LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


March 2000


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

(where to ask about) hand presses? (7 messages)
.fon to .ttf? (1 message)
50's font (3 messages)
<No subject> (2 messages)
Adobe Font Format specification (1 message)
Aldus Manutius at the British Library (20 messages)
Bauhaus (3 messages)
Bauhaus versus Humanity (1 message)
Be Back Later (1 message)
Book list (2 messages)
calligraphers all: do you have any scans/examples of your handwriting & your calligraphy side-by-side, e.g., in the same piece? (1 message)
Calligraphy link (1 message)
Captions: Above or below? (8 messages)
Character limit in Type1 font names on NT? (1 message)
CM Bright (was Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?) (1 message)
Copyright etc. etc... (7 messages)
Copyrights & Typefaces (6 messages)
CSS information (1 message)
CSS Question (30 messages)
Cubics, Beziers and tools (7 messages)
Customising... (1 message)
Defining characteristics of Georgia, Syntax, and FGC (6 messages)
Design OF Type (2 messages)
do you know about World Book Day? (4 messages)
does anyone have a phone-number/snail-address/e-mail for Rosemary Sassoon? (1 message)
DTL (9 messages)
Dutch Masters! (2 messages)
Dwiggins (2 messages)
Egyptienne F (1 message)
fact-checkers subservient to tale-spinners when it comes to letter-forms among other areas: another example - and a lesson on how to *avoid* it ... (1 message)
Fournier (5 messages)
Fournier & New Bringhurst (2 messages)
Fournier & stuff (1 message)
Genius / genie ass / gee, nice ass! (2 messages)
Genus Type-Ass (5 messages)
Good news for the Britypes (1 message)
Gros Canon (12 messages)
Guild of Book Workers Supply Directory (1 message)
Herman Zapf to become honorary member of DANTE (4 messages)
how did your great-grandfather's grandfather write? - visit this site to see handwriting-styles used about 300 years ago (1 message)
Hrant's rant ;-) (2 messages)
I'm back (2 messages)
Importance of spelling. Or (Iowa college students learn the hard way why it's important to check your spelling) put the whole message in the 'Subject' line thus avoiding having to open up the email at all unless, of course, your email application only shows the first four or five words and you don't know what the hell the message is about anyway;-) (1 message)
Iowa college students learn the hard way why it's important to check your spelling (1 message)
Jackboot Grotesque (3 messages)
Jan V (2 messages)
JFP (4 messages)
Jo Clarke: have any of youse run across *real phrases in the real world* that, by virtue of being typeset in font X, uniquely characterize or epitomize font X? Most definitely, Jo. But not so much a phrase. The name of the font itself. Think the word 'Helvetica', see Helvetica. See the word 'Plantin', Plantin it is. We have a breakfast cereal in the UK called Optima but the typeface isn't. I still *see* Optima though. (1 message)
Latest WOID. (1 message)
Legibility and readablity of typefaces (Was: Type design for the visually impaired?) (1 message)
Legibility and readablity of typefaces (Was: Type design forthe visually impaired?) (1 message)
Letterpress Printers (TAN?) (1 message)
London Underground (was: national typefaces) (3 messages)
Looking for Wolfgang.ttf (1 message)
MS Publisher... (OT?) (2 messages)
multimedia teaching job (2 messages)
MyFonts.com upgrade & ecommerce (1 message)
national typefaces (36 messages)
Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts (28 messages)
New developments with ITC (1 message)
of possible interest: handwriting is not dead ... (4 messages)
Old comp.fonts articles archived on Deja.com (1 message)
Parenthedot (7 messages)
Photopolymer plates (5 messages)
PLEASE READ: yes, those calligra-comics are NOT for the sensitive; I would NOT ever show them in a class! I sent them ONLY because... (1 message)
Polymer Plate Vendors (was Pressing on Women) (1 message)
Pressing Women (19 messages)
Pressing WomenTYPO-L Digest - 16 Mar 2000 to 17 Mar 2000 (#2000-83) (3 messages)
Pressing WomenTYPO-L Digest - 16 Mar 2000 to 17 Mar 2000(#2000-83) (1 message)
[log in to unmask] (1 message)
quote to ponder (1 message)
R: 50's font (4 messages)
RE : Adding Fonts (1 message)
Representative sentences (1 message)
RK Eye (4 messages)
Rotis (was: national typefaces) (1 message)
screen ratios (2 messages)
seeking opinions from calligraphers & other letter-lovers on a web-site's statement that Carolingian = Italic (5 messages)
seeking opinions from calligraphers & other letter-lovers ona web-site's statement that Carolingian = Italic (1 message)
Society for Italic Handwriting launches its *new* periodical! (1 message)
some questions are so simple that the answers become complex ... please help me ... ? (3 messages)
some questions are so simple that the answers become complex ...please help me ... ? (1 message)
someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used in some dictionaries of English (1 message)
Sorted! (was re: Fournier & stuff) (3 messages)
SOTA Needs To Know! (1 message)
Spacing lc. italics (2 messages)
Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG (1 message)
Sumner Stone (1 message)
Survey (1 message)
the "Carolingian = Italic" claimant replies (1 message)
The Design OF Type (6 messages)
The transmogrification of the Book (1 message)
this story is made up almost entirely of the words which together compose 1/2 of ordinary written text (1 message)
this story is made up almost entirely of the words which togethercompose 1/2 of ordinary written text (2 messages)
Type design for the visually impaired? (8 messages)
Type group in the UK (1 message)
Type-Design Mailing List? (2 messages)
typeCards (1 message)
typeCards, step 2 (1 message)
Typecon 98 Revisited (2 messages)
TypeCon98 Revisited (2 messages)
Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright? (12 messages)
TYPO-L Digest - 27 Mar 2000 to 28 Mar 2000 (#2000-93) (1 message)
Unger's Paradox (9 messages)
Unsubscribing from TYPO-L (4 messages)
URW (1 message)
Visible Language (3 messages)
Web book info (2 messages)
Web design (was CSS Question) (3 messages)
what is your definition of "calligraphy"? and may I quote you on this? (1 message)
Why Portrait? <-- Kate, please note brevity :-) (5 messages)
Why Portrait? <-- Kate, please note brevity :-) - But I, for one, don't mind, and sometimes even like, Kate's elephantine subject lines... Hey, people *should* be allowed such unharmful little eccentricities... ;-) (1 message)
Wild TYPO-L postings? (9 messages)
you might enjoy this calligraphic humor on the Net ... (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TYPO-L Home

TYPO-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

(where to ask about) hand presses?

Re: (where to ask about) hand presses?

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:25:33 +0100

43 lines

Re: (where to ask about) hand presses?

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:17:32 -0800

37 lines

Re: (where to ask about) hand presses?

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:46:51 -0800

19 lines

Re: (where to ask about) hand presses?

Sander Pinkse <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:29:15 +0200

30 lines

Re: (where to ask about) hand presses?

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 20:56:20 -0800

40 lines

Re: (where to ask about) hand presses?

matthew langley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:09:41 -0500

35 lines

(where to ask about) hand presses?

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 19:33:18 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

.fon to .ttf?

.fon to .ttf?

Antonio Cavedoni <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 19:42:07 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

50's font

Re: 50's font

Franko Luin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2000 01:22:37 +0100

38 lines

Re: 50's font

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 10:51:19 -0800

21 lines

50's font

Antonio Cavedoni <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 19:42:13 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:38:54 -0800

17 lines

<No subject>

Paul T Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:23:56 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Adobe Font Format specification

Adobe Font Format specification

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2000 12:32:12 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:40:18 +0100

24 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:05:10 -0800

24 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 21:35:33 +0100

24 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:21:10 -0800

19 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2000 23:20:26 -0500

33 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 00:54:24 +0100

24 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2000 21:09:32 +0100

34 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Paul T Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2000 07:31:34 -0500

37 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2000 00:14:31 -0500

40 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2000 22:39:46 -0500

27 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2000 13:59:18 +0100

26 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Michael Lepera <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 21:36:27 -0500

62 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 18:15:19 -0800

27 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:59:49 -0800

35 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:44:30 -0500

33 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:57:36 -0500

47 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Paul T Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:49:23 -0500

37 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 18:07:08 +0100

27 lines

Re: Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Paul T Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 11:52:43 -0500

34 lines

Aldus Manutius at the British Library

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:56:17 -0000

42 lines

New Thread

Bauhaus

Re: Bauhaus

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:33:30 -0800

32 lines

Re: Bauhaus

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:11:18 -0800

31 lines

Bauhaus

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:41:56 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

Bauhaus versus Humanity

Bauhaus versus Humanity

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:03:36 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

Be Back Later

Be Back Later

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:39:15 EST

22 lines

New Thread

Book list

Re: Book list

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:35:38 -0500

29 lines

Book list

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:54:01 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

calligraphers all: do you have any scans/examples of your handwriting & your calligraphy side-by-side, e.g., in the same piece?

calligraphers all: do you have any scans/examples of your handwriting & your calligraphy side-by-side, e.g., in the same piece?

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 14:18:18 -0500

120 lines

New Thread

Calligraphy link

Calligraphy link

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:14:12 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Captions: Above or below?

Re: Captions: Above or below?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 11:41:21 -0800

24 lines

Re: Captions: Above or below?

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 16:29:21 +0100

41 lines

Re: Captions: Above or below?

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 16:35:11 +0100

34 lines

Re: Captions: Above or below?

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 16:33:51 +0100

45 lines

Re: Captions: Above or below?

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 14:38:24 +0100

33 lines

Re: Captions: Above or below?

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 07:07:33 -0800

26 lines

Re: Captions: Above or below?

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 12:59:52 -0000

58 lines

Captions: Above or below?

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:49:02 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Character limit in Type1 font names on NT?

Character limit in Type1 font names on NT?

Rasmus Bruun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2000 19:42:51 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

CM Bright (was Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?)

CM Bright (was Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?)

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2000 01:02:21 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

Copyright etc. etc...

Re: Copyright etc. etc...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 13:36:36 -0800

19 lines

Re: Copyright etc. etc...

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 16:30:28 -0800

17 lines

Re: Copyright etc. etc...

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 22:10:46 +0100

49 lines

Re: Copyright etc. etc...

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:36:55 -0800

36 lines

Re: Copyright etc. etc...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 12:43:35 -0500

48 lines

Re: Copyright etc. etc...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:05:04 -0800

28 lines

Copyright etc. etc...

Marc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:59:46 +0100

69 lines

New Thread

Copyrights & Typefaces

Re: Copyrights & Typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 16:25:40 -0800

31 lines

Re: Copyrights & Typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 13:18:39 -0800

22 lines

Re: Copyrights & Typefaces

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 15:23:52 EST

32 lines

Re: Copyrights & Typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2000 11:43:33 -0800

20 lines

Re: Copyrights & Typefaces

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2000 09:16:18 -0800

30 lines

Re: Copyrights & Typefaces

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 11:26:13 EST

28 lines

New Thread

CSS information

CSS information

brian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:23:06 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

CSS Question

Re: CSS Question

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 05:31:14 -0800

19 lines

Re: CSS Question

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:19:12 -0800

22 lines

Re: CSS Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:42:18 -0800

21 lines

Re: CSS Question

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:34:47 -0800

29 lines

Re: CSS Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:56:12 -0800

26 lines

Re: CSS Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:55:48 -0800

143 lines

Re: CSS Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:51:14 -0800

19 lines

Re: CSS Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:51:10 -0800

25 lines

Re: CSS Question

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:38:43 -0500

26 lines

Re: CSS Question

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 22:30:24 -0800

32 lines

Re: CSS Question

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:09:30 +0200

38 lines

Re: CSS Question

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:58:25 +0100

17 lines

Re: CSS Question

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 01:15:15 -0800

26 lines

Re: CSS Question

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 01:13:17 -0800

36 lines

Re: CSS Question

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:26:21 +0200

33 lines

Re: CSS Question

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:00:45 -0800

56 lines

Re: CSS Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:40:21 -0800

46 lines

Re: CSS Question

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:25:38 -0500

49 lines

Re: CSS Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:02:50 -0800

51 lines

Re: CSS Question

Jim Rudolf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 22:40:21 +0200

34 lines

Re: CSS Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:59:10 -0800

23 lines

Re: CSS Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:43:34 -0800

22 lines

Re: CSS Question

Stacy Westbrook <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 14:35:03 -0500

26 lines

Re: CSS Question

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 07:32:05 +1200

31 lines

Re: CSS Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:19:17 -0800

30 lines

Re: CSS Question

David Zienowicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:03:55 -0500

38 lines

Re: CSS Question

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 21:37:49 -0800

27 lines

Re: CSS Question

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 01:59:12 -0800

34 lines

Re: CSS Question

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 03:24:28 -0500

39 lines

CSS Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 14:57:38 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Cubics, Beziers and tools

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Peter Ring <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 21:02:09 +0100

32 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 17:39:01 -0800

40 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2000 13:09:38 -0800

18 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Peter Ring <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2000 21:53:42 +0100

69 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2000 09:07:11 -0500

32 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 20:15:39 -0800

29 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 17:42:22 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

Customising...

Customising...

Marc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 16:29:50 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Defining characteristics of Georgia, Syntax, and FGC

Re: Defining characteristics of Georgia, Syntax, and FGC

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:14:58 -0800

18 lines

Re: Defining characteristics of Georgia, Syntax, and FGC

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2000 08:42:16 -0800

24 lines

Re: Defining characteristics of Georgia, Syntax, and FGC

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2000 20:22:45 -0800

16 lines

Re: Defining characteristics of Georgia, Syntax, and FGC

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2000 21:16:47 -0500

30 lines

Re: Defining characteristics of Georgia, Syntax, and FGC

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2000 00:04:09 +0100

21 lines

Re: Defining characteristics of Georgia, Syntax, and FGC

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2000 14:38:25 -0800

123 lines

New Thread

Design OF Type

Re: Design OF Type

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2000 23:25:40 +0000

21 lines

Re: Design OF Type

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2000 21:53:02 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

do you know about World Book Day?

Re: do you know about World Book Day?

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 11:40:32 -0800

27 lines

Re: do you know about World Book Day?

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 20:41:27 +0100

25 lines

Re: do you know about World Book Day?

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 18:04:19 -0000

31 lines

do you know about World Book Day?

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 11:13:38 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

does anyone have a phone-number/snail-address/e-mail for Rosemary Sassoon?

does anyone have a phone-number/snail-address/e-mail for Rosemary Sassoon?

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 13:14:23 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

DTL

Re: DTL

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:44:26 -0800

25 lines

Re: DTL

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:19:49 -0800

26 lines

Re: DTL

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 10:54:47 -0800

16 lines

Re: DTL

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 10:34:39 -0800

55 lines

Re: DTL

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:19:41 -0300

31 lines

Re: DTL

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2000 16:33:14 -0800

20 lines

Re: DTL

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2000 14:56:43 -0800

25 lines

Re: DTL

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2000 14:50:24 -0800

26 lines

DTL

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2000 14:08:50 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Dutch Masters!

Re: Dutch Masters!

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:59:41 +0100

18 lines

Dutch Masters!

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 20:53:46 -0800

15 lines

New Thread

Dwiggins

Re: Dwiggins

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:05:54 -0800

19 lines

Re: Dwiggins

Amy Ruth Buchanan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:38:59 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

Egyptienne F

Egyptienne F

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 09:49:23 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

fact-checkers subservient to tale-spinners when it comes to letter-forms among other areas: another example - and a lesson on how to *avoid* it ...

fact-checkers subservient to tale-spinners when it comes to letter-forms among other areas: another example - and a lesson on how to *avoid* it ...

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:31:11 -0500

85 lines

New Thread

Fournier

Re: Fournier

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 16:28:50 -0800

33 lines

Re: Fournier

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 12:30:02 -0600

34 lines

Re: Fournier

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 17:42:28 +0100

21 lines

Re: Fournier

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 22:12:20 +0100

38 lines

Re: Fournier

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 17:23:57 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Fournier & New Bringhurst

Re: Fournier & New Bringhurst

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:49:21 -0800

18 lines

Fournier & New Bringhurst

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2000 01:08:55 -0800

33 lines

New Thread

Fournier & stuff

Re: Fournier & stuff

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2000 19:59:08 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Genius / genie ass / gee, nice ass!

Re: Genius / genie ass / gee, nice ass!

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:52:52 -0800

24 lines

Genius / genie ass / gee, nice ass!

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:44:35 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Genus Type-Ass

Re: Genus Type-Ass

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:37:00 -0800

40 lines

Re: Genus Type-Ass

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 07:46:47 -0500

33 lines

Re: Genus Type-Ass

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:05:40 +0100

30 lines

Re: Genus Type-Ass

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 21:58:18 -0800

49 lines

Genus Type-Ass

Paul T Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:09:06 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Good news for the Britypes

Good news for the Britypes

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 23:26:06 +0000

17 lines

New Thread

Gros Canon

Re: Gros Canon

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 23:38:07 -0500

27 lines

Re: Gros Canon

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:44:38 -0800

20 lines

Re: Gros Canon

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:11:29 -0500

36 lines

Re: Gros Canon

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:16:27 -0800

21 lines

Re: Gros Canon

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:24:15 +0100

26 lines

Re: Gros Canon

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:13:39 -0800

53 lines

Re: Gros Canon

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:23:17 +0100

25 lines

Re: Gros Canon

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 23:05:10 +0100

28 lines

Re: Gros Canon

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 12:27:35 -0800

43 lines

Re: Gros Canon

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:03:25 -0800

39 lines

Re: Gros Canon

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 10:34:23 +0100

30 lines

Gros Canon

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Mar 2000 23:31:52 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

Guild of Book Workers Supply Directory

Guild of Book Workers Supply Directory

Guild of Book Workers <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2000 18:02:23 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Herman Zapf to become honorary member of DANTE

Re: Herman Zapf to become honorary member of DANTE

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:05:47 +0100

31 lines

Re: Herman Zapf to become honorary member of DANTE

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2000 16:09:41 +0000

16 lines

Re: Herman Zapf to become honorary member of DANTE

gunnarb <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 13:06:20 -0700

53 lines

Herman Zapf to become honorary member of DANTE

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 15:11:53 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

how did your great-grandfather's grandfather write? - visit this site to see handwriting-styles used about 300 years ago

how did your great-grandfather's grandfather write? - visit this site to see handwriting-styles used about 300 years ago

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 10:50:59 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

Hrant's rant ;-)

Re: Hrant's rant ;-)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:11:40 -0800

25 lines

Hrant's rant ;-)

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 19:35:29 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

I'm back

Re: I'm back

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 20:52:15 -0300

30 lines

I'm back

Jorge de Buen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 11:01:47 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

Importance of spelling. Or (Iowa college students learn the hard way why it's important to check your spelling) put the whole message in the 'Subject' line thus avoiding having to open up the email at all unless, of course, your email application only shows the first four or five words and you don't know what the hell the message is about anyway;-)

Re: Importance of spelling. Or (Iowa college students learn the hard way why it's important to check your spelling) put the whole message in the 'Subject' line thus avoiding having to open up the email at all unless, of course, your email application only shows the first four or five words and you don't know what the hell the message is about anyway;-)

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:26:28 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

Iowa college students learn the hard way why it's important to check your spelling

Iowa college students learn the hard way why it's important to check your spelling

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:04:37 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

Jackboot Grotesque

Re: Jackboot Grotesque

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:44:44 -0800

20 lines

Re: Jackboot Grotesque

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:26:55 EST

32 lines

Jackboot Grotesque

Paul T Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2000 19:34:02 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Jan V

Re: Jan V

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2000 08:08:00 -0800

33 lines

Jan V

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2000 20:51:03 +0000

14 lines

New Thread

JFP

Re: JFP

Simon Daniels <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2000 17:41:39 -0800

28 lines

Re: JFP

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:24:35 -0800

38 lines

Re: JFP

Very Graphics <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:24:35 -0800

30 lines

JFP

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2000 22:16:18 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

Jo Clarke: have any of youse run across *real phrases in the real world* that, by virtue of being typeset in font X, uniquely characterize or epitomize font X? Most definitely, Jo. But not so much a phrase. The name of the font itself. Think the word 'Helvetica', see Helvetica. See the word 'Plantin', Plantin it is. We have a breakfast cereal in the UK called Optima but the typeface isn't. I still *see* Optima though.

Jo Clarke: have any of youse run across *real phrases in the real world* that, by virtue of being typeset in font X, uniquely characterize or epitomize font X? Most definitely, Jo. But not so much a phrase. The name of the font itself. Think the word 'Helvetica', see Helvetica. See the word 'Plantin', Plantin it is. We have a breakfast cereal in the UK called Optima but the typeface isn't. I still *see* Optima though.

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 22:42:15 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

Latest WOID.

Latest WOID.

Paul T Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 17:36:59 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Legibility and readablity of typefaces (Was: Type design for the visually impaired?)

Re: Legibility and readablity of typefaces (Was: Type design for the visually impaired?)

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 19:05:26 -0800

62 lines

New Thread

Legibility and readablity of typefaces (Was: Type design forthe visually impaired?)

Re: Legibility and readablity of typefaces (Was: Type design forthe visually impaired?)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:13:25 -0800

42 lines

New Thread

Letterpress Printers (TAN?)

Letterpress Printers (TAN?)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2000 22:24:01 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

London Underground (was: national typefaces)

Re: London Underground (was: national typefaces)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:04:20 -0800

27 lines

Re: London Underground (was: national typefaces)

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 11:00:21 -0000

30 lines

Re: London Underground (was: national typefaces)

Alexios Zavras <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 11:21:24 +0200

76 lines

New Thread

Looking for Wolfgang.ttf

Looking for Wolfgang.ttf

Sara Aden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:02:34 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

MS Publisher... (OT?)

Re: MS Publisher... (OT?)

Edward Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 10:15:01 -0800

42 lines

Re: MS Publisher... (OT?)

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2000 15:56:06 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

multimedia teaching job

Re: multimedia teaching job

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2000 11:44:17 +0100

36 lines

multimedia teaching job

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 16:32:40 -0800

48 lines

New Thread

MyFonts.com upgrade & ecommerce

MyFonts.com upgrade & ecommerce

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2000 18:25:19 -0000

23 lines

New Thread

national typefaces

Re: national typefaces

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:43:56 -0300

35 lines

Re: national typefaces

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:01:31 +0100

49 lines

Re: national typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:01:05 -0800

29 lines

Re: national typefaces

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 19:16:51 -0300

68 lines

Re: national typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:21:05 -0800

27 lines

Re: national typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:20:40 -0800

31 lines

Re: national typefaces

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2000 16:42:04 -0300

61 lines

Re: national typefaces

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2000 13:58:21 +0100

38 lines

Re: national typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 11:58:22 -0800

39 lines

Re: national typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 11:58:07 -0800

22 lines

Re: national typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 11:57:39 -0800

23 lines

Re: national typefaces

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 18:08:46 +0100

29 lines

Re: national typefaces

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 15:25:00 +0100

25 lines

Re: national typefaces

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:52:41 +0000

14 lines

Re: national typefaces

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:35:34 +0100

38 lines

Re: national typefaces

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:04:51 +0100

17 lines

Re: national typefaces

Matthias Jordan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:56:13 +0100

30 lines

Re: National TYpefaces

James Montalbano <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:35:31 -0500

28 lines

Re: National TYpefaces

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:14:43 +0000

18 lines

Re: national typefaces

Alistair Vining <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:07:56 -0000

29 lines

National TYpefaces

Don Wilkes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 08:25:36 -0800

23 lines

Re: national typefaces

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:47:52 -0500

21 lines

Re: national typefaces

Gerhard Kordmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:56:20 +0100

23 lines

Re: national typefaces

Franko Luin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 07:10:29 +0100

36 lines

Re: national typefaces

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 20:55:51 -0800

16 lines

Re: national typefaces

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 22:56:13 -0500

28 lines

Re: national typefaces

Michael Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 22:10:52 EST

22 lines

Re: national typefaces

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 03:00:14 -0000

55 lines

Re: national typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 17:32:44 -0800

42 lines

Re: national typefaces

Michael Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 20:23:38 EST

21 lines

Re: national typefaces

Michael Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 20:01:52 EST

22 lines

Re: national typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:29:49 -0800

19 lines

Re: national typefaces

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 23:22:05 +0100

32 lines

Re: national typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:15:06 -0800

28 lines

Re: national typefaces

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:08:48 +1200

22 lines

national typefaces

Paul Razzell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:44:31 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 10:45:02 +0100

33 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 21:44:58 -0800

25 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 00:17:58 -0500

32 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 22:20:48 -0500

39 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 22:13:58 -0500

34 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 16:55:03 -0800

20 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Michael Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 19:27:55 EST

12 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 16:26:48 -0800

18 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Michael Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 18:59:57 EST

12 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Michael Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 18:11:49 EST

18 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:05:25 -0800

18 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:28:04 -0800

29 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Franko Luin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 19:09:52 +0100

30 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:22:02 -0500

45 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Paul T Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:12:45 -0500

37 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 17:58:32 +0100

24 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 17:55:49 +0100

18 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 11:27:29 EST

32 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Franko Luin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 08:13:16 +0100

30 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Franko Luin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 07:23:49 +0100

28 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2000 21:57:56 -0500

23 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2000 16:38:53 -0800

19 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Michael Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2000 19:21:19 EST

12 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2000 19:19:57 -0500

42 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2000 17:54:10 -0500

27 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Paul T Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2000 17:24:07 -0500

27 lines

Re: Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2000 13:53:25 -0800

36 lines

Nazi/pre-Nazi era German fonts

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2000 15:51:15 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

New developments with ITC

New developments with ITC

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:49:00 -0800

66 lines

New Thread

of possible interest: handwriting is not dead ...

Re: of possible interest: handwriting is not dead ...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:45:35 -0800

27 lines

Re: of possible interest: handwriting is not dead ...

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:26:54 -0500

28 lines

Re: of possible interest: handwriting is not dead ...

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 17:54:48 -0500

20 lines

of possible interest: handwriting is not dead ...

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 17:19:22 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Old comp.fonts articles archived on Deja.com

Old comp.fonts articles archived on Deja.com

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 03:48:30 -0000

29 lines

New Thread

Parenthedot

Re: Parenthedot

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:40:13 -0500

53 lines

Re: Parenthedot

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 22:22:17 +0100

28 lines

Re: Parenthedot

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 15:35:08 EST

37 lines

Re: Parenthedot

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:00:59 +0100

17 lines

Re: Parenthedot

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:52:42 +0200

36 lines

Re: Parenthedot

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:43:05 -0500

26 lines

Parenthedot

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 17:38:18 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Photopolymer plates

Re: Photopolymer plates

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 15:13:15 -0500

23 lines

Re: Photopolymer plates

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:03:06 -0800

19 lines

Re: Photopolymer plates

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 13:43:21 -0500

30 lines

Re: Photopolymer plates

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:08:35 -0800

35 lines

Photopolymer plates

Harold "Jay" Kyle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:52:01 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

PLEASE READ: yes, those calligra-comics are NOT for the sensitive; I would NOT ever show them in a class! I sent them ONLY because...

PLEASE READ: yes, those calligra-comics are NOT for the sensitive; I would NOT ever show them in a class! I sent them ONLY because...

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:01:20 -0500

84 lines

New Thread

Polymer Plate Vendors (was Pressing on Women)

Polymer Plate Vendors (was Pressing on Women)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 18:06:24 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Pressing Women

Re: Pressing Women

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:37:23 -0800

47 lines

Pressing Women

Don Wilkes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:21:08 -0800

22 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:11:27 -0800

31 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Sander Pinkse <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:20:48 +0100

30 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:00:45 +0100

31 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 23:09:03 -0800

57 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 19:01:19 -0500

23 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:39:51 -0800

20 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 13:34:56 -0800

45 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 13:02:44 -0800

41 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 12:48:31 -0800

51 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 12:41:25 -0800

77 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Michael Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 15:19:51 EST

29 lines

Re: Pressing Women

William I. Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 15:10:51 -0500

43 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Sander Pinkse <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 21:05:46 +0100

49 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:45:18 -0800

46 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:26:34 -0800

25 lines

Re: Pressing Women

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:15:36 -0800

38 lines

Pressing Women

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 10:53:22 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Pressing WomenTYPO-L Digest - 16 Mar 2000 to 17 Mar 2000 (#2000-83)

Re: Pressing WomenTYPO-L Digest - 16 Mar 2000 to 17 Mar 2000 (#2000-83)

Michael Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 20:05:52 EST

23 lines

Re: Pressing WomenTYPO-L Digest - 16 Mar 2000 to 17 Mar 2000 (#2000-83)

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 19:40:37 -0500

20 lines

Pressing WomenTYPO-L Digest - 16 Mar 2000 to 17 Mar 2000 (#2000-83)

George Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:58:49 -0600

146 lines

New Thread

Pressing WomenTYPO-L Digest - 16 Mar 2000 to 17 Mar 2000(#2000-83)

Re: Pressing WomenTYPO-L Digest - 16 Mar 2000 to 17 Mar 2000(#2000-83)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:02:28 -0800

111 lines

New Thread

[log in to unmask]

[log in to unmask]

Walt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 09:10:58 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

quote to ponder

quote to ponder

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:21:49 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

R: 50's font

Re: R: 50's font

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 23:54:23 +0100

36 lines

Re: R: 50's font

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 14:17:55 -0800

37 lines

Re: R: 50's font

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:32:23 -0500

43 lines

R: 50's font

Antonio Cavedoni <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2000 18:06:36 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

RE : Adding Fonts

Re: RE : Adding Fonts

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 17:22:29 -0800

33 lines

New Thread

Representative sentences

Representative sentences

Joe Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 18:56:22 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

RK Eye

Re: RK Eye

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:12:29 -0800

20 lines

Re: RK Eye

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:15:51 +0100

20 lines

Re: RK Eye

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:09:12 -0800

43 lines

RK Eye

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 15:57:02 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Rotis (was: national typefaces)

Rotis (was: national typefaces)

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:17:52 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

screen ratios

Re: screen ratios

Robert M. McClure <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 10:21:22 -0700

48 lines

screen ratios

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 23:24:05 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

seeking opinions from calligraphers & other letter-lovers on a web-site's statement that Carolingian = Italic

Re: seeking opinions from calligraphers & other letter-lovers on a web-site's statement that Carolingian = Italic

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:24:42 -0500

26 lines

Re: seeking opinions from calligraphers & other letter-lovers on a web-site's statement that Carolingian = Italic

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 18:37:40 +0100

42 lines

Re: seeking opinions from calligraphers & other letter-lovers on a web-site's statement that Carolingian = Italic

William I. Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:57:08 -0500

26 lines

Re: seeking opinions from calligraphers & other letter-lovers on a web-site's statement that Carolingian = Italic

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 07:32:53 -0800

22 lines

seeking opinions from calligraphers & other letter-lovers on a web-site's statement that Carolingian = Italic

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:11:42 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

seeking opinions from calligraphers & other letter-lovers ona web-site's statement that Carolingian = Italic

Re: seeking opinions from calligraphers & other letter-lovers ona web-site's statement that Carolingian = Italic

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:04:33 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

Society for Italic Handwriting launches its *new* periodical!

Society for Italic Handwriting launches its *new* periodical!

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:46:43 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

some questions are so simple that the answers become complex ... please help me ... ?

Re: some questions are so simple that the answers become complex ... please help me ... ?

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:01:29 -0500

34 lines

Re: some questions are so simple that the answers become complex ... please help me ... ?

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 08:19:19 -0500

37 lines

some questions are so simple that the answers become complex ... please help me ... ?

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 06:53:55 -0500

70 lines

New Thread

some questions are so simple that the answers become complex ...please help me ... ?

Re: some questions are so simple that the answers become complex ...please help me ... ?

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:12:47 -0000

21 lines

New Thread

someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used in some dictionaries of English

Re: someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used in some dictionaries of English

Jonathan Paterson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 11:41:54 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

Sorted! (was re: Fournier & stuff)

Re: Sorted! (was re: Fournier & stuff)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 09:12:15 -0800

19 lines

Re: Sorted! (was re: Fournier & stuff)

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 10:19:14 +0100

21 lines

Sorted! (was re: Fournier & stuff)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2000 20:58:17 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

SOTA Needs To Know!

SOTA Needs To Know!

Bob Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:22:57 -0500

81 lines

New Thread

Spacing lc. italics

Re: Spacing lc. italics

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 23:57:40 +0100

43 lines

Spacing lc. italics

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:07:43 +0000

17 lines

New Thread

Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Robert M. McClure <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2000 20:36:51 -0700

58 lines

New Thread

Sumner Stone

Sumner Stone

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 09:49:12 +0100

85 lines

New Thread

Survey

Survey

Ellipsis Communications <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:41:42 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

the "Carolingian = Italic" claimant replies

the "Carolingian = Italic" claimant replies

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:20:25 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

The Design OF Type

Re: The Design OF Type

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 12:39:37 -0600

30 lines

Re: The Design OF Type

Eric Kindel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:19:45 +0000

100 lines

Re: The Design OF Type

Chuck Rowe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2000 22:57:30 -0500

43 lines

Re: The Design OF Type

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:40:21 -0600

52 lines

Re: The Design OF Type

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:27:51 -0800

26 lines

The Design OF Type

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2000 22:04:32 -0600

59 lines

New Thread

The transmogrification of the Book

The transmogrification of the Book

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:20:36 -0800

13 lines

New Thread

this story is made up almost entirely of the words which together compose 1/2 of ordinary written text

this story is made up almost entirely of the words which together compose 1/2 of ordinary written text

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 14:23:26 -0500

86 lines

New Thread

this story is made up almost entirely of the words which togethercompose 1/2 of ordinary written text

Re: this story is made up almost entirely of the words which togethercompose 1/2 of ordinary written text

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 14:46:51 -0500

30 lines

Re: this story is made up almost entirely of the words which togethercompose 1/2 of ordinary written text

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:50:23 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Type design for the visually impaired?

Re: Type design for the visually impaired?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:42:13 -0800

39 lines

Re: Type design for the visually impaired?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:40:52 -0800

52 lines

Re: Type design for the visually impaired?

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:18:32 +0200

56 lines

Re: Type design for the visually impaired?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 03:58:41 -0500

46 lines

Re: Type design for the visually impaired?

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:08:05 +0200

36 lines

Re: Type design for the visually impaired?

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 19:38:33 -0800

27 lines

Re: Type design for the visually impaired?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:11:31 -0800

74 lines

Re: Type design for the visually impaired?

Sebastian Marius Kirsch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 23:23:13 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

Type group in the UK

Type group in the UK

Monib <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:29:23 +1000

17 lines

New Thread

Type-Design Mailing List?

Re: Type-Design Mailing List?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2000 11:32:30 -0800

25 lines

Type-Design Mailing List?

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2000 20:39:57 -0800

33 lines

New Thread

typeCards

typeCards

Franko Luin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 13:00:55 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

typeCards, step 2

typeCards, step 2

Franko Luin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2000 14:28:52 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Typecon 98 Revisited

Re: Typecon 98 Revisited

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 23:00:08 +0100

16 lines

Typecon 98 Revisited

tony d <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 16:12:37 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

TypeCon98 Revisited

Re: TypeCon98 Revisited

Tony Di Pietro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2000 21:12:09 -0500

26 lines

TypeCon98 Revisited

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2000 13:54:45 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

Michael Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2000 13:58:53 EST

22 lines

Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2000 10:05:19 +0100

51 lines

Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2000 09:51:38 +0100

18 lines

Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2000 10:07:24 +0100

37 lines

Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2000 01:13:38 +0100

22 lines

Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 14:48:22 -0800

24 lines

Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 14:16:54 -0800

25 lines

Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 11:29:44 -0800

20 lines

Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:21:44 -0800

47 lines

Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 09:43:20 -0800

51 lines

Re: Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 18:22:36 +0100

30 lines

Typewriter font to go with Lucida Bright?

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:22:59 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 27 Mar 2000 to 28 Mar 2000 (#2000-93)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 27 Mar 2000 to 28 Mar 2000 (#2000-93)

Sara Larson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:54:45 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Unger's Paradox

Re: Unger's Paradox

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2000 10:49:40 -0800

34 lines

Re: Unger's Paradox

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 18:40:38 -0800

33 lines

Re: Unger's Paradox

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 22:26:02 +0100

36 lines

Re: Unger's Paradox

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 13:19:21 -0800

35 lines

Re: Unger's Paradox

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 17:59:30 -0300

31 lines

Re: Unger's Paradox

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 12:41:52 -0800

33 lines

Re: Unger's Paradox

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2000 22:55:24 +0100

32 lines

Re: Unger's Paradox

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2000 18:17:52 -0300

26 lines

Unger's Paradox

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2000 12:45:02 -0800

16 lines

New Thread

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:15:01 +0100

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 09:15:02 GMT

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:15:02 GMT

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 09:15:01 GMT

68 lines

New Thread

URW

URW

Ramsey Margolis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2000 10:51:50 +1300

24 lines

New Thread

Visible Language

Re: Visible Language

Lucans, Gunars <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2000 15:28:46 -0600

19 lines

Re: Visible Language

Rasmus Bruun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2000 22:25:01 +0100

22 lines

Visible Language

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:53:30 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

Web book info

Re: Web book info

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 22:28:10 +0000

19 lines

Re: Web book info

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:48:20 -0800

46 lines

New Thread

Web design (was CSS Question)

Re: Web design (was CSS Question)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:56:39 -0800

43 lines

Re: Web design (was CSS Question)

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:27:15 -0800

35 lines

Web design (was CSS Question)

Tom Chadwin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:28:52 +0100

146 lines

New Thread

what is your definition of "calligraphy"? and may I quote you on this?

what is your definition of "calligraphy"? and may I quote you on this?

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:17:29 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Why Portrait? <-- Kate, please note brevity :-)

Re: Why Portrait? <-- Kate, please note brevity :-)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:32:17 -0800

26 lines

Re: Why Portrait? <-- Kate, please note brevity :-)

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:16:37 -0300

40 lines

Re: Why Portrait? <-- Kate, please note brevity :-)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:01:04 -0800

25 lines

Re: Why Portrait? <-- Kate, please note brevity :-)

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:53:47 -0800

23 lines

Why Portrait? <-- Kate, please note brevity :-)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:06:21 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

Why Portrait? <-- Kate, please note brevity :-) - But I, for one, don't mind, and sometimes even like, Kate's elephantine subject lines... Hey, people *should* be allowed such unharmful little eccentricities... ;-)

Re: Why Portrait? <-- Kate, please note brevity :-) - But I, for one, don't mind, and sometimes even like, Kate's elephantine subject lines... Hey, people *should* be allowed such unharmful little eccentricities... ;-)

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:12:42 -0300

20 lines

New Thread

Wild TYPO-L postings?

Re: Wild TYPO-L postings?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:27:23 -0800

20 lines

Re: Wild TYPO-L postings?

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 16:52:57 +0100

20 lines

Re: Wild TYPO-L postings?

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 23:13:59 -0500

30 lines

Re: Wild TYPO-L postings?

gunnarb <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 12:58:07 -0700

20 lines

Re: Wild TYPO-L postings?

Franko Luin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 23:38:16 +0100

25 lines

Re: Wild TYPO-L postings?

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 21:04:25 +0100

22 lines

Re: Wild TYPO-L postings?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 13:16:28 -0800

18 lines

Re: Wild TYPO-L postings?

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 15:22:31 -0000

19 lines

Wild TYPO-L postings?

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2000 15:54:23 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

you might enjoy this calligraphic humor on the Net ...

you might enjoy this calligraphic humor on the Net ...

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:15:39 -0500

39 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
August 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
February 1994
January 1994
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager