LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


May 2000


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"HOW TYPOGRAPHY HAPPENS" (1 message)
"Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2) (22 messages)
'Eye' Strain (was Re: Transitional period) (3 messages)
(forwarded) text versus image (12 messages)
... ... (1 message)
an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures (16 messages)
Announcing Catalogue 49 (1 message)
article on summer-camp for handwriting contains claim that "hwg-slant was caused by fountain-pens" (?!) (1 message)
Attachments (29 messages)
Attachments (A Question) (1 message)
Bad Design (2 messages)
baseline 30 (1 message)
Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids) (16 messages)
book found online has interesting ideas re the alphabet (2 messages)
Bookman Swash buckling (1 message)
Bouma Experiment - Results (2 messages)
Bringhurst in _Scholarly Publishing_ (1 message)
British premier picks up his pen to show sincerity, makes propaganda for computers but doesn't seem to use one himself (3 messages)
Brody & THE FACE (1 message)
Calling Toby W (TAN) (1 message)
Character Style (1 message)
Character Style: Was: Subscript problem (30 messages)
chopped ascenders (2 messages)
colophon & blurb people (11 messages)
Colophon and Blurb People (2 messages)
coming OpenType fonts (was: Minion Web) (2 messages)
concerned about *serious* historical errors which open one recent book on handwriting (2 messages)
Cooper (was Re: Two Things) (1 message)
Critiquing student work (1 message)
Dair Devil (2 messages)
Distorting Typefaces (was Character Style) (1 message)
Fazed Weiss Roman (4 messages)
Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime (11 messages)
FB Miller specimen abberation? (3 messages)
Font Face/Type Head (1 message)
Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk (13 messages)
Fonts for On-line Manual (14 messages)
Fontzone interviewed (1 message)
Fwd: Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures (1 message)
genuine blackletter ( was Re: Type factoids) (1 message)
Gettin' down! (4 messages)
Heller's book of the minute (4 messages)
Help identifying wood type (1 message)
How Typography Happens (4 messages)
Ishi (1 message)
Legibility Terrorism (1 message)
Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing) (5 messages)
Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!) (6 messages)
Look, I was misinformed ... do I have to apologize for that? (3 messages)
Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font (9 messages)
Looking for van Dijk samples (2 messages)
Looking for van Dijk samples (I've posted a sample) (1 message)
lucasfonts (1 message)
Mac Character Map utility? (9 messages)
Minion Web (3 messages)
Missing ns and ms (1 message)
MP3 (2 messages)
MP3 (was: Transitional period) (2 messages)
New magazine (17 messages)
off topic: Printing (39 messages)
Oops, they did it again. (1 message)
our handwriting's history: a CD-ROM (1 message)
Oversized Jill in the snow. (2 messages)
Packets Errant (1 message)
Packromedia (1 message)
Pet Peeve (2 messages)
Photoshop 5.5 (3 messages)
Photoshop 5.5 / font problems (1 message)
Please Read (7 messages)
PLEASE TAKE THIS OFFLIST! (was:Re: Talking to the wind) (2 messages)
PopChar URL for "Mac Character Map utility" inquiry (1 message)
prestige (Re: Transitional period) (2 messages)
Printing (14 messages)
Proforma's relatives (2 messages)
Protections (5 messages)
PS... (1 message)
Quark Stuff (4 messages)
Re ... ... (3 messages)
Readability and screen contrast (2 messages)
readability vs legibility (12 messages)
readability vs legibility (Was: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)) (1 message)
Reading Italic (was:Re: Typography Book (Weingart)) (1 message)
Rogue's galley submissions (1 message)
Schröööder (3 messages)
Search for Eye (1 message)
Search for Octavo (16 messages)
seek history of "dollar-$ign" (LONG) (1 message)
seek info on letter-combination frequencies (2 messages)
Silica (1 message)
Slow Sites at Play (8 messages)
SoCal Lead (4 messages)
squished: Was: Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem (3 messages)
Subscript problem (19 messages)
Talking to the wind (18 messages)
Thank ye (1 message)
title of the Bringhurst article (1 message)
totally off topic---to Ron Koster (2 messages)
Transitional period (30 messages)
Two things (19 messages)
Type factoids (17 messages)
type utilities (3 messages)
TypeCon 2000 Update (1 message)
TypeCon 2000: The Program (w/Participant list) as of 5/18, pt1 (1 message)
TypeCon 2000: The Program, pt 2 (The Panels) (1 message)
TYPO-L Digest - 10 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-146) (2 messages)
TYPO-L Digest - 18 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-155) (2 messages)
TYPO-L Digest - 26 May 2000 to 27 May 2000 (#2000-165) (1 message)
TYPO-L Digest - 29 May 2000 to 30 May 2000 (#2000-168) (1 message)
TYPO-L Digest - 8 May 2000 (#2000-141) (1 message)
Unsubscribing from TYPO-L (4 messages)
Warde (11 messages)
Was: Search for Octavo; Now: Search for Eye (1 message)
Web Quotes was: New magazine (18 messages)
WhiteOut-L (17 messages)
Ye example (4 messages)
Ye Olde Thorn (1 message)
Ye superscript (20 messages)
Ye Thorn (6 messages)
You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ... (4 messages)
Zen-o-phobic about attachments (1 message)
[SOTATypeCon] The Program (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TYPO-L Home

TYPO-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

Date

Size

New Thread

"HOW TYPOGRAPHY HAPPENS"

"HOW TYPOGRAPHY HAPPENS"

Tue, 16 May 2000 19:35:34 -0400

61 lines

New Thread

"Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Sat, 13 May 2000 18:15:50 -0700

27 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Sat, 13 May 2000 04:18:12 -0700

27 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Sat, 13 May 2000 07:26:43 -0400

38 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Fri, 12 May 2000 12:25:45 -0400

27 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Fri, 12 May 2000 06:29:16 +0000

38 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:29:41 -0400

20 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:43:02 -0700

29 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Tue, 9 May 2000 06:19:31 +0100

37 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Mon, 8 May 2000 16:49:07 -0700

22 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Mon, 8 May 2000 23:25:51 +0100

34 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:11:42 -0700

19 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:11:30 -0700

21 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:11:14 -0700

18 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:06:32 -0700

27 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Mon, 8 May 2000 12:40:46 +0100

34 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Sun, 7 May 2000 16:33:25 -0700

48 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Sun, 7 May 2000 07:40:40 -0400

41 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Sat, 6 May 2000 19:02:32 -0700

21 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Sun, 7 May 2000 02:36:27 +0100

17 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Sun, 7 May 2000 02:00:24 +0100

41 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Sat, 6 May 2000 17:37:04 -0700

26 lines

"Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Sun, 7 May 2000 01:06:01 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

'Eye' Strain (was Re: Transitional period)

Re: 'Eye' Strain (was Re: Transitional period)

Sun, 14 May 2000 12:58:19 -0700

20 lines

Re: 'Eye' Strain (was Re: Transitional period)

Sun, 14 May 2000 20:44:24 +0100

26 lines

'Eye' Strain (was Re: Transitional period)

Tue, 9 May 2000 03:16:56 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

(forwarded) text versus image

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Tue, 9 May 2000 03:58:48 +0000

47 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:57:34 -0700

18 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Sun, 7 May 2000 12:50:00 -0500

36 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Sat, 6 May 2000 23:59:02 -0700

45 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Sat, 6 May 2000 22:15:06 -0700

36 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Sat, 6 May 2000 19:53:28 +0200

40 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Sat, 6 May 2000 09:56:29 BST

25 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Sat, 6 May 2000 05:54:06 +0000

35 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:41:55 -0700

48 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Fri, 5 May 2000 09:41:07 -0700

51 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Fri, 5 May 2000 11:24:18 -0400

27 lines

(forwarded) text versus image

Fri, 5 May 2000 04:11:23 +0000

92 lines

New Thread

... ...

... ...

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:56:20 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:55:51 -0400

19 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:13:54 +0000

64 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:13:54 +0000

36 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Mon, 1 May 2000 08:46:41 +0000

48 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Mon, 1 May 2000 04:15:36 -0400

18 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 22:48:54 -0700

25 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Mon, 1 May 2000 00:03:15 -0400

70 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 20:58:18 -0700

23 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:49:57 -0400

22 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:38:08 -0400

57 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 20:17:56 -0700

30 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:54:33 -0400

39 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:45:20 -0400

89 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 18:52:38 -0700

56 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 22:44:46 -0300

32 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 20:06:07 -0400

95 lines

New Thread

Announcing Catalogue 49

Announcing Catalogue 49

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:31:36 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

article on summer-camp for handwriting contains claim that "hwg-slant was caused by fountain-pens" (?!)

article on summer-camp for handwriting contains claim that "hwg-slant was caused by fountain-pens" (?!)

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:52:34 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

Attachments

Re: Attachments

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:59:23 -0700

28 lines

Re: Attachments

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:08:31 -0700

20 lines

Re: Attachments

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:00:37 +0200

27 lines

Re: Attachments

Thu, 11 May 2000 16:47:12 -0700

19 lines

Re: Attachments

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:05:37 -0700

21 lines

Re: Attachments

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:14:52 +0200

42 lines

Re: Attachments

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:00:52 EDT

28 lines

Re: Attachments

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:12:33 -0400

39 lines

Re: Attachments

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:36:29 -0700

38 lines

Re: Attachments

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:31:18 -0300

30 lines

Re: Attachments

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:59:03 +0200

30 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 22:17:39 -0700

24 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 23:44:12 +0100

15 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 14:06:00 -0700

15 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 16:39:32 -0400

20 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 16:36:12 +0000

30 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:22:45 -0700

26 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:53:55 -0700

17 lines

Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:12:16 -0700

15 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:57:30 EDT

23 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:47:46 -0400

19 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:20:16 -0400

30 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:28:44 -0700

22 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:18:44 -0400

17 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 18:13:37 +0100

12 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:57:42 -0400

25 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:23:21 -0700

16 lines

Re: Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:59:47 -0400

51 lines

Attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 14:44:52 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

Attachments (A Question)

Re: Attachments (A Question)

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:59:21 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

Bad Design

Re: Bad Design

Sat, 20 May 2000 00:06:48 +0100

17 lines

Bad Design

Sat, 20 May 2000 00:28:59 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

baseline 30

baseline 30

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:35:14 +0100

14 lines

New Thread

Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:47:13 -0400

35 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Tue, 23 May 2000 18:14:28 +0200

49 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:51:23 -0400

38 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:19:57 +0200

33 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:13:01 -0700

24 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 20:59:22 -0400

35 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:01:15 -0400

31 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:18:17 -0400

27 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:10:23 +0200

23 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:00:39 -0400

36 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:49:21 +0200

29 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:42:59 +0200

24 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:34:02 -0400

27 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:11:37 -0400

37 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 17:40:15 +0200

28 lines

Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 11:11:35 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

book found online has interesting ideas re the alphabet

Re: book found online has interesting ideas re the alphabet

Wed, 31 May 2000 15:45:59 -0700

29 lines

book found online has interesting ideas re the alphabet

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:25:53 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Bookman Swash buckling

Re: Bookman Swash buckling

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:06:48 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Bouma Experiment - Results

Re: Bouma Experiment - Results

Wed, 17 May 2000 16:50:23 -0400

53 lines

Bouma Experiment - Results

Wed, 17 May 2000 13:44:54 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

Bringhurst in _Scholarly Publishing_

Bringhurst in _Scholarly Publishing_

Tue, 9 May 2000 17:51:19 -0400

64 lines

New Thread

British premier picks up his pen to show sincerity, makes propaganda for computers but doesn't seem to use one himself

Re: British premier picks up his pen to show sincerity, makes propaganda for computers but doesn't seem to use one himself

Sun, 7 May 2000 15:09:57 -0400

26 lines

Re: British premier picks up his pen to show sincerity, makes propaganda for computers but doesn't seem to use one himself

Sun, 7 May 2000 11:42:25 -0700

32 lines

British premier picks up his pen to show sincerity, makes propaganda for computers but doesn't seem to use one himself

Sat, 6 May 2000 22:01:33 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Brody & THE FACE

Brody & THE FACE

Sun, 21 May 2000 01:31:56 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Calling Toby W (TAN)

Calling Toby W (TAN)

Fri, 26 May 2000 11:54:53 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Character Style

Re: Character Style

Sun, 7 May 2000 19:09:28 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:16:52 -0700

23 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Mon, 8 May 2000 17:28:23 +0200

23 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sun, 7 May 2000 19:02:59 -0400

25 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sun, 7 May 2000 21:52:56 +0200

31 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sun, 7 May 2000 16:38:24 -0300

35 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sun, 7 May 2000 12:09:57 -0700

22 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sun, 7 May 2000 15:27:46 -0300

94 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sun, 7 May 2000 09:58:17 -0700

48 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sun, 7 May 2000 07:54:24 +0000

59 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sat, 6 May 2000 16:28:17 -0400

21 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sat, 6 May 2000 15:26:35 -0400

34 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sat, 6 May 2000 12:12:54 -0700

39 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sat, 6 May 2000 15:04:37 -0400

50 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sat, 6 May 2000 20:14:39 +0900

36 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sat, 6 May 2000 09:45:44 +0200

36 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:45:44 -0700

28 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:51:00 -0700

19 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:45:10 -0700

31 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Fri, 5 May 2000 18:28:14 +0200

40 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Fri, 5 May 2000 08:37:11 -0700

31 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Fri, 5 May 2000 11:08:53 -0400

26 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Fri, 5 May 2000 01:33:01 -0700

34 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Fri, 5 May 2000 09:48:19 +0200

36 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 23:29:40 +0100

20 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 18:00:55 -0400

25 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 14:55:42 -0700

53 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 13:59:26 -0700

29 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 13:50:05 -0700

51 lines

Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 13:01:34 -0700

49 lines

Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 12:42:25 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

chopped ascenders

Re: chopped ascenders

Thu, 18 May 2000 14:02:37 -0700

19 lines

chopped ascenders

Thu, 18 May 2000 13:54:11 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

colophon & blurb people

Re: colophon & blurb people

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:48:15 -0700

22 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:27:58 -0700

27 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:22:27 -0700

22 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Mon, 22 May 2000 11:40:39 -0700

42 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Fri, 19 May 2000 23:20:11 -0700

40 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Fri, 19 May 2000 17:08:00 -0400

25 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:37:26 -0700

22 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:51:07 PDT

52 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:17:04 -0700

45 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:19:01 -0400

36 lines

colophon & blurb people

Fri, 19 May 2000 07:51:46 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

Colophon and Blurb People

Re: Colophon and Blurb People

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:32:03 -0700

25 lines

Re: Colophon and Blurb People

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:02:41 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

coming OpenType fonts (was: Minion Web)

Re: coming OpenType fonts (was: Minion Web)

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:01:33 -0700

21 lines

coming OpenType fonts (was: Minion Web)

Thu, 18 May 2000 07:14:40 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

concerned about *serious* historical errors which open one recent book on handwriting

Re: concerned about *serious* historical errors which open one recent book on handwriting

Mon, 29 May 2000 23:37:08 -0400

41 lines

concerned about *serious* historical errors which open one recent book on handwriting

Mon, 29 May 2000 22:24:10 -0400

50 lines

New Thread

Cooper (was Re: Two Things)

Cooper (was Re: Two Things)

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:14:59 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

Critiquing student work

Critiquing student work

Tue, 2 May 2000 17:19:59 -0600

34 lines

New Thread

Dair Devil

Re: Dair Devil

Sun, 28 May 2000 11:30:55 -0400

36 lines

Dair Devil

Sun, 28 May 2000 16:18:20 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Distorting Typefaces (was Character Style)

Distorting Typefaces (was Character Style)

Fri, 5 May 2000 02:19:23 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

Fazed Weiss Roman

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:10:54 -0700

21 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:21:02 -0400

32 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:22:33 -0700

31 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman

Thu, 18 May 2000 13:08:43 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Thu, 18 May 2000 22:08:00 +0100

19 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:17:09 -0500

30 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:11:32 +0200

27 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Thu, 18 May 2000 09:02:24 -0700

30 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:39:29 -0400

32 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Thu, 18 May 2000 07:56:11 -0700

17 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:49:56 -0400

33 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:21:01 +0100

15 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Wed, 17 May 2000 23:12:32 -0700

22 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:49:13 -0700

39 lines

Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Wed, 17 May 2000 13:42:42 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

FB Miller specimen abberation?

Re: FB Miller specimen abberation?

Fri, 12 May 2000 18:13:29 -0700

35 lines

Re: FB Miller specimen abberation?

Thu, 11 May 2000 02:27:52 -0700

29 lines

FB Miller specimen abberation?

Thu, 11 May 2000 02:07:47 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

Font Face/Type Head

Font Face/Type Head

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:18:12 -0400

97 lines

New Thread

Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:59:15 EDT

22 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:01:48 -0700

87 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Wed, 10 May 2000 20:40:53 GMT

16 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:49:40 -0700

18 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:39:10 EDT

26 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:33:53 -0700

20 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:16:03 EDT

32 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Wed, 10 May 2000 07:12:13 -0400

23 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:54:18 +0200

39 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:10:59 -0700

26 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:56:29 PDT

29 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:54:51 -0700

19 lines

Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Tue, 9 May 2000 14:27:40 EDT

19 lines

New Thread

Fonts for On-line Manual

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Fri, 5 May 2000 01:35:17 -0700

29 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Thu, 4 May 2000 16:16:40 -0400

18 lines

Fonts for On-line Manual

Fri, 5 May 2000 00:02:35 +0400

29 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:13:15 -0700

35 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Mon, 1 May 2000 13:58:16 -0700

51 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Mon, 1 May 2000 14:31:07 -0700

46 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Mon, 1 May 2000 14:27:49 -0700

19 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Tue, 2 May 2000 00:20:43 +0400

38 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:57:52 -0700

35 lines

Fonts for On-line Manual

Mon, 1 May 2000 23:40:54 +0400

44 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:13:12 -0700

48 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Mon, 1 May 2000 00:24:41 -0700

17 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:58:53 -0700

26 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:42:12 -0700

22 lines

New Thread

Fontzone interviewed

Fontzone interviewed

Wed, 17 May 2000 12:29:26 +0200

76 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Fwd: Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:56:13 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

genuine blackletter ( was Re: Type factoids)

genuine blackletter ( was Re: Type factoids)

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:05:49 +0200

20 lines

New Thread

Gettin' down!

Re: Gettin' down!

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:02:05 -0700

43 lines

Re: Gettin' down!

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:56:41 -0400

63 lines

Re: Gettin' down!

Wed, 10 May 2000 19:04:28 -0700

36 lines

Gettin' down!

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:26:22 -0400

67 lines

New Thread

Heller's book of the minute

Re: Heller's book of the minute

Wed, 31 May 2000 13:27:07 -0700

25 lines

Re: Heller's book of the minute

Tue, 30 May 2000 16:12:33 -0400

35 lines

Re: Heller's book of the minute

Tue, 30 May 2000 15:18:30 -0400

26 lines

Heller's book of the minute

Tue, 30 May 2000 10:58:01 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Help identifying wood type

Help identifying wood type

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:30:46 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

How Typography Happens

Re: How Typography Happens

Sun, 21 May 2000 15:17:24 +0100

18 lines

Re: How Typography Happens

Sun, 21 May 2000 12:24:16 +0100

28 lines

Re: How Typography Happens

Tue, 2 May 2000 12:43:29 -0700

15 lines

How Typography Happens

Tue, 2 May 2000 12:59:00 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

Ishi

Ishi

Mon, 1 May 2000 08:49:28 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

Legibility Terrorism

Legibility Terrorism

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:38:06 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Re: Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:39:28 -0400

30 lines

Re: Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:39:26 -0400

29 lines

Re: Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Thu, 18 May 2000 07:55:09 -0700

18 lines

Re: Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:38:29 +0100

17 lines

Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:36:00 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:01:35 +0200

27 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:15:37 -0700

41 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Mon, 22 May 2000 00:49:07 +0200

25 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Sun, 21 May 2000 08:35:45 -0400

27 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Sat, 20 May 2000 22:41:46 -0700

32 lines

Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Sat, 20 May 2000 22:35:34 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

Look, I was misinformed ... do I have to apologize for that?

Re: Look, I was misinformed ... do I have to apologize for that?

Wed, 3 May 2000 11:01:06 -0700

24 lines

Re: Look, I was misinformed ... do I have to apologize for that?

Wed, 3 May 2000 10:51:11 -0700

36 lines

Look, I was misinformed ... do I have to apologize for that?

Wed, 3 May 2000 11:55:52 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Thu, 4 May 2000 10:45:00 -0700

19 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Tue, 2 May 2000 13:04:37 -0400

37 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:58:47 -0700

36 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:31:13 -0700

29 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:20:42 -0700

21 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:09:26 -0700

26 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Tue, 2 May 2000 09:52:56 -0700

32 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Tue, 2 May 2000 08:37:31 -0400

36 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:41:11 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

Looking for van Dijk samples

Re: Looking for van Dijk samples

Mon, 1 May 2000 19:10:38 -0400

22 lines

Looking for van Dijk samples

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:01:05 -0700

17 lines

New Thread

Looking for van Dijk samples (I've posted a sample)

Re: Looking for van Dijk samples (I've posted a sample)

Mon, 1 May 2000 19:26:09 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

lucasfonts

Re: lucasfonts

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 22:57:25 -0300

31 lines

New Thread

Mac Character Map utility?

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Sat, 27 May 2000 19:17:49 -0500

34 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Fri, 26 May 2000 14:31:20 -0300

27 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Fri, 26 May 2000 10:38:29 EST

47 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Fri, 26 May 2000 08:17:18 -0700

29 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Fri, 26 May 2000 09:50:56 EST

19 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Thu, 25 May 2000 21:53:03 -0400

52 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Thu, 25 May 2000 21:48:50 -0400

36 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:09:12 -0700

36 lines

Mac Character Map utility?

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:42:56 EST

40 lines

New Thread

Minion Web

Re: Minion Web

Fri, 12 May 2000 12:29:29 -0700

27 lines

Re: Minion Web

Fri, 12 May 2000 12:35:35 -0400

27 lines

Minion Web

Fri, 12 May 2000 08:55:09 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

Missing ns and ms

Missing ns and ms

Sat, 20 May 2000 09:27:08 -0400

56 lines

New Thread

MP3

Re: MP3

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:13:15 +1200

45 lines

Re: MP3

Tue, 9 May 2000 15:12:35 +0200

65 lines

New Thread

MP3 (was: Transitional period)

Re: MP3 (was: Transitional period)

Tue, 9 May 2000 23:06:02 +1200

34 lines

MP3 (was: Transitional period)

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:22:05 +0200

35 lines

New Thread

New magazine

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:38:07 -0400

34 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:09:19 +0200

32 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:35:18 -0700

25 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:27:26 -0700

39 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:09:21 -0700

31 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:34:52 -0700

28 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 17:20:37 +0100

38 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:19:09 -0500

27 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:25:30 +0100

30 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:41:25 -0400

42 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:42:15 +0200

23 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:03:50 +0100

22 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:03:55 +0100

26 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:35:56 +0200

30 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:52:43 +0100

26 lines

Re: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:59:48 +1200

25 lines

New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:00:47 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

off topic: Printing

Re: off topic: Printing

Fri, 19 May 2000 09:38:43 +0100

20 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:48:22 -0700

18 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Fri, 19 May 2000 00:34:04 +0100

21 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:46:46 -0700

42 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Thu, 18 May 2000 18:07:08 -0400

49 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:36:06 -0400

72 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:02:35 -0700

43 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:51:21 -0400

37 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:35:57 -0400

67 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Wed, 17 May 2000 19:24:11 -0300

56 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Wed, 17 May 2000 13:18:02 -0700

47 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:51:51 -0700

21 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:41:39 -0400

44 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:12:35 -0700

36 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:01:31 -0400

42 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:00:53 -0700

30 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Wed, 17 May 2000 10:46:36 -0700

44 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Wed, 17 May 2000 10:43:43 -0700

35 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:17:35 -0300

36 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:11:49 -0300

72 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Wed, 17 May 2000 08:56:38 -0400

52 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 20:45:36 -0400

45 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 21:23:43 +0200

34 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 18:19:07 -0400

30 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 18:19:05 -0400

63 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 13:34:03 -0700

35 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 12:00:32 -0700

44 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 11:36:20 -0700

36 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 10:54:45 -0700

19 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 17:45:51 +0100

36 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 11:11:37 -0400

26 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 11:45:47 -0400

28 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 07:41:43 -0700

70 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 10:15:01 -0400

42 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 08:52:26 -0400

44 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 08:52:53 -0400

82 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 08:30:47 -0400

27 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tue, 16 May 2000 10:29:26 +0200

23 lines

off topic: Printing

Mon, 15 May 2000 08:36:44 -0700

56 lines

New Thread

Oops, they did it again.

Oops, they did it again.

Wed, 31 May 2000 00:32:23 -0700

17 lines

New Thread

our handwriting's history: a CD-ROM

our handwriting's history: a CD-ROM

Mon, 29 May 2000 00:11:09 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

Oversized Jill in the snow.

Re: Oversized Jill in the snow.

Thu, 11 May 2000 09:58:14 -0400

45 lines

Re: Oversized Jill in the snow.

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:51:52 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Packets Errant

Packets Errant

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:26:37 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

Packromedia

Re: Packromedia

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:31:02 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

Pet Peeve

Re: Pet Peeve

Tue, 2 May 2000 13:41:17 -0400

27 lines

Re: Pet Peeve

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:34:52 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

Photoshop 5.5

Re: Photoshop 5.5

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:29:09 -0700

41 lines

Re: Photoshop 5.5

Wed, 17 May 2000 20:36:47 +0100

17 lines

Photoshop 5.5

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:34:53 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Photoshop 5.5 / font problems

Re: Photoshop 5.5 / font problems

Thu, 18 May 2000 13:08:00 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Please Read

Re: Please Read

Mon, 15 May 2000 11:32:12 -0700

24 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Sat, 13 May 2000 07:24:18 -0400

43 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Fri, 12 May 2000 21:31:01 -0400

24 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Fri, 12 May 2000 15:39:14 -0700

53 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Fri, 12 May 2000 14:23:20 -0700

48 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Fri, 12 May 2000 15:58:53 EDT

23 lines

PLEASE READ

Fri, 12 May 2000 12:48:13 -0700

56 lines

New Thread

PLEASE TAKE THIS OFFLIST! (was:Re: Talking to the wind)

Re: PLEASE TAKE THIS OFFLIST! (was:Re: Talking to the wind)

Tue, 2 May 2000 17:53:54 -0700

11 lines

PLEASE TAKE THIS OFFLIST! (was:Re: Talking to the wind)

Tue, 2 May 2000 20:40:32 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

PopChar URL for "Mac Character Map utility" inquiry

PopChar URL for "Mac Character Map utility" inquiry

Fri, 26 May 2000 08:34:42 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

prestige (Re: Transitional period)

Re: prestige (Re: Transitional period)

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:52:08 -0700

33 lines

prestige (Re: Transitional period)

Mon, 8 May 2000 22:17:02 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

Printing

Re: Printing

Mon, 15 May 2000 19:53:25 -0400

45 lines

Re: Printing

Mon, 15 May 2000 18:00:21 +0200

23 lines

Re: Printing

Mon, 15 May 2000 09:48:11 -0400

58 lines

Re: Printing

Sat, 13 May 2000 16:31:24 -0300

37 lines

Re: Printing

Sat, 13 May 2000 17:07:49 +0100

19 lines

Re: Printing

Sat, 13 May 2000 11:52:45 -0400

39 lines

Re: Printing

Sat, 13 May 2000 11:40:04 -0400

104 lines

Re: Printing

Sat, 13 May 2000 06:54:34 -0400

30 lines

Re: Printing

Fri, 12 May 2000 22:33:29 -0400

29 lines

Re: Printing

Sat, 13 May 2000 06:44:33 -0400

55 lines

Re: Printing

Fri, 12 May 2000 21:43:53 -0400

32 lines

Re: Printing

Fri, 12 May 2000 20:21:55 -0400

32 lines

Re: Printing

Fri, 12 May 2000 20:11:56 -0400

40 lines

Printing

Fri, 12 May 2000 19:35:29 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Proforma's relatives

Re: Proforma's relatives

Sun, 14 May 2000 23:02:02 -0700

20 lines

Proforma's relatives

Mon, 15 May 2000 15:03:13 +1000

18 lines

New Thread

Protections

Re: Protections

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:04:55 EDT

34 lines

Re: Protections

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:46:37 -0700

21 lines

Re: Protections

Tue, 9 May 2000 22:26:02 -0700

38 lines

Re: Protections

Tue, 9 May 2000 20:35:37 EDT

39 lines

Protections

Tue, 9 May 2000 16:05:05 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

PS...

PS...

Tue, 9 May 2000 20:01:47 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

Quark Stuff

Re: Quark Stuff

Wed, 3 May 2000 19:41:28 +0100

42 lines

Re: Quark Stuff

Wed, 3 May 2000 15:42:56 -0400

35 lines

Re: Quark Stuff

Wed, 3 May 2000 15:31:22 -0400

57 lines

Quark Stuff

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:17:45 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

Re ... ...

Re ... ...

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:16:09 +0100

32 lines

Re ... ...

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:43:09 -0700

22 lines

Re ... ...

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:51:33 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Readability and screen contrast

Re: Readability and screen contrast

Thu, 4 May 2000 11:12:55 -0700

41 lines

Readability and screen contrast

Wed, 3 May 2000 23:13:59 -0400

39 lines

New Thread

readability vs legibility

Re: readability vs legibility

Wed, 10 May 2000 20:56:36 -0700

27 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:57:09 -0400

32 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:14:01 -0700

20 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Tue, 9 May 2000 21:15:52 +0200

32 lines

readability vs legibility

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:18:40 -0700

22 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:54:55 -0700

20 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:59:37 -0700

92 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:29:53 -0400

36 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:14:10 -0700

28 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Tue, 9 May 2000 08:30:07 -0700

53 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:40:23 +0200

37 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:32:30 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

readability vs legibility (Was: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2))

Re: readability vs legibility (Was: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2))

Mon, 8 May 2000 22:50:21 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

Reading Italic (was:Re: Typography Book (Weingart))

Reading Italic (was:Re: Typography Book (Weingart))

Tue, 16 May 2000 14:45:40 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Rogue's galley submissions

Rogue's galley submissions

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:09:59 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

Schröööder

Re: Schröööder

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:13:46 -0700

25 lines

Re: Schröööder

Thu, 11 May 2000 14:24:25 -0300

34 lines

Schröööder

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:11:05 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Search for Eye

Search for Eye

Fri, 12 May 2000 10:56:01 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

Search for Octavo

Re: Search for Octavo

Mon, 15 May 2000 11:08:39 +0100

39 lines

Search for Octavo

Sun, 14 May 2000 19:51:52 -0500

26 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Sun, 14 May 2000 19:40:23 -0500

36 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Sun, 14 May 2000 14:34:48 -0300

40 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Sat, 13 May 2000 11:30:02 +0100

30 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Fri, 12 May 2000 10:06:26 -0500

16 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:50:13 -0500

35 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:31:44 -0500

39 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:22:10 -0500

32 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Thu, 11 May 2000 16:13:21 -0300

37 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:06:28 -0700

24 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:49:03 -0300

39 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:41:15 -0700

21 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:55:58 -0700

19 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:16:33 +0100

26 lines

Search for Octavo

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:18:30 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

seek history of "dollar-$ign" (LONG)

Re: seek history of "dollar-$ign" (LONG)

Mon, 1 May 2000 08:28:53 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

seek info on letter-combination frequencies

Re: seek info on letter-combination frequencies

Tue, 2 May 2000 00:27:58 +0900

38 lines

Re: seek info on letter-combination frequencies

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:28:02 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Silica

Silica

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:09:52 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Slow Sites at Play

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Wed, 31 May 2000 14:29:22 -0400

34 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:23:24 -0700

23 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Wed, 31 May 2000 14:07:06 -0400

39 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Wed, 31 May 2000 10:47:45 -0700

21 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:19:03 -0300

30 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:11:00 +0100

27 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:15:20 +0200

29 lines

Slow Sites at Play

Tue, 30 May 2000 15:22:07 -0700

22 lines

New Thread

SoCal Lead

Re: SoCal Lead

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:55:52 -0500

42 lines

Re: SoCal Lead

Tue, 30 May 2000 17:18:53 -0700

26 lines

Re: SoCal Lead

Tue, 30 May 2000 16:47:53 -0700

25 lines

SoCal Lead

Tue, 30 May 2000 08:23:07 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

squished: Was: Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Re: squished: Was: Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:35:53 -0300

43 lines

Re: squished: Was: Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sun, 7 May 2000 20:11:30 -0700

28 lines

squished: Was: Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Sun, 7 May 2000 15:25:40 -0300

33 lines

New Thread

Subscript problem

Re: Subscript problem

Sat, 6 May 2000 20:12:35 +0900

28 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 15:12:39 -0400

24 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 13:50:44 -0400

48 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 10:46:08 -0700

19 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 12:09:29 +0100

20 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 17:02:28 +0900

26 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Thu, 4 May 2000 16:57:02 +0900

27 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Wed, 3 May 2000 23:33:21 +0200

31 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Wed, 3 May 2000 13:34:12 -0700

36 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Wed, 3 May 2000 15:32:43 -0400

36 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Wed, 3 May 2000 21:33:15 +0200

45 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Wed, 3 May 2000 14:39:01 -0400

51 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Wed, 3 May 2000 11:05:34 -0700

25 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:42:04 -0400

36 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Wed, 3 May 2000 08:40:52 -0700

25 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Wed, 3 May 2000 08:30:32 -0700

37 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Wed, 3 May 2000 22:24:24 +0900

38 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:40:19 +0200

58 lines

Subscript problem

Wed, 3 May 2000 16:35:07 +0900

34 lines

New Thread

Talking to the wind

Re: Talking to the wind

Wed, 3 May 2000 09:06:17 +0100

29 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Wed, 3 May 2000 01:47:58 -0400

55 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Tue, 2 May 2000 13:32:24 -0400

27 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Tue, 2 May 2000 09:53:02 -0700

19 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Tue, 2 May 2000 08:57:10 -0400

65 lines

Talking to the wind

Tue, 2 May 2000 09:01:12 -0400

59 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Tue, 2 May 2000 01:30:30 -0400

29 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Mon, 1 May 2000 20:52:52 -0700

49 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Mon, 1 May 2000 22:59:52 +0000

37 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:27:39 -0700

22 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Mon, 1 May 2000 17:18:17 -0400

31 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:07:04 -0700

20 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:34:19 -0400

34 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:27:18 -0400

118 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Mon, 1 May 2000 13:59:50 +0000

40 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:27:11 -0700

22 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Mon, 1 May 2000 09:55:48 -0700

27 lines

Talking to the wind

Mon, 1 May 2000 11:32:31 -0400

76 lines

New Thread

Thank ye

Thank ye

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:23:20 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

title of the Bringhurst article

title of the Bringhurst article

Tue, 9 May 2000 17:57:30 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

totally off topic---to Ron Koster

Re: totally off topic---to Ron Koster

Mon, 8 May 2000 20:15:38 -0400

52 lines

totally off topic---to Ron Koster

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:20:02 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

Transitional period

Re: Transitional period

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:54:28 +1200

29 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:12:58 -0700

32 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 20:46:17 -0700

72 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 20:32:34 -0400

76 lines

Re: Transitional period

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:11:27 +1200

30 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 16:48:48 -0700

58 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 17:46:22 -0400

51 lines

Re: Transitional period

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:40:36 +1200

29 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:29:32 -0700

21 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:28:13 -0700

18 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:45:58 -0700

42 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:49:06 -0400

28 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:57:21 -0400

20 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:46:29 -0700

40 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:07:51 -0700

31 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:53:01 -0700

29 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:40:39 -0400

32 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:33:21 -0400

25 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:14:38 +0100

26 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 09:27:13 -0700

80 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:08:29 +0100

37 lines

Re: Transitional period

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:54:22 +0100

22 lines

Re: Transitional period

Sun, 7 May 2000 21:52:36 -0700

43 lines

Re: Transitional period

Sun, 7 May 2000 20:43:56 -0700

37 lines

Re: Transitional period

Sun, 7 May 2000 16:41:37 -0700

23 lines

Re: Transitional period

Sun, 7 May 2000 16:15:36 -0400

22 lines

Re: Transitional period

Sun, 7 May 2000 14:00:02 -0400

38 lines

Re: Transitional period

Sun, 7 May 2000 14:17:57 -0400

26 lines

Re: Transitional period

Sun, 7 May 2000 19:13:51 BST

19 lines

Transitional period

Sun, 7 May 2000 17:44:31 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Two things

Re: Two things

Sun, 21 May 2000 13:45:17 -0300

51 lines

Re: Two things

Sat, 20 May 2000 09:47:21 -0700

33 lines

Re: Two things

Fri, 19 May 2000 12:57:27 -0300

37 lines

Re: Two Things

Fri, 19 May 2000 08:03:14 -0700

29 lines

Re: Two things

Fri, 19 May 2000 16:29:40 +0200

23 lines

Re: Two Things

Thu, 18 May 2000 20:26:15 -0400

23 lines

Re: Two things

Thu, 18 May 2000 17:01:54 -0700

27 lines

Re: Two things

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:01:21 -0700

20 lines

Re: Two Things

Thu, 18 May 2000 21:31:30 +0100

17 lines

Re: Two things

Thu, 18 May 2000 12:49:00 -0700

38 lines

Re: Two things

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:34:48 -0300

31 lines

Re: Two Things

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:08:25 -0700

22 lines

Re: Two things

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:03:09 -0700

31 lines

Re: Two Things

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:04:45 -0700

36 lines

Re: Two things

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:45:37 -0700

23 lines

Re: Two things

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:19:23 -0700

27 lines

Re: Two things

Wed, 17 May 2000 22:15:42 +0100

16 lines

Re: Two things

Wed, 17 May 2000 12:57:47 -0700

31 lines

Two things

Wed, 17 May 2000 20:32:26 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Type factoids

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:20:06 -0700

26 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:01:28 -0400

27 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:45:01 -0400

24 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:53:10 +0200

28 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 15:16:59 -0400

30 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 15:12:43 -0400

37 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:38:47 -0400

38 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:29:45 -0400

34 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 10:59:04 -0400

35 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 08:46:49 -0400

25 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 08:29:14 -0400

20 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 08:04:48 -0400

26 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 07:57:03 -0400

57 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 20:24:15 +1200

22 lines

Re: Type factoids

Sun, 21 May 2000 23:35:16 -0700

20 lines

Re: Type factoids

Mon, 22 May 2000 17:49:28 +1200

39 lines

Type factoids

Sun, 21 May 2000 22:39:38 -0700

42 lines

New Thread

type utilities

Re: type utilities

Mon, 8 May 2000 16:16:11 -0400

34 lines

Re: type utilities

Mon, 8 May 2000 15:57:59 -0400

25 lines

type utilities

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:15:45 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

TypeCon 2000 Update

TypeCon 2000 Update

Sun, 7 May 2000 17:05:36 -0400

154 lines

New Thread

TypeCon 2000: The Program (w/Participant list) as of 5/18, pt1

TypeCon 2000: The Program (w/Participant list) as of 5/18, pt1

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:53:29 -0400

106 lines

New Thread

TypeCon 2000: The Program, pt 2 (The Panels)

TypeCon 2000: The Program, pt 2 (The Panels)

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:57:12 -0400

159 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 10 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-146)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 10 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-146)

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:54:21 -0700

31 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 10 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-146)

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:42:07 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 18 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-155)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-155)

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:10:08 -0700

24 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-155)

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:37:43 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 26 May 2000 to 27 May 2000 (#2000-165)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 26 May 2000 to 27 May 2000 (#2000-165)

Sun, 28 May 2000 02:19:01 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 29 May 2000 to 30 May 2000 (#2000-168)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 29 May 2000 to 30 May 2000 (#2000-168)

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:04:38 EST

31 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 8 May 2000 (#2000-141)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 8 May 2000 (#2000-141)

Mon, 8 May 2000 15:41:17 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Wed, 24 May 2000 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Wed, 17 May 2000 09:15:02 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Wed, 3 May 2000 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

Warde

Re: Warde

Wed, 24 May 2000 16:33:00 -0700

37 lines

Re: Warde

Wed, 24 May 2000 16:58:57 -0400

34 lines

Re: Warde

Wed, 24 May 2000 21:12:42 +0100

31 lines

Re: Warde

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:51:30 -0700

26 lines

Re: Warde

Wed, 24 May 2000 15:31:33 EDT

25 lines

Re: Warde

Wed, 24 May 2000 20:24:45 +0100

14 lines

Re: Warde

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:10:15 -0700

24 lines

Re: Warde

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:52:34 -0700

43 lines

Re: Warde

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:55:23 -0700

20 lines

Re: Warde

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:40:47 -0700

22 lines

Warde

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:28:11 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

Was: Search for Octavo; Now: Search for Eye

Was: Search for Octavo; Now: Search for Eye

Fri, 12 May 2000 10:10:14 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

Web Quotes was: New magazine

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Fri, 12 May 2000 13:04:26 -0700

163 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Thu, 11 May 2000 22:17:20 -0700

23 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Thu, 11 May 2000 18:01:51 -0300

34 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Thu, 11 May 2000 13:11:03 -0700

32 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Thu, 11 May 2000 16:44:53 -0300

21 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:45:47 -0700

23 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Thu, 11 May 2000 08:30:59 -0700

39 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:41:53 -0300

31 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:26:29 -0300

48 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:51:40 +0100

18 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Thu, 11 May 2000 08:32:44 +0000

149 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 23:37:36 -0400

34 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 19:11:42 -0700

42 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 17:28:41 -0400

25 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:02:40 -0400

36 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:47:18 -0700

19 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:38:15 -0300

24 lines

Web Quotes was: New magazine

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:16:51 -0700

49 lines

New Thread

WhiteOut-L

Re: WhiteOut-L

Wed, 10 May 2000 18:44:00 -0400

89 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:48:07 -0400

48 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:16:14 -0700

30 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:55:21 -0400

86 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:02:40 -0400

29 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:52:40 +0100

64 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Wed, 10 May 2000 02:47:50 +0000

20 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Wed, 10 May 2000 06:48:35 +0200

27 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Tue, 9 May 2000 20:21:21 -0700

36 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Tue, 9 May 2000 22:54:53 -0400

58 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Tue, 9 May 2000 21:53:58 -0400

23 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Tue, 9 May 2000 21:21:33 -0400

64 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Tue, 9 May 2000 21:06:07 -0400

69 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Tue, 9 May 2000 17:24:00 -0700

43 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Tue, 9 May 2000 19:54:56 -0400

48 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Sun, 7 May 2000 20:07:52 -0700

43 lines

WhiteOut-L

Sun, 7 May 2000 18:37:36 -0400

123 lines

New Thread

Ye example

Re: Ye example

Fri, 19 May 2000 23:14:34 -0400

45 lines

Re: Ye example

Fri, 19 May 2000 23:04:17 -0400

38 lines

Re: Ye example

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:57:56 -0400

39 lines

Ye example

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:39:08 -0400

87 lines

New Thread

Ye Olde Thorn

Ye Olde Thorn

Sat, 20 May 2000 09:39:45 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

Ye superscript

Re: Ye superscript

Sun, 21 May 2000 18:06:22 +0100

31 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Sat, 20 May 2000 22:30:36 -0700

38 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Sat, 20 May 2000 16:42:54 -0400

30 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 23:45:24 -0400

33 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:29:07 -0700

46 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:43:46 -0400

28 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:31:45 -0700

32 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:38:38 -0400

37 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:24:50 -0300

30 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:01:10 -0400

29 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:34:18 -0400

20 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:12:28 -0400

36 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 17:00:32 -0700

30 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:47:35 -0400

44 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:45:02 -0400

34 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:37:30 -0400

32 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:33:00 -0400

30 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 16:28:41 -0700

31 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Sat, 20 May 2000 00:02:25 +0100

25 lines

Ye superscript

Fri, 19 May 2000 18:20:10 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Ye Thorn

Re: Ye Thorn

Sat, 20 May 2000 09:27:07 -0400

34 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:59:01 -0700

33 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:03:35 -0400

40 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:56:33 -0400

41 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:49:18 -0400

32 lines

Ye Thorn

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:34:47 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Re: You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:40:47 -0400

38 lines

Re: You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:32:30 +0300

52 lines

Re: You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:22:37 -0400

38 lines

You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:09:38 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

Zen-o-phobic about attachments

Zen-o-phobic about attachments

Tue, 9 May 2000 16:22:31 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

[SOTATypeCon] The Program

Re: [SOTATypeCon] The Program

Tue, 16 May 2000 20:53:39 +0100

17 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
February 1994
January 1994
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager