LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


February 2001


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave TYPO-L
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

A rose by any other name...

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:05:40 -0800

25 lines

Re: A rose by any other name...

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:21:23 +0000

21 lines

Re: A rose by any other name...

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:10:24 -0800

24 lines

A Virus Question (TAN)

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:33:16 +0000

22 lines

Re: A Virus Question (TAN)

Alan Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:09:25 -0000

31 lines

Re: A Virus Question (TAN)

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:57:53 -0500

64 lines

Re: A Virus Question (TAN)

Alistair Vining <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:27:55 -0000

35 lines

Re: A Virus Question (TAN)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:34:33 -0500

29 lines

Re: A Virus Question (TAN)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:22:50 -0800

19 lines

adjusting curve points in fontographer

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:22:11 -0000

18 lines

austrian blackletter

Cynthia Jacquette <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:34:27 -0800

15 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:40:47 -0800

26 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:12:06 -0800

31 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 21:44:49 +0100

43 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:56:08 -0800

19 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 22:46:12 +0100

28 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 13:53:14 -0800

19 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 23:31:40 +0100

29 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Cynthia Jacquette <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:16:35 -0800

19 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:25:39 -0800

22 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 19:40:28 -0800

39 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:58:26 +0100

36 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Cynthia Jacquette <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:24:43 -0800

21 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Cynthia Jacquette <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:29:23 -0800

17 lines

bemboszoo

matt carey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:51:57 +0000

17 lines

Re: Boumas - any good books

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:12:26 -0800

54 lines

Re: Boumas - any good books

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:25:22 -0800

20 lines

Re: Boumas - back propagation

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:16:43 -0800

40 lines

Re: Boumas - Chinese and Blurs

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:20:49 -0800

38 lines

Boumas - debate resolved

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:01:02 -0800

71 lines

Re: Boumas - debate resolved

John Ahlstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 01:08:53 -0800

25 lines

Re: Boumas - debate resolved

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 02:52:58 -0800

24 lines

Re: Boumas - debate resolved

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:37:06 +0100

40 lines

Re: Boumas - debate resolved

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 07:34:48 -0800

20 lines

Boumas - debate resolved - Chinese

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:35:32 -0800

27 lines

Re: Boumas - debate resolved - Chinese

John Ahlstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 01:16:01 -0800

25 lines

Re: Boumas - debate resolved - signature

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 04:56:39 -0800

30 lines

Re: Boumas - flash and gibberish tests

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 19:11:43 -0800

62 lines

Re: Boumas - flash and gibberish tests

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 08:54:59 -0800

38 lines

Re: Boumas - opinion evolution

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:31:03 -0800

25 lines

Boumas - readability measures

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:11:02 -0800

89 lines

Re: Boumas - readability measures

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:26:18 +0100

80 lines

Re: Boumas - readability measures

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:37:37 -0800

25 lines

Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:09:29 -0800

68 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:38:42 +0100

45 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:25:10 -0800

60 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:25:45 +0100

34 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:42:05 -0800

175 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:16:53 -0500

28 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:57:10 -0800

41 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:42:41 -0800

20 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:48:13 -0800

20 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:23:26 -0800

28 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:36:31 -0800

26 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:24:55 -0800

44 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 02:14:34 -0800

26 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:12:23 -0800

64 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:56:18 -0500

32 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:07:09 -0800

38 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 20:00:43 -0800

61 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:25:24 -0800

52 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:42:24 -0800

33 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 00:52:51 -0500

59 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 22:10:00 -0800

34 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:01:03 +1100

50 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 23:10:40 -0800

54 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 07:20:19 -0800

18 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 07:32:32 -0800

38 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:18:04 -0800

29 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:15:07 -0800

58 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:52:47 +1100

41 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:02:00 -0800

25 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:56:07 -0800

69 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2001 12:30:31 +1100

38 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:43:13 -0800

32 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:44:25 -0800

25 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:52:48 -0800

35 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:58:27 -0800

19 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 19:50:13 -0800

26 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 19:55:14 -0800

33 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - timing

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:00:37 -0800

31 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - timing

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:07:08 -0800

163 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:28:02 -0800

62 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:14:25 -0800

49 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:18:19 -0800

47 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:46:36 -0800

43 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:52:29 -0800

63 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:01:27 -0800

34 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:05:35 -0800

47 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:49:41 -0800

36 lines

Boumas - why the debate

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:30:01 -0800

62 lines

CtO Safe?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:36:41 -0800

23 lines

Re: CtO safe?

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:21:36 -0800

38 lines

Re: CtO safe?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:20:55 -0800

19 lines

Re: CtO safe?

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:58:04 -0500

25 lines

Re: CtO safe?

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:30:18 -0500

25 lines

Re: CtO safe?

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:06:01 -0800

29 lines

Re: CtO safe?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:00:05 -0800

22 lines

Re: CtO safe?

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:22:37 +0100

40 lines

Re: CtO safe?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:56:29 -0800

28 lines

delta-shift value

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:24:03 -0000

26 lines

Re: delta-shift value

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:54:15 +0000

22 lines

Re: delta-shift value

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:54:07 +0000

67 lines

Re: delta-shift value

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:59:37 -0800

22 lines

Re: delta-shift value

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:22:14 -0000

38 lines

Re: delta-shift value

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:39:33 -0000

93 lines

Re: delta-shift value

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:25:32 -0800

21 lines

Re: delta-shift value

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:45:16 -0000

33 lines

evenness in curved characters

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:34:35 -0000

26 lines

Font called Chantilly?

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:40:14 -0800

19 lines

Re: Font called Chantilly?

Bjorn Christianson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:32:29 -0600

35 lines

Font Problems with Windows ME

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:17:03 -0600

34 lines

Re: Font Problems with Windows ME

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:26:23 -0500

84 lines

Re: Font Problems with Windows ME

Simon Daniels <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:45:12 -0800

23 lines

for a possibly interesting article about handwriting, visit this URL

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 23:49:48 -0500

27 lines

Re: for a possibly interesting article about handwriting, visit this URL

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:37:44 -0500

28 lines

for a possibly interesting article on handwriting, visit this URL ;-)

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 23:49:49 -0500

32 lines

Re: for a possibly interesting article on handwriting, visit this URL ;-)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 01:38:20 -0400

15 lines

forwarded by authorial request: credit and link for the story "What Letters Do On Their Time Off"

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 02:01:09 -0500

48 lines

Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:28:29 -0500

25 lines

Re: Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:37:47 -0800

26 lines

Re: Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:31:37 -0500

27 lines

Re: Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:13:36 -0800

19 lines

Re: Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:41:09 -0400

33 lines

Re: Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:56:16 -0800

16 lines

Re: Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:44:36 -0800

23 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 23:06:21 -0800

43 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:00:29 -0800

72 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:50:28 +0100

50 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:29:50 -0800

38 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:45:26 -0800

41 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:59:55 -0800

30 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 23:42:54 -0800

45 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:15:22 +0100

29 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:56:04 +0100

38 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:14:26 -0800

25 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:56:17 -0800

22 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:04:03 -0800

43 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:45:55 -0800

26 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:27:27 -0800

61 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:31:27 +0100

32 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:09:11 +0100

35 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:29:22 -0800

26 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 13:02:31 +0100

41 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 05:03:45 -0800

33 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:24:15 +0100

49 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 23:59:58 -0800

35 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:53:11 -0800

35 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:06:37 +0100

38 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:09:00 +0100

39 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:39:30 -0500

25 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:02:33 -0800

29 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:35:19 +0100

33 lines

Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 09:15:57 -0800

55 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:31:58 -0500

40 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 10:10:57 -0800

24 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:40:58 -0400

59 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:07:20 -0800

32 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 15:18:18 -0500

31 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:30:29 -0800

29 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:34:03 -0800

22 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:39:29 -0800

23 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:40:30 -0800

33 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:07:00 -0500

37 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:09:57 +0100

47 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:29:10 +0100

38 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 15:35:24 -0800

23 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Michael J Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 18:40:36 EST

20 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 15:49:40 -0800

27 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 19:21:54 -0500

31 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:22:34 -0800

42 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 06:13:09 +0100

22 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:04:49 +0100

36 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:11:54 +0100

28 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:15:32 +0100

29 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:19:03 +0100

31 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:04:04 -0500

46 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:44:20 +0100

33 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:25:55 -0400

28 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:48:01 +0100

32 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:55:08 -0800

18 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:21:01 -0400

41 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:37:02 -0800

26 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:47:22 -0800

21 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:14:57 -0800

27 lines

GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:25:11 -0800

113 lines

Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:36:06 -0800

52 lines

Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:02:44 -0800

65 lines

Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:41:53 -0800

38 lines

Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:17:49 -0800

29 lines

Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:52:06 -0800

21 lines

Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:12:07 -0800

31 lines

Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 07:17:59 -0800

21 lines

help

Metin Ozdemir <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:55:43 +0200

31 lines

Re: help

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:19:19 -0800

17 lines

Re: help

Kay H Khoo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:19:32 +0800

37 lines

Re: help

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:19:59 EST

33 lines

Re: help

Metin Ozdemir <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:08:41 +0200

19 lines

Illustrator question

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:40:29 +0000

20 lines

Re: Illustrator question

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:55:09 -0500

32 lines

Re: Illustrator question

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:17:13 +0000

18 lines

just the site for an on-line piece appeared in 2 papers, bewailed "death of cursive penmanship," noted a new style

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:55:43 -0500

40 lines

L-slash trash

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:23:57 +0000

22 lines

Re: L-slash trash

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:30:48 -0500

35 lines

Re: L-slash trash

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:32:46 +0000

18 lines

Re: L-slash trash

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:44:55 -0500

33 lines

Re: L-slash trash

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:39:07 -0800

33 lines

Re: L-slash trash

Søren Olsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:40:54 +0800

22 lines

Re: L-slash trash

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:02:34 +0000

28 lines

Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:23:54 -0800

33 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:47:33 -0800

44 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 11:46:57 -0800

56 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 14:49:59 -0800

71 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:04:31 -0800

36 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:47:27 -0800

23 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:03:26 -0800

85 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:42:24 -0800

36 lines

logo creators

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:13:53 -0000

20 lines

logo creators

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:31:26 -0000

15 lines

Re: logo creators

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:02:40 +0100

28 lines

Looking for two typefaces

Stephen Moye <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:01:49 +0000

21 lines

Re: Looking for two typefaces

M. Thavenius <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 23:28:37 +0100

28 lines

M U Y U R G E N T E ---- No abran el virus

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:54:31 -0800

36 lines

Mardersteig's Dante

Gahlord Dewald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:01:11 -0500

26 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:20:43 -0800

19 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:56:55 -0500

28 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Per Olav Walmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:28:26 +0100

30 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:44:29 -0800

20 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 02:42:23 -0600

25 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Eric Kindel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:41:44 +0000

34 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 02:55:05 -0800

21 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:09:31 -0500

31 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

LABA.CB <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:34:23 -0500

40 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:37:01 -0800

34 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:16:07 -0800

13 lines

Missing fonts

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 16:52:44 +0000

28 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 12:16:44 -0500

58 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 17:45:15 +0000

27 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 17:58:30 +0000

16 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 13:23:32 -0500

31 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 20:33:06 +0000

37 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:48:51 -0500

41 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 22:16:15 +0000

19 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 21:47:55 -0500

49 lines

Re: Missing fonts

matt carey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:02:02 +0000

23 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:34:09 -0500

30 lines

net-site for on-line story about WHAC: World Handwriting Achievement Competition

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:24:57 -0500

23 lines

New Font Released - John Speed

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:42:49 -0600

27 lines

Newlyn takes the web plunge

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:23:51 -0800

16 lines

Newspaper Type Design

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:22:40 -0800

25 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:29:55 +0100

29 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:30:49 -0800

17 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:08:23 +0100

23 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:35:48 +0100

26 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:43:57 +0100

39 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Conor Mangat <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:51:39 +0000

30 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:35:37 +0100

20 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:50:56 +0100

26 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 18:44:35 +0100

15 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:57:56 -0800

21 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 19:07:58 +0100

28 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:13:04 -0800

37 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:17:33 -0300

33 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:23:22 -0800

34 lines

no msge : thanks 4 the advice HHP will pester .fog newsgroup

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:59:13 -0000

11 lines

Now that Makambo is dead

Matthew Bardram <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:06:39 -0700

25 lines

of interest - this on-line piece appeared in 2 papers, bewailed "death of cursive penmanship," noted a new style

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:50:40 -0500

99 lines

Opinions on the euro?

Conor Mangat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:54:04 +0000

38 lines

Re: Opinions on the euro?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:23:30 -0800

25 lines

Re: Opinions on the euro?

Sander Pinkse <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:02:50 +0100

32 lines

Re: Opinions on the euro?

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:48:36 -0000

42 lines

Re: Opinions on the euro?

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:20:19 +0100

35 lines

PC font encoding

David Zienowicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 21:15:46 -0500

20 lines

Pentagram; was: Stymie stymies reading.

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:52:34 -0800

36 lines

Re: Pentagram; was: Stymie stymies reading.

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:50:11 -0800

39 lines

Re: Pentagram; was: Stymie stymies reading.

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 15:25:16 -0200

29 lines

Re: Pentagram; was: Stymie stymies reading.

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:43:16 -0500

33 lines

Re: Pentagram; was: Stymie stymies reading.

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:48:03 -0800

19 lines

Photoshop Question

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:51:45 -0800

26 lines

Re: Photoshop Question

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:17:24 -0800

14 lines

Re: Photoshop Question

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:04:35 -0800

27 lines

Re: Photoshop Question

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:00:13 -0800

20 lines

Re: Photoshop Question

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:25:32 +1100

37 lines

Re: Photoshop Question

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:25:07 -0800

25 lines

problems with unevenness in colour

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:53:34 -0000

32 lines

Question about a golden rule

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:57:15 +1100

53 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:10:37 -0500

22 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:46:30 +0100

22 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:50:20 -0500

30 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:08:48 -0400

57 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:35:40 -0800

28 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:02:30 -0800

45 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:12:52 +1100

48 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:35:01 -0800

23 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:58:16 +1100

39 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:04:20 -0800

18 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:24:54 +1100

34 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:34:39 -0800

21 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:53:02 -0500

26 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:13:56 -0500

35 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:42:26 -0500

70 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:45:52 -0800

18 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:49:05 -0800

19 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:37:11 -0400

72 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:50:07 -0400

44 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:50:16 -0500

47 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:09:14 -0800

25 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:45:23 -0400

67 lines

Quick Typo ?: text figures in bibliography?

Gahlord Dewald <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:17:52 -0500

34 lines

Re: Quick Typo ?: text figures in bibliography?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 13:36:24 -0800

25 lines

Re: Quick Typo ?: text figures in bibliography?

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:51:38 -0500

27 lines

Rare Book School at the University of Virginia

Vincent Golden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 19:18:55 -0600

69 lines

Readability research

Karel van der Waarde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:16:06 +0100

55 lines

Re: Readability research

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:31:20 -0800

36 lines

Re: Readability research - A web link

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 00:16:09 -0800

22 lines

Readability research - More web links

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:35:39 -0800

32 lines

Re: Readability research - More web links

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:18:24 -0800

29 lines

Ryder

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:36:14 +0100

18 lines

Re: Ryder

Michael J Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:02:55 EST

19 lines

Searching and surfing for typeface patents

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:51:13 -0800

117 lines

Select Photoshop Question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 12:16:35 -0500

25 lines

Re: Select Photoshop Question

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:26:59 -0800

21 lines

Shape of the euro sign

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:50 +0000

39 lines

Re: Shape of the euro sign

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:33:55 -0800

28 lines

Re: Shape of the euro sign

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:19:41 +0000

27 lines

Re: Shape of the euro sign

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:51:39 -0800

19 lines

Re: Shape of the euro sign

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:53:29 EST

23 lines

Re: Shape of the euro sign

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:52:51 -0500

18 lines

Re: Shape of the euro sign

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:55:25 -0800

24 lines

sorry, list tech question

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:17:47 -0800

25 lines

Re: sorry, list tech question

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:41:26 -0800

31 lines

Re: Stymie stymies reading.

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:29:37 +0100

32 lines

Re: Stymie stymies reading.

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 07:25:17 -0800

32 lines

Re: Stymie stymies reading.

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:59:54 -0200

28 lines

Re: Stymie stymies reading.

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:03:52 -0800

13 lines

Re: Stymie stymies reading.

matt carey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:39:21 +0000

37 lines

Suggestions?

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:34:39 +0000

24 lines

Re: Suggestions?

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:10:14 -0800

19 lines

Re: Suggestions?

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:25:03 +0100

25 lines

Sum of the Parts (was Re: Boumas - vision)

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:12:14 -0300

59 lines

Re: Sum of the Parts (was Re: Boumas - vision)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:38:57 -0800

26 lines

Re: Sum of the Parts (was Re: Boumas - vision)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:56:19 -0500

30 lines

Re: Sum of the Parts (was Re: Boumas - vision)

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:38:07 -0300

49 lines

Sv: Illustrator question

Søren Olsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:37:30 +0100

31 lines

Testing 1 2 3

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 22:49:00 +0000

14 lines

Re: Testing 1 2 3

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:49:58 -0800

35 lines

Re: Testing 1 2 3

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:28:22 -0800

19 lines

Re: Testing 1 2 3

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:46:44 +0000

23 lines

Re: Testing 1 2 3

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:45:38 -0800

25 lines

the leaf

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 01:23:14 +0100

19 lines

Re: the leaf

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:33:33 -0800

25 lines

Re: the leaf

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:51:39 -0800

32 lines

Re: the leaf

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 21:01:12 -0800

17 lines

TrueType hinting process

Bjorn Christianson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 01:06:59 -0600

89 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:52:01 -0500

32 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:46:51 -0800

23 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:09:24 -0800

27 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Bjorn Christianson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:25:25 -0600

47 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Bjorn Christianson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:28:05 -0600

33 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:42:10 -0500

43 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:32:58 -0500

32 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Bjorn Christianson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:40:24 -0600

45 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:05:38 -0500

25 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:12:01 -0500

39 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:13:27 -0800

17 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:02:06 -0500

33 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:11:09 -0800

18 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:23:46 -0500

25 lines

Type foundries

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:09:15 +0100

18 lines

Re: Type foundries

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 05:10:18 -0700

28 lines

Re: Type foundries

Simon Daniels <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:09:13 -0800

24 lines

Re: Type foundries

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:30:02 +0100

33 lines

Re: Type foundries

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:38:55 +0100

32 lines

Re: Type foundries

Simon Daniels <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:34:16 -0800

22 lines

Type sizes

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:40:29 +0100

18 lines

Re: Type sizes

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:14:01 -0400

84 lines

Re: Type sizes

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:12:09 +0100

26 lines

Re: Type sizes

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:35:11 -0800

32 lines

Re: Type sizes

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:49:54 -0400

42 lines

Re: Type sizes

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 15:05:16 +0100

41 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:15:01 GMT

68 lines

Where did the word "italic" come from?

LABA.CB <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:17:06 -0500

22 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:26:48 -0800

21 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

parkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 07:33:54 -0800

37 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:27:41 -0500

19 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

parkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:38:36 -0800

49 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:36:07 -0500

19 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:50:19 -0400

18 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:52:41 -0500

39 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:51:38 -0500

21 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:03:58 EST

19 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

LABA.CB <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:55:51 -0500

25 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:28:49 EST

34 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Gahlord Dewald <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:43:46 -0500

23 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Antonio Cavedoni <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 23:37:18 +0100

26 lines

[Off-topic] Book Design Trade Practices

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:00:19 -0500

26 lines

[OT] Re: Boumas - vision

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:34:38 -0800

42 lines


Back to: Main TYPO-L Page



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager