LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


May 2000


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TYPO-L Home

TYPO-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

"HOW TYPOGRAPHY HAPPENS"

Oak Knoll Press <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 19:35:34 -0400

61 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

TJ Brennan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 18:15:50 -0700

27 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

John Ahlstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 04:18:12 -0700

27 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 07:26:43 -0400

38 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 12:25:45 -0400

27 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 06:29:16 +0000

38 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

David E. Hollingsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:29:41 -0400

20 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:43:02 -0700

29 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 06:19:31 +0100

37 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 16:49:07 -0700

22 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 23:25:51 +0100

34 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:11:42 -0700

19 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:11:30 -0700

21 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:11:14 -0700

18 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:06:32 -0700

27 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 12:40:46 +0100

34 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

TJ Brennan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 16:33:25 -0700

48 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 07:40:40 -0400

41 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 19:02:32 -0700

21 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 02:36:27 +0100

17 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 02:00:24 +0100

41 lines

Re: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 17:37:04 -0700

26 lines

"Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 01:06:01 +0100

32 lines

Re: 'Eye' Strain (was Re: Transitional period)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 12:58:19 -0700

20 lines

Re: 'Eye' Strain (was Re: Transitional period)

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 20:44:24 +0100

26 lines

'Eye' Strain (was Re: Transitional period)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 03:16:56 -0700

38 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 03:58:48 +0000

47 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:57:34 -0700

18 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Matt Spiegler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 12:50:00 -0500

36 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 23:59:02 -0700

45 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

TJ Brennan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 22:15:06 -0700

36 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Franko Luin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 19:53:28 +0200

40 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

John Lockerbie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 09:56:29 BST

25 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 05:54:06 +0000

35 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:41:55 -0700

48 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 09:41:07 -0700

51 lines

Re: (forwarded) text versus image

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 11:24:18 -0400

27 lines

(forwarded) text versus image

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 04:11:23 +0000

92 lines

... ...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:56:20 -0700

24 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:55:51 -0400

19 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:13:54 +0000

64 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:13:54 +0000

36 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 08:46:41 +0000

48 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 04:15:36 -0400

18 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Ravensara Travillian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 22:48:54 -0700

25 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 00:03:15 -0400

70 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 20:58:18 -0700

23 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:49:57 -0400

22 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:38:08 -0400

57 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 20:17:56 -0700

30 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:54:33 -0400

39 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:45:20 -0400

89 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 18:52:38 -0700

56 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 22:44:46 -0300

32 lines

Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 20:06:07 -0400

95 lines

Announcing Catalogue 49

Frances Wakeman Books <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:31:36 +0100

31 lines

article on summer-camp for handwriting contains claim that "hwg-slant was caused by fountain-pens" (?!)

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:52:34 -0400

53 lines

Re: Attachments

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:59:23 -0700

28 lines

Re: Attachments

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:08:31 -0700

20 lines

Re: Attachments

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:00:37 +0200

27 lines

Re: Attachments

Robert M. McClure <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 16:47:12 -0700

19 lines

Re: Attachments

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:05:37 -0700

21 lines

Re: Attachments

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:14:52 +0200

42 lines

Re: Attachments

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:00:52 EDT

28 lines

Re: Attachments

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:12:33 -0400

39 lines

Re: Attachments

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:36:29 -0700

38 lines

Re: Attachments

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:31:18 -0300

30 lines

Re: Attachments

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:59:03 +0200

30 lines

Re: Attachments

TJ Brennan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 22:17:39 -0700

24 lines

Re: Attachments

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 23:44:12 +0100

15 lines

Re: Attachments

Delve Withrington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 14:06:00 -0700

15 lines

Re: Attachments

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 16:39:32 -0400

20 lines

Re: Attachments

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 16:36:12 +0000

30 lines

Re: Attachments

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:22:45 -0700

26 lines

Re: Attachments

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:53:55 -0700

17 lines

Attachments

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:12:16 -0700

15 lines

Re: Attachments

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:57:30 EDT

23 lines

Re: Attachments

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:47:46 -0400

19 lines

Re: Attachments

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:20:16 -0400

30 lines

Re: Attachments

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:28:44 -0700

22 lines

Re: Attachments

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:18:44 -0400

17 lines

Re: Attachments

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 18:13:37 +0100

12 lines

Re: Attachments

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:57:42 -0400

25 lines

Re: Attachments

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:23:21 -0700

16 lines

Re: Attachments

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:59:47 -0400

51 lines

Attachments

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 14:44:52 +0100

66 lines

Re: Attachments (A Question)

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:59:21 -0700

18 lines

Re: Bad Design

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 00:06:48 +0100

17 lines

Bad Design

Antonio Cavedoni <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 00:28:59 +0200

38 lines

baseline 30

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:35:14 +0100

14 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:47:13 -0400

35 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 18:14:28 +0200

49 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:51:23 -0400

38 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:19:57 +0200

33 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:13:01 -0700

24 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 20:59:22 -0400

35 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:01:15 -0400

31 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:18:17 -0400

27 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:10:23 +0200

23 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:00:39 -0400

36 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:49:21 +0200

29 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:42:59 +0200

24 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:34:02 -0400

27 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:11:37 -0400

37 lines

Re: Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 17:40:15 +0200

28 lines

Black Letter Fonts (was Re: Type factoids)

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 11:11:35 -0400

37 lines

Re: book found online has interesting ideas re the alphabet

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 15:45:59 -0700

29 lines

book found online has interesting ideas re the alphabet

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:25:53 -0400

29 lines

Re: Bookman Swash buckling

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:06:48 -0400

23 lines

Re: Bouma Experiment - Results

Westenkirchner, Suzy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 16:50:23 -0400

53 lines

Bouma Experiment - Results

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 13:44:54 -0700

45 lines

Bringhurst in _Scholarly Publishing_

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 17:51:19 -0400

64 lines

Re: British premier picks up his pen to show sincerity, makes propaganda for computers but doesn't seem to use one himself

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 15:09:57 -0400

26 lines

Re: British premier picks up his pen to show sincerity, makes propaganda for computers but doesn't seem to use one himself

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 11:42:25 -0700

32 lines

British premier picks up his pen to show sincerity, makes propaganda for computers but doesn't seem to use one himself

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 22:01:33 +0100

21 lines

Brody & THE FACE

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 01:31:56 -0700

30 lines

Calling Toby W (TAN)

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 11:54:53 +0100

16 lines

Re: Character Style

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 19:09:28 -0400

33 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:16:52 -0700

23 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 17:28:23 +0200

23 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 19:02:59 -0400

25 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 21:52:56 +0200

31 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 16:38:24 -0300

35 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 12:09:57 -0700

22 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 15:27:46 -0300

94 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 09:58:17 -0700

48 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 07:54:24 +0000

59 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 16:28:17 -0400

21 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 15:26:35 -0400

34 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 12:12:54 -0700

39 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 15:04:37 -0400

50 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 20:14:39 +0900

36 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 09:45:44 +0200

36 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:45:44 -0700

28 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:51:00 -0700

19 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:45:10 -0700

31 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 18:28:14 +0200

40 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Bobbi Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 08:37:11 -0700

31 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 11:08:53 -0400

26 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 01:33:01 -0700

34 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 09:48:19 +0200

36 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 23:29:40 +0100

20 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 18:00:55 -0400

25 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 14:55:42 -0700

53 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 13:59:26 -0700

29 lines

Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 13:50:05 -0700

51 lines

Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 13:01:34 -0700

49 lines

Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 12:42:25 -0700

30 lines

Re: chopped ascenders

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 14:02:37 -0700

19 lines

chopped ascenders

Don Wilkes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 13:54:11 -0700

23 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:48:15 -0700

22 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:27:58 -0700

27 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:22:27 -0700

22 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 11:40:39 -0700

42 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 23:20:11 -0700

40 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 17:08:00 -0400

25 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:37:26 -0700

22 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

danielle foushee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:51:07 PDT

52 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:17:04 -0700

45 lines

Re: colophon & blurb people

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:19:01 -0400

36 lines

colophon & blurb people

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 07:51:46 -0700

45 lines

Re: Colophon and Blurb People

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:32:03 -0700

25 lines

Re: Colophon and Blurb People

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:02:41 -0700

30 lines

Re: coming OpenType fonts (was: Minion Web)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:01:33 -0700

21 lines

coming OpenType fonts (was: Minion Web)

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 07:14:40 -0700

48 lines

Re: concerned about *serious* historical errors which open one recent book on handwriting

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 23:37:08 -0400

41 lines

concerned about *serious* historical errors which open one recent book on handwriting

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 22:24:10 -0400

50 lines

Cooper (was Re: Two Things)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:14:59 -0700

21 lines

Critiquing student work

Jared Benson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 17:19:59 -0600

34 lines

Re: Dair Devil

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2000 11:30:55 -0400

36 lines

Dair Devil

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2000 16:18:20 +0100

21 lines

Distorting Typefaces (was Character Style)

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 02:19:23 -0700

36 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:10:54 -0700

21 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:21:02 -0400

32 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:22:33 -0700

31 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman

George Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 13:08:43 -0500

44 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 22:08:00 +0100

19 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:17:09 -0500

30 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:11:32 +0200

27 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 09:02:24 -0700

30 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:39:29 -0400

32 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 07:56:11 -0700

17 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:49:56 -0400

33 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:21:01 +0100

15 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 23:12:32 -0700

22 lines

Re: Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:49:13 -0700

39 lines

Fazed Weiss Roman majuscule quickly vexes Randolph, bigtime

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 13:42:42 -0500

46 lines

Re: FB Miller specimen abberation?

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 18:13:29 -0700

35 lines

Re: FB Miller specimen abberation?

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 02:27:52 -0700

29 lines

FB Miller specimen abberation?

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 02:07:47 -0700

27 lines

Font Face/Type Head

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:18:12 -0400

97 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:59:15 EDT

22 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:01:48 -0700

87 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

sian dunford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 20:40:53 GMT

16 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:49:40 -0700

18 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:39:10 EDT

26 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:33:53 -0700

20 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:16:03 EDT

32 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 07:12:13 -0400

23 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:54:18 +0200

39 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:10:59 -0700

26 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

danielle foushee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:56:29 PDT

29 lines

Re: Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:54:51 -0700

19 lines

Font history: Akzidenz Grotesk

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 May 2000 14:27:40 EDT

19 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 01:35:17 -0700

29 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 16:16:40 -0400

18 lines

Fonts for On-line Manual

Alexei Kostin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 00:02:35 +0400

29 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:13:15 -0700

35 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 13:58:16 -0700

51 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 14:31:07 -0700

46 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 14:27:49 -0700

19 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Alexei Kostin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 00:20:43 +0400

38 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:57:52 -0700

35 lines

Fonts for On-line Manual

Alexei Kostin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 23:40:54 +0400

44 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:13:12 -0700

48 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 00:24:41 -0700

17 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:58:53 -0700

26 lines

Re: Fonts for On-line Manual

Steven Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:42:12 -0700

22 lines

Fontzone interviewed

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 12:29:26 +0200

76 lines

Fwd: Re: an interesting thing about those Inuit soapstone sculptures

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:56:13 -0400

29 lines

genuine blackletter ( was Re: Type factoids)

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:05:49 +0200

20 lines

Re: Gettin' down!

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:02:05 -0700

43 lines

Re: Gettin' down!

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:56:41 -0400

63 lines

Re: Gettin' down!

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 19:04:28 -0700

36 lines

Gettin' down!

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:26:22 -0400

67 lines

Re: Heller's book of the minute

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 13:27:07 -0700

25 lines

Re: Heller's book of the minute

Matt Spiegler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 16:12:33 -0400

35 lines

Re: Heller's book of the minute

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 15:18:30 -0400

26 lines

Heller's book of the minute

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 10:58:01 -0700

26 lines

Help identifying wood type

Vincent Golden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:30:46 -0500

25 lines

Re: How Typography Happens

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 15:17:24 +0100

18 lines

Re: How Typography Happens

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 12:24:16 +0100

28 lines

Re: How Typography Happens

Bobbi Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 12:43:29 -0700

15 lines

How Typography Happens

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 12:59:00 -0500

12 lines

Ishi

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 08:49:28 +0000

35 lines

Legibility Terrorism

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:38:06 -0700

38 lines

Re: Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:39:28 -0400

30 lines

Re: Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:39:26 -0400

29 lines

Re: Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 07:55:09 -0700

18 lines

Re: Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:38:29 +0100

17 lines

Letterpress (was Re: off topic: Printing)

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:36:00 -0400

75 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:01:35 +0200

27 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:15:37 -0700

41 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Sebastian Marius Kirsch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 00:49:07 +0200

25 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 08:35:45 -0400

27 lines

Re: Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 22:41:46 -0700

32 lines

Letterpress Scala (Majoorly Nice!)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 22:35:34 -0700

20 lines

Re: Look, I was misinformed ... do I have to apologize for that?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 11:01:06 -0700

24 lines

Re: Look, I was misinformed ... do I have to apologize for that?

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 10:51:11 -0700

36 lines

Look, I was misinformed ... do I have to apologize for that?

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 11:55:52 +0000

32 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 10:45:00 -0700

19 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 13:04:37 -0400

37 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:58:47 -0700

36 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:31:13 -0700

29 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:20:42 -0700

21 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:09:26 -0700

26 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 09:52:56 -0700

32 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 08:37:31 -0400

36 lines

Re: Looking for Spiky-Irregular-Sturdy Font

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:41:11 -0700

41 lines

Re: Looking for van Dijk samples

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 19:10:38 -0400

22 lines

Looking for van Dijk samples

Paul Razzell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:01:05 -0700

17 lines

Re: Looking for van Dijk samples (I've posted a sample)

Kent K. Steinbrenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 19:26:09 -0700

20 lines

Re: lucasfonts

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 22:57:25 -0300

31 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Victor Gaultney <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 May 2000 19:17:49 -0500

34 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 14:31:20 -0300

27 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Matt Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 10:38:29 EST

47 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

John Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 08:17:18 -0700

29 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Matt Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 09:50:56 EST

19 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 21:53:03 -0400

52 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 21:48:50 -0400

36 lines

Re: Mac Character Map utility?

John Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:09:12 -0700

36 lines

Mac Character Map utility?

Matt Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:42:56 EST

40 lines

Re: Minion Web

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 12:29:29 -0700

27 lines

Re: Minion Web

Stephen Moye <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 12:35:35 -0400

27 lines

Minion Web

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 08:55:09 -0700

36 lines

Missing ns and ms

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 09:27:08 -0400

56 lines

Re: MP3

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:13:15 +1200

45 lines

Re: MP3

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 15:12:35 +0200

65 lines

Re: MP3 (was: Transitional period)

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 23:06:02 +1200

34 lines

MP3 (was: Transitional period)

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:22:05 +0200

35 lines

Re: New magazine

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:38:07 -0400

34 lines

Re: New magazine

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:09:19 +0200

32 lines

Re: New magazine

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:35:18 -0700

25 lines

Re: New magazine

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:27:26 -0700

39 lines

Re: New magazine

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:09:21 -0700

31 lines

Re: New magazine

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:34:52 -0700

28 lines

Re: New magazine

Alistair Vining <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 17:20:37 +0100

38 lines

Re: New magazine

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:19:09 -0500

27 lines

Re: New magazine

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:25:30 +0100

30 lines

Re: New magazine

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:41:25 -0400

42 lines

Re: New magazine

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:42:15 +0200

23 lines

Re: New magazine

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:03:50 +0100

22 lines

Re: New magazine

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:03:55 +0100

26 lines

Re: New magazine

Sander Pinkse <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:35:56 +0200

30 lines

Re: New magazine

Alistair Vining <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:52:43 +0100

26 lines

Re: New magazine

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:59:48 +1200

25 lines

New magazine

Sander Pinkse <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:00:47 +0200

24 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 09:38:43 +0100

20 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:48:22 -0700

18 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 00:34:04 +0100

21 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:46:46 -0700

42 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 18:07:08 -0400

49 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:36:06 -0400

72 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:02:35 -0700

43 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:51:21 -0400

37 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:35:57 -0400

67 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 19:24:11 -0300

56 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 13:18:02 -0700

47 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:51:51 -0700

21 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:41:39 -0400

44 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:12:35 -0700

36 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:01:31 -0400

42 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:00:53 -0700

30 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 10:46:36 -0700

44 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 10:43:43 -0700

35 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:17:35 -0300

36 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:11:49 -0300

72 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 08:56:38 -0400

52 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 20:45:36 -0400

45 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Sebastian Marius Kirsch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 21:23:43 +0200

34 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 18:19:07 -0400

30 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 18:19:05 -0400

63 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 13:34:03 -0700

35 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 12:00:32 -0700

44 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 11:36:20 -0700

36 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 10:54:45 -0700

19 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 17:45:51 +0100

36 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 11:11:37 -0400

26 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 11:45:47 -0400

28 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 07:41:43 -0700

70 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 10:15:01 -0400

42 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 08:52:26 -0400

44 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 08:52:53 -0400

82 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 08:30:47 -0400

27 lines

Re: off topic: Printing

Rolf Marvin Be Lindgren <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 10:29:26 +0200

23 lines

off topic: Printing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 08:36:44 -0700

56 lines

Oops, they did it again.

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 00:32:23 -0700

17 lines

our handwriting's history: a CD-ROM

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 00:11:09 -0400

38 lines

Re: Oversized Jill in the snow.

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 09:58:14 -0400

45 lines

Re: Oversized Jill in the snow.

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:51:52 +0100

16 lines

Packets Errant

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:26:37 -0700

23 lines

Re: Packromedia

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:31:02 +0100

19 lines

Re: Pet Peeve

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 13:41:17 -0400

27 lines

Re: Pet Peeve

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:34:52 -0700

20 lines

Re: Photoshop 5.5

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:29:09 -0700

41 lines

Re: Photoshop 5.5

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 20:36:47 +0100

17 lines

Photoshop 5.5

Richard Kegler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:34:53 -0400

32 lines

Re: Photoshop 5.5 / font problems

George Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 13:08:00 -0500

38 lines

Re: Please Read

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 11:32:12 -0700

24 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 07:24:18 -0400

43 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 21:31:01 -0400

24 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 15:39:14 -0700

53 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 14:23:20 -0700

48 lines

Re: PLEASE READ

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 15:58:53 EDT

23 lines

PLEASE READ

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 12:48:13 -0700

56 lines

Re: PLEASE TAKE THIS OFFLIST! (was:Re: Talking to the wind)

michaellynch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 17:53:54 -0700

11 lines

PLEASE TAKE THIS OFFLIST! (was:Re: Talking to the wind)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 20:40:32 -0400

70 lines

PopChar URL for "Mac Character Map utility" inquiry

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 08:34:42 +0000

27 lines

Re: prestige (Re: Transitional period)

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:52:08 -0700

33 lines

prestige (Re: Transitional period)

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 22:17:02 +0200

39 lines

Re: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 19:53:25 -0400

45 lines

Re: Printing

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 18:00:21 +0200

23 lines

Re: Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 09:48:11 -0400

58 lines

Re: Printing

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 16:31:24 -0300

37 lines

Re: Printing

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 17:07:49 +0100

19 lines

Re: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 11:52:45 -0400

39 lines

Re: Printing

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 11:40:04 -0400

104 lines

Re: Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 06:54:34 -0400

30 lines

Re: Printing

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 22:33:29 -0400

29 lines

Re: Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 06:44:33 -0400

55 lines

Re: Printing

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 21:43:53 -0400

32 lines

Re: Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 20:21:55 -0400

32 lines

Re: Printing

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 20:11:56 -0400

40 lines

Printing

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 19:35:29 -0400

31 lines

Re: Proforma's relatives

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 23:02:02 -0700

20 lines

Proforma's relatives

Monib <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 15:03:13 +1000

18 lines

Re: Protections

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:04:55 EDT

34 lines

Re: Protections

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:46:37 -0700

21 lines

Re: Protections

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 22:26:02 -0700

38 lines

Re: Protections

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 20:35:37 EDT

39 lines

Protections

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 16:05:05 -0700

21 lines

PS...

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 20:01:47 -0400

30 lines

Re: Quark Stuff

Andy Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 19:41:28 +0100

42 lines

Re: Quark Stuff

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 15:42:56 -0400

35 lines

Re: Quark Stuff

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 15:31:22 -0400

57 lines

Quark Stuff

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:17:45 -0700

29 lines

Re ... ...

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:16:09 +0100

32 lines

Re ... ...

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:43:09 -0700

22 lines

Re ... ...

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:51:33 +0100

30 lines

Re: Readability and screen contrast

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 11:12:55 -0700

41 lines

Readability and screen contrast

Mark A. Hiselman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 23:13:59 -0400

39 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 20:56:36 -0700

27 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:57:09 -0400

32 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:14:01 -0700

20 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 21:15:52 +0200

32 lines

readability vs legibility

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:18:40 -0700

22 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:54:55 -0700

20 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:59:37 -0700

92 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:29:53 -0400

36 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:14:10 -0700

28 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Mario Estioko <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 08:30:07 -0700

53 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:40:23 +0200

37 lines

Re: readability vs legibility

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:32:30 +0100

26 lines

Re: readability vs legibility (Was: "Type not fit for a greengrocer" (The Guardian on type, #2))

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 22:50:21 -0700

44 lines

Reading Italic (was:Re: Typography Book (Weingart))

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 14:45:40 -0400

42 lines

Rogue's galley submissions

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:09:59 +0100

15 lines

Re: Schröööder

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:13:46 -0700

25 lines

Re: Schröööder

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 14:24:25 -0300

34 lines

Schröööder

William I. Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:11:05 -0400

21 lines

Search for Eye

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 10:56:01 -0700

33 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 11:08:39 +0100

39 lines

Search for Octavo

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 19:51:52 -0500

26 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 19:40:23 -0500

36 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 14:34:48 -0300

40 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 11:30:02 +0100

30 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 10:06:26 -0500

16 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:50:13 -0500

35 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:31:44 -0500

39 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:22:10 -0500

32 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 16:13:21 -0300

37 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:06:28 -0700

24 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:49:03 -0300

39 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:41:15 -0700

21 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:55:58 -0700

19 lines

Re: Search for Octavo

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:16:33 +0100

26 lines

Search for Octavo

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:18:30 -0500

44 lines

Re: seek history of "dollar-$ign" (LONG)

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 08:28:53 +0000

28 lines

Re: seek info on letter-combination frequencies

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 00:27:58 +0900

38 lines

Re: seek info on letter-combination frequencies

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:28:02 -0400

42 lines

Silica

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:09:52 -0700

26 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 14:29:22 -0400

34 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:23:24 -0700

23 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Jack Mlynek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 14:07:06 -0400

39 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 10:47:45 -0700

21 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:19:03 -0300

30 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Edward Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:11:00 +0100

27 lines

Re: Slow Sites at Play

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:15:20 +0200

29 lines

Slow Sites at Play

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 15:22:07 -0700

22 lines

Re: SoCal Lead

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:55:52 -0500

42 lines

Re: SoCal Lead

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 17:18:53 -0700

26 lines

Re: SoCal Lead

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 16:47:53 -0700

25 lines

SoCal Lead

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 08:23:07 -0700

36 lines

Re: squished: Was: Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:35:53 -0300

43 lines

Re: squished: Was: Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 20:11:30 -0700

28 lines

squished: Was: Re: Character Style: Was: Subscript problem

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 15:25:40 -0300

33 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 20:12:35 +0900

28 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 15:12:39 -0400

24 lines

Re: Subscript problem

William I. Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 13:50:44 -0400

48 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 10:46:08 -0700

19 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 12:09:29 +0100

20 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 17:02:28 +0900

26 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 16:57:02 +0900

27 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 23:33:21 +0200

31 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 13:34:12 -0700

36 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 15:32:43 -0400

36 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 21:33:15 +0200

45 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 14:39:01 -0400

51 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 11:05:34 -0700

25 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:42:04 -0400

36 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 08:40:52 -0700

25 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 08:30:32 -0700

37 lines

Re: Subscript problem

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 22:24:24 +0900

38 lines

Re: Subscript problem

David Somers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:40:19 +0200

58 lines

Subscript problem

Becky Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 16:35:07 +0900

34 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 09:06:17 +0100

29 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 01:47:58 -0400

55 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 13:32:24 -0400

27 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 09:53:02 -0700

19 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 08:57:10 -0400

65 lines

Talking to the wind

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 09:01:12 -0400

59 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 01:30:30 -0400

29 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 20:52:52 -0700

49 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 22:59:52 +0000

37 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:27:39 -0700

22 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 17:18:17 -0400

31 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:07:04 -0700

20 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:34:19 -0400

34 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:27:18 -0400

118 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 13:59:50 +0000

40 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:27:11 -0700

22 lines

Re: Talking to the wind

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 09:55:48 -0700

27 lines

Talking to the wind

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 11:32:31 -0400

76 lines

Thank ye

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:23:20 -0400

20 lines

title of the Bringhurst article

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 17:57:30 -0400

20 lines

Re: totally off topic---to Ron Koster

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 20:15:38 -0400

52 lines

totally off topic---to Ron Koster

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:20:02 -0700

18 lines

Re: Transitional period

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:54:28 +1200

29 lines

Re: Transitional period

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:12:58 -0700

32 lines

Re: Transitional period

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 20:46:17 -0700

72 lines

Re: Transitional period

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 20:32:34 -0400

76 lines

Re: Transitional period

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:11:27 +1200

30 lines

Re: Transitional period

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 16:48:48 -0700

58 lines

Re: Transitional period

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 17:46:22 -0400

51 lines

Re: Transitional period

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:40:36 +1200

29 lines

Re: Transitional period

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:29:32 -0700

21 lines

Re: Transitional period

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:28:13 -0700

18 lines

Re: Transitional period

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:45:58 -0700

42 lines

Re: Transitional period

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:49:06 -0400

28 lines

Re: Transitional period

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:57:21 -0400

20 lines

Re: Transitional period

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:46:29 -0700

40 lines

Re: Transitional period

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:07:51 -0700

31 lines

Re: Transitional period

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:53:01 -0700

29 lines

Re: Transitional period

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:40:39 -0400

32 lines

Re: Transitional period

David E. Hollingsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:33:21 -0400

25 lines

Re: Transitional period

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:14:38 +0100

26 lines

Re: Transitional period

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 09:27:13 -0700

80 lines

Re: Transitional period

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:08:29 +0100

37 lines

Re: Transitional period

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:54:22 +0100

22 lines

Re: Transitional period

SUGAR in their vitamins? <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 21:52:36 -0700

43 lines

Re: Transitional period

Ben Haskell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 20:43:56 -0700

37 lines

Re: Transitional period

TJ Brennan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 16:41:37 -0700

23 lines

Re: Transitional period

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 16:15:36 -0400

22 lines

Re: Transitional period

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 14:00:02 -0400

38 lines

Re: Transitional period

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 14:17:57 -0400

26 lines

Re: Transitional period

John Lockerbie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 19:13:51 BST

19 lines

Transitional period

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 17:44:31 +0100

22 lines

Re: Two things

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 13:45:17 -0300

51 lines

Re: Two things

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 09:47:21 -0700

33 lines

Re: Two things

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 12:57:27 -0300

37 lines

Re: Two Things

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 08:03:14 -0700

29 lines

Re: Two things

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 16:29:40 +0200

23 lines

Re: Two Things

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 20:26:15 -0400

23 lines

Re: Two things

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 17:01:54 -0700

27 lines

Re: Two things

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:01:21 -0700

20 lines

Re: Two Things

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 21:31:30 +0100

17 lines

Re: Two things

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 12:49:00 -0700

38 lines

Re: Two things

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:34:48 -0300

31 lines

Re: Two Things

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:08:25 -0700

22 lines

Re: Two things

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:03:09 -0700

31 lines

Re: Two Things

Georgia Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:04:45 -0700

36 lines

Re: Two things

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:45:37 -0700

23 lines

Re: Two things

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:19:23 -0700

27 lines

Re: Two things

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 22:15:42 +0100

16 lines

Re: Two things

TJ Brennan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 12:57:47 -0700

31 lines

Two things

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 20:32:26 +0100

22 lines

Re: Type factoids

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:20:06 -0700

26 lines

Re: Type factoids

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:01:28 -0400

27 lines

Re: Type factoids

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:45:01 -0400

24 lines

Re: Type factoids

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:53:10 +0200

28 lines

Re: Type factoids

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 15:16:59 -0400

30 lines

Re: Type factoids

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 15:12:43 -0400

37 lines

Re: Type factoids

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:38:47 -0400

38 lines

Re: Type factoids

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:29:45 -0400

34 lines

Re: Type factoids

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 10:59:04 -0400

35 lines

Re: Type factoids

Dave Nalle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 08:46:49 -0400

25 lines

Re: Type factoids

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 08:29:14 -0400

20 lines

Re: Type factoids

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 08:04:48 -0400

26 lines

Re: Type factoids

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 07:57:03 -0400

57 lines

Re: Type factoids

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 20:24:15 +1200

22 lines

Re: Type factoids

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 23:35:16 -0700

20 lines

Re: Type factoids

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 17:49:28 +1200

39 lines

Type factoids

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 22:39:38 -0700

42 lines

Re: type utilities

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 16:16:11 -0400

34 lines

Re: type utilities

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 15:57:59 -0400

25 lines

type utilities

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:15:45 -0700

27 lines

TypeCon 2000 Update

Bob Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 17:05:36 -0400

154 lines

TypeCon 2000: The Program (w/Participant list) as of 5/18, pt1

Bob Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:53:29 -0400

106 lines

TypeCon 2000: The Program, pt 2 (The Panels)

Bob Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:57:12 -0400

159 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 10 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-146)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:54:21 -0700

31 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 10 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-146)

George E. Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:42:07 -0500

31 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-155)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:10:08 -0700

24 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 18 May 2000 - Special issue (#2000-155)

Terry Chouinard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:37:43 -0500

47 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 26 May 2000 to 27 May 2000 (#2000-165)

Matt Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2000 02:19:01 -0500

20 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 29 May 2000 to 30 May 2000 (#2000-168)

Matt Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:04:38 EST

31 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 8 May 2000 (#2000-141)

George E. Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 15:41:17 -0500

41 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 09:15:02 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Re: Warde

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 16:33:00 -0700

37 lines

Re: Warde

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 16:58:57 -0400

34 lines

Re: Warde

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 21:12:42 +0100

31 lines

Re: Warde

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:51:30 -0700

26 lines

Re: Warde

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 15:31:33 EDT

25 lines

Re: Warde

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 20:24:45 +0100

14 lines

Re: Warde

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:10:15 -0700

24 lines

Re: Warde

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:52:34 -0700

43 lines

Re: Warde

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:55:23 -0700

20 lines

Re: Warde

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:40:47 -0700

22 lines

Warde

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:28:11 -0700

38 lines

Was: Search for Octavo; Now: Search for Eye

Randy Tibbott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 10:10:14 -0500

16 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 13:04:26 -0700

163 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 22:17:20 -0700

23 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 18:01:51 -0300

34 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 13:11:03 -0700

32 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 16:44:53 -0300

21 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:45:47 -0700

23 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 08:30:59 -0700

39 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:41:53 -0300

31 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 10:26:29 -0300

48 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:51:40 +0100

18 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 08:32:44 +0000

149 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 23:37:36 -0400

34 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 19:11:42 -0700

42 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 17:28:41 -0400

25 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:02:40 -0400

36 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:47:18 -0700

19 lines

Re: Web Quotes was: New magazine

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:38:15 -0300

24 lines

Web Quotes was: New magazine

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:16:51 -0700

49 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 18:44:00 -0400

89 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:48:07 -0400

48 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:16:14 -0700

30 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:55:21 -0400

86 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:02:40 -0400

29 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Alistair Vining <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:52:40 +0100

64 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 02:47:50 +0000

20 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 06:48:35 +0200

27 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 20:21:21 -0700

36 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 22:54:53 -0400

58 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 21:53:58 -0400

23 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 21:21:33 -0400

64 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 21:06:07 -0400

69 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 17:24:00 -0700

43 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 19:54:56 -0400

48 lines

Re: WhiteOut-L

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 20:07:52 -0700

43 lines

WhiteOut-L

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 18:37:36 -0400

123 lines

Re: Ye example

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 23:14:34 -0400

45 lines

Re: Ye example

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 23:04:17 -0400

38 lines

Re: Ye example

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:57:56 -0400

39 lines

Ye example

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:39:08 -0400

87 lines

Ye Olde Thorn

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 09:39:45 -0700

40 lines

Re: Ye superscript

David E. Hollingsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 18:06:22 +0100

31 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 22:30:36 -0700

38 lines

Re: Ye superscript

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 16:42:54 -0400

30 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 23:45:24 -0400

33 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:29:07 -0700

46 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:43:46 -0400

28 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:31:45 -0700

32 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:38:38 -0400

37 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Leo Kantor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:24:50 -0300

30 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:01:10 -0400

29 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:34:18 -0400

20 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:12:28 -0400

36 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 17:00:32 -0700

30 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:47:35 -0400

44 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:45:02 -0400

34 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:37:30 -0400

32 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:33:00 -0400

30 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 16:28:41 -0700

31 lines

Re: Ye superscript

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 00:02:25 +0100

25 lines

Ye superscript

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 18:20:10 -0400

42 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Kent Lew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 09:27:07 -0400

34 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:59:01 -0700

33 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:03:35 -0400

40 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:56:33 -0400

41 lines

Re: Ye Thorn

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:49:18 -0400

32 lines

Ye Thorn

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:34:47 -0400

42 lines

Re: You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:40:47 -0400

38 lines

Re: You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Paul Constantin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:32:30 +0300

52 lines

Re: You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:22:37 -0400

38 lines

You say you want a resolution ... Well-l-l, you know ...

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 16:09:38 +0000

48 lines

Zen-o-phobic about attachments

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 16:22:31 +0000

23 lines

Re: [SOTATypeCon] The Program

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 20:53:39 +0100

17 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
February 1994
January 1994
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager