LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


August 2000


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave TYPO-L
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

(forwarded) of possible interest: What are 2000 Reasons America Should Read?

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:32:05 -0400

75 lines

600 dotter

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 22:02:02 +0100

26 lines

Aaarrrgh!

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:04:44 +0100

23 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:52:23 -0400

32 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Brian Sooy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 09:21:01 -0400

32 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:27:42 EDT

28 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Robert M. McClure <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:22:55 -0700

24 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:58:11 -0400

25 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:22:12 -0400

31 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:19:18 -0500

36 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:23:49 -0500

41 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 17:42:30 +0100

20 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 13:09:25 EDT

38 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Robert M. McClure <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 12:49:36 -0700

39 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 18:54:17 EDT

42 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:55:37 +0200

32 lines

Appropriate face for business letters

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:00:10 +0100

31 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:04:34 -0700

33 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:54:33 -0700

45 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 16:26:31 -0400

24 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 13:36:11 -0700

32 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 16:44:56 -0400

30 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 17:02:26 -0400

33 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:19:27 -0700

35 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 15:04:56 -0700

37 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:24:57 -0400

33 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 15:43:06 -0700

20 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 21:19:43 -0700

27 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Aug 2000 11:51:56 +0100

38 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 11:25:56 +0100

28 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 09:36:06 -0400

30 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 16:55:02 +0200

23 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 08:40:16 -0700

59 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 09:29:48 -0700

26 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Michael J Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 14:01:52 EDT

16 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 11:06:55 -0700

37 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 15:46:06 -0700

23 lines

Appropriate face for business letters

arthur <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:39:01 +0800

26 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:40:31 +0200

29 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:02:32 -0400

36 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:47:35 -0700

25 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 19:34:02 +0100

17 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:55:20 +0100

35 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:36:48 +0200

32 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 17:41:35 +0000

40 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:23:26 -0400

48 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 18:37:47 -0700

37 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:10:05 -0700

40 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Charles Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 23:33:38 -0400

66 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Charles Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 23:30:51 -0400

39 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:05:46 +0100

37 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:03:21 +0100

40 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 14:58:11 +0200

35 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 15:13:47 +0100

30 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:42:59 -0700

24 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 18:59:17 +0000

58 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 15:43:33 +0200

38 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 16:42:30 +0100

24 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 09:13:15 -0700

71 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:55:38 -0700

26 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 15:33:14 -0700

21 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 05:27:52 -0700

16 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 00:14:36 +0100

32 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 08:15:46 -0700

37 lines

Bookseller Profile

Frances Wakeman Books <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 15:20:26 +0100

44 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 23:23:45 -0400

36 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 12:18:04 +0200

42 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 12:12:05 -0700

93 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:17:45 -0700

41 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 14:10:59 -0700

37 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 22:08:17 +0200

83 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 00:56:53 -0400

65 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:04:48 +0200

69 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 00:24:23 -0400

108 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:15:22 +0200

110 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Aug 2000 00:51:13 -0400

85 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Aug 2000 12:34:48 +0200

66 lines

derivative works: copyright question

Andre Isaak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:31:51 -0500

27 lines

Dies Irae

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 18:52:27 -0700

34 lines

Re: Dies Irae

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:27:27 -0700

42 lines

Ditchling on TV

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 16:52:13 +0100

17 lines

dot dot. .. Eureka

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:43:16 -0700

21 lines

Re: dot dot. .. Eureka

Peter Bilak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:56:51 +0100

18 lines

Re: dot dot. .. Eureka

peter bilak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:35:25 +0200

28 lines

Re: dot dot. .. Eureka

Sander Pinkse <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:38:10 +0200

31 lines

Re: dot dot. .. Eureka

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:16:07 -0700

32 lines

Ducks; was: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 09:29:03 -0700

69 lines

Re: Ducks; was: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 19:04:07 +0100

31 lines

Re: Ducks; was: Appropriate face for business letters

Charles Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 22:27:35 -0400

50 lines

Ethan Lipton

Michael J Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 19:34:09 EDT

18 lines

Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Aug 2000 22:19:10 -0400

40 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Aug 2000 23:50:28 -0400

51 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:36:18 +0200

40 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 07:24:18 -0400

32 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:45:35 +0200

37 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:03:57 +0200

112 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:15:42 +0200

20 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:46:26 +0200

39 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 07:48:37 -0700

27 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:36:30 +0200

23 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:49:05 -0400

37 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:21:34 -0400

28 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 18:39:51 +0200

34 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:51:17 -0400

35 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 00:22:30 +0200

28 lines

Extraordinary Font Pirate Site

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:29:20 -0500

33 lines

Re: Extraordinary Font Pirate Site

arthur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:30:48 +0800

30 lines

Re: Extraordinary Font Pirate Site

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:24:37 -0700

37 lines

Re: Extraordinary Font Pirate Site

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:46:02 -0700

25 lines

fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Allers Heinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Aug 2000 16:12:10 +0200

41 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Jaap Pranger <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Aug 2000 18:16:37 +0200

28 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Aug 2000 12:43:42 -0400

38 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Allers Heinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:46:39 +0200

33 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Jaap Pranger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 20:46:26 +0200

55 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 20:50:56 +0200

30 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Allers Heinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:04:23 +0200

77 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Jaap Pranger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 20:10:21 +0200

100 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 19:57:56 -0400

66 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Jaap Pranger <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Aug 2000 07:01:25 +0200

34 lines

Foggy Tip

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Aug 2000 10:57:44 +0100

26 lines

Font & Design Newsletter

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Aug 2000 09:41:19 -0500

35 lines

FontLab Mac [Re: fog to ttf when ...]

Jaap Pranger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:15:32 +0200

50 lines

Re: FontLab Mac [Re: fog to ttf when ...]

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:08:03 +0200

57 lines

Frog on the Baseline

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 15:39:24 +0100

19 lines

Fwd: sneak preview

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 17:13:52 -0700

16 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 00:08:11 -0400

27 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 23:37:32 -0500

43 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 23:32:42 -0500

24 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 21:59:21 -0700

27 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 08:31:49 -0400

57 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:54:13 -0700

31 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 14:26:17 -0400

21 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 16:36:51 -0400

31 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:49:28 -0700

24 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 20:05:45 -0400

34 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:24:47 +0100

17 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:01:24 -0700

45 lines

German Court Upholds Font Name Protection

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:08:51 -0400

45 lines

Gill bio

Don Wilkes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Aug 2000 08:16:06 -0700

25 lines

Re: Gill bio

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Aug 2000 19:07:41 +0100

37 lines

Re: Gill bio

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Aug 2000 20:41:19 +0100

17 lines

Giving away your babies

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:07:23 +0100

43 lines

Re: Giving away your babies

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:22:01 -0400

28 lines

Re: Giving away your babies

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:55:05 -0700

70 lines

Re: Giving away your babies

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:17:52 -0700

46 lines

Re: Giving away your babies

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:38:49 -0400

63 lines

Re: Giving away your babies

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:40:32 -0700

35 lines

Re: Giving away your babies

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Aug 2000 23:46:08 -0500

28 lines

Graphic design in Quebec

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 18:23:10 -0400

96 lines

Re: Graphic design in Quebec / Duth design

peter bilak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:01:27 +0200

22 lines

Gutenberg digital (was: Gutenberg exhibit in Louisville)

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:51:33 +0200

37 lines

Re: Gutenberg digital (was: Gutenberg exhibit in Louisville)

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:36:23 -0700

36 lines

Gutenberg exhibit in Louisville

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:40:54 -0400

160 lines

Re: Gutenberg exhibit in Louisville

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:19:17 +0100

22 lines

Header: Sale on all art books-30% off the ABEBOOKS price

Carol Grossman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:38:56 -0600

41 lines

Hi, I'm testing

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:23:26 -0700

18 lines

Re: Hi, I'm testing

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 18:45:11 -0400

29 lines

I'm away on business 2-August through 14-August

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 21:59:08 -0400

19 lines

ITC Monsters of the '70s

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 08:56:55 -0400

39 lines

Re: ITC Monsters of the '70s (was Re: Curious Letterspacing)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 17:15:53 -0700

21 lines

Re: ITC Monsters of the '70s (was Re: Curious Letterspacing)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 17:17:51 -0700

33 lines

Judgement Day

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 17:45:50 +0100

29 lines

Re: Judgement Day

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:09:27 -0400

28 lines

Re: Judgement Day

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:59:41 -0700

35 lines

Judgment Day-o, day-o, ...

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:33:30 -0400

37 lines

Re: Judgment Day-o, day-o, ...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:51:34 -0400

29 lines

Lubalin Center/Cooper Design Events

MIRSKY LAWRENCE <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:35:07 -0400

95 lines

More letterspacing for emphasis

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 07:01:15 -0700

22 lines

new web type website

Brian Sooy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:50:19 -0400

27 lines

Off topicness, &c. (was Re: Curious Letterspacing)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:40:42 -0700

32 lines

One of these is not like the others

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:06:52 -0400

50 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:35:28 -0400

38 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:50:19 -0400

46 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:15:43 -0400

37 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:55:14 -0400

41 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 08:24:49 -0700

54 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:35:11 -0400

34 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:41:56 EDT

40 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:45:08 EDT

35 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 12:04:18 -0700

27 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 17:00:18 -0400

29 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

John Ahlstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 23:00:19 -0700

21 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 23:20:02 -0700

19 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Andy Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:17:45 +0100

31 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:10:19 -0700

54 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:38:58 -0700

49 lines

OpenType and ATSUI

Andre Isaak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:24:18 -0500

41 lines

Re: OpenType and ATSUI

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Aug 2000 10:03:15 -0700

33 lines

OpenType FDK [was: Unicode?]

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 14:46:58 -0400

61 lines

Re: OpenType FDK [was: Unicode?]

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 09:25:49 -0700

54 lines

Re: OpenType FDK [was: Unicode?]

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 19:28:49 -0400

36 lines

period space space

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 14:48:19 -0400

27 lines

Re: period space space

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 14:54:09 -0400

40 lines

Re: period space space

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 14:11:59 -0500

50 lines

Re: period space space

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:47:03 +0200

28 lines

Re: period space space

Mark A. Hiselman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 08:31:35 -0400

21 lines

Re: period space space

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 15:41:56 EDT

40 lines

question about german ess-tset

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:55:35 -0400

25 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:14:06 +0200

26 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:11:15 +0200

31 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 19:51:15 +0200

24 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:45:11 EDT

41 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 20:29:36 +0100

19 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:10:31 -0400

33 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Sebastian Marius Kirsch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 23:02:10 +0200

47 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 19:41:54 -0400

35 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:04:17 +0200

32 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:59:14 +0100

28 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:29:23 +0200

38 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 14:01:20 +0200

28 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:09:14 EDT

29 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:10:47 EDT

22 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:15:59 EDT

34 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 23:14:59 +0200

34 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 13:29:13 EDT

30 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Sebastian Marius Kirsch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Aug 2000 22:29:51 +0200

27 lines

Scriptorium Update #88 - New Celtic CD & New Fonts

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:25:28 -0500

117 lines

Re: Sneak Preview

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 21:00:00 +0100

22 lines

Re: Sneak Preview

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 16:30:53 -0400

27 lines

Re: Standard sizes online

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 12:51:24 +0200

34 lines

Re: Standard sizes online

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:57:39 -0700

40 lines

Striking back

Anthony Cahalan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:25:25 +1000

61 lines

Re: Striking back

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:55:12 +0200

78 lines

Re: Striking back

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 08:23:25 -0700

40 lines

Re: Surplus designers,

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 11:04:56 +0100

23 lines

Re: Surplus designers, was Re: Appropriate face for business let

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:18:19 +0000

54 lines

Re: Surplus designers, was Re: Appropriate face for business let

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:39:14 -0700

21 lines

Surplus designers, was Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Aug 2000 19:54:49 -0700

44 lines

TeX-Stammtisch Erlangen entfaellt im August

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:51:00 +0200

26 lines

Re: TeX-Stammtisch Erlangen entfaellt im August

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:09:52 +0200

16 lines

Two recent articles on typography

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:32:05 -0700

23 lines

Type in SF

Jared Benson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 07:42:28 -0700

22 lines

Re: Type in SF

jim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 12:38:41 -0700

25 lines

Re: Type in SF

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:03:07 -0700

23 lines

Re: Type in SF

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:01:57 -0700

30 lines

Typesetter debacles [was Re: Aaarrrgh!]

Robert M. McClure <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:24:16 -0700

46 lines

Typography-A dying art

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:35:19 -0700

21 lines

Re: Typography-A dying art

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 18:29:04 -0400

22 lines

Re: Typography-A dying art

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 16:15:37 -0700

41 lines

Re: Typography-A dying art

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 23:47:37 -0400

22 lines

Re: Typography-A dying art

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:17:40 EDT

28 lines

Re: Typography-A dying art

peter bilak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:30:25 +0200

22 lines

Unicode?

Emma Megitt GD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:03:01 +0200

13 lines

Re: Unicode?

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:20:57 -0700

26 lines

Re: Unicode?

Stephen Moye <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 12:53:04 -0400

29 lines

Re: Unicode?

Brandon Oakley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 14:18:57 EDT

48 lines

Re: Unicode?

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:44:54 +0200

25 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 09:15:02 +0100

68 lines

Warnock (what I meant to say)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:23:06 -0700

19 lines

Web Typography (was: Typography-A dying art)

tell3a <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 16:52:48 -0500

47 lines

Re: Web Typography (was: Typography-A dying art)

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:02:25 -0700

51 lines

Re: Web Typography (was: Typography-A dying art)

Matt Spiegler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:50:06 -0400

66 lines

Re: Web Typography (was: Typography-A dying art)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:16:32 -0400

99 lines

Re: Web Typography (was: Typography-A dying art)

SUGAR in their vitamins? <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:52:31 -0700

37 lines

Women in the Book Trade

Oak Knoll Press <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 18:13:17 -0400

62 lines

Re: [CE-L] QUERY TOOLS Fonts & clip art CD-ROMs

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 14:39:43 -0400

58 lines

Re: [CE-L] QUERY TOOLS Fonts & clip art CD-ROMs

michaellynch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:14:43 -0700

95 lines


Back to: Main TYPO-L Page



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager