gerry Leonidas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:38:54 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

Help I need a font!

Re: Help I need a font!

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:35:21 -0600

31 lines

Re: Help I need a font!

Sigurdur Armannsson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:08:21 +0000

16 lines

Re: Help I need a font!

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 13:36:05 +0000

14 lines

Re: Help I need a font!

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 00:47:26 -0600

44 lines

Help I need a font!

Alan Litchfield <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 18:11:17 +1300

31 lines

New Thread

Hobos and ho boys

Re: Hobos and ho boys

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:04:18 -0500

19 lines

Re: Hobos and ho boys

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:54:17 -0800

37 lines

Hobos and ho boys

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:23:33 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 09:30:31 -0500

45 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 00:26:08 +0000

53 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:07:22 -0800

45 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:51:57 -0000

25 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:25:20 -0500

28 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:10:17 +0000

28 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:25:17 -0500

29 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:52:57 -0500

17 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:52:21 -0500

28 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:06:33 +0000

24 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 20:00:49 -0500

30 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:40:25 -0500

34 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:14:53 -0500

56 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:47:25 -0500

36 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:07:21 +0100

22 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:26:17 +0200

49 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:34:41 +0000

19 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:45:15 -0500

25 lines

Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 14:12:14 -0800

43 lines

New Thread

Legibility :: Readability

Re: Legibility :: Readability

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:02:54 +0200

48 lines

Re: Legibility :: Readability

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 03:03:36 -0800

43 lines

Re: Legibility :: Readability

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 10:23:48 -0800

28 lines

Re: Legibility :: Readability

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 09:51:45 -0800

36 lines

Re: Legibility :: Readability

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 17:45:56 +0200

54 lines

Re: Legibility :: Readability

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 06:42:42 -0800

62 lines

Legibility :: Readability

Lindsay Rollo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 15:37:09 +1300

28 lines

New Thread

letterpress impression

Re: letterpress impression

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:28:42 -0800

31 lines

Re: letterpress impression

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 09:42:47 -0700

39 lines

Re: letterpress impression

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:33:43 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

letterpress impression (was Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today)

letterpress impression (was Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:39:11 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

matching Times 727

matching Times 727

Bruce Kennett Studio <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 23:06:17 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

Need help with an old typographic pun

Re: Need help with an old typographic pun

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:30:00 EST

53 lines

Re: Need help with an old typographic pun

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:24:41 +0000

16 lines

Re: Need help with an old typographic pun

David S. Rose <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:19:52 -0500

69 lines

Re: Need help with an old typographic pun

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:24:40 +0000

52 lines

Re: Need help with an old typographic pun

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:09:18 -0500

31 lines

Need help with an old typographic pun

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:41:51 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Need help with typo pun

Re: Need help with typo pun

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:51:38 -0500

23 lines

Re: Need help with typo pun

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:57:16 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

Not-sign & URL

Re: Not-sign & URL

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:38:06 +0100

132 lines

New Thread

Numbered among the elect

Numbered among the elect

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:58:52 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Old guys and old type

Re: Old guys and old type

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2002 05:00:07 +0000

43 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Bruce Kennett Studio <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 19:59:42 -0500

30 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:17:42 +0200

33 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:04:12 -0500

24 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:01:41 -0800

29 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:17:21 +0200

69 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:17:22 -0500

21 lines

Old guys and old type

Robert Chapdu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:15:55 -0800

61 lines

New Thread

organizing type libraries

Re: organizing type libraries

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:31:36 -0500

58 lines

Re: organizing type libraries

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 08:22:05 +0000

59 lines

Re: organizing type libraries

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:25:30 -0500

74 lines

Re: organizing type libraries

Michele Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:08:11 -0500

110 lines

Re: organizing type libraries

adrian cockcroft <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:22:37 +0000

40 lines

Re: organizing type libraries

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:21:19 -0500

42 lines

organizing type libraries

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:24:33 -0800

80 lines

New Thread

Orthotypo : Url & non-division car.

Re: Orthotypo : Url & non-division car.

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 01:13:33 -0400

48 lines

Orthotypo : Url & non-division car.

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2002 23:54:04 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

Pangrams

Re: Pangrams

Perry Whittle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 21:24:51 -0800

33 lines

Re: Pangrams

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:15:54 EST

27 lines

Re: Pangrams

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:30:13 +0100

31 lines

Re: Pangrams

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:10:47 EST

24 lines

Re: Pangrams

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 02:44:21 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Pangrams (Win by default).

Re: Pangrams (Win by default).

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 16:57:38 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:05:18 -0500

34 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:32:32 +0100

61 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Alexios Zavras <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:01:56 +0200

30 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:28:05 EST

28 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:48:31 -0600

29 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:14:13 -0500

34 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:53:34 EST

26 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:29:47 EST

30 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:01:59 +0200

51 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:27:15 -0500

33 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:24:06 +0000

19 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:08:59 -0500

27 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:49:41 -0500

27 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

adrian cockcroft <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:47:34 +0000

47 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 12:37:47 -0800

37 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 10:31:19 -0800

30 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 10:41:08 -0800

22 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 13:29:39 EST

31 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 10:10:37 -0800

29 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 08:52:03 -0800

27 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 23:21:31 -0600

61 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 21:51:08 -0400

55 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:21:19 -0800

88 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 15:45:47 -700

51 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:10:20 -0500

33 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:28:56 -0500

36 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:50:44 -0400

40 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:16:48 -0500

29 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:55:39 -0800

73 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:43:06 -0500

62 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

parkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:29:22 -0800

52 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:03:51 -0500

24 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:54:48 -0500

42 lines

Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:39:59 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

Plotting typesetting solution--Fire two!

Plotting typesetting solution--Fire two!

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 00:50:45 -0600

55 lines

New Thread

polygraphic ?

Re: polygraphic ?

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:37:12 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

Potpourri

Re: Potpourri

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:40:33 +0200

32 lines

Re: Potpourri

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 09:41:27 +0100

38 lines

Potpourri

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:28:25 -0800

93 lines

Re: Potpourri

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:12:06 +0200

41 lines

Re: Potpourri

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:30:18 -0500

32 lines

Potpourri

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:01:26 -0800

30 lines

Re: Potpourri

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 07:24:13 -0500

31 lines

Potpourri

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 23:16:19 -0800

82 lines

New Thread

poygraphic ?

Re: poygraphic ?

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:12:38 -0000

32 lines

Re: poygraphic ?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:21:44 -0500

19 lines

poygraphic ?

Carel F H M Kuitenbrouwer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:04:06 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Pretzel change-o

Pretzel change-o

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:01:26 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Readability studies - funding

Re: Readability studies - funding

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:30:47 -0500

35 lines

Re: Readability studies - funding

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 14:35:58 -0800

33 lines

Re: Readability studies - funding

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 13:34:53 -0800

30 lines

Re: Readability studies - funding

Lindsay Rollo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:30:28 +1300

20 lines

Readability studies - funding

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 02:12:39 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Readability Study

Re: Readability Study

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:09:00 +0200

40 lines

Readability Study

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 22:52:45 -0800

176 lines

Re: readability study

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:35:48 -0500

32 lines

Re: readability study

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:53:10 +0200

54 lines

Re: readability study

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:22:45 -0000

27 lines

Re: readability study

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:31:34 -0800

113 lines

Re: readability study

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:25:27 +0200

24 lines

Re: readability study

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 10:48:46 -0800

26 lines

Re: readability study

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 10:43:24 -0800

56 lines

Re: readability study

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 13:43:54 -0500

29 lines

Re: readability study

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 08:34:38 -700

43 lines

Re: readability study

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 08:34:38 -700

38 lines

Re: readability study

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 17:30:33 +0200

52 lines

Re: readability study

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:15:51 -0700

29 lines

Re: readability study

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 18:40:12 -0800

22 lines

Re: readability study

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:21:27 -0500

41 lines

Re: readability study

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:25:09 -0400

70 lines

Re: readability study

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:18:15 -0800

69 lines

Re: readability study

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:29:42 +0200

47 lines

Re: readability study

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:28:54 +0200

34 lines

Re: readability study

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:55:03 -0700

25 lines

Re: readability study

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:45:36 -0800

70 lines

Re: readability study

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:43:16 -0700

40 lines

Re: readability study

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:34:49 -0700

27 lines

Re: readability study

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:09:42 -0400

85 lines

Re: readability study

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:54:54 -0800

59 lines

Re: readability study

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:19:17 -0700

25 lines

Re: readability study

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:42:14 -0800

73 lines

readability study

kemie guaida <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:02:28 -0800

53 lines

New Thread

Readability study - adaption

Readability study - adaption

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 13:26:27 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Readability study - definitions again

Re: Readability study - definitions again

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:24:00 +0200

84 lines

Readability study - definitions again

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:26:48 -0800

47 lines

New Thread

Readability study - individuals

Readability study - individuals

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:06:47 -0800

46 lines

New Thread

readibility again

Re: readibility again

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:05:32 -0500

20 lines

Re: readibility again

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:20:49 -0500

19 lines

Re: readibility again

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:53:18 -0500

18 lines

Re: readibility again

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:11:41 +0000

24 lines

Re: readibility again

Bruce Kennett Studio <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:57:05 -0500

38 lines

Re: readibility again

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:19:35 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

readibility vs legibility (10 & 5)

Re: readibility vs legibility (10 & 5)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:16:07 -0800

43 lines

Re: readibility vs legibility (10 & 5)

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:52:23 +0100

114 lines

New Thread

Readibily vs legibility

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:01:19 -700

54 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:15:49 +0200

40 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:47:48 +0000

19 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 23:58:43 -0400

60 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 09:13:34 +0100

76 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 17:14:06 -0800

37 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 16:13:24 -700

75 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:38:52 -0400

76 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 22:32:21 +0200

60 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:05:32 -0700

57 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:10:36 -0700

46 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:50:08 -0400

52 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

English, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:47:54 -0700

44 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Kristoffer Lindqvist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:16:08 +0200

21 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:05:33 +0100

34 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:56:08 +0200

32 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:51:11 -0800

48 lines

Readibily vs legibility

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:20:58 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

Readibily vs legibility TAN

Re: Readibily vs legibility TAN

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:49:47 -0500

18 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility TAN

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:42:23 -0500

19 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility TAN

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:32:54 +0200

34 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility TAN

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:10:58 -0500

18 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility TAN

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:14:48 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

readiblity again

Re: readiblity again

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:28:26 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Reading is a monkey, not a river.

Re: Reading is a monkey, not a river.

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 17:15:56 -0800

33 lines

Re: Reading is a monkey, not a river.

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 16:39:49 -0800

24 lines

Re: Reading is a monkey, not a river.

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:43:27 -0500

28 lines

Reading is a monkey, not a river.

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 07:57:41 +0000

15 lines

New Thread

Rigidity, Gently

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 09:39:01 -0800

25 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 23:08:41 -0700

31 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 22:51:08 -0800

87 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:35:00 -0500

23 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:14:14 -0700

38 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:58:47 -0800

78 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:39:27 -0800

79 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:06:08 -0700

44 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:54:58 -0800

85 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:54:28 -0800

40 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:22:18 +0200

31 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:11:42 -0800

53 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:34:28 -0500

31 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:45:51 -0800

83 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:32:58 -0800

18 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:28:28 -0800

61 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 19:44:51 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

rrr, Lispingly

Re: rrr, Lispingly

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:59:49 +0000

21 lines

rrr, Lispingly

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:22:00 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Serif Magazine (was Re: Potpourri)

Serif Magazine (was Re: Potpourri)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:43:22 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Simplification, Deeply

Re: Simplification, Deeply

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 12:32:01 -0500

23 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 23:21:31 -0800

119 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 02:34:50 +0000

51 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 15:53:16 -0700

111 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 15:24:51 -0800

95 lines

New Thread

Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:56:53 -0500

20 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:53:42 -0500

33 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:51:03 -0700

36 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:46:45 -0800

28 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:40:57 +0000

69 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:11:06 +0000

20 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 02:51:51 -0800

62 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 01:57:29 -0700

41 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 17:50:44 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

slash and burn

Re: slash and burn

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:30:35 -0500

24 lines

Re: slash and burn

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:49:37 -0700

29 lines

Re: slash and burn

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:16:59 +0000

22 lines

Re: slash and burn

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:56:29 -0500

20 lines

Re: slash and burn

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:54:43 -0500

35 lines

Re: slash and burn

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 09:48:56 -0800

43 lines

Re: slash and burn

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:13:10 -0500

50 lines

slash and burn

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:38:34 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

Stem Points?

Re: Stem Points?

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:05:56 +0000

18 lines

Stem Points?

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:15:00 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

syntax spacing

syntax spacing

Bruce Kennett Studio <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:17:59 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

syntax-antiqua

syntax-antiqua

Bruce Kennett Studio <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 23:12:27 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Talking Typography

Re: Talking Typography

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 01:26:38 -0400

21 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:02:46 -0800

35 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 20:37:46 -0400

28 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:44:33 -0800

29 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:22:29 -0700

29 lines

Re: Talking Typography

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:24:24 -0500

32 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:11:06 -0800

67 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:21:42 -0500

22 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:15:49 -0500

35 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:16:18 -0800

64 lines

Re: Talking Typography

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:40:14 -0500

75 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:18:19 -0800

46 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:08:00 -0700

45 lines

Talking Typography

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 12:50:45 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

TDC2 2002 & TDC48 : Extended Extention

TDC2 2002 & TDC48 : Extended Extention

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 01:35:10 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

Tea and Strumpets

Re: Tea and Strumpets

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:04:47 +0200

30 lines

Re: Tea and Strumpets

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:44:31 +0000

26 lines

Tea and Strumpets

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:02:59 -0800

44 lines

New Thread

Text for greeking text

Text for greeking text

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:33:12 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

The Best of the Best: A Traveling Exhibition of the Guild of Book Workers - McCabe Library, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA - January 10 - February 20, 2002

The Best of the Best: A Traveling Exhibition of the Guild of Book Workers - McCabe Library, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA - January 10 - February 20, 2002

Peter D. Verheyen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:13:30 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

The quick brown fox in Greek

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek

Ramsey Margolis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:04:26 +1300

33 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:18:13 -0800

23 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:10:55 EST

31 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:05:38 -0500

33 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:17:19 EST

30 lines

The quick brown fox in Greek

Ramsey Margolis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:16:49 +1300

25 lines

New Thread

The quick brown fox in Greek/Url & non-division car

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek/Url & non-division car

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:17:51 -0500

19 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek/Url & non-division car

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:00:44 -0500

28 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek/Url & non-division car

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:49:33 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

The Royal Tenenbaums

Re: The Royal Tenenbaums

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:23:04 -0500

31 lines

Re: The Royal Tenenbaums

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:59:00 -0400

42 lines

Re: The Royal Tenenbaums

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:49:25 +0100

24 lines

Re: The Royal Tenenbaums

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 02:46:31 -0700

56 lines

New Thread

The Royal Tennenbaums

Re: The Royal Tennenbaums

leslie harpold <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 22:16:19 -0500

35 lines

Re: The Royal Tennenbaums

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:56:10 -0800

21 lines

Re: The Royal Tennenbaums

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:03:19 -0400

30 lines

The Royal Tennenbaums

Brett Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:47:54 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

The URLy-burly of linebreaks

The URLy-burly of linebreaks

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:25:54 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

thin spaces

Re: thin spaces

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:18:09 +0100

38 lines

Thin Spaces

Lindsay Rollo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:46:37 +1300

30 lines

New Thread

This just in :

This just in :

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:51:39 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Two New Fonts

Two New Fonts

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:07:55 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

Typeface ID and resources for same (was Re: The Royal Tenenbaums)

Re: Typeface ID and resources for same (was Re: The Royal Tenenbaums)

Marten Thavenius <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:02:32 +0100

24 lines

Typeface ID and resources for same (was Re: The Royal Tenenbaums)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:16:43 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Types of 'Le Monde'

Re: Types of 'Le Monde'

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:48:44 +0200

48 lines

Re: Types of 'Le Monde'

English, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 16:24:27 -0700

55 lines

Re: Types of 'Le Monde'

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:15:41 +0200

37 lines

Re: Types of 'Le Monde'

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:05:10 -0800

20 lines

Re: Types of 'Le Monde'

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:12:48 +0200

28 lines

Re: Types of 'Le Monde'

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 09:34:19 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 12 Jan 2002 to 13 Jan 2002 (#2002-15)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 12 Jan 2002 to 13 Jan 2002 (#2002-15)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:37:00 -0500

22 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 12 Jan 2002 to 13 Jan 2002 (#2002-15)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:28:23 -0800

69 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 13 Jan 2002 to 14 Jan 2002 (#2002-16)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 13 Jan 2002 to 14 Jan 2002 (#2002-16)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 22:40:26 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 14 Jan 2002 to 15 Jan 2002 (#2002-17)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 14 Jan 2002 to 15 Jan 2002 (#2002-17)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:03:10 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:11:29 +0200

31 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:59:18 -0000

49 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:36:37 +0200

37 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 06:16:29 +0000

26 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2002 15:05:45 -0500

30 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:45:21 +0200

44 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:21:30 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:55:27 -0500

30 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:31:44 EST

27 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:57:54 -0500

33 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:19:25 EST

33 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:16:29 -0500

32 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:13:29 EST

35 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 17:41:44 -0500

34 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:20:51 EST

35 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:06:42 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 28 Jan 2002 to 29 Jan 2002 (#2002-32)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 28 Jan 2002 to 29 Jan 2002 (#2002-32)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:54:39 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

typographical experimentation

typographical experimentation

kemie guaida <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:40:10 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

Typography Courses at Virginia (Mosley, Provan)

Typography Courses at Virginia (Mosley, Provan)

Rare Book School <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:33:01 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

Unger's Thoughts

Unger's Thoughts

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 10:53:10 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:15:02 GMT

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:15:03 GMT

68 lines

New Thread

Unwanted windows (was Film credit/poster design)

Unwanted windows (was Film credit/poster design)

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 09:36:25 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Url & non-division car

Re: Url & non-division car

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 08:26:21 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

URL hyphens

URL hyphens

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:23:42 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

URL problems

Re: URL problems

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:58:09 -0500

26 lines

Re: URL problems

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2002 07:51:43 -0800

27 lines

Re: URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:20:47 -0800

36 lines

Re: URL problems

Peter Ring <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:48:00 +0100

36 lines

Re: URL problems

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:30:13 -0800

17 lines

Re: URL problems

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:17:20 EST

34 lines

Re: URL problems

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:52:06 -0500

44 lines

Re: URL problems

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:01:48 -0500

22 lines

Re: URL problems

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:42:38 +0000

33 lines

Re: URL problems

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:33:30 -0800

67 lines

Re: URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:29:26 -0800

29 lines

Re: URL problems

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:01:45 -0400

31 lines

Re: URL problems

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:54:44 -0500

40 lines

Re: URL problems

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:37:09 EST

34 lines

Re: URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:31:41 -0800

48 lines

Re: URL problems

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:58:57 -0500

23 lines

Re: URL problems

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:55:07 -0500

22 lines

Re: URL problems

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:00:28 -0500

29 lines

Re: URL problems

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:14:10 EST

26 lines

Re: URL problems

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:00:25 EST

23 lines

Re: URL problems

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:19:01 -0500

49 lines

Re: URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:24:35 -0800

52 lines

Re: URL problems

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:10:03 -0500

25 lines

Re: URL problems

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:09:42 -0500

34 lines

Re: URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:06:07 -0800

29 lines

Re: URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:04:52 -0800

56 lines

Re: URL problems

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:27:41 -0400

46 lines

Re: URL problems

Dan Franklin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:15:45 -0600

17 lines

URL problems

Maarten Idema III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:03:46 +0000

16 lines

URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:47:45 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

URL problems (getting pretty TAN)

Re: URL problems (getting pretty TAN)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:00:37 EST

31 lines

Re: URL problems (getting pretty TAN)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:29:48 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

URL thank me for this

URL thank me for this

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:23:27 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

URLs of wisdom

Re: URLs of wisdom

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:04:35 -0600

46 lines

Re: URLs of wisdom

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:52:59 -0500

22 lines

Re: URLs of wisdom

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:54:34 -0400

27 lines

URLs of wisdom

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:31:22 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

War on Pretzel (off topic)

War on Pretzel (off topic)

Ramiro Espinosa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:57:39 -0600

21 lines

New Thread

What do you want to know? was: readability study

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:38:26 -700

57 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 21:21:24 -0800

25 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 07:14:53 -0800

146 lines

What do you want to know? was: readability study

Karel van der Waarde <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:40:31 +0100

51 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 20:48:17 -0700

21 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:36:00 -0400

15 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:51:06 -0800

27 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:41:34 -0800

57 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 16:28:20 -0800

63 lines

What do you want to know? was: readability study

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 11:24:43 -0800

48 lines

New Thread

X marks the spot

X marks the spot

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:07:23 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

[T-D] Film credit/poster design

Re: [T-D] Film credit/poster design

Jason Babler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 21:03:33 -0700

47 lines

Re: [T-D] Film credit/poster design

kemie guaida <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 22:48:40 -0800

21 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
February 1994
January 1994
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager