LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


May 2000


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave TYPO-L
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Most Recent First

From

Date

Size

"HOW TYPOGRAPHY HAPPENS"

Oak Knoll Press <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 19:35:34 -0400

61 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

TJ Brennan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 18:15:50 -0700

27 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

John Ahlstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 04:18:12 -0700

27 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 07:26:43 -0400

38 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 12:25:45 -0400

27 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 06:29:16 +0000

38 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

David E. Hollingsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:29:41 -0400

20 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:43:02 -0700

29 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 06:19:31 +0100

37 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 16:49:07 -0700

22 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 23:25:51 +0100

34 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:11:42 -0700

19 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:11:30 -0700

21 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:11:14 -0700

18 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:06:32 -0700

27 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 12:40:46 +0100

34 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

TJ Brennan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 16:33:25 -0700

48 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 07:40:40 -0400

41 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 19:02:32 -0700

21 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 02:36:27 +0100

17 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 02:00:24 +0100

41 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 17:37:04 -0700

26 lines

"Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 01:06:01 +0100

32 lines

Re: 'Eye' Strain (was Re: Transitional period)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 12:58:19 -0700

20 lines

Re: 'Eye' Strain (was Re: Transitional period)

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 20:44:24 +0100

26 lines

'Eye' Strain (was Re: Transitional period)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 03:16:56 -0700

38 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 03:58:48 +0000

47 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:57:34 -0700

18 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Matt Spiegler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 12:50:00 -0500

36 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 23:59:02 -0700

45 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

TJ Brennan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 22:15:06 -0700

36 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Franko Luin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 19:53:28 +0200

40 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

John Lockerbie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 09:56:29 BST

25 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 05:54:06 +0000

35 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:41:55 -0700

48 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 09:41:07 -0700

51 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 11:24:18 -0400

27 lines

(forwarded) text versus image

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 04:11:23 +0000

92 lines

... ...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:56:20 -0700

24 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:55:51 -0400

19 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:13:54 +0000

64 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:13:54 +0000

36 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 08:46:41 +0000

48 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 04:15:36 -0400

18 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Ravensara Travillian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 22:48:54 -0700

25 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 00:03:15 -0400

70 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 20:58:18 -0700

23 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:49:57 -0400

22 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:38:08 -0400

57 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 20:17:56 -0700

30 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:54:33 -0400

39 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:45:20 -0400

89 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 18:52:38 -0700

56 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 22:44:46 -0300

32 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 20:06:07 -0400

95 lines

Announcing Catalogue 49

Frances Wakeman Books <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:31:36 +0100

31 lines

article on summer-camp for handwriting contains claim that "hwg-slant was caused by fountain-pens" (?!)

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:52:34 -0400

53 lines

Re: Attachments

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:59:23 -0700

28 lines

Re: Attachments

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:08:31 -0700

20 lines

Re: Attachments

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:00:37 +0200

27 lines

Re: Attachments

Robert M. McClure <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 16:47:12 -0700

19 lines

Re: Attachments

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:05:37 -0700

21 lines

Re: Attachments

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:14:52 +0200

42 lines

Re: Attachments

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:00:52 EDT

28 lines

Re: Attachments

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:12:33 -0400

39 lines

Re: Attachments

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:36:29 -0700

38 lines

Re: Attachments

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:31:18 -0300

30 lines

Re: Attachments

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:59:03 +0200

30 lines

Re: Attachments

TJ Brennan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 22:17:39 -0700

24 lines

Re: Attachments

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 23:44:12 +0100

15 lines

Re: Attachments

Delve Withrington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 14:06:00 -0700

15 lines

Re: Attachments

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 16:39:32 -0400

20 lines

Re: Attachments

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 16:36:12 +0000

30 lines

Re: Attachments

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:22:45 -0700

26 lines

Re: Attachments

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:53:55 -0700

17 lines

Attachments

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:12:16 -0700

15 lines

Re: Attachments

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:57:30 EDT

23 lines

Re: Attachments

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:47:46 -0400

19 lines

Re: Attachments

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:20:16 -0400

30 lines

Re: Attachments

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:28:44 -0700

22 lines

Re: Attachments

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:18:44 -0400

17 lines

Re: Attachments

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 18:13:37 +0100

12 lines

Re: Attachments

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:57:42 -0400

25 lines

Re: Attachments

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:23:21 -0700

16 lines

Re: Attachments

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:59:47 -0400

51 lines

Attachments

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 14:44:52 +0100

66 lines

Re: Attachments (A Question)

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:59:21 -0700

18 lines

Re: Bad Design

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 00:06:48 +0100

17 lines

Bad Design

Antonio Cavedoni <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 00:28:59 +0200

38 lines

baseline 30

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:35:14 +0100

14 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:47:13 -0400

35 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 18:14:28 +0200

49 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:51:23 -0400

38 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:19:57 +0200

33 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:13:01 -0700

24 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 20:59:22 -0400

35 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:01:15 -0400

31 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:18:17 -0400

27 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:10:23 +0200

23 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:00:39 -0400

36 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:49:21 +0200

29 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:42:59 +0200

24 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:34:02 -0400

27 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:11:37 -0400

37 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 17:40:15 +0200

28 lines

Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 11:11:35 -0400

37 lines

Re: book found online has interesting ideas re the alphabet

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 15:45:59 -0700

29 lines

book found online has interesting ideas re the alphabet

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:25:53 -0400

29 lines

Re: Bookman Swash buckling

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:06:48 -0400

23 lines

Re: Bouma Experiment - Results

Westenkirchner, Suzy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 16:50:23 -0400

53 lines

Bouma Experiment - Results

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 13:44:54 -0700

45 lines

Bringhurst in _Scholarly Publishing_

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 17:51:19 -0400

64 lines

Re: British premier picks up his pen to show sincerity, makes propaganda for computers but doesn't seem to use one himself

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 15:09:57 -0400

26 lines

Re: British premier picks up his pen to show sincerity, makes propaganda for computers but doesn't seem to use one himself

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 11:42:25 -0700

32 lines

British premier picks up his pen to show sincerity, makes propaganda for computers but doesn't seem to use one himself

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 22:01:33 +0100

21 lines

Brody & THE FACE

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 01:31:56 -0700

30 lines

Calling Toby W (TAN)

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 11:54:53 +0100

16 lines

Re: Character Style

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 19:09:28 -0400

33 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:16:52 -0700

23 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 17:28:23 +0200

23 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 19:02:59 -0400

25 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 21:52:56 +0200

31 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 16:38:24 -0300

35 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 12:09:57 -0700

22 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 15:27:46 -0300

94 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 09:58:17 -0700

48 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 07:54:24 +0000

59 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 16:28:17 -0400

21 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 15:26:35 -0400

34 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 12:12:54 -0700

39 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 15:04:37 -0400

50 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 20:14:39 +0900

36 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 09:45:44 +0200

36 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:45:44 -0700

28 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:51:00 -0700

19 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:45:10 -0700

31 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 18:28:14 +0200

40 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Bobbi Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 08:37:11 -0700

31 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 11:08:53 -0400

26 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 01:33:01 -0700

34 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 09:48:19 +0200

36 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 23:29:40 +0100

20 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 18:00:55 -0400

25 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 14:55:42 -0700

53 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 13:59:26 -0700

29 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 13:50:05 -0700

51 lines

Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 13:01:34 -0700

49 lines

Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 12:42:25 -0700

30 lines

Re: chopped ascenders

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 14:02:37 -0700

19 lines

chopped ascenders

Don Wilkes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 13:54:11 -0700

23 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:48:15 -0700

22 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:27:58 -0700

27 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:22:27 -0700

22 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 11:40:39 -0700

42 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 23:20:11 -0700

40 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 17:08:00 -0400

25 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:37:26 -0700

22 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

danielle foushee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:51:07 PDT

52 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:17:04 -0700

45 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:19:01 -0400

36 lines

colophon & blurb people

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 07:51:46 -0700

45 lines

Re: Colophon and Blurb People

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:32:03 -0700

25 lines

Re: Colophon and Blurb People

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:02:41 -0700

30 lines

Re: coming OpenType fonts (was: Minion Web)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:01:33 -0700

21 lines

coming OpenType fonts (was: Minion Web)

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 07:14:40 -0700

48 lines

Re: concerned about *serious* historical errors which open one recent book on handwriting

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 23:37:08 -0400

41 lines

concerned about *serious* historical errors which open one recent book on handwriting

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 22:24:10 -0400

50 lines

Cooper (was Re: Two Things)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:14:59 -0700

21 lines

Critiquing student work

Jared Benson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 17:19:59 -0600

34 lines

Re: Dair Devil

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2000 11:30:55 -0400

36 lines

Dair Devil

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2000 16:18:20 +0100

21 lines

Distorting Typefaces (was Character Style)

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 02:19:23 -0700

36 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:10:54 -0700

21 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:21:02 -0400

32 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:22:33 -0700

31 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman

George Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 13:08:43 -0500

44 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 22:08:00 +0100

19 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:17:09 -0500

30 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:11:32 +0200

27 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 09:02:24 -0700

30 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:39:29 -0400

32 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 07:56:11 -0700

17 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:49:56 -0400

33 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:21:01 +0100

15 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 23:12:32 -0700

22 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:49:13 -0700

39 lines

Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 13:42:42 -0500

46 lines

Re: FB Miller specimen abberation?

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 18:13:29 -0700

35 lines

Re: FB Miller specimen abberation?

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 02:27:52 -0700

29 lines

FB Miller specimen abberation?

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 02:07:47 -0700

27 lines

Font Face/Type Head

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:18:12 -0400

97 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:59:15 EDT

22 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:01:48 -0700

87 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

sian dunford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 20:40:53 GMT

16 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:49:40 -0700

18 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:39:10 EDT

26 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:33:53 -0700

20 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:16:03 EDT

32 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 07:12:13 -0400

23 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:54:18 +0200

39 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:10:59 -0700

26 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

danielle foushee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:56:29 PDT

29 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:54:51 -0700

19 lines

Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 May 2000 14:27:40 EDT

19 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 01:35:17 -0700

29 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 16:16:40 -0400

18 lines

Fonts for On-line Manual

Alexei Kostin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 00:02:35 +0400

29 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:13:15 -0700

35 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 13:58:16 -0700

51 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 14:31:07 -0700

46 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 14:27:49 -0700

19 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Alexei Kostin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 00:20:43 +0400

38 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:57:52 -0700

35 lines

Fonts for On-line Manual

Alexei Kostin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 23:40:54 +0400

44 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:13:12 -0700

48 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 00:24:41 -0700

17 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:58:53 -0700

26 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Steven Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:42:12 -0700

22 lines

Fontzone interviewed

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 12:29:26 +0200

76 lines

Fwd: Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:56:13 -0400

29 lines

genuine blackletter ( was Re: Type factoids)

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:05:49 +0200

20 lines

Re: Gettin' down!

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:02:05 -0700

43 lines

Re: Gettin' down!

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:56:41 -0400

63 lines

Re: Gettin' down!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 19:04:28 -0700

36 lines

Gettin' down!

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:26:22 -0400

67 lines

Re: Heller's book of the minute

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 13:27:07 -0700

25 lines

Re: Heller's book of the minute

Matt Spiegler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 16:12:33 -0400

35 lines

Re: Heller's book of the minute

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 15:18:30 -0400

26 lines

Heller's book of the minute

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 10:58:01 -0700

26 lines

Help identifying wood type

Vincent Golden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:30:46 -0500

25 lines

Re: How Typography Happens

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 15:17:24 +0100

18 lines

Re: How Typography Happens

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 12:24:16 +0100

28 lines

Re: How Typography Happens

Bobbi Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 12:43:29 -0700

15 lines

How Typography Happens

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 12:59:00 -0500

12 lines

Ishi

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 08:49:28 +0000

35 lines

Legibility Terrorism

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:38:06 -0700

38 lines

Re: Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:39:28 -0400

30 lines

Re: Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:39:26 -0400

29 lines

Re: Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 07:55:09 -0700

18 lines

Re: Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:38:29 +0100

17 lines

Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:36:00 -0400

75 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:01:35 +0200

27 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:15:37 -0700

41 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Sebastian Marius Kirsch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 00:49:07 +0200

25 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 08:35:45 -0400

27 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 22:41:46 -0700

32 lines

Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 22:35:34 -0700

20 lines

Re: Look, I was misinformed ... do I have to apologize for that?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 11:01:06 -0700

24 lines

Re: Look, I was misinformed ... do I have to apologize for that?

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 10:51:11 -0700

36 lines

Look, I was misinformed ... do I have to apologize for that?

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 11:55:52 +0000

32 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 10:45:00 -0700

19 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 13:04:37 -0400

37 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:58:47 -0700

36 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:31:13 -0700

29 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:20:42 -0700

21 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:09:26 -0700

26 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 09:52:56 -0700

32 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 08:37:31 -0400

36 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:41:11 -0700

41 lines

Re: Looking for van Dijk samples

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 19:10:38 -0400

22 lines

Looking for van Dijk samples

Paul Razzell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:01:05 -0700

17 lines

Re: Looking for van Dijk samples (I've posted a sample)

Kent K. Steinbrenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 19:26:09 -0700

20 lines

Re: lucasfonts

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 22:57:25 -0300

31 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Victor Gaultney <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 May 2000 19:17:49 -0500

34 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 14:31:20 -0300

27 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Matt Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 10:38:29 EST

47 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

John Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 08:17:18 -0700

29 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Matt Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 09:50:56 EST

19 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 21:53:03 -0400

52 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 21:48:50 -0400

36 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

John Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:09:12 -0700

36 lines

Mac Character Map utility?

Matt Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:42:56 EST

40 lines

Re: Minion Web

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 12:29:29 -0700

27 lines

Re: Minion Web

Stephen Moye <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 12:35:35 -0400

27 lines

Minion Web

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 08:55:09 -0700

36 lines

Missing ns and ms

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 09:27:08 -0400

56 lines

Re: MP3

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:13:15 +1200

45 lines

Re: MP3

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 15:12:35 +0200

65 lines

Re: MP3 (was: Transitional period)

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 23:06:02 +1200

34 lines

MP3 (was: Transitional period)

Martin Schröder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:22:05 +0200

35 lines

Re: New magazine

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:38:07 -0400

34 lines

Re: New magazine

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:09:19 +0200

32 lines

Re: New magazine

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:35:18 -0700

25 lines

Re: New magazine

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:27:26 -0700

39 lines

Re: New magazine

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:09:21 -0700

31 lines

Re: New magazine

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:34:52 -0700

28 lines

Re: New magazine

Alistair Vining <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 17:20:37 +0100

38 lines

Re: New magazine

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:19:09 -0500

27 lines

Re: New magazine

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:25:30 +0100

30 lines

Re: New magazine

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:41:25 -0400

42 lines

Re: New magazine

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:42:15 +0200

23 lines

Re: New magazine

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:03:50 +0100

22 lines

Re: New magazine

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:03:55 +0100

26 lines

Re: New magazine

Sander Pinkse <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:35:56 +0200

30 lines

Re: New magazine

Alistair Vining <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:52:43 +0100

26 lines

Re: New magazine

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:59:48 +1200

25 lines

New magazine

Sander Pinkse <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:00:47 +0200

24 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 09:38:43 +0100

20 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:48:22 -0700

18 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 00:34:04 +0100

21 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:46:46 -0700

42 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 18:07:08 -0400

49 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:36:06 -0400

72 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:02:35 -0700

43 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:51:21 -0400

37 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:35:57 -0400

67 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 19:24:11 -0300

56 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 13:18:02 -0700

47 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:51:51 -0700

21 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:41:39 -0400

44 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:12:35 -0700

36 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:01:31 -0400

42 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:00:53 -0700

30 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 10:46:36 -0700

44 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 10:43:43 -0700

35 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:17:35 -0300

36 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:11:49 -0300

72 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 08:56:38 -0400

52 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 20:45:36 -0400

45 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Sebastian Marius Kirsch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 21:23:43 +0200

34 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 18:19:07 -0400

30 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 18:19:05 -0400

63 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 13:34:03 -0700

35 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 12:00:32 -0700

44 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 11:36:20 -0700

36 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 10:54:45 -0700

19 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 17:45:51 +0100

36 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 11:11:37 -0400

26 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 11:45:47 -0400

28 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 07:41:43 -0700

70 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 10:15:01 -0400

42 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 08:52:26 -0400

44 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 08:52:53 -0400

82 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 08:30:47 -0400

27 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Rolf Marvin Be Lindgren <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 10:29:26 +0200

23 lines

off topic: Printing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 08:36:44 -0700

56 lines

Oops, they did it again.

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 00:32:23 -0700

17 lines

our handwriting's history: a CD-ROM

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 00:11:09 -0400

38 lines

Re: Oversized Jill in the snow.

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 09:58:14 -0400

45 lines

Re: Oversized Jill in the snow.

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:51:52 +0100

16 lines

Packets Errant

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:26:37 -0700

23 lines

Re: Packromedia

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:31:02 +0100

19 lines

Re: Pet Peeve

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 13:41:17 -0400

27 lines

Re: Pet Peeve

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:34:52 -0700

20 lines

Re: Photoshop 5.5

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:29:09 -0700

41 lines

Re: Photoshop 5.5

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 20:36:47 +0100

17 lines

Photoshop 5.5

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:34:53 -0400

32 lines

Re: Photoshop 5.5 / font problems

George Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 13:08:00 -0500

38 lines

Re: Please Read

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 11:32:12 -0700

24 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 07:24:18 -0400

43 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 21:31:01 -0400

24 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 15:39:14 -0700

53 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 14:23:20 -0700

48 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 15:58:53 EDT

23 lines

PLEASE READ

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 12:48:13 -0700

56 lines

Re: PLEASE TAKE THIS OFFLIST! (was:Re: Talking to the wind)

michaellynch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 17:53:54 -0700

11 lines

PLEASE TAKE THIS OFFLIST! (was:Re: Talking to the wind)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 20:40:32 -0400

70 lines

PopChar URL for "Mac Character Map utility" inquiry

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 08:34:42 +0000

27 lines

Re: prestige (Re: Transitional period)

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:52:08 -0700

33 lines

prestige (Re: Transitional period)

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 22:17:02 +0200

39 lines

Re: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 19:53:25 -0400

45 lines

Re: Printing

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 18:00:21 +0200

23 lines

Re: Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 09:48:11 -0400

58 lines

Re: Printing

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 16:31:24 -0300

37 lines

Re: Printing

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 17:07:49 +0100

19 lines

Re: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 11:52:45 -0400

39 lines

Re: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 11:40:04 -0400

104 lines

Re: Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 06:54:34 -0400

30 lines

Re: Printing

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 22:33:29 -0400

29 lines

Re: Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 06:44:33 -0400

55 lines

Re: Printing

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 21:43:53 -0400

32 lines

Re: Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 20:21:55 -0400

32 lines

Re: Printing

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 20:11:56 -0400

40 lines

Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 19:35:29 -0400

31 lines

Re: Proforma's relatives

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 23:02:02 -0700

20 lines

Proforma's relatives

Monib <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 15:03:13 +1000

18 lines

Re: Protections

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:04:55 EDT

34 lines

Re: Protections

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:46:37 -0700

21 lines

Re: Protections

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 22:26:02 -0700

38 lines

Re: Protections

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 20:35:37 EDT

39 lines

Protections

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 16:05:05 -0700

21 lines

PS...

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 20:01:47 -0400

30 lines

Re: Quark Stuff

Andy Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 19:41:28 +0100

42 lines

Re: Quark Stuff

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 15:42:56 -0400

35 lines

Re: Quark Stuff

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 15:31:22 -0400

57 lines

Quark Stuff

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:17:45 -0700

29 lines

Re ... ...

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:16:09 +0100

32 lines

Re ... ...

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:43:09 -0700

22 lines

Re ... ...

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:51:33 +0100

30 lines

Re: Readability and screen contrast

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 11:12:55 -0700

41 lines

Readability and screen contrast

Mark A. Hiselman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 23:13:59 -0400

39 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 20:56:36 -0700

27 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:57:09 -0400

32 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:14:01 -0700

20 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 21:15:52 +0200

32 lines

readability vs legibility

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:18:40 -0700

22 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:54:55 -0700

20 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:59:37 -0700

92 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:29:53 -0400

36 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:14:10 -0700

28 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Mario Estioko <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 08:30:07 -0700

53 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:40:23 +0200

37 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:32:30 +0100

26 lines

Re: readability vs legibility (Was: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2))

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 22:50:21 -0700

44 lines

Reading Italic (was:Re: Typography Book (Weingart))

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 14:45:40 -0400

42 lines

Rogue's galley submissions

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:09:59 +0100

15 lines

Re: Schröööder

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:13:46 -0700

25 lines

Re: Schröööder

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 14:24:25 -0300

34 lines

Schröööder

William I. Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:11:05 -0400

21 lines

Search for Eye

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 10:56:01 -0700

33 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 11:08:39 +0100

39 lines

Search for Octavo

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 19:51:52 -0500

26 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 19:40:23 -0500

36 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 14:34:48 -0300

40 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 11:30:02 +0100

30 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 10:06:26 -0500

16 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:50:13 -0500

35 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:31:44 -0500

39 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:22:10 -0500

32 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 16:13:21 -0300

37 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:06:28 -0700

24 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:49:03 -0300

39 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:41:15 -0700

21 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:55:58 -0700

19 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:16:33 +0100

26 lines

Search for Octavo

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:18:30 -0500

44 lines

Re: seek history of "dollar-$ign" (LONG)

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 08:28:53 +0000

28 lines

Re: seek info on letter-combination frequencies

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 00:27:58 +0900

38 lines

Re: seek info on letter-combination frequencies

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:28:02 -0400

42 lines

Silica

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:09:52 -0700

26 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 14:29:22 -0400

34 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:23:24 -0700

23 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 14:07:06 -0400

39 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 10:47:45 -0700

21 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:19:03 -0300

30 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Edward Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:11:00 +0100

27 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:15:20 +0200

29 lines

Slow Sites at Play

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 15:22:07 -0700

22 lines

Re: SoCal Lead

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:55:52 -0500

42 lines

Re: SoCal Lead

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 17:18:53 -0700

26 lines

Re: SoCal Lead

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 16:47:53 -0700

25 lines

SoCal Lead

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 08:23:07 -0700

36 lines

Re: squished: Was: Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:35:53 -0300

43 lines

Re: squished: Was: Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 20:11:30 -0700

28 lines

squished: Was: Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 15:25:40 -0300

33 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 20:12:35 +0900

28 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 15:12:39 -0400

24 lines

Re: Subscript problem

William I. Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 13:50:44 -0400

48 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 10:46:08 -0700

19 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 12:09:29 +0100

20 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 17:02:28 +0900

26 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 16:57:02 +0900

27 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 23:33:21 +0200

31 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 13:34:12 -0700

36 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 15:32:43 -0400

36 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 21:33:15 +0200

45 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 14:39:01 -0400

51 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 11:05:34 -0700

25 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:42:04 -0400

36 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 08:40:52 -0700

25 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 08:30:32 -0700

37 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 22:24:24 +0900

38 lines

Re: Subscript problem

David Somers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:40:19 +0200

58 lines

Subscript problem

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 16:35:07 +0900

34 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 09:06:17 +0100

29 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 01:47:58 -0400

55 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 13:32:24 -0400

27 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 09:53:02 -0700

19 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 08:57:10 -0400

65 lines

Talking to the wind

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 09:01:12 -0400

59 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 01:30:30 -0400

29 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 20:52:52 -0700

49 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 22:59:52 +0000

37 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:27:39 -0700

22 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 17:18:17 -0400

31 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:07:04 -0700

20 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:34:19 -0400

34 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:27:18 -0400

118 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 13:59:50 +0000

40 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:27:11 -0700

22 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 09:55:48 -0700

27 lines

Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 11:32:31 -0400

76 lines

Thank ye

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:23:20 -0400

20 lines

title of the Bringhurst article

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 17:57:30 -0400

20 lines

Re: totally off topic---to Ron Koster

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 20:15:38 -0400

52 lines

totally off topic---to Ron Koster

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:20:02 -0700

18 lines

Re: Transitional period

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:54:28 +1200

29 lines

Re: Transitional period

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:12:58 -0700

32 lines

Re: Transitional period

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 20:46:17 -0700

72 lines

Re: Transitional period

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 20:32:34 -0400

76 lines

Re: Transitional period

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:11:27 +1200

30 lines

Re: Transitional period

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 16:48:48 -0700

58 lines

Re: Transitional period

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 17:46:22 -0400

51 lines

Re: Transitional period

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:40:36 +1200

29 lines

Re: Transitional period

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:29:32 -0700

21 lines

Re: Transitional period

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:28:13 -0700

18 lines

Re: Transitional period

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:45:58 -0700

42 lines

Re: Transitional period

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:49:06 -0400

28 lines

Re: Transitional period

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:57:21 -0400

20 lines

Re: Transitional period

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:46:29 -0700

40 lines

Re: Transitional period

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:07:51 -0700

31 lines

Re: Transitional period

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:53:01 -0700

29 lines

Re: Transitional period

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:40:39 -0400

32 lines

Re: Transitional period

David E. Hollingsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:33:21 -0400

25 lines

Re: Transitional period

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:14:38 +0100

26 lines

Re: Transitional period

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 09:27:13 -0700

80 lines

Re: Transitional period

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:08:29 +0100

37 lines

Re: Transitional period

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:54:22 +0100

22 lines

Re: Transitional period

SUGAR in their vitamins? <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 21:52:36 -0700

43 lines

Re: Transitional period

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 20:43:56 -0700

37 lines

Re: Transitional period

TJ Brennan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 16:41:37 -0700

23 lines

Re: Transitional period

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 16:15:36 -0400

22 lines

Re: Transitional period

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 14:00:02 -0400

38 lines

Re: Transitional period

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 14:17:57 -0400

26 lines

Re: Transitional period

John Lockerbie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 19:13:51 BST

19 lines

Transitional period

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 17:44:31 +0100

22 lines

Re: Two things

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 13:45:17 -0300

51 lines

Re: Two things

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 09:47:21 -0700

33 lines

Re: Two things

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 12:57:27 -0300

37 lines

Re: Two Things

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 08:03:14 -0700

29 lines

Re: Two things

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 16:29:40 +0200

23 lines

Re: Two Things

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 20:26:15 -0400

23 lines

Re: Two things

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 17:01:54 -0700

27 lines

Re: Two things

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:01:21 -0700

20 lines

Re: Two Things

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 21:31:30 +0100

17 lines

Re: Two things

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 12:49:00 -0700

38 lines

Re: Two things

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:34:48 -0300

31 lines

Re: Two Things

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:08:25 -0700

22 lines

Re: Two things

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:03:09 -0700

31 lines

Re: Two Things

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:04:45 -0700

36 lines

Re: Two things

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:45:37 -0700

23 lines

Re: Two things

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:19:23 -0700

27 lines

Re: Two things

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 22:15:42 +0100

16 lines

Re: Two things

TJ Brennan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 12:57:47 -0700

31 lines

Two things

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 20:32:26 +0100

22 lines

Re: Type factoids

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:20:06 -0700

26 lines

Re: Type factoids

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:01:28 -0400

27 lines

Re: Type factoids

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:45:01 -0400

24 lines

Re: Type factoids

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:53:10 +0200

28 lines

Re: Type factoids

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 15:16:59 -0400

30 lines

Re: Type factoids

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 15:12:43 -0400

37 lines

Re: Type factoids

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:38:47 -0400

38 lines

Re: Type factoids

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:29:45 -0400

34 lines

Re: Type factoids

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 10:59:04 -0400

35 lines

Re: Type factoids

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 08:46:49 -0400

25 lines

Re: Type factoids

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 08:29:14 -0400

20 lines

Re: Type factoids

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 08:04:48 -0400

26 lines

Re: Type factoids

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 07:57:03 -0400

57 lines

Re: Type factoids

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 20:24:15 +1200

22 lines

Re: Type factoids

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 23:35:16 -0700

20 lines

Re: Type factoids

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 17:49:28 +1200

39 lines

Type factoids

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 22:39:38 -0700

42 lines

Re: type utilities

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 16:16:11 -0400

34 lines

Re: type utilities

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 15:57:59 -0400

25 lines

type utilities

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:15:45 -0700

27 lines

TypeCon 2000 Update

Bob Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 17:05:36 -0400

154 lines

TypeCon 2000: The Program (w/Participant list) as of 5/18, pt1

Bob Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:53:29 -0400

106 lines

TypeCon 2000: The Program, pt 2 (The Panels)

Bob Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:57:12 -0400

159 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 10 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-146)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:54:21 -0700

31 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 10 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-146)

George E. Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:42:07 -0500

31 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-155)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:10:08 -0700

24 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-155)

Terry Chouinard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:37:43 -0500

47 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 26 May 2000 to 27 May 2000 (#2000-165)

Matt Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2000 02:19:01 -0500

20 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 29 May 2000 to 30 May 2000 (#2000-168)

Matt Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:04:38 EST

31 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 8 May 2000 (#2000-141)

George E. Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 15:41:17 -0500

41 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 09:15:02 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Re: Warde

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 16:33:00 -0700

37 lines

Re: Warde

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 16:58:57 -0400

34 lines

Re: Warde

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 21:12:42 +0100

31 lines

Re: Warde

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:51:30 -0700

26 lines

Re: Warde

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 15:31:33 EDT

25 lines

Re: Warde

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 20:24:45 +0100

14 lines

Re: Warde

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:10:15 -0700

24 lines

Re: Warde

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:52:34 -0700

43 lines

Re: Warde

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:55:23 -0700

20 lines

Re: Warde

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:40:47 -0700

22 lines

Warde

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:28:11 -0700

38 lines

Was: Search for Octavo; Now: Search for Eye

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 10:10:14 -0500

16 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 13:04:26 -0700

163 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 22:17:20 -0700

23 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 18:01:51 -0300

34 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 13:11:03 -0700

32 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 16:44:53 -0300

21 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:45:47 -0700

23 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 08:30:59 -0700

39 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:41:53 -0300

31 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:26:29 -0300

48 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:51:40 +0100

18 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 08:32:44 +0000

149 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 23:37:36 -0400

34 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 19:11:42 -0700

42 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 17:28:41 -0400

25 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:02:40 -0400

36 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:47:18 -0700

19 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:38:15 -0300

24 lines

Web Quotes was: New magazine

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:16:51 -0700

49 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 18:44:00 -0400

89 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:48:07 -0400

48 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:16:14 -0700

30 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:55:21 -0400

86 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:02:40 -0400

29 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Alistair Vining <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:52:40 +0100

64 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 02:47:50 +0000

20 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 06:48:35 +0200

27 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 20:21:21 -0700

36 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 22:54:53 -0400

58 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 21:53:58 -0400

23 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 21:21:33 -0400

64 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 21:06:07 -0400

69 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 17:24:00 -0700

43 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 19:54:56 -0400

48 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 20:07:52 -0700

43 lines

WhiteOut-L

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 18:37:36 -0400

123 lines

Re: Ye example

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 23:14:34 -0400

45 lines

Re: Ye example

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 23:04:17 -0400

38 lines

Re: Ye example

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:57:56 -0400

39 lines

Ye example

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:39:08 -0400

87 lines

Ye Olde Thorn

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 09:39:45 -0700

40 lines

Re: Ye superscript

David E. Hollingsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 18:06:22 +0100

31 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 22:30:36 -0700

38 lines

Re: Ye superscript

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 16:42:54 -0400

30 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 23:45:24 -0400

33 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:29:07 -0700

46 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:43:46 -0400

28 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:31:45 -0700

32 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:38:38 -0400

37 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:24:50 -0300

30 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:01:10 -0400

29 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:34:18 -0400

20 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:12:28 -0400

36 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 17:00:32 -0700

30 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:47:35 -0400

44 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:45:02 -0400

34 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:37:30 -0400

32 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:33:00 -0400

30 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 16:28:41 -0700

31 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 00:02:25 +0100

25 lines

Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 18:20:10 -0400

42 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 09:27:07 -0400

34 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:59:01 -0700

33 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:03:35 -0400

40 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:56:33 -0400

41 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:49:18 -0400

32 lines

Ye Thorn

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:34:47 -0400

42 lines

Re: You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:40:47 -0400

38 lines

Re: You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Paul Constantin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:32:30 +0300

52 lines

Re: You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:22:37 -0400

38 lines

You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:09:38 +0000

48 lines

Zen-o-phobic about attachments

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 16:22:31 +0000

23 lines

Re: [SOTATypeCon] The Program

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 20:53:39 +0100

17 lines


Back to: Main TYPO-L Page



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager