LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


June 2001


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"No Logo"(Was: Re: Blackletter) (3 messages)
"No Logo"/Rotis :( (1 message)
<<Norwegian guillemets>> (2 messages)
A CANTICLE FOR LEIBOWITZ (1 message)
Advice, please (33 messages)
ATypI Copenhagen program (3 messages)
Blackletter (2 messages)
Blackletter = Nazi? (Was: Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?) (4 messages)
Book notice (3 messages)
Bringhurst, book exhibit in SF (1 message)
Bruggenletter (was Re: Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam) (4 messages)
California cursive-contest bill (SB 420) has the title "Palmer Method comp" [for "competition"] (1 message)
Celtic Gospel Books links (2 messages)
Don't stop thinking of going your own way (1 message)
Dot Dot Dot . . . (4 messages)
Empire of the Sultans (2 messages)
Euro Symbol (13 messages)
fa.typography question (2 messages)
Falsum & other handwriting fonts (1 message)
FHWA/Highway_Gothic/Interstate/Blue_Highway (4 messages)
First print of (5 messages)
fonts and Mac OS X? (13 messages)
Fonts for e-book (1 message)
for full text of the Washington TIMES handwriting-story (it didn't make the web-site), ask me & I'll e-mail it (2 messages)
for those who've had experiences with graphologists (15 messages)
Formal Riding Gear Optional (2 messages)
Formal Writing Gear (6 messages)
Formalism (small typo content) [was: Oxymorons (nil typo content)] (2 messages)
Fraktur - bad; swastika - bad; posters - gut (4 messages)
FW: PAGA's for sale (1 message)
Fwd: query: readability research (1 message)
Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airp orts) (5 messages)
Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports) (12 messages)
Guillemets point in or out? (8 messages)
Handwriting analysis/Kristin's query (1 message)
Handwriting font (1 message)
handwriting fonts (20 messages)
Handwriting fonts: what to charge? (17 messages)
Help Identifying Font (1 message)
Here is the full text of the Washington TIMES handwriting-story (1 message)
High on ASCII (17 messages)
High on ASCII/happy birthday Hrant (5 messages)
Highlights (7 messages)
Horsey Type (1 message)
Horsy Type (8 messages)
Hrant 4 months from 1/3 century (1 message)
Introductions? (7 messages)
Islam and calligraphy (1 message)
Islam and calligraphy (was digest blah blah) (1 message)
Keepin' it real (1 message)
Kristin's query (1 message)
Leni et al.... (3 messages)
License Plate Highway Stuff (2 messages)
Linotype fonts for Mac OS X (1 message)
Lore Ipsum Falsum (5 messages)
Lorem Ipsum Falsum (18 messages)
mail lists (1 message)
Making a fascism statement--NOT (20 messages)
Moderation (1 message)
More Highway Stuff (6 messages)
more on @ (2 messages)
more on graphology (5 messages)
more on graphology (moron graphology?: a horror-story (3 messages)
More on: SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL CONNOTATIONS OF FONTS (4 messages)
movie about NYT's last night of hot type? (5 messages)
Name the @ conversation revived (2 messages)
Name the @ symbol (2 messages)
newbie question re TYPO-L archives and FreeBSD (2 messages)
Nina -> Tahoma -> Verdana -> Santa Maria (4 messages)
of possible interest (1 message)
Off topic: Enough? (2 messages)
Off-Topic (1 message)
OT eye of needle; was: handwriting fonts (1 message)
Oxymoron (1 message)
Oxymorons (nil typo content) (13 messages)
Oxymorons (Was:Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?) (6 messages)
Parmenides Photos + Open Studio Announcement (1 message)
Parmenides PT. 2 (2 messages)
Pencil & Paper (10 messages)
Posting Style (Re: Introductions?) (9 messages)
Problems with Mac to PC conversion (4 messages)
Responsibilities to font vendors (4 messages)
Signs of change at New York airports (3 messages)
Spacing/kerning (11 messages)
Still Off Topic: Orwell; was: Leni et al.... (2 messages)
Study of fonts reveals the real you (1 message)
Suitcase question (1 message)
Taking a Break (2 messages)
Taxi dashboards (1 message)
TDC47 in SF for HOW (1 message)
Teaching (Was Re: Advice, please) (2 messages)
Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California (20 messages)
TT for PC, T1 for Mac (6 messages)
Two tangents to the holy books thread (4 messages)
Type designer obit (1 message)
type id (2 messages)
Typecon2001 last day to register (1 message)
Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam (1 message)
Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam (& something else as well) (2 messages)
TYPO-L Digest - 14 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-25) (5 messages)
TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-31) (1 message)
TYPO-L Digest - 20 Jun 2001 to 21 Jun 2001 (#2001-34) (9 messages)
TYPO-L Digest - 21 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-35) (1 message)
UNC visual journalism teaching opening (fwd) (1 message)
unsubscribe (1 message)
Unsubscribing from TYPO-L (3 messages)
visit http://www.washtimes.com, Saturday and Sunday, for a feature-story interviewing a listmember (1 message)
web type pet peeve (40 messages)
where are typographer.com? (2 messages)
where there's a will there's a triumph (2 messages)
workshop (1 message)
WWII propaganda typography (1 message)
[OT] Re: where there's a will there's a triumph (10 messages)
[OT] was Re: Falsum & other handwriting fonts (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TYPO-L Home

TYPO-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"No Logo"(Was: Re: Blackletter)

Re: "No Logo"(Was: Re: Blackletter)

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:24:23 +0100

37 lines

Re: "No Logo"(Was: Re: Blackletter)

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:41:25 -0700

19 lines

"No Logo"(Was: Re: Blackletter)

Kai Bernau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:57:11 +0200

28 lines

New Thread

"No Logo"/Rotis :(

Re: "No Logo"/Rotis :(

Kai Bernau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 17:31:46 +0200

54 lines

New Thread

<<Norwegian guillemets>>

Re: <<Norwegian guillemets>>

Per Olav Walmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2001 08:41:17 +0200

36 lines

<<Norwegian guillemets>>

Christer Hellmark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:58:55 +0200

15 lines

New Thread

A CANTICLE FOR LEIBOWITZ

A CANTICLE FOR LEIBOWITZ

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:11:15 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

Advice, please

Re: Advice, please

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Jun 2001 03:50:24 +0100

30 lines

Re: Advice, please

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:08:18 -0400

30 lines

Re: Advice, please

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:32:07 +0200

40 lines

Re: Advice, please

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:15:25 -0300

40 lines

Re: Advice, please

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 18:47:21 +0200

33 lines

Re: Advice, please

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:51:15 -0300

26 lines

Re: Advice, please

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 18:30:10 +0200

33 lines

Re: Advice, please

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:28:39 -0700

40 lines

Re: Advice, please

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 00:06:30 -0300

37 lines

Re: Advice, please

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:38:51 -0700

63 lines

Re: Advice, please

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:15:56 -0400

38 lines

Re: Advice, please

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:06:06 +0200

29 lines

Re: Advice, please

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:48:57 -0400

27 lines

Re: Advice, please

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:34:11 +0100

27 lines

Re: Advice, please

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:20:10 -0300

43 lines

Re: Advice, please

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:23:08 -0700

51 lines

Re: Advice, please

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:46:44 -0300

49 lines

Re: Advice, please

Jay Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:26:41 -0400

66 lines

Re: Advice, please

Jay Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:21:19 -0400

87 lines

Re: Advice, please

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:18:59 -0400

37 lines

Re: Advice, please

Jay Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:02:23 -0400

147 lines

Re: Advice, please

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:46:59 -0400

47 lines

Re: Advice, please

Jay Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:31:39 -0400

44 lines

Re: Advice, please

Jay Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:30:16 -0400

78 lines

Re: Advice, please

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:29:37 -0400

25 lines

Re: Advice, please

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:37:07 -0400

33 lines

Re: Advice, please

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:19:19 -0700

27 lines

Re: Advice, please

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:10:38 +0200

43 lines

Re: Advice, please

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:32:58 -0700

36 lines

Re: Advice, please

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:23:51 -0400

30 lines

Re: Advice, please

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:18:28 +0100

35 lines

Re: Advice, please

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:13:53 -0400

34 lines

Advice, please

Jay Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:34:05 -0400

74 lines

New Thread

ATypI Copenhagen program

Re: ATypI Copenhagen program

matt carey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:46:17 +0100

47 lines

Re: ATypI Copenhagen program

Jay Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:36:55 -0400

73 lines

ATypI Copenhagen program

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:10:34 +0200

44 lines

New Thread

Blackletter

Re: Blackletter

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:18:46 -0300

22 lines

Re: Blackletter

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:15:03 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Blackletter = Nazi? (Was: Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?)

Re: Blackletter = Nazi? (Was: Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:43:11 EDT

34 lines

Re: Blackletter = Nazi? (Was: Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?)

Kai Bernau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:34:38 +0200

36 lines

Re: Blackletter = Nazi? (Was: Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?)

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 05:35:38 -0700

31 lines

Blackletter = Nazi? (Was: Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?)

Kai Bernau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:23:21 +0200

49 lines

New Thread

Book notice

Re: Book notice

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:11:53 -0700

23 lines

Re: Book notice

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:44:07 -0700

33 lines

Book notice

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:19:29 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

Bringhurst, book exhibit in SF

Bringhurst, book exhibit in SF

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:55:19 -0700

59 lines

New Thread

Bruggenletter (was Re: Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam)

Re: Bruggenletter (was Re: Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam)

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:37:05 +0100

23 lines

Re: Bruggenletter (was Re: Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:55:02 -0300

25 lines

Re: Bruggenletter (was Re: Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam)

Ramiro Espinosa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:49:43 -0300

22 lines

Bruggenletter (was Re: Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam)

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:07:33 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

California cursive-contest bill (SB 420) has the title "Palmer Method comp" [for "competition"]

California cursive-contest bill (SB 420) has the title "Palmer Method comp" [for "competition"]

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Jun 2001 02:01:10 -0400

174 lines

New Thread

Celtic Gospel Books links

Re: Celtic Gospel Books links

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:24:14 +0200

38 lines

Celtic Gospel Books links

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:35:25 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

Don't stop thinking of going your own way

Don't stop thinking of going your own way

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:43:21 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

Dot Dot Dot . . .

Re: Dot Dot Dot . . .

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:38:27 -0400

25 lines

Re: Dot Dot Dot . . .

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:37:47 -0400

18 lines

Re: Dot Dot Dot . . .

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:28:59 -0400

24 lines

Dot Dot Dot . . .

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:49:25 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Empire of the Sultans

Re: Empire of the Sultans

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:06:02 +0100

30 lines

Empire of the Sultans

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:51:04 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Euro Symbol

Re: Euro Symbol

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:02:36 +0100

41 lines

Re: Euro Symbol

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:04:28 +0100

29 lines

Re: Euro Symbol

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:23:16 +0100

25 lines

Re: Euro Symbol

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:22:37 +0200

28 lines

Re: Euro Symbol

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:05:44 +0100

37 lines

Re: Euro Symbol

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:33:01 +0200

34 lines

Re: Euro Symbol

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:18:51 +0200

31 lines

Re: Euro Symbol

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:06:22 +0200

26 lines

Re: Euro Symbol

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:18:53 +0100

15 lines

Re: Euro Symbol

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:38:11 -0400

45 lines

Re: Euro Symbol

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:49:59 +0100

31 lines

Re: Euro Symbol

Stefan Menningh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:37:59 +0200

17 lines

Euro Symbol

Stefan Menningh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:13:38 +0200

32 lines

New Thread

fa.typography question

Re: fa.typography question

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:22:51 -0500

28 lines

fa.typography question

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:20:07 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Falsum & other handwriting fonts

Falsum & other handwriting fonts

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:59:16 -0400

67 lines

New Thread

FHWA/Highway_Gothic/Interstate/Blue_Highway

Re: FHWA/Highway_Gothic/Interstate/Blue_Highway

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:41:14 +0100

16 lines

Re: FHWA/Highway_Gothic/Interstate/Blue_Highway

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:16:35 +0100

36 lines

Re: FHWA/Highway_Gothic/Interstate/Blue_Highway

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 17:42:29 +0100

17 lines

Re: FHWA/Highway_Gothic/Interstate/Blue_Highway

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:16:42 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

First print of

Re: First print of

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:42:09 -0500

28 lines

Re: First print of

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:22:45 -0500

62 lines

Re: First print of

Jason Babler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 21:13:10 -0700

29 lines

Re: First print of

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:43:21 -0700

48 lines

First print of

Jason Babler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:21:57 -0700

46 lines

New Thread

fonts and Mac OS X?

Re: fonts and Mac OS X?

Terri Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:04:57 -0700

20 lines

Re: fonts and Mac OS X?

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:07:39 +0200

25 lines

Re: fonts and Mac OS X?

Terri Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:17:53 -0700

18 lines

Re: fonts and Mac OS X?

Terri Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:16:05 -0700

18 lines

Re: fonts and Mac OS X?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:01:02 -0300

18 lines

Re: fonts and Mac OS X?

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:53:29 -0700

26 lines

Re: fonts and Mac OS X?

Terri Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:38:12 -0700

14 lines

Re: fonts and Mac OS X?

Kino <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:32:18 +0900

50 lines

Re: fonts and Mac OS X?

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 21:39:14 -0400

52 lines

Re: fonts and Mac OS X?

Kino <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:09:53 +0900

30 lines

Re: fonts and Mac OS X?

Terri Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:04:54 -0700

18 lines

Re: fonts and Mac OS X?

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:54:22 -0400

36 lines

fonts and Mac OS X?

Terri Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:48:33 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

Fonts for e-book

Fonts for e-book

Scribe Typography <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jun 2001 16:29:06 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

for full text of the Washington TIMES handwriting-story (it didn't make the web-site), ask me & I'll e-mail it

Re: for full text of the Washington TIMES handwriting-story (it didn't make the web-site), ask me & I'll e-mail it

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:06:36 -0400

21 lines

for full text of the Washington TIMES handwriting-story (it didn't make the web-site), ask me & I'll e-mail it

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:00:48 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:39:27 +0100

32 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:30:30 -0400

66 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:53:25 -0400

35 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:26:50 -0700

36 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:08:31 -0400

33 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:52:34 -0400

42 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:47:34 -0500

24 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:42:27 -0400

31 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:33:30 -0700

41 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:55:31 -0500

27 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:41:11 -0700

29 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

adrian cockcroft <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:34:13 +0100

30 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:44:35 -0400

33 lines

Re: for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 02:21:51 +0200

31 lines

for those who've had experiences with graphologists

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 20:00:30 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

Formal Riding Gear Optional

Re: Formal Riding Gear Optional

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:15:46 +0100

43 lines

Formal Riding Gear Optional

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:49:17 -0700

59 lines

New Thread

Formal Writing Gear

Re: Formal Writing Gear

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:43:59 +0100

45 lines

Re: Formal Writing Gear

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:26:06 -0700

54 lines

Re: Formal Writing Gear

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:37:04 -0700

43 lines

Formal Writing Gear

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:10:42 -0700

50 lines

Re: Formal Writing Gear

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 02:11:50 -0700

67 lines

Re: Formal Writing Gear

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:22:22 -0700

93 lines

New Thread

Formalism (small typo content) [was: Oxymorons (nil typo content)]

Re: Formalism (small typo content) [was: Oxymorons (nil typo content)]

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:03:19 -0400

153 lines

Formalism (small typo content) [was: Oxymorons (nil typo content)]

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 17:08:29 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Fraktur - bad; swastika - bad; posters - gut

Re: Fraktur - bad; swastika - bad; posters - gut

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:18:51 -0400

69 lines

Re: Fraktur - bad; swastika - bad; posters - gut

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:22:37 -0400

38 lines

Re: Fraktur - bad; swastika - bad; posters - gut

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:02:54 -0400

56 lines

Fraktur - bad; swastika - bad; posters - gut

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:46:48 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

FW: PAGA's for sale

FW: PAGA's for sale

Vincent Golden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:04:02 -0500

178 lines

New Thread

Fwd: query: readability research

Fwd: query: readability research

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:29:40 EDT

25 lines

New Thread

Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airp orts)

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airp orts)

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:40:48 -0700

36 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airp orts)

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:59:27 +0100

15 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airp orts)

adrian cockcroft <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:06:00 +0100

29 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airp orts)

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:36:34 +0100

21 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airp orts)

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:46:15 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 18:51:48 -0700

27 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 20:17:32 -0400

25 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 18:02:44 -0600

21 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:57:10 -0400

27 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Paul Solyn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:30:23 -0500

20 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:59:27 EDT

35 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:52:40 -0400

32 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 21:38:05 +0100

14 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:33:23 -0600

24 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:21:17 -0400

34 lines

Re: Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:52:11 -0600

40 lines

Grocer's apostrophe (was Re: Signs of change at New York airports)

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:48:02 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Guillemets point in or out?

Re: Guillemets point in or out?

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:25:25 -0400

23 lines

Re: Guillemets point in or out?

alorenz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 22:59:56 +0200

33 lines

Re: Guillemets point in or out?

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 22:11:38 +0200

30 lines

Re: Guillemets point in or out?

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:00:02 -0400

43 lines

Re: Guillemets point in or out?

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:50:49 -0300

45 lines

Re: Guillemets point in or out?

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:39:10 -0400

27 lines

Re: Guillemets point in or out?

Jim Rudolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:35:39 +0200

32 lines

Guillemets point in or out?

Scribe Typography <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:05:39 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

Handwriting analysis/Kristin's query

Handwriting analysis/Kristin's query

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:49:00 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

Handwriting font

Handwriting font

Christian Liljeberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:08:12 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

handwriting fonts

Re: handwriting fonts

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:27:43 -0700

23 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 23:21:12 +0200

30 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:13:34 -0400

34 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:12:19 -0500

18 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:08:51 -0400

24 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:59:23 +0200

37 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:54:03 -0400

39 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:23:54 -0400

25 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:15:07 +0200

32 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:06:32 -0400

30 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:03:04 -0700

41 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:13:01 -0400

20 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:02:27 -0700

26 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:58:17 -0700

37 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:53:38 -0400

30 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:48:58 +0100

31 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:21:05 -0700

36 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:40:22 -0400

30 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:26:57 -0400

42 lines

Re: handwriting fonts

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:45:36 -0700

65 lines

New Thread

Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:06:45 -0700

25 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:22:07 -0400

34 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:02:59 -0700

31 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:26:04 -0400

34 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:19:53 -0700

29 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:21:58 -0300

23 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:14:49 -0400

26 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:58:30 +0100

30 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:45:42 -0400

38 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 09:33:07 -0500

30 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 09:59:04 -0400

49 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 09:39:31 -0400

40 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 01:17:07 -0400

73 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:50:10 -0700

32 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 00:25:29 -0400

43 lines

Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:16:50 -0700

27 lines

Handwriting fonts: what to charge?

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:33:47 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

Help Identifying Font

Help Identifying Font

cooter fisherman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:12:50 -0000

23 lines

New Thread

Here is the full text of the Washington TIMES handwriting-story

Here is the full text of the Washington TIMES handwriting-story

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:16:16 +0100

69 lines

New Thread

High on ASCII

Re: High on ASCII

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:05:26 -0400

33 lines

Re: High on ASCII

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:14:31 -0400

25 lines

Re: High on ASCII

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:03:14 -0400

23 lines

Re: High on ASCII

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:11:44 -0400

38 lines

Re: High on ASCII

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:01:21 -0400

32 lines

Re: High on ASCII

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:58:07 -0400

30 lines

Re: High on ASCII

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:50:23 -0400

41 lines

Re: High on ASCII

David E. Hollingsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:40:37 -0400

46 lines

Re: High on ASCII

Lucans, Gunars <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:12:33 -0500

38 lines

Re: High on ASCII

Lucans, Gunars <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:09:40 -0500

39 lines

Re: High on ASCII

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:51:58 -0700

26 lines

Re: High on ASCII

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:12:46 -0400

47 lines

Re: High on ASCII

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:47:27 -0400

34 lines

Re: High on ASCII

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 02:19:13 -0400

26 lines

Re: High on ASCII

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 02:02:48 -0400

39 lines

Re: High on ASCII

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:44:06 -0700

32 lines

High on ASCII

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:45:06 -0400

51 lines

New Thread

High on ASCII/happy birthday Hrant

Re: High on ASCII/happy birthday Hrant

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:57:48 -0700

29 lines

Re: High on ASCII/happy birthday Hrant

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:17:21 +0100

34 lines

Re: High on ASCII/happy birthday Hrant

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:04:44 -0400

25 lines

Re: High on ASCII/happy birthday Hrant

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:40:30 +0100

20 lines

Re: High on ASCII/happy birthday Hrant

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:30:53 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

Highlights

Re: Highlights

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:09:00 +0100

18 lines

Re: Highlights

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:07:14 -0700

30 lines

Re: Highlights

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:45:20 -0400

27 lines

Re: Highlights

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:34:20 +0100

17 lines

Re: Highlights

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:49:53 -0600

23 lines

Re: Highlights

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:36:21 -0700

33 lines

Highlights

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 22:32:38 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

Horsey Type

Re: Horsey Type

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:38:53 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Horsy Type

Re: Horsy Type

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:24:30 -0400

29 lines

Re: Horsy Type

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:21:28 -700

26 lines

Re: Horsy Type

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jun 2001 16:25:19 +0100

17 lines

Re: Horsy Type

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:56:44 -0400

21 lines

Re: Horsy Type

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jun 2001 11:41:26 +0100

16 lines

Re: Horsy Type

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 17:58:00 -700

44 lines

Re: Horsy Type

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 15:21:20 -0700

32 lines

Horsy Type

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:26:31 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

Hrant 4 months from 1/3 century

Hrant 4 months from 1/3 century

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:58:59 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

Introductions?

Re: Introductions?

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:04:49 -0400

46 lines

Re: Introductions?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:51:34 -0300

53 lines

Re: Introductions?

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:11:34 +0100

24 lines

Re: Introductions?

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:02:54 -0500

31 lines

Re: Introductions?

Steven Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:45:13 +0100

54 lines

Re: Introductions?

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:37:41 -0700

38 lines

Introductions?

Steven Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:29:34 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

Islam and calligraphy

Re: Islam and calligraphy

Tony Pacey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:52:10 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Islam and calligraphy (was digest blah blah)

Re: Islam and calligraphy (was digest blah blah)

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:46:26 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Keepin' it real

Keepin' it real

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 22:33:48 -0700

14 lines

New Thread

Kristin's query

Kristin's query

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 02:20:32 -0400

87 lines

New Thread

Leni et al....

Re: Leni et al....

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:07:55 -0500

40 lines

Re: Leni et al....

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jun 2001 17:32:18 EDT

32 lines

Leni et al....

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 14:06:10 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

License Plate Highway Stuff

Re: License Plate Highway Stuff

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:18:30 -0700

38 lines

License Plate Highway Stuff

Lewis Kirk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:06:34 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Linotype fonts for Mac OS X

Linotype fonts for Mac OS X

Henk Gianotten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 02:00:55 +0200

93 lines

New Thread

Lore Ipsum Falsum

Re: Lore Ipsum Falsum

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:02:59 -0500

33 lines

Re: Lore Ipsum Falsum

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:39:37 -0400

39 lines

Re: Lore Ipsum Falsum

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:24:09 +0200

30 lines

Re: Lore Ipsum Falsum

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:17:55 -0400

76 lines

Re: Lore Ipsum Falsum

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:54:56 +0200

41 lines

New Thread

Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:54:57 -0400

85 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:40:07 -0400

32 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:56:12 -0300

31 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:44:31 -0700

32 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:06:22 +0200

37 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:49:51 -0400

31 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:33:48 -0400

52 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:25:48 -0400

60 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:19:29 -0400

39 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Dan Franklin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:55:55 -0500

35 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:48:16 -0400

27 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:15:46 +0100

19 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:00:54 -0500

40 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:38:09 -0400

66 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Dan Franklin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:16:11 -0500

32 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:46:56 -0400

55 lines

Re: Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:00:03 -0700

29 lines

Lorem Ipsum Falsum

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:59:35 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

mail lists

mail lists

Andy Tung <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:16:46 +0100

11 lines

New Thread

Making a fascism statement--NOT

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:45:15 +0100

41 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:35:01 EDT

40 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:51:37 -0400

57 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:24:40 -0700

34 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:51:44 -0400

26 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:53:11 -0700

29 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:37:15 EDT

31 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:33:44 EDT

33 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:29:36 -0400

23 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:27:17 -0400

32 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:25:08 -0700

51 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:20:44 -0400

26 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:14:18 -0400

28 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:04:32 -0400

29 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:43:58 -0400

27 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:42:12 -0700

56 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:39:00 -0400

26 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:20:52 -0400

38 lines

Re: Making a fascism statement--NOT

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:02:16 -0400

31 lines

Making a fascism statement--NOT

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:28:44 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

Moderation

Moderation

Erik Halbert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 20:25:08 +1000

14 lines

New Thread

More Highway Stuff

More Highway Stuff

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 22:52:05 -0700

62 lines

Re: More Highway Stuff

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:09:32 -700

43 lines

Re: More Highway Stuff

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jun 2001 17:39:00 +0200

31 lines

More Highway Stuff

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jun 2001 08:20:44 -0700

32 lines

Re: More Highway Stuff

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2001 18:25:23 +0200

32 lines

Re: More Highway Stuff

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:16:21 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

more on @

Re: more on @

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:41:51 -0400

30 lines

more on @

Don Wilkes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:22:12 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

more on graphology

Re: more on graphology

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:35:52 -700

43 lines

Re: more on graphology

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:51:06 -0400

39 lines

Re: more on graphology

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:18:45 -0400

72 lines

Re: more on graphology

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 07:52:28 -0400

24 lines

Re: more on graphology

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:03:09 +0200

44 lines

New Thread

more on graphology (moron graphology?: a horror-story

Re: more on graphology (moron graphology?: a horror-story

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 18:16:41 -0400

26 lines

Re: more on graphology (moron graphology?: a horror-story

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:36:28 -0500

30 lines

more on graphology (moron graphology?: a horror-story

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:30:30 -0400

76 lines

New Thread

More on: SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL CONNOTATIONS OF FONTS

Re: More on: SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL CONNOTATIONS OF FONTS

Don Wilkes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:20:47 -0700

22 lines

Re: More on: SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL CONNOTATIONS OF FONTS

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:09:01 -0400

27 lines

Re: More on: SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL CONNOTATIONS OF FONTS

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:50:57 -0700

39 lines

More on: SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL CONNOTATIONS OF FONTS

Don Wilkes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:06:23 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

movie about NYT's last night of hot type?

Re: movie about NYT's last night of hot type?

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 03:15:02 -0700

40 lines

Re: movie about NYT's last night of hot type?

Terri Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:55:14 -0700

36 lines

Re: movie about NYT's last night of hot type?

LABA.CB <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:43:11 -0400

39 lines

Re: movie about NYT's last night of hot type?

Kristin.Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:23:59 -0500

32 lines

movie about NYT's last night of hot type?

Terri Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:26:58 -0700

19 lines

New Thread

Name the @ conversation revived

Re: Name the @ conversation revived

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:18:45 -0400

37 lines

Name the @ conversation revived

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:05:10 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

Name the @ symbol

Re: Name the @ symbol

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:42:49 -0400

27 lines

Re: Name the @ symbol

John Ahlstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:49:52 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

newbie question re TYPO-L archives and FreeBSD

Re: newbie question re TYPO-L archives and FreeBSD

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:49:02 +0100

25 lines

newbie question re TYPO-L archives and FreeBSD

Paul Sciortino <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:18:55 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Nina -> Tahoma -> Verdana -> Santa Maria

Re: Nina -> Tahoma -> Verdana -> Santa Maria

Alan Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:01:56 +0100

25 lines

Re: Nina -> Tahoma -> Verdana -> Santa Maria

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:46:26 +0100

31 lines

Re: Nina -> Tahoma -> Verdana -> Santa Maria

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 15:10:23 +0200

50 lines

Re: Nina -> Tahoma -> Verdana -> Santa Maria

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 06:27:53 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

of possible interest

of possible interest

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:01:13 -0400

39 lines

New Thread

Off topic: Enough?

Re: Off topic: Enough?

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 17:26:51 -0300

40 lines

Off topic: Enough?

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:48:09 +0200

34 lines

New Thread

Off-Topic

Off-Topic

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:51:16 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

OT eye of needle; was: handwriting fonts

OT eye of needle; was: handwriting fonts

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:30:22 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Oxymoron

Re: Oxymoron

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 15:04:42 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 02:11:49 -0400

26 lines

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 01:22:16 -0400

38 lines

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 01:05:19 -0400

56 lines

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jun 2001 23:37:22 -0400

25 lines

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Angelo Bottino <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jun 2001 16:44:42 -0700

22 lines

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:37:02 -0400

30 lines

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jun 2001 07:43:54 -0400

23 lines

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jun 2001 06:21:59 -0400

14 lines

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 01:03:32 -0400

161 lines

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 22:29:02 +0100

38 lines

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:18:08 -0700

18 lines

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 15:19:14 -0400

35 lines

Re: Oxymorons (nil typo content)

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:39:57 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

Oxymorons (Was:Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?)

Re: Oxymorons (Was:Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?)

Kai Bernau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 01:50:07 +0200

24 lines

Re: Oxymorons (Was:Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:09:13 -0400

140 lines

Re: Oxymorons (Was:Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:08:41 -0400

150 lines

Re: Oxymorons (Was:Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:35:13 -0400

22 lines

Re: Oxymorons (Was:Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?)

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:28:00 +0100

34 lines

Oxymorons (Was:Re: Handwriting fonts: what to charge?)

Kai Bernau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 17:31:45 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

Parmenides Photos + Open Studio Announcement

Parmenides Photos + Open Studio Announcement

Delve Withrington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:11:40 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

Parmenides PT. 2

Re: Parmenides PT. 2

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 07:21:04 -0400

26 lines

Parmenides PT. 2

Jason Babler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 19:20:36 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

Pencil & Paper

Re: Pencil & Paper

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:57:45 +0200

38 lines

Re: Pencil & Paper

Gerry Leonidas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:23:55 +0100

48 lines

Re: Pencil & Paper

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:19:22 -0400

48 lines

Re: Pencil & Paper

Alexios Zavras <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:01:49 +0300

29 lines

Re: Pencil & Paper

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:13:48 -0700

33 lines

Re: Pencil & Paper

parkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:42:30 -0700

35 lines

Re: Pencil & Paper

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 19:18:39 -0400

39 lines

Re: Pencil & Paper

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:36:04 -0400

43 lines

Re: Pencil & Paper

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 19:58:30 +0100

22 lines

Pencil & Paper

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:51:17 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Posting Style (Re: Introductions?)

Re: Posting Style (Re: Introductions?)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:33:44 +0200

32 lines

Re: Posting Style (Re: Introductions?)

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:56:17 +0100

26 lines

Re: Posting Style (Re: Introductions?)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:36:30 +0200

35 lines

Re: Posting Style (Re: Introductions?)

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:08:52 +0100

24 lines

Re: Posting Style (Re: Introductions?)

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:48:33 -0600

23 lines

Re: Posting Style (Re: Introductions?)

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 20:23:27 +0100

15 lines

Re: Posting Style (Re: Introductions?)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:54:14 -0300

24 lines

Re: Posting Style (Re: Introductions?)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:43:11 -0400

46 lines

Posting Style (Re: Introductions?)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:23:35 -0300

31 lines

New Thread

Problems with Mac to PC conversion

Re: Problems with Mac to PC conversion

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 23:55:24 +0200

39 lines

Re: Problems with Mac to PC conversion

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:42:26 -0300

15 lines

Re: Problems with Mac to PC conversion

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:36:09 -0300

36 lines

Problems with Mac to PC conversion

Paul Mijland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:15:25 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

Responsibilities to font vendors

Re: Responsibilities to font vendors

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:46:16 +0200

34 lines

Re: Responsibilities to font vendors

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:09:56 -0700

36 lines

Re: Responsibilities to font vendors

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:20:36 -0700

39 lines

Responsibilities to font vendors

Georgia Wolf 2 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:30:46 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

Signs of change at New York airports

Re: Signs of change at New York airports

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:41:23 -0600

26 lines

Re: Signs of change at New York airports

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:30:08 +0100

12 lines

Signs of change at New York airports

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:35:12 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Spacing/kerning

Re: Spacing/kerning

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 15:27:07 +0200

37 lines

Re: Spacing/kerning

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 08:28:09 -0400

22 lines

Re: Spacing/kerning

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:42:49 -0400

17 lines

Re: Spacing/kerning

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 09:52:03 -0400

22 lines

Re: Spacing/kerning

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 00:41:34 -0400

31 lines

Re: Spacing/kerning

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:12:40 -0700

25 lines

Re: Spacing/kerning

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:12:58 +0100

50 lines

Re: Spacing/kerning

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:47:29 -0400

34 lines

Re: Spacing/kerning

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:34:50 -0400

27 lines

Re: Spacing/kerning

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:52:49 -0400

33 lines

Spacing/kerning

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:39:18 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Still Off Topic: Orwell; was: Leni et al....

Re: Still Off Topic: Orwell; was: Leni et al....

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 18:54:14 -0700

15 lines

Still Off Topic: Orwell; was: Leni et al....

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 11:30:24 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

Study of fonts reveals the real you

Study of fonts reveals the real you

Don Wilkes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:47:37 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

Suitcase question

Suitcase question

Anders Bundgaard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:23:08 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

Taking a Break

Re: Taking a Break

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:09:09 +0200

35 lines

Taking a Break

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:59:42 EDT

23 lines

New Thread

Taxi dashboards

Taxi dashboards

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:35:26 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

TDC47 in SF for HOW

TDC47 in SF for HOW

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 03:35:48 -0300

37 lines

New Thread

Teaching (Was Re: Advice, please)

Re: Teaching (Was Re: Advice, please)

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 03:39:03 -0700

73 lines

Teaching (Was Re: Advice, please)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 03:43:48 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Christopher L. Tabby <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:04:07 -0600

54 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 02:49:09 -0300

30 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:41:44 -0400

22 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Chuck Rowe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:23:49 -0400

24 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2001 17:51:30 -0400

19 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2001 11:58:56 -0400

23 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2001 08:50:35 -0700

29 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2001 11:42:02 -0400

25 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2001 10:17:45 -0500

30 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2001 10:41:19 -0400

22 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2001 09:14:53 -0500

29 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Paul Solyn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2001 08:21:51 -0500

23 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Christopher L. Tabby <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Jun 2001 08:54:10 -0600

47 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jun 2001 18:44:08 EDT

43 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jun 2001 11:33:08 -0400

28 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jun 2001 08:30:39 -0700

34 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jun 2001 08:04:09 -0700

44 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2001 23:47:24 -0700

27 lines

Re: Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2001 21:57:49 -0400

26 lines

Times New Roman and the Federal Court in Southern California

Paul Tripodi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:58:21 -0700

68 lines

New Thread

TT for PC, T1 for Mac

Re: TT for PC, T1 for Mac

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:56:05 -0400

29 lines

Re: TT for PC, T1 for Mac

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:51:55 +0200

31 lines

Re: TT for PC, T1 for Mac

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:38:16 -0400

30 lines

Re: TT for PC, T1 for Mac

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:35:15 +0200

51 lines

Re: TT for PC, T1 for Mac

michaellynch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:45:53 -0700

53 lines

TT for PC, T1 for Mac

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:02:21 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Two tangents to the holy books thread

Re: Two tangents to the holy books thread

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:21:46 -0400

26 lines

Re: Two tangents to the holy books thread

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:10:40 +0200

56 lines

Re: Two tangents to the holy books thread

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 19:13:46 -0300

31 lines

Two tangents to the holy books thread

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:45:17 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Type designer obit

Type designer obit

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:22:32 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

type id

Re: type id

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 02:42:49 -0300

42 lines

type id

Damien Flux <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 02:02:21 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Typecon2001 last day to register

Typecon2001 last day to register

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:39:23 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam

Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam

Ramiro Espinosa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:50:48 -0300

35 lines

New Thread

Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam (& something else as well)

Re: Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam (& something else as well)

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 19:00:34 +0100

33 lines

Re: Typeface of the bridges in Amsterdam (& something else as well)

Sander Pinkse <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:15:46 +0200

41 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 14 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-25)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 14 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-25)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:43:20 -0400

29 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 14 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-25)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:39:15 -0400

38 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 14 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-25)

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:37:17 -0400

30 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 14 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-25)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:10:37 -0400

36 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 14 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-25)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:25:19 -0700

73 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-31)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-31)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:30:21 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 20 Jun 2001 to 21 Jun 2001 (#2001-34)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 20 Jun 2001 to 21 Jun 2001 (#2001-34)

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:02:07 -0700

24 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 20 Jun 2001 to 21 Jun 2001 (#2001-34)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:35:52 +0200

42 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 20 Jun 2001 to 21 Jun 2001 (#2001-34)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:36:38 -0400

23 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 20 Jun 2001 to 21 Jun 2001 (#2001-34)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:17:50 +0200

49 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 20 Jun 2001 to 21 Jun 2001 (#2001-34)

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:47:23 -0700

34 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 20 Jun 2001 to 21 Jun 2001 (#2001-34)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:22:11 -0400

46 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 20 Jun 2001 to 21 Jun 2001 (#2001-34)

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:05:16 +0100

33 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 20 Jun 2001 to 21 Jun 2001 (#2001-34)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:11:52 +0200

28 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 20 Jun 2001 to 21 Jun 2001 (#2001-34)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:32:38 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 21 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-35)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 21 Jun 2001 - Special issue (#2001-35)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:02:31 -0700

75 lines

New Thread

UNC visual journalism teaching opening (fwd)

UNC visual journalism teaching opening (fwd)

Jay Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:43:16 -0400

88 lines

New Thread

unsubscribe

unsubscribe

Andy Tung <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:08:26 +0100

11 lines

New Thread

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Re: Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Ballard, Moureen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:39:43 -0700

118 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:15:02 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

visit http://www.washtimes.com, Saturday and Sunday, for a feature-story interviewing a listmember

visit http://www.washtimes.com, Saturday and Sunday, for a feature-story interviewing a listmember

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:01:14 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

web type pet peeve

Re: web type pet peeve

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 22:37:03 -0700

30 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 00:19:39 -0400

28 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 00:20:07 -0300

26 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Matthew <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 21:04:30 -0700

51 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:59:15 -0400

39 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:30:34 -0300

43 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 15:10:14 -0700

37 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 16:20:58 -0700

22 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 11:22:21 -0700

31 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:29:41 +0200

35 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:47:09 +0200

32 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jun 2001 16:43:58 -0700

26 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jun 2001 16:32:48 -0700

21 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

adrian cockcroft <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 20:56:30 +0100

23 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:43:17 -0600

24 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:32:18 -0300

62 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 19:56:49 +0100

17 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:54:09 -0300

64 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:59:58 -0700

49 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Toby Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:40:37 +0100

41 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:09:28 +0200

39 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 03:33:57 -0300

39 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jun 2001 04:00:41 +0100

22 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 15:22:56 -0700

28 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

adrian cockcroft <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 22:34:22 +0100

31 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:27:27 -0700

18 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:56:46 +0100

16 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:23:20 -0700

49 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:54:52 -0700

30 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:55:56 -0400

20 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:48:28 +0100

37 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

adrian cockcroft <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:05:46 +0100

29 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:00:31 -0300

34 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Stacy Westbrook <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:18:57 -0400

27 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

adrian cockcroft <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:36:12 +0100

30 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

adrian cockcroft <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:36:09 +0100

25 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:06:19 +0100

17 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jun 2001 00:55:54 -0300

43 lines

Re: web type pet peeve

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:38:07 -0700

33 lines

web type pet peeve

Eric Iverson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 23:25:59 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

where are typographer.com?

Re: where are typographer.com?

matt carey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:36:10 +0100

42 lines

where are typographer.com?

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:25:32 +0200

22 lines

New Thread

where there's a will there's a triumph

Re: where there's a will there's a triumph

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 01:44:05 -0400

46 lines

where there's a will there's a triumph

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 22:28:53 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

workshop

workshop

Claudia Ortega <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:13:32 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

WWII propaganda typography

WWII propaganda typography

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:05:55 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

[OT] Re: where there's a will there's a triumph

Re: [OT] Re: where there's a will there's a triumph

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:27:32 -0400

83 lines

Re: [OT] Re: where there's a will there's a triumph

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:07:28 -0700

43 lines

Re: [OT] Re: where there's a will there's a triumph

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:19:35 -0400

228 lines

Re: [OT] Re: where there's a will there's a triumph

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:22:56 -0700

70 lines

Re: [OT] Re: where there's a will there's a triumph

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 16:46:53 -0400

111 lines

Re: [OT] Re: where there's a will there's a triumph

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 08:22:37 -0700

44 lines

Re: [OT] Re: where there's a will there's a triumph

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 02:39:24 -0400

28 lines

Re: [OT] Re: where there's a will there's a triumph

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 02:25:10 -0400

65 lines

Re: [OT] Re: where there's a will there's a triumph

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 02:00:25 -0400

59 lines

[OT] Re: where there's a will there's a triumph

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 22:37:04 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

[OT] was Re: Falsum & other handwriting fonts

[OT] was Re: Falsum & other handwriting fonts

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:03:05 -0300

26 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2017
February 2017
August 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
February 1994
January 1994
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager