LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


January 2002


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave TYPO-L
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re: (ITC) Souvenir

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:09:35 -0500

37 lines

(ITC) Souvenir (was Re: Do this, don't do that!)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:20:35 -0500

36 lines

AIGA: YouÂ’re Invited to Face Off for LIte racy

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:33:05 -0800

66 lines

Alphabet Reform Baby (was:readability study)

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:43:55 -0800

37 lines

Re: Alphabet Reform Baby (was:readability study)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 23:20:41 -0800

25 lines

American Type-riding into the sunset

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:11:36 -0500

24 lines

Re: American Type-riding into the sunset

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:27:19 -0500

35 lines

Re: American Type-riding into the sunset

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:43:36 +0000

40 lines

Re: American Type-riding into the sunset

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:39:51 -0500

27 lines

Re: American Type-riding into the sunset

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:14:59 -0500

19 lines

Re: American Type-riding into the sunset

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:53:10 -0800

44 lines

book recommendation

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:08:54 +0100

18 lines

Re: book recommendation

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:16:45 -0500

24 lines

Re: book recommendation

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:37:00 +0100

42 lines

Bookman

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:45:33 -0800

28 lines

Bringhurst

Wilkes, Don MSER:EX <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:32:04 -0800

25 lines

Re: Bringhurst

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 21:20:37 +0200

33 lines

Bringhurst, was Re: Potpourri

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:05:01 -700

27 lines

Re: Bringhurst, was Re: Potpourri

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:57:25 -0500

25 lines

Capital, my capital...

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:34:40 -0500

19 lines

Capitalization

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 20:48:27 +0000

22 lines

Re: Capitalization

AudioEnz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 10:01:24 +1300

27 lines

Re: Capitalization

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:25:53 -0800

42 lines

Re: Capitalization

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:41:09 -0500

25 lines

Re: Capitalization

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 17:09:16 -0800

33 lines

Re: Capitalization

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:25:44 -0500

29 lines

Re: Capitalization

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:44:01 -0500

30 lines

Re: Capitalization

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 13:09:18 -0500

57 lines

Re: Capitalization

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:12:13 -0400

39 lines

Re: Comments on TypoL list discussion

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 07:08:15 -0800

64 lines

comp.fonts entire archive (1988 onwards) online

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:53:04 -0000

29 lines

Re: comp.fonts entire archive (1988 onwards) online

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:42:06 -0500

33 lines

Definition sources

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:17:29 +0000

44 lines

Designs for the euro sign

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:37:23 +0000

21 lines

Dialup

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:09:17 -0500

20 lines

Do this, don't do that!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:56:32 -0500

41 lines

Re: Do this, don't do that!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:14:43 EST

29 lines

Re: Do this, don't do that!

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:22:16 -0500

19 lines

Re: Do this, don't do that!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:07:30 EST

31 lines

Re: Do this, don't do that!

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:09:58 -0400

24 lines

Don't hate me because I'm cross posting this message!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:07:13 -0500

36 lines

Re: Don't hate me... book reviews

Delve Withrington <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:32:17 -0800

26 lines

Re: Don't hate me... book reviews

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:46:13 -0500

22 lines

Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:03:58 -0800

27 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 01:03:11 -0600

26 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:14:08 -0700

29 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:20:42 -0800

24 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:58:02 +0200

32 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:40:42 -0800

55 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:58:11 -0700

58 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:24:43 -0800

70 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:23:28 -0500

24 lines

Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 03:36:30 +0000

33 lines

Re: Eurostile/style

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:18:40 -0500

20 lines

Eurostile/style (was Re: American Type-riding into the sunset)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:07:24 -0500

45 lines

Re: Eurostile/style (was Re: American Type-riding into the sunset)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:40:57 -0500

20 lines

Re: Eurostile/style (was Re: American Type-riding into the sunset)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 23:26:57 +0200

32 lines

fa.typography

Lindsay Rollo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:59:05 +1300

19 lines

Re: fa.typography

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:16:39 -0400

21 lines

Re: fa.typography

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 19:18:52 -0800

25 lines

Film credit/poster design

Jason Babler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Dec 2001 21:14:02 -0700

34 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Dec 2001 21:25:39 -0700

45 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 12:48:27 -0400

17 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design

Rui Duarte <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 18:38:07 GMT

64 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 19:21:45 -0600

31 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 17:43:25 -0700

16 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:57:05 -0500

26 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design TAN

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 11:45:40 +0000

28 lines

Re: Film credit/poster design TAN

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 13:00:36 -0400

36 lines

Follow up - Help I need a font

Alan Litchfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:28:26 +1300

17 lines

Re: Follow up - Help I need a font

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 16:01:55 -0600

28 lines

Re: Follow up - Help I need a font

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:40:53 -0800

25 lines

Re: Follow up - Help I need a font

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:20:46 -0600

45 lines

Re: Follow up - Help I need a font

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:37:51 -0600

23 lines

FontLab v Fog

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:17:06 +0000

26 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:37:46 +0000

39 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:48:27 +0000

18 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 17:19:33 +0000

34 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:27:42 -0500

40 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Alexios Zavras <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:08:47 +0200

42 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:37:17 -0500

30 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:47:58 -0600

30 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:15:51 -0600

37 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:33:26 +0000

26 lines

Re: FontLab v Fog

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:34:05 +0000

35 lines

Friz, the cat of the Baskervilles

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:39:26 -0500

32 lines

Re: From TYPO-L

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:45:06 +0000

28 lines

Fwd: Comments on TypoL list discussion

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 06:53:17 -0800

60 lines

Re: Greek pangrams online

Gerry Leonidas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:38:54 +0000

18 lines

Re: Greek pangrams online

Paula L. Guthat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 05:36:37 -0500

10 lines

Re: Greek pangrams online

Ramsey Margolis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:43:03 +1300

23 lines

Re: Greek pangrams online

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:59:48 -0400

19 lines

Re: Greek pangrams online

Alexios Zavras <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:32:30 +0200

34 lines

Help I need a font!

Alan Litchfield <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 18:11:17 +1300

31 lines

Re: Help I need a font!

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 00:47:26 -0600

44 lines

Re: Help I need a font!

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 13:36:05 +0000

14 lines

Re: Help I need a font!

Sigurdur Armannsson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:08:21 +0000

16 lines

Re: Help I need a font!

Mark Simonson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:35:21 -0600

31 lines

Hobos and ho boys

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:23:33 -0500

19 lines

Re: Hobos and ho boys

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:54:17 -0800

37 lines

Re: Hobos and ho boys

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:04:18 -0500

19 lines

Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 14:12:14 -0800

43 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:45:15 -0500

25 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:34:41 +0000

19 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:26:17 +0200

49 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:07:21 +0100

22 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:47:25 -0500

36 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:14:53 -0500

56 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:40:25 -0500

34 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 20:00:49 -0500

30 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:06:33 +0000

24 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:52:21 -0500

28 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:52:57 -0500

17 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:25:17 -0500

29 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:10:17 +0000

28 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:25:20 -0500

28 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:51:57 -0000

25 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:07:22 -0800

45 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 00:26:08 +0000

53 lines

Re: Justifying ASCII Paragraphs (+ Bonus Question)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 09:30:31 -0500

45 lines

Legibility :: Readability

Lindsay Rollo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 15:37:09 +1300

28 lines

Re: Legibility :: Readability

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 06:42:42 -0800

62 lines

Re: Legibility :: Readability

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 17:45:56 +0200

54 lines

Re: Legibility :: Readability

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 09:51:45 -0800

36 lines

Re: Legibility :: Readability

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 10:23:48 -0800

28 lines

Re: Legibility :: Readability

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 03:03:36 -0800

43 lines

Re: Legibility :: Readability

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:02:54 +0200

48 lines

Re: letterpress impression

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:33:43 -0500

25 lines

Re: letterpress impression

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 09:42:47 -0700

39 lines

Re: letterpress impression

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:28:42 -0800

31 lines

letterpress impression (was Re: Emigre "Hot Type Redefined" in LA Times today)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:39:11 -0500

42 lines

matching Times 727

Bruce Kennett Studio <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 23:06:17 -0500

63 lines

Need help with an old typographic pun

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:41:51 -0500

38 lines

Re: Need help with an old typographic pun

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:09:18 -0500

31 lines

Re: Need help with an old typographic pun

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:24:40 +0000

52 lines

Re: Need help with an old typographic pun

David S. Rose <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:19:52 -0500

69 lines

Re: Need help with an old typographic pun

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:24:41 +0000

16 lines

Re: Need help with an old typographic pun

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:30:00 EST

53 lines

Re: Need help with typo pun

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:57:16 +0100

15 lines

Re: Need help with typo pun

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:51:38 -0500

23 lines

Re: Not-sign & URL

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:38:06 +0100

132 lines

Numbered among the elect

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:58:52 -0500

32 lines

Old guys and old type

Robert Chapdu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:15:55 -0800

61 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:17:22 -0500

21 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:17:21 +0200

69 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:01:41 -0800

29 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:04:12 -0500

24 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:17:42 +0200

33 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Bruce Kennett Studio <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 19:59:42 -0500

30 lines

Re: Old guys and old type

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2002 05:00:07 +0000

43 lines

organizing type libraries

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:24:33 -0800

80 lines

Re: organizing type libraries

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:21:19 -0500

42 lines

Re: organizing type libraries

adrian cockcroft <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:22:37 +0000

40 lines

Re: organizing type libraries

Michele Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:08:11 -0500

110 lines

Re: organizing type libraries

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:25:30 -0500

74 lines

Re: organizing type libraries

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 08:22:05 +0000

59 lines

Re: organizing type libraries

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:31:36 -0500

58 lines

Orthotypo : Url & non-division car.

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2002 23:54:04 +0100

57 lines

Re: Orthotypo : Url & non-division car.

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 01:13:33 -0400

48 lines

Re: Pangrams

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 02:44:21 +0100

49 lines

Re: Pangrams

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:10:47 EST

24 lines

Re: Pangrams

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:30:13 +0100

31 lines

Re: Pangrams

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:15:54 EST

27 lines

Re: Pangrams

Perry Whittle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 21:24:51 -0800

33 lines

Re: Pangrams (Win by default).

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 16:57:38 +0100

25 lines

Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:39:59 -0600

48 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:54:48 -0500

42 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:03:51 -0500

24 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

parkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:29:22 -0800

52 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:43:06 -0500

62 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:55:39 -0800

73 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:16:48 -0500

29 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:50:44 -0400

40 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:28:56 -0500

36 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:10:20 -0500

33 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 15:45:47 -700

51 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:21:19 -0800

88 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 21:51:08 -0400

55 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 23:21:31 -0600

61 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 08:52:03 -0800

27 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 10:10:37 -0800

29 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 13:29:39 EST

31 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 10:41:08 -0800

22 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 10:31:19 -0800

30 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 12:37:47 -0800

37 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

adrian cockcroft <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:47:34 +0000

47 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:49:41 -0500

27 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:08:59 -0500

27 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:24:06 +0000

19 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:27:15 -0500

33 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:01:59 +0200

51 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:29:47 EST

30 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:53:34 EST

26 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:14:13 -0500

34 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:48:31 -0600

29 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:28:05 EST

28 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Alexios Zavras <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:01:56 +0200

30 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:32:32 +0100

61 lines

Re: Plotting typesetting solution--Fire one!

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:05:18 -0500

34 lines

Plotting typesetting solution--Fire two!

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2002 00:50:45 -0600

55 lines

Re: polygraphic ?

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:37:12 -0800

19 lines

Potpourri

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 23:16:19 -0800

82 lines

Re: Potpourri

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 07:24:13 -0500

31 lines

Potpourri

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:01:26 -0800

30 lines

Re: Potpourri

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:30:18 -0500

32 lines

Re: Potpourri

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:12:06 +0200

41 lines

Potpourri

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:28:25 -0800

93 lines

Re: Potpourri

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 09:41:27 +0100

38 lines

Re: Potpourri

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:40:33 +0200

32 lines

poygraphic ?

Carel F H M Kuitenbrouwer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:04:06 +0100

23 lines

Re: poygraphic ?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:21:44 -0500

19 lines

Re: poygraphic ?

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:12:38 -0000

32 lines

Pretzel change-o

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:01:26 -0500

22 lines

Readability studies - funding

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 02:12:39 -0800

25 lines

Re: Readability studies - funding

Lindsay Rollo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:30:28 +1300

20 lines

Re: Readability studies - funding

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 13:34:53 -0800

30 lines

Re: Readability studies - funding

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 14:35:58 -0800

33 lines

Re: Readability studies - funding

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:30:47 -0500

35 lines

readability study

kemie guaida <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:02:28 -0800

53 lines

Re: readability study

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:42:14 -0800

73 lines

Re: readability study

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:19:17 -0700

25 lines

Re: readability study

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:54:54 -0800

59 lines

Re: readability study

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:09:42 -0400

85 lines

Re: readability study

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:34:49 -0700

27 lines

Re: readability study

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:43:16 -0700

40 lines

Re: readability study

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:45:36 -0800

70 lines

Re: readability study

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:55:03 -0700

25 lines

Re: readability study

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:28:54 +0200

34 lines

Re: readability study

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:29:42 +0200

47 lines

Re: readability study

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:18:15 -0800

69 lines

Re: readability study

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:25:09 -0400

70 lines

Re: readability study

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:21:27 -0500

41 lines

Re: readability study

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 18:40:12 -0800

22 lines

Re: readability study

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:15:51 -0700

29 lines

Re: readability study

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 17:30:33 +0200

52 lines

Re: readability study

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 08:34:38 -700

38 lines

Re: readability study

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 08:34:38 -700

43 lines

Re: readability study

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 13:43:54 -0500

29 lines

Re: readability study

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 10:43:24 -0800

56 lines

Re: readability study

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 10:48:46 -0800

26 lines

Re: readability study

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:25:27 +0200

24 lines

Re: readability study

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:31:34 -0800

113 lines

Re: readability study

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:22:45 -0000

27 lines

Re: readability study

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:53:10 +0200

54 lines

Re: readability study

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:35:48 -0500

32 lines

Readability Study

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 22:52:45 -0800

176 lines

Re: Readability Study

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:09:00 +0200

40 lines

Readability study - adaption

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 13:26:27 -0800

27 lines

Readability study - definitions again

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:26:48 -0800

47 lines

Re: Readability study - definitions again

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:24:00 +0200

84 lines

Readability study - individuals

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:06:47 -0800

46 lines

Re: readibility again

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:19:35 +0100

20 lines

Re: readibility again

Bruce Kennett Studio <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:57:05 -0500

38 lines

Re: readibility again

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:11:41 +0000

24 lines

Re: readibility again

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:53:18 -0500

18 lines

Re: readibility again

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:20:49 -0500

19 lines

Re: readibility again

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:05:32 -0500

20 lines

Re: readibility vs legibility (10 & 5)

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:52:23 +0100

114 lines

Re: readibility vs legibility (10 & 5)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:16:07 -0800

43 lines

Readibily vs legibility

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:20:58 +0100

45 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:51:11 -0800

48 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:56:08 +0200

32 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:05:33 +0100

34 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Kristoffer Lindqvist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:16:08 +0200

21 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

English, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:47:54 -0700

44 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:50:08 -0400

52 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:10:36 -0700

46 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:05:32 -0700

57 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 22:32:21 +0200

60 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:38:52 -0400

76 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 16:13:24 -700

75 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 17:14:06 -0800

37 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 09:13:34 +0100

76 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 23:58:43 -0400

60 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:47:48 +0000

19 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:15:49 +0200

40 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:01:19 -700

54 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility TAN

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:14:48 -0800

35 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility TAN

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:10:58 -0500

18 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility TAN

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:32:54 +0200

34 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility TAN

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:42:23 -0500

19 lines

Re: Readibily vs legibility TAN

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:49:47 -0500

18 lines

Re: readiblity again

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:28:26 -0500

38 lines

Reading is a monkey, not a river.

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 07:57:41 +0000

15 lines

Re: Reading is a monkey, not a river.

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:43:27 -0500

28 lines

Re: Reading is a monkey, not a river.

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 16:39:49 -0800

24 lines

Re: Reading is a monkey, not a river.

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 17:15:56 -0800

33 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 19:44:51 +0200

33 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:28:28 -0800

61 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:32:58 -0800

18 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:45:51 -0800

83 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:34:28 -0500

31 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:11:42 -0800

53 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:22:18 +0200

31 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:54:28 -0800

40 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:54:58 -0800

85 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:06:08 -0700

44 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:39:27 -0800

79 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:58:47 -0800

78 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:14:14 -0700

38 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:35:00 -0500

23 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 22:51:08 -0800

87 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 23:08:41 -0700

31 lines

Re: Rigidity, Gently

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 09:39:01 -0800

25 lines

rrr, Lispingly

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:22:00 -0800

25 lines

Re: rrr, Lispingly

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:59:49 +0000

21 lines

Serif Magazine (was Re: Potpourri)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:43:22 -0500

34 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 15:24:51 -0800

95 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 15:53:16 -0700

111 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 02:34:50 +0000

51 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 23:21:31 -0800

119 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 12:32:01 -0500

23 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 17:50:44 -0800

34 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 01:57:29 -0700

41 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 02:51:51 -0800

62 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:11:06 +0000

20 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:40:57 +0000

69 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:46:45 -0800

28 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:51:03 -0700

36 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:53:42 -0500

33 lines

Re: Simplification, Deeply TAN: snow

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:56:53 -0500

20 lines

slash and burn

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:38:34 -0800

39 lines

Re: slash and burn

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:13:10 -0500

50 lines

Re: slash and burn

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 09:48:56 -0800

43 lines

Re: slash and burn

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:54:43 -0500

35 lines

Re: slash and burn

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:56:29 -0500

20 lines

Re: slash and burn

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:16:59 +0000

22 lines

Re: slash and burn

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:49:37 -0700

29 lines

Re: slash and burn

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:30:35 -0500

24 lines

Stem Points?

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:15:00 +0000

25 lines

Re: Stem Points?

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:05:56 +0000

18 lines

syntax spacing

Bruce Kennett Studio <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:17:59 -0500

37 lines

syntax-antiqua

Bruce Kennett Studio <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 23:12:27 -0500

20 lines

Talking Typography

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 12:50:45 -0800

32 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:08:00 -0700

45 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:18:19 -0800

46 lines

Re: Talking Typography

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:40:14 -0500

75 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:16:18 -0800

64 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:15:49 -0500

35 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:21:42 -0500

22 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:11:06 -0800

67 lines

Re: Talking Typography

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:24:24 -0500

32 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:22:29 -0700

29 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:44:33 -0800

29 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 20:37:46 -0400

28 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:02:46 -0800

35 lines

Re: Talking Typography

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2002 01:26:38 -0400

21 lines

TDC2 2002 & TDC48 : Extended Extention

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 01:35:10 -0400

45 lines

Tea and Strumpets

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:02:59 -0800

44 lines

Re: Tea and Strumpets

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:44:31 +0000

26 lines

Re: Tea and Strumpets

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:04:47 +0200

30 lines

Text for greeking text

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:33:12 -0500

25 lines

The Best of the Best: A Traveling Exhibition of the Guild of Book Workers - McCabe Library, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA - January 10 - February 20, 2002

Peter D. Verheyen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:13:30 -0500

63 lines

The quick brown fox in Greek

Ramsey Margolis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:16:49 +1300

25 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:17:19 EST

30 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:05:38 -0500

33 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:10:55 EST

31 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:18:13 -0800

23 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek

Ramsey Margolis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:04:26 +1300

33 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek/Url & non-division car

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:49:33 +0000

44 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek/Url & non-division car

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:00:44 -0500

28 lines

Re: The quick brown fox in Greek/Url & non-division car

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:17:51 -0500

19 lines

Re: The Royal Tenenbaums

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 02:46:31 -0700

56 lines

Re: The Royal Tenenbaums

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:49:25 +0100

24 lines

Re: The Royal Tenenbaums

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:59:00 -0400

42 lines

Re: The Royal Tenenbaums

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:23:04 -0500

31 lines

The Royal Tennenbaums

Brett Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:47:54 -0800

37 lines

Re: The Royal Tennenbaums

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:03:19 -0400

30 lines

Re: The Royal Tennenbaums

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:56:10 -0800

21 lines

Re: The Royal Tennenbaums

leslie harpold <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 22:16:19 -0500

35 lines

The URLy-burly of linebreaks

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:25:54 -0500

26 lines

Thin Spaces

Lindsay Rollo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:46:37 +1300

30 lines

Re: thin spaces

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:18:09 +0100

38 lines

This just in :

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:51:39 -0400

32 lines

Two New Fonts

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:07:55 -0600

43 lines

Typeface ID and resources for same (was Re: The Royal Tenenbaums)

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:16:43 -0500

41 lines

Re: Typeface ID and resources for same (was Re: The Royal Tenenbaums)

Marten Thavenius <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:02:32 +0100

24 lines

Re: Types of 'Le Monde'

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 09:34:19 +0100

19 lines

Re: Types of 'Le Monde'

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:12:48 +0200

28 lines

Re: Types of 'Le Monde'

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:05:10 -0800

20 lines

Re: Types of 'Le Monde'

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:15:41 +0200

37 lines

Re: Types of 'Le Monde'

English, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2002 16:24:27 -0700

55 lines

Re: Types of 'Le Monde'

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:48:44 +0200

48 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 12 Jan 2002 to 13 Jan 2002 (#2002-15)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:28:23 -0800

69 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 12 Jan 2002 to 13 Jan 2002 (#2002-15)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:37:00 -0500

22 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 13 Jan 2002 to 14 Jan 2002 (#2002-16)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2002 22:40:26 -0800

36 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 14 Jan 2002 to 15 Jan 2002 (#2002-17)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:03:10 -0800

34 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:21:30 -0800

32 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:45:21 +0200

44 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2002 15:05:45 -0500

30 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 06:16:29 +0000

26 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:36:37 +0200

37 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:59:18 -0000

49 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jan 2002 to 19 Jan 2002 (#2002-21)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:11:29 +0200

31 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:06:42 -0800

30 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:20:51 EST

35 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 17:41:44 -0500

34 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:13:29 EST

35 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:16:29 -0500

32 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:19:25 EST

33 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:57:54 -0500

33 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:31:44 EST

27 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 19 Jan 2002 to 20 Jan 2002 (#2002-22)

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:55:27 -0500

30 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 28 Jan 2002 to 29 Jan 2002 (#2002-32)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:54:39 -0800

18 lines

typographical experimentation

kemie guaida <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:40:10 -0800

17 lines

Typography Courses at Virginia (Mosley, Provan)

Rare Book School <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:33:01 -0500

57 lines

Unger's Thoughts

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2002 10:53:10 -0800

18 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:15:03 GMT

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:15:02 GMT

68 lines

Unwanted windows (was Film credit/poster design)

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 09:36:25 -0500

29 lines

Re: Url & non-division car

Jef Tombeur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 08:26:21 +0100

59 lines

URL hyphens

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:23:42 -0800

34 lines

URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:47:45 -0800

39 lines

URL problems

Maarten Idema III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:03:46 +0000

16 lines

Re: URL problems

Dan Franklin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:15:45 -0600

17 lines

Re: URL problems

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:27:41 -0400

46 lines

Re: URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:04:52 -0800

56 lines

Re: URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:06:07 -0800

29 lines

Re: URL problems

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:09:42 -0500

34 lines

Re: URL problems

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:10:03 -0500

25 lines

Re: URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:24:35 -0800

52 lines

Re: URL problems

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:19:01 -0500

49 lines

Re: URL problems

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:00:25 EST

23 lines

Re: URL problems

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:14:10 EST

26 lines

Re: URL problems

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:00:28 -0500

29 lines

Re: URL problems

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:55:07 -0500

22 lines

Re: URL problems

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:58:57 -0500

23 lines

Re: URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:31:41 -0800

48 lines

Re: URL problems

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:37:09 EST

34 lines

Re: URL problems

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:54:44 -0500

40 lines

Re: URL problems

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:01:45 -0400

31 lines

Re: URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:29:26 -0800

29 lines

Re: URL problems

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:33:30 -0800

67 lines

Re: URL problems

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:42:38 +0000

33 lines

Re: URL problems

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:01:48 -0500

22 lines

Re: URL problems

William Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:52:06 -0500

44 lines

Re: URL problems

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:17:20 EST

34 lines

Re: URL problems

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:30:13 -0800

17 lines

Re: URL problems

Peter Ring <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:48:00 +0100

36 lines

Re: URL problems

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:20:47 -0800

36 lines

Re: URL problems

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2002 07:51:43 -0800

27 lines

Re: URL problems

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:58:09 -0500

26 lines

Re: URL problems (getting pretty TAN)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:29:48 -0500

45 lines

Re: URL problems (getting pretty TAN)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:00:37 EST

31 lines

URL thank me for this

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:23:27 -0500

25 lines

URLs of wisdom

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:31:22 -0500

33 lines

Re: URLs of wisdom

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:54:34 -0400

27 lines

Re: URLs of wisdom

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:52:59 -0500

22 lines

Re: URLs of wisdom

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:04:35 -0600

46 lines

War on Pretzel (off topic)

Ramiro Espinosa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:57:39 -0600

21 lines

What do you want to know? was: readability study

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 11:24:43 -0800

48 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 16:28:20 -0800

63 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:41:34 -0800

57 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:51:06 -0800

27 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:36:00 -0400

15 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Gerald Lange <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 20:48:17 -0700

21 lines

What do you want to know? was: readability study

Karel van der Waarde <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:40:31 +0100

51 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 07:14:53 -0800

146 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2002 21:21:24 -0800

25 lines

Re: What do you want to know? was: readability study

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:38:26 -700

57 lines

X marks the spot

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:07:23 -0500

20 lines

Re: [T-D] Film credit/poster design

kemie guaida <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 22:48:40 -0800

21 lines

Re: [T-D] Film credit/poster design

Jason Babler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2002 21:03:33 -0700

47 lines


Back to: Main TYPO-L Page



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager