LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


August 2000


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TYPO-L Home

TYPO-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

(forwarded) of possible interest: What are 2000 Reasons America Should Read?

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:32:05 -0400

75 lines

600 dotter

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 22:02:02 +0100

26 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:55:37 +0200

32 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 18:54:17 EDT

42 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Robert M. McClure <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 12:49:36 -0700

39 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 13:09:25 EDT

38 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 17:42:30 +0100

20 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:23:49 -0500

41 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:19:18 -0500

36 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:22:12 -0400

31 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:58:11 -0400

25 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Robert M. McClure <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:22:55 -0700

24 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:27:42 EDT

28 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Brian Sooy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 09:21:01 -0400

32 lines

Re: Aaarrrgh!

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:52:23 -0400

32 lines

Aaarrrgh!

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:04:44 +0100

23 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 08:15:46 -0700

37 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 00:14:36 +0100

32 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 05:27:52 -0700

16 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 15:33:14 -0700

21 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:55:38 -0700

26 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 09:13:15 -0700

71 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 16:42:30 +0100

24 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 15:43:33 +0200

38 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 18:59:17 +0000

58 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:42:59 -0700

24 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 15:13:47 +0100

30 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 14:58:11 +0200

35 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:03:21 +0100

40 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:05:46 +0100

37 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Charles Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 23:30:51 -0400

39 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Charles Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 23:33:38 -0400

66 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:10:05 -0700

40 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 18:37:47 -0700

37 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:23:26 -0400

48 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 17:41:35 +0000

40 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:36:48 +0200

32 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:55:20 +0100

35 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 19:34:02 +0100

17 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:47:35 -0700

25 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:02:32 -0400

36 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:40:31 +0200

29 lines

Appropriate face for business letters

arthur <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:39:01 +0800

26 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 15:46:06 -0700

23 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 11:06:55 -0700

37 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Michael J Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 14:01:52 EDT

16 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 09:29:48 -0700

26 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 08:40:16 -0700

59 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 16:55:02 +0200

23 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 09:36:06 -0400

30 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Aug 2000 11:25:56 +0100

28 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Aug 2000 11:51:56 +0100

38 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 21:19:43 -0700

27 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 15:43:06 -0700

20 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:24:57 -0400

33 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 15:04:56 -0700

37 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:19:27 -0700

35 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 17:02:26 -0400

33 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 16:44:56 -0400

30 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 13:36:11 -0700

32 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 16:26:31 -0400

24 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:54:33 -0700

45 lines

Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:04:34 -0700

33 lines

Appropriate face for business letters

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:00:10 +0100

31 lines

Bookseller Profile

Frances Wakeman Books <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 15:20:26 +0100

44 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Aug 2000 12:34:48 +0200

66 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Aug 2000 00:51:13 -0400

85 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:15:22 +0200

110 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 00:24:23 -0400

108 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:04:48 +0200

69 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 00:56:53 -0400

65 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 22:08:17 +0200

83 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 14:10:59 -0700

37 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:17:45 -0700

41 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 12:12:05 -0700

93 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 12:18:04 +0200

42 lines

Re: Curious Letterspacing

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 23:23:45 -0400

36 lines

derivative works: copyright question

Andre Isaak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:31:51 -0500

27 lines

Re: Dies Irae

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:27:27 -0700

42 lines

Dies Irae

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 18:52:27 -0700

34 lines

Ditchling on TV

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 16:52:13 +0100

17 lines

Re: dot dot. .. Eureka

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:16:07 -0700

32 lines

Re: dot dot. .. Eureka

Sander Pinkse <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:38:10 +0200

31 lines

Re: dot dot. .. Eureka

peter bilak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:35:25 +0200

28 lines

Re: dot dot. .. Eureka

Peter Bilak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:56:51 +0100

18 lines

dot dot. .. Eureka

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:43:16 -0700

21 lines

Re: Ducks; was: Appropriate face for business letters

Charles Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 22:27:35 -0400

50 lines

Re: Ducks; was: Appropriate face for business letters

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 19:04:07 +0100

31 lines

Ducks; was: Appropriate face for business letters

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 09:29:03 -0700

69 lines

Ethan Lipton

Michael J Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 19:34:09 EDT

18 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 00:22:30 +0200

28 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:51:17 -0400

35 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 18:39:51 +0200

34 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:21:34 -0400

28 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:49:05 -0400

37 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:36:30 +0200

23 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 07:48:37 -0700

27 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:46:26 +0200

39 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:15:42 +0200

20 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:03:57 +0200

112 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:45:35 +0200

37 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 07:24:18 -0400

32 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:36:18 +0200

40 lines

Re: Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Aug 2000 23:50:28 -0400

51 lines

Extracting embedded fonts from PDFs

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Aug 2000 22:19:10 -0400

40 lines

Re: Extraordinary Font Pirate Site

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:46:02 -0700

25 lines

Re: Extraordinary Font Pirate Site

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:24:37 -0700

37 lines

Re: Extraordinary Font Pirate Site

arthur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:30:48 +0800

30 lines

Extraordinary Font Pirate Site

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:29:20 -0500

33 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Jaap Pranger <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Aug 2000 07:01:25 +0200

34 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 19:57:56 -0400

66 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Jaap Pranger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 20:10:21 +0200

100 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Allers Heinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:04:23 +0200

77 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 20:50:56 +0200

30 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Jaap Pranger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 20:46:26 +0200

55 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Allers Heinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:46:39 +0200

33 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Aug 2000 12:43:42 -0400

38 lines

Re: fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Jaap Pranger <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Aug 2000 18:16:37 +0200

28 lines

fog to ttf when dec. code >126

Allers Heinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Aug 2000 16:12:10 +0200

41 lines

Foggy Tip

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Aug 2000 10:57:44 +0100

26 lines

Font & Design Newsletter

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Aug 2000 09:41:19 -0500

35 lines

Re: FontLab Mac [Re: fog to ttf when ...]

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:08:03 +0200

57 lines

FontLab Mac [Re: fog to ttf when ...]

Jaap Pranger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:15:32 +0200

50 lines

Frog on the Baseline

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 15:39:24 +0100

19 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:01:24 -0700

45 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:24:47 +0100

17 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 20:05:45 -0400

34 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:49:28 -0700

24 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 16:36:51 -0400

31 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 14:26:17 -0400

21 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:54:13 -0700

31 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 08:31:49 -0400

57 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 21:59:21 -0700

27 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 23:32:42 -0500

24 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 23:37:32 -0500

43 lines

Re: Fwd: sneak preview

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 00:08:11 -0400

27 lines

Fwd: sneak preview

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 17:13:52 -0700

16 lines

German Court Upholds Font Name Protection

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:08:51 -0400

45 lines

Re: Gill bio

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Aug 2000 20:41:19 +0100

17 lines

Re: Gill bio

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Aug 2000 19:07:41 +0100

37 lines

Gill bio

Don Wilkes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Aug 2000 08:16:06 -0700

25 lines

Re: Giving away your babies

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Aug 2000 23:46:08 -0500

28 lines

Re: Giving away your babies

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:40:32 -0700

35 lines

Re: Giving away your babies

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:38:49 -0400

63 lines

Re: Giving away your babies

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:17:52 -0700

46 lines

Re: Giving away your babies

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:55:05 -0700

70 lines

Re: Giving away your babies

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:22:01 -0400

28 lines

Giving away your babies

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:07:23 +0100

43 lines

Graphic design in Quebec

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 18:23:10 -0400

96 lines

Re: Graphic design in Quebec / Duth design

peter bilak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:01:27 +0200

22 lines

Re: Gutenberg digital (was: Gutenberg exhibit in Louisville)

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:36:23 -0700

36 lines

Gutenberg digital (was: Gutenberg exhibit in Louisville)

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:51:33 +0200

37 lines

Re: Gutenberg exhibit in Louisville

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:19:17 +0100

22 lines

Gutenberg exhibit in Louisville

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:40:54 -0400

160 lines

Header: Sale on all art books-30% off the ABEBOOKS price

Carol Grossman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:38:56 -0600

41 lines

Re: Hi, I'm testing

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 18:45:11 -0400

29 lines

Hi, I'm testing

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:23:26 -0700

18 lines

I'm away on business 2-August through 14-August

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 21:59:08 -0400

19 lines

ITC Monsters of the '70s

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 08:56:55 -0400

39 lines

Re: ITC Monsters of the '70s (was Re: Curious Letterspacing)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 17:17:51 -0700

33 lines

Re: ITC Monsters of the '70s (was Re: Curious Letterspacing)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 17:15:53 -0700

21 lines

Re: Judgement Day

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:59:41 -0700

35 lines

Re: Judgement Day

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:09:27 -0400

28 lines

Judgement Day

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 17:45:50 +0100

29 lines

Re: Judgment Day-o, day-o, ...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:51:34 -0400

29 lines

Judgment Day-o, day-o, ...

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:33:30 -0400

37 lines

Lubalin Center/Cooper Design Events

MIRSKY LAWRENCE <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:35:07 -0400

95 lines

More letterspacing for emphasis

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 07:01:15 -0700

22 lines

new web type website

Brian Sooy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:50:19 -0400

27 lines

Off topicness, &c. (was Re: Curious Letterspacing)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:40:42 -0700

32 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:38:58 -0700

49 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:10:19 -0700

54 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Andy Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:17:45 +0100

31 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 23:20:02 -0700

19 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

John Ahlstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 23:00:19 -0700

21 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 17:00:18 -0400

29 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 12:04:18 -0700

27 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:45:08 EDT

35 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:41:56 EDT

40 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:35:11 -0400

34 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 08:24:49 -0700

54 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:55:14 -0400

41 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:15:43 -0400

37 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:50:19 -0400

46 lines

Re: One of these is not like the others

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:35:28 -0400

38 lines

One of these is not like the others

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:06:52 -0400

50 lines

Re: OpenType and ATSUI

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Aug 2000 10:03:15 -0700

33 lines

OpenType and ATSUI

Andre Isaak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:24:18 -0500

41 lines

Re: OpenType FDK [was: Unicode?]

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 19:28:49 -0400

36 lines

Re: OpenType FDK [was: Unicode?]

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 09:25:49 -0700

54 lines

OpenType FDK [was: Unicode?]

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 14:46:58 -0400

61 lines

Re: period space space

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 15:41:56 EDT

40 lines

Re: period space space

Mark A. Hiselman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 08:31:35 -0400

21 lines

Re: period space space

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:47:03 +0200

28 lines

Re: period space space

Don Hosek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 14:11:59 -0500

50 lines

Re: period space space

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 14:54:09 -0400

40 lines

period space space

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 14:48:19 -0400

27 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Sebastian Marius Kirsch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Aug 2000 22:29:51 +0200

27 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2000 13:29:13 EDT

30 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 23:14:59 +0200

34 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:15:59 EDT

34 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:10:47 EDT

22 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:09:14 EDT

29 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 14:01:20 +0200

28 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:29:23 +0200

38 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:59:14 +0100

28 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:04:17 +0200

32 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 19:41:54 -0400

35 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Sebastian Marius Kirsch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 23:02:10 +0200

47 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:10:31 -0400

33 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 20:29:36 +0100

19 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:45:11 EDT

41 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 19:51:15 +0200

24 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:11:15 +0200

31 lines

Re: question about german ess-tset

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:14:06 +0200

26 lines

question about german ess-tset

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:55:35 -0400

25 lines

Scriptorium Update #88 - New Celtic CD & New Fonts

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:25:28 -0500

117 lines

Re: Sneak Preview

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 16:30:53 -0400

27 lines

Re: Sneak Preview

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 21:00:00 +0100

22 lines

Re: Standard sizes online

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:57:39 -0700

40 lines

Re: Standard sizes online

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 12:51:24 +0200

34 lines

Re: Striking back

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 08:23:25 -0700

40 lines

Re: Striking back

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:55:12 +0200

78 lines

Striking back

Anthony Cahalan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:25:25 +1000

61 lines

Re: Surplus designers,

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 11:04:56 +0100

23 lines

Re: Surplus designers, was Re: Appropriate face for business let

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:39:14 -0700

21 lines

Re: Surplus designers, was Re: Appropriate face for business let

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:18:19 +0000

54 lines

Surplus designers, was Re: Appropriate face for business letters

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Aug 2000 19:54:49 -0700

44 lines

Re: TeX-Stammtisch Erlangen entfaellt im August

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:09:52 +0200

16 lines

TeX-Stammtisch Erlangen entfaellt im August

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:51:00 +0200

26 lines

Two recent articles on typography

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:32:05 -0700

23 lines

Re: Type in SF

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:01:57 -0700

30 lines

Re: Type in SF

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:03:07 -0700

23 lines

Re: Type in SF

jim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 12:38:41 -0700

25 lines

Type in SF

Jared Benson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 07:42:28 -0700

22 lines

Typesetter debacles [was Re: Aaarrrgh!]

Robert M. McClure <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:24:16 -0700

46 lines

Re: Typography-A dying art

peter bilak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:30:25 +0200

22 lines

Re: Typography-A dying art

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:17:40 EDT

28 lines

Re: Typography-A dying art

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 23:47:37 -0400

22 lines

Re: Typography-A dying art

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 16:15:37 -0700

41 lines

Re: Typography-A dying art

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 18:29:04 -0400

22 lines

Typography-A dying art

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:35:19 -0700

21 lines

Re: Unicode?

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:44:54 +0200

25 lines

Re: Unicode?

Brandon Oakley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 14:18:57 EDT

48 lines

Re: Unicode?

Stephen Moye <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 12:53:04 -0400

29 lines

Re: Unicode?

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:20:57 -0700

26 lines

Unicode?

Emma Megitt GD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:03:01 +0200

13 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 09:15:02 +0100

68 lines

Warnock (what I meant to say)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:23:06 -0700

19 lines

Re: Web Typography (was: Typography-A dying art)

SUGAR in their vitamins? <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:52:31 -0700

37 lines

Re: Web Typography (was: Typography-A dying art)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:16:32 -0400

99 lines

Re: Web Typography (was: Typography-A dying art)

Matt Spiegler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:50:06 -0400

66 lines

Re: Web Typography (was: Typography-A dying art)

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:02:25 -0700

51 lines

Web Typography (was: Typography-A dying art)

tell3a <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 16:52:48 -0500

47 lines

Women in the Book Trade

Oak Knoll Press <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 18:13:17 -0400

62 lines

Re: [CE-L] QUERY TOOLS Fonts & clip art CD-ROMs

michaellynch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:14:43 -0700

95 lines

Re: [CE-L] QUERY TOOLS Fonts & clip art CD-ROMs

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 14:39:43 -0400

58 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
February 1994
January 1994
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager