LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


February 2001


View:

Show Contributor List | Hide Contributor List

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TYPO-L Home

TYPO-L Home

Subject

From Sorted by Sender, Chronologically

Date

Size

Re: L-slash trash

=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Olsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:40:54 +0800

22 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 06:13:09 +0100

22 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 19:07:58 +0100

28 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 18:44:35 +0100

15 lines

Re: Opinions on the euro?

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:20:19 +0100

35 lines

Re: A Virus Question (TAN)

Alan Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:09:25 -0000

31 lines

Re: A Virus Question (TAN)

Alistair Vining <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:27:55 -0000

35 lines

Re: Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:44:36 -0800

23 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:47:22 -0800

21 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:39:29 -0800

23 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:34:03 -0800

22 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 02:55:05 -0800

21 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:44:29 -0800

20 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:30:49 -0800

17 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Antonio Cavedoni <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 23:37:18 +0100

26 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:50:16 -0500

47 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:42:26 -0500

70 lines

Re: Boumas - any good books

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:12:26 -0800

54 lines

Re: Boumas - back propagation

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:16:43 -0800

40 lines

Re: Boumas - Chinese and Blurs

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:20:49 -0800

38 lines

Re: Boumas - debate resolved

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 02:52:58 -0800

24 lines

Boumas - debate resolved

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:01:02 -0800

71 lines

Boumas - debate resolved - Chinese

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:35:32 -0800

27 lines

Re: Boumas - debate resolved - signature

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 04:56:39 -0800

30 lines

Re: Boumas - flash and gibberish tests

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 19:11:43 -0800

62 lines

Re: Boumas - opinion evolution

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:31:03 -0800

25 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:52:48 -0800

35 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:15:07 -0800

58 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 23:10:40 -0800

54 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:42:24 -0800

33 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:25:24 -0800

52 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:07:09 -0800

38 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 02:14:34 -0800

26 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:23:26 -0800

28 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:42:41 -0800

20 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:25:10 -0800

60 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - timing

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:00:37 -0800

31 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:05:35 -0800

47 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:52:29 -0800

63 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:18:19 -0800

47 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:28:02 -0800

62 lines

Boumas - why the debate

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:30:01 -0800

62 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 05:03:45 -0800

33 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:29:22 -0800

26 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:56:17 -0800

22 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 23:42:54 -0800

45 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:29:50 -0800

38 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 23:06:21 -0800

43 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:02:33 -0800

29 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:53:11 -0800

35 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 23:59:58 -0800

35 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:47:27 -0800

23 lines

Re: Readability research - A web link

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 00:16:09 -0800

22 lines

Readability research - More web links

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:35:39 -0800

32 lines

Re: Font called Chantilly?

Bjorn Christianson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:32:29 -0600

35 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Bjorn Christianson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:40:24 -0600

45 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Bjorn Christianson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:28:05 -0600

33 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Bjorn Christianson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:25:25 -0600

47 lines

TrueType hinting process

Bjorn Christianson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 01:06:59 -0600

89 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2001 12:30:31 +1100

38 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:52:47 +1100

41 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:01:03 +1100

50 lines

Re: Photoshop Question

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:25:32 +1100

37 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:24:54 +1100

34 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:58:16 +1100

39 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:12:52 +1100

48 lines

Question about a golden rule

Brendan McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:57:15 +1100

53 lines

Re: Shape of the euro sign

Burke, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:19:41 +0000

27 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 22:10:00 -0800

34 lines

[OT] Re: Boumas - vision

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:34:38 -0800

42 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:24:55 -0800

44 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Conor Mangat <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:51:39 +0000

30 lines

Opinions on the euro?

Conor Mangat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:54:04 +0000

38 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 19:55:14 -0800

33 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 19:50:13 -0800

26 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:56:07 -0800

69 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:18:04 -0800

29 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:45:55 -0800

26 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:14:57 -0800

27 lines

Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:12:07 -0800

31 lines

Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:17:49 -0800

29 lines

Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:41:53 -0800

38 lines

Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:36:06 -0800

52 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:03:26 -0800

85 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 11:46:57 -0800

56 lines

Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:23:54 -0800

33 lines

Re: Shape of the euro sign

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:55:25 -0800

24 lines

Re: Testing 1 2 3

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:45:38 -0800

25 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Cynthia Jacquette <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:29:23 -0800

17 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Cynthia Jacquette <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:24:43 -0800

21 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Cynthia Jacquette <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:16:35 -0800

19 lines

austrian blackletter

Cynthia Jacquette <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:34:27 -0800

15 lines

Font Problems with Windows ME

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:17:03 -0600

34 lines

New Font Released - John Speed

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:42:49 -0600

27 lines

Re: CtO safe?

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:06:01 -0800

29 lines

Re: CtO safe?

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:21:36 -0800

38 lines

PC font encoding

David Zienowicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 21:15:46 -0500

20 lines

Re: L-slash trash

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:39:07 -0800

33 lines

Re: Testing 1 2 3

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:49:58 -0800

35 lines

Re: the leaf

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:51:39 -0800

32 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 02:42:23 -0600

25 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Eric Kindel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:41:44 +0000

34 lines

Mardersteig's Dante

Gahlord Dewald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:01:11 -0500

26 lines

Quick Typo ?: text figures in bibliography?

Gahlord Dewald <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:17:52 -0500

34 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Gahlord Dewald <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:43:46 -0500

23 lines

Re: for a possibly interesting article on handwriting, visit this URL ;-)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 01:38:20 -0400

15 lines

Re: Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:41:09 -0400

33 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:21:01 -0400

41 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:25:55 -0400

28 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:40:58 -0400

59 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:45:23 -0400

67 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:50:07 -0400

44 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:37:11 -0400

72 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:08:48 -0400

57 lines

Re: Type sizes

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:49:54 -0400

42 lines

Re: Type sizes

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:14:01 -0400

84 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:50:19 -0400

18 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:25:45 +0100

34 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:15:22 +0100

29 lines

Re: A Virus Question (TAN)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:22:50 -0800

19 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 19:40:28 -0800

39 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:04:03 -0800

43 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:37:02 -0800

26 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:22:34 -0800

42 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 15:49:40 -0800

27 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:30:29 -0800

29 lines

Pentagram; was: Stymie stymies reading.

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:52:34 -0800

36 lines

Re: Shape of the euro sign

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:51:39 -0800

19 lines

sorry, list tech question

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:17:47 -0800

25 lines

Re: Type sizes

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:35:11 -0800

32 lines

Re: A Virus Question (TAN)

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:57:53 -0500

64 lines

Re: Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:31:37 -0500

27 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:39:30 -0500

25 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:04:04 -0500

46 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 19:21:54 -0500

31 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:07:00 -0500

37 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 15:18:18 -0500

31 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:31:58 -0500

40 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 21:47:55 -0500

49 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:13:56 -0500

35 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:10:37 -0500

22 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:12:01 -0500

39 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:32:58 -0500

32 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:42:10 -0500

43 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Harvey Fishman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:52:01 -0500

32 lines

Re: A rose by any other name...

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:10:24 -0800

24 lines

A rose by any other name...

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:05:40 -0800

25 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:25:39 -0800

22 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 13:53:14 -0800

19 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:56:08 -0800

19 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:12:06 -0800

31 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:40:47 -0800

26 lines

Re: Boumas - any good books

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:25:22 -0800

20 lines

Re: Boumas - debate resolved

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 07:34:48 -0800

20 lines

Re: Boumas - flash and gibberish tests

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 08:54:59 -0800

38 lines

Re: Boumas - readability measures

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:37:37 -0800

25 lines

Boumas - readability measures

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:11:02 -0800

89 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:58:27 -0800

19 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:44:25 -0800

25 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:43:13 -0800

32 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:02:00 -0800

25 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 07:32:32 -0800

38 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 07:20:19 -0800

18 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 20:00:43 -0800

61 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:12:23 -0800

64 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:36:31 -0800

26 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:48:13 -0800

20 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:57:10 -0800

41 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:42:05 -0800

175 lines

Boumas - vision

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:09:29 -0800

68 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - timing

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:07:08 -0800

163 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:49:41 -0800

36 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:01:27 -0800

34 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:46:36 -0800

43 lines

Re: Boumas - vision - unsharp

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:14:25 -0800

49 lines

Re: CtO safe?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:56:29 -0800

28 lines

Re: CtO safe?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:00:05 -0800

22 lines

Re: CtO safe?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:20:55 -0800

19 lines

CtO Safe?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:36:41 -0800

23 lines

Re: delta-shift value

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:25:32 -0800

21 lines

Re: delta-shift value

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:59:37 -0800

22 lines

Re: Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:13:36 -0800

19 lines

Re: Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:37:47 -0800

26 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:27:27 -0800

61 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:59:55 -0800

30 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:45:26 -0800

41 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:00:29 -0800

72 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 15:35:24 -0800

23 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:40:30 -0800

33 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:07:20 -0800

32 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 10:10:57 -0800

24 lines

Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 09:15:57 -0800

55 lines

Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 07:17:59 -0800

21 lines

Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:52:06 -0800

21 lines

Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:02:44 -0800

65 lines

GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:25:11 -0800

113 lines

Re: help

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:19:19 -0800

17 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:42:24 -0800

36 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:04:31 -0800

36 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 14:49:59 -0800

71 lines

Re: Language differences, was Re: GD&R

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:47:33 -0800

44 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:20:43 -0800

19 lines

Newlyn takes the web plunge

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:23:51 -0800

16 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:13:04 -0800

37 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:57:56 -0800

21 lines

Newspaper Type Design

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:22:40 -0800

25 lines

Re: Opinions on the euro?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:23:30 -0800

25 lines

Re: Pentagram; was: Stymie stymies reading.

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:48:03 -0800

19 lines

Re: Photoshop Question

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:25:07 -0800

25 lines

Re: Photoshop Question

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:00:13 -0800

20 lines

Re: Photoshop Question

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:04:35 -0800

27 lines

Photoshop Question

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:51:45 -0800

26 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:09:14 -0800

25 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:49:05 -0800

19 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:45:52 -0800

18 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:34:39 -0800

21 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:04:20 -0800

18 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:35:01 -0800

23 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:02:30 -0800

45 lines

Re: Quick Typo ?: text figures in bibliography?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 13:36:24 -0800

25 lines

Re: Readability research

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:31:20 -0800

36 lines

Re: Readability research - More web links

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:18:24 -0800

29 lines

Re: Shape of the euro sign

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:33:55 -0800

28 lines

Re: Stymie stymies reading.

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 07:25:17 -0800

32 lines

Re: Sum of the Parts (was Re: Boumas - vision)

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:38:57 -0800

26 lines

Re: Testing 1 2 3

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:28:22 -0800

19 lines

Re: the leaf

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:33:33 -0800

25 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:11:09 -0800

18 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:13:27 -0800

17 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:46:51 -0800

23 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Hrant H Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:26:48 -0800

21 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 00:52:51 -0500

59 lines

Re: CtO safe?

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:58:04 -0500

25 lines

Re: for a possibly interesting article about handwriting, visit this URL

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:37:44 -0500

28 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:23:46 -0500

25 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:02:06 -0500

33 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:05:38 -0500

25 lines

Re: CtO safe?

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:22:37 +0100

40 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:50:56 +0100

26 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:35:37 +0100

20 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:08:23 +0100

23 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:29:55 +0100

29 lines

Re: Stymie stymies reading.

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:29:37 +0100

32 lines

Re: Suggestions?

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:25:03 +0100

25 lines

Re: Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:56:16 -0800

16 lines

Re: sorry, list tech question

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:41:26 -0800

31 lines

Re: the leaf

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 21:01:12 -0800

17 lines

Re: Boumas - debate resolved

John Ahlstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 01:08:53 -0800

25 lines

Re: Boumas - debate resolved - Chinese

John Ahlstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 01:16:01 -0800

25 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:14:26 -0800

25 lines

M U Y U R G E N T E ---- No abran el virus

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:54:31 -0800

36 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:23:22 -0800

34 lines

Re: Suggestions?

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:10:14 -0800

19 lines

Readability research

Karel van der Waarde <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:16:06 +0100

55 lines

for a possibly interesting article about handwriting, visit this URL

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 23:49:48 -0500

27 lines

for a possibly interesting article on handwriting, visit this URL ;-)

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 23:49:49 -0500

32 lines

forwarded by authorial request: credit and link for the story "What Letters Do On Their Time Off"

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 02:01:09 -0500

48 lines

just the site for an on-line piece appeared in 2 papers, bewailed "death of cursive penmanship," noted a new style

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:55:43 -0500

40 lines

net-site for on-line story about WHAC: World Handwriting Achievement Competition

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:24:57 -0500

23 lines

of interest - this on-line piece appeared in 2 papers, bewailed "death of cursive penmanship," noted a new style

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:50:40 -0500

99 lines

Re: help

Kay H Khoo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:19:32 +0800

37 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:56:18 -0500

32 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:16:53 -0500

28 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:09:31 -0500

31 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:56:55 -0500

28 lines

Re: Sum of the Parts (was Re: Boumas - vision)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:56:19 -0500

30 lines

[Off-topic] Book Design Trade Practices

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:00:19 -0500

26 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

LABA.CB <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:34:23 -0500

40 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

LABA.CB <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:55:51 -0500

25 lines

Where did the word "italic" come from?

LABA.CB <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:17:06 -0500

22 lines

Re: delta-shift value

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:54:07 +0000

67 lines

Re: Opinions on the euro?

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:48:36 -0000

42 lines

Re: Looking for two typefaces

M. Thavenius <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 23:28:37 +0100

28 lines

bemboszoo

matt carey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:51:57 +0000

17 lines

Re: Missing fonts

matt carey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:02:02 +0000

23 lines

Re: Stymie stymies reading.

matt carey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:39:21 +0000

37 lines

Now that Makambo is dead

Matthew Bardram <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:06:39 -0700

25 lines

Re: help

Metin Ozdemir <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:08:41 +0200

19 lines

help

Metin Ozdemir <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:55:43 +0200

31 lines

Re: A Virus Question (TAN)

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:34:33 -0500

29 lines

Fracktoor Ubu Roi

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:28:29 -0500

25 lines

Select Photoshop Question

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 12:16:35 -0500

25 lines

Re: Shape of the euro sign

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:52:51 -0500

18 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:51:38 -0500

21 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:36:07 -0500

19 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Michael Dooley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:55:08 -0800

18 lines

Shape of the euro sign

Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:50 +0000

39 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Michael J Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 18:40:36 EST

20 lines

Re: Ryder

Michael J Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:02:55 EST

19 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:16:07 -0800

13 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:37:01 -0800

34 lines

Re: Pentagram; was: Stymie stymies reading.

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:50:11 -0800

39 lines

Re: Photoshop Question

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:17:24 -0800

14 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:35:40 -0800

28 lines

Searching and surfing for typeface patents

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:51:13 -0800

117 lines

Re: Select Photoshop Question

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:26:59 -0800

21 lines

Re: Stymie stymies reading.

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:03:52 -0800

13 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

parkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:38:36 -0800

49 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

parkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 07:33:54 -0800

37 lines

Re: Mardersteig's Dante

Per Olav Walmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:28:26 +0100

30 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:15:01 GMT

68 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:53:02 -0500

26 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:50:20 -0500

30 lines

Re: Quick Typo ?: text figures in bibliography?

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:51:38 -0500

27 lines

adjusting curve points in fontographer

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:22:11 -0000

18 lines

Re: delta-shift value

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:45:16 -0000

33 lines

Re: delta-shift value

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:39:33 -0000

93 lines

Re: delta-shift value

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:22:14 -0000

38 lines

delta-shift value

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:24:03 -0000

26 lines

evenness in curved characters

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:34:35 -0000

26 lines

logo creators

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:31:26 -0000

15 lines

logo creators

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:13:53 -0000

20 lines

no msge : thanks 4 the advice HHP will pester .fog newsgroup

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:59:13 -0000

11 lines

problems with unevenness in colour

R Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:53:34 -0000

32 lines

Re: CtO safe?

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:30:18 -0500

25 lines

Re: Pentagram; was: Stymie stymies reading.

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:43:16 -0500

33 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:27:41 -0500

19 lines

Re: Font Problems with Windows ME

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:26:23 -0500

84 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:52:41 -0500

39 lines

Re: help

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:19:59 EST

33 lines

Re: Shape of the euro sign

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:53:29 EST

23 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:28:49 EST

34 lines

Re: Where did the word "italic" come from?

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:03:58 EST

19 lines

Re: Boumas - debate resolved

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:37:06 +0100

40 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:17:33 -0300

33 lines

Re: Pentagram; was: Stymie stymies reading.

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 15:25:16 -0200

29 lines

Re: Stymie stymies reading.

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:59:54 -0200

28 lines

Re: Sum of the Parts (was Re: Boumas - vision)

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:38:07 -0300

49 lines

Sum of the Parts (was Re: Boumas - vision)

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:12:14 -0300

59 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:58:26 +0100

36 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 23:31:40 +0100

29 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 22:46:12 +0100

28 lines

Re: austrian blackletter

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 21:44:49 +0100

43 lines

Re: Boumas - readability measures

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:26:18 +0100

80 lines

Re: Boumas - vision

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:38:42 +0100

45 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:24:15 +0100

49 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 13:02:31 +0100

41 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:09:11 +0100

35 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:31:27 +0100

32 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:56:04 +0100

38 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:50:28 +0100

50 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:35:19 +0100

33 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:09:00 +0100

39 lines

Re: Fraktur Boumas - readability measures

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:06:37 +0100

38 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:48:01 +0100

32 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:44:20 +0100

33 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:19:03 +0100

31 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:15:32 +0100

29 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:11:54 +0100

28 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:04:49 +0100

36 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:29:10 +0100

38 lines

Re: Fraktur Uber Alles Baby

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:09:57 +0100

47 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:43:57 +0100

39 lines

Re: Newspaper Type Design

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:35:48 +0100

26 lines

Re: Question about a golden rule

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:46:30 +0100

22 lines

Ryder

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:36:14 +0100

18 lines

Re: Type foundries

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:38:55 +0100

32 lines

Re: Type foundries

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:30:02 +0100

33 lines

Type foundries

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:09:15 +0100

18 lines

Re: Type sizes

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 15:05:16 +0100

41 lines

Re: Type sizes

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:12:09 +0100

26 lines

Type sizes

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:40:29 +0100

18 lines

Re: A rose by any other name...

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:21:23 +0000

21 lines

A Virus Question (TAN)

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:33:16 +0000

22 lines

Re: delta-shift value

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:54:15 +0000

22 lines

Re: Illustrator question

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:17:13 +0000

18 lines

Illustrator question

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:40:29 +0000

20 lines

Re: L-slash trash

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:02:34 +0000

28 lines

Re: L-slash trash

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:32:46 +0000

18 lines

L-slash trash

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:23:57 +0000

22 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 22:16:15 +0000

19 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 20:33:06 +0000

37 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 17:58:30 +0000

16 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 17:45:15 +0000

27 lines

Missing fonts

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 16:52:44 +0000

28 lines

Suggestions?

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:34:39 +0000

24 lines

Re: Testing 1 2 3

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:46:44 +0000

23 lines

Testing 1 2 3

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 22:49:00 +0000

14 lines

Sv: Illustrator question

S=?ISO-8859-1?B?+A==?=ren Olsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:37:30 +0100

31 lines

Re: Opinions on the euro?

Sander Pinkse <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:02:50 +0100

32 lines

Re: Font Problems with Windows ME

Simon Daniels <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:45:12 -0800

23 lines

Re: Type foundries

Simon Daniels <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:34:16 -0800

22 lines

Re: Type foundries

Simon Daniels <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:09:13 -0800

24 lines

Re: Type foundries

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 05:10:18 -0700

28 lines

Looking for two typefaces

Stephen Moye <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:01:49 +0000

21 lines

Re: Illustrator question

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:55:09 -0500

32 lines

Re: L-slash trash

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:44:55 -0500

33 lines

Re: L-slash trash

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:30:48 -0500

35 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:34:09 -0500

30 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:48:51 -0500

41 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 13:23:32 -0500

31 lines

Re: Missing fonts

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 12:16:44 -0500

58 lines

Rare Book School at the University of Virginia

Vincent Golden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 19:18:55 -0600

69 lines

Font called Chantilly?

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:40:14 -0800

19 lines

Re: TrueType hinting process

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:09:24 -0800

27 lines

Re: logo creators

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:02:40 +0100

28 lines

the leaf

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 01:23:14 +0100

19 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
February 1994
January 1994
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager