LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TYPO-L Archives


TYPO-L Archives

TYPO-L Archives


February 2000


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

a versus a (30 messages)
almost certainly off-topic by a mile: does any Italic-writer have/wish to share scans of their handwriting before/after learning Italic? (2 messages)
apostrophes (4 messages)
At the mercy of the typo (2 messages)
Baskerville (2 messages)
Baskerville dispute (13 messages)
bitmap only True Type (2 messages)
Carson city (was Re:Type Question...) (10 messages)
Cleartype on Salon (3 messages)
Cooper (1 message)
copyright info (9 messages)
Copyrights & Typefaces (2 messages)
Cubics, Beziers and tools (18 messages)
does anyone have a snailmail address for Michael Twyman? (2 messages)
dsiegel intrigue (3 messages)
Eric Gill Conference & Exhibitions (1 message)
Font request (16 messages)
Font sketch (13 messages)
Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference) (32 messages)
for your interest (especially if in/near NYC): exhibit on 400 years of American handwriting till 3-March-2000 at Columbia Univ. (1 message)
Formal appologies... (1 message)
Fraction Bar (1 message)
Fwd: Re: Poltawski typeface: invitation to test (cross-post, sorry) (2 messages)
Glyph/apostrophe/glyph (25 messages)
handwriting hot-heads: Saturday's Seattle TIMES reports on MDs opposing a bill that would require them to write legibly (1 message)
help raise public knowledge! - YOU can combat a serious paleographic error promulgated in this popular USA magazine! (1 message)
history-of-writing net-site at the University of Maryland: http://www.wam.umd.edu/~rfradkin/alphapage.html (1 message)
Hrant & Emigre (2 messages)
InDesign = URW HZ program? (4 messages)
IPA font (4 messages)
ITC's ATypI99 (4 messages)
Jill (4 messages)
Latin script evolution (8 messages)
Lean Beziers (11 messages)
linear B/typography websites (3 messages)
Linotype Estienne & Modeling (8 messages)
macro and breve in IPA (2 messages)
Mecanorma? (6 messages)
MinionMM crazy kerning? (4 messages)
MM redux (was: InDesign = URW HZ program?) (2 messages)
more places to search for font? (3 messages)
multimedia teaching position (1 message)
Off-topic: footie taunts (1 message)
On the Subject of Subjects (3 messages)
Orange & Black -- Go Tigers! (2 messages)
oswald cooper (4 messages)
phonetic reference book (1 message)
Poltawski typeface: invitation to test (cross-post, sorry) (5 messages)
Precision Type Font Reference (2 messages)
PREPUBLICATION ANNOUNCEMENT - Fritz & Trudi Eberhardt: An Oral History (1 message)
Printing Type on eBay and in San Francisco (1 message)
RE : Adding Fonts (1 message)
Really need this font (3 messages)
research help (9 messages)
Ret: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph (1 message)
seek help with character-assignment problems in FontLab (2 messages)
Shockwave Text (1 message)
site for fonts that mimic the printing/cursive of various school-handwriting models (1 message)
Site navigation (4 messages)
Site navigation; was: Web book info (1 message)
sites for teaching job listing (1 message)
Small Caps (1 message)
Small Caps & Small Figs (4 messages)
Small Figs (4 messages)
someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used (9 messages)
someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used in (2 messages)
someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used in some dictionaries of English (1 message)
Splines quadratic and cubic (5 messages)
Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG (25 messages)
Standard Medium, Bold? (2 messages)
SVG (42 messages)
test: please ignore & delete (1 message)
Testing: please ignore & delete (1 message)
The supposed theft strikes back (3 messages)
Them's fightin' words (3 messages)
today's WALL STREET JOURNAL (10-Feb-2000) ran a piece on Italic handwriting, by a recent "convert" among their reporters ... (1 message)
Traps, Thorns and MMs (2 messages)
type copyright (2 messages)
Type Question (6 messages)
Type Question... (43 messages)
Type Question... Revisited (3 messages)
TYPO-L Digest - 22 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-57) (2 messages)
typography in Denmark was slovenia (1 message)
typography in slovenia (18 messages)
Unctionalist finnovation (2 messages)
Unsubscribing from TYPO-L (2 messages)
Upsilon (14 messages)
Web book info (44 messages)
What will those guys in Redmond think of next? (1 message)
where to ask type ID question? (8 messages)
x-height lining figures (1 message)
you can help research! (handwriting-researcher is creating a data-base of *all* existing handwriting-methods/-models/-programs) (1 message)
[WD]: name this font (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TYPO-L Home

TYPO-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

a versus a

Re: a versus a

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 11:41:28 -0800

43 lines

Re: a versus a

gunnarb <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 11:22:58 -0700

36 lines

Re: a versus a

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:31:58 +0100

28 lines

Re: a versus a

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 11:02:23 +0100

28 lines

Re: a versus a

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:34:52 -0500

38 lines

Re: a versus a

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 17:28:37 -0800

19 lines

Re: a versus a

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:49:55 -0800

30 lines

Re: a versus a

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:02:54 +0100

66 lines

Re: a versus a

Ian Petersen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 23:53:51 +0100

19 lines

Re: a versus a

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 14:28:45 -0800

47 lines

Re: a versus a

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 17:03:43 -0500

30 lines

Re: a versus a

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 22:56:53 +0100

48 lines

Re: a versus a

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:54:02 -0500

44 lines

Re: a versus a

Fernanda Martins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 19:24:14 +0000

76 lines

Re: a versus a

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:56:39 -0500

41 lines

Re: a versus a

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:48:32 -0500

68 lines

Re: a versus a

David <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:28:55 -0500

26 lines

Re: a versus a

David <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:18:05 -0500

26 lines

Re: a versus a

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 12:04:22 -0800

30 lines

Re: a versus a

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 11:34:09 -0800

48 lines

Re: a versus a

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 11:35:04 -0800

37 lines

Re: a versus a

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 14:16:39 -0500

37 lines

Re: a versus a

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:49:43 -0800

60 lines

Re: a versus a

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:39:59 -0800

30 lines

Re: a versus a

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:05:44 -0800

51 lines

Re: a versus a

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:17:16 -0500

101 lines

Re: a versus a

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 09:04:57 -0500

26 lines

Re: a versus a

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 23:12:26 -0500

80 lines

Re: a versus a

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 20:43:54 -0500

29 lines

a versus a

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 20:00:38 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

almost certainly off-topic by a mile: does any Italic-writer have/wish to share scans of their handwriting before/after learning Italic?

Re: almost certainly off-topic by a mile: does any Italic-writer have/wish to share scans of their handwriting before/after learning Italic?

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:15:47 -0800

30 lines

almost certainly off-topic by a mile: does any Italic-writer have/wish to share scans of their handwriting before/after learning Italic?

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 02:23:20 -0500

81 lines

New Thread

apostrophes

Re: apostrophes

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 21:24:24 -0800

25 lines

Re: apostrophes

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 13:32:59 EST

27 lines

Re: apostrophes

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 17:26:52 +0000

23 lines

apostrophes

Don Wilkes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 08:08:10 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

At the mercy of the typo

Re: At the mercy of the typo

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 12:21:42 -0800

31 lines

At the mercy of the typo

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:02:34 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Baskerville

Re: Baskerville

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:19:53 -0800

21 lines

Re: Baskerville

David Glover <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 17:37:16 -0800

13 lines

New Thread

Baskerville dispute

Re: Baskerville dispute

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:25:16 -0800

24 lines

Re: Baskerville dispute

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 23:47:04 +0100

36 lines

Re: Baskerville dispute

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:07:57 -0800

16 lines

Re: Baskerville dispute

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:05:43 -0800

17 lines

Re: Baskerville dispute

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:55:42 -0800

24 lines

Re: Baskerville dispute

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:44:49 -0800

27 lines

Re: Baskerville dispute

William I. Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 17:37:57 -0500

35 lines

Re: Baskerville dispute

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:30:24 -0800

24 lines

Re: Baskerville dispute

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:24:36 -0800

24 lines

Re: Baskerville dispute

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:57:37 -0500

25 lines

Re: Baskerville dispute

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:36:42 -0800

24 lines

Re: Baskerville dispute

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:17:54 -0800

20 lines

Baskerville dispute

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 21:12:07 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

bitmap only True Type

Re: bitmap only True Type

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 17:49:14 -0800

23 lines

Re: bitmap only True Type

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 05:30:06 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Carson city (was Re:Type Question...)

Re: Carson city (was Re:Type Question...)

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:37:09 -0800

20 lines

Re: Carson city (was Re:Type Question...)

michaellynch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:31:33 -0800

15 lines

Re: Carson city (was Re:Type Question...)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:28:22 -0800

19 lines

Re: Carson city (was Re:Type Question...)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 21:03:35 -0800

30 lines

Re: Carson city (was Re:Type Question...)

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 20:55:58 -0800

25 lines

Re: Carson city (was Re:Type Question...)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 14:00:48 -0800

60 lines

Re: Carson city (was Re:Type Question...)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 15:39:55 -0400

18 lines

Re: Carson city (was Re:Type Question...)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:58:07 -0800

31 lines

Re: Carson city (was Re:Type Question...)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:00:05 -0800

50 lines

Carson city (was Re:Type Question...)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:44:27 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Cleartype on Salon

Re: Cleartype on Salon

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:26:52 -0800

18 lines

Re: Cleartype on Salon

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:15:51 -0800

38 lines

Cleartype on Salon

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 02:47:48 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

Cooper

Re: Cooper

George Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 22:17:43 -0600

78 lines

New Thread

copyright info

Re: copyright info

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 04:19:50 -0800

29 lines

Re: copyright info

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 11:22:02 -0800

22 lines

Re: copyright info

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 12:56:08 EST

30 lines

Re: copyright info

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 08:49:39 -0800

26 lines

Re: copyright info

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 13:06:09 EST

29 lines

Re: copyright info

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 15:38:00 +0100

32 lines

Re: copyright info

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 06:34:00 +0100

42 lines

Re: copyright info

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 00:09:49 -0500

65 lines

copyright info

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 20:50:37 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

Copyrights & Typefaces

Re: Copyrights & Typefaces

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 14:21:38 -0800

49 lines

Copyrights & Typefaces

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 13:45:07 -0800

29 lines

New Thread

Cubics, Beziers and tools

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 12:29:17 -0800

69 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:22:53 -0800

36 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 10:22:11 -0400

22 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 23:41:15 -0500

33 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:02:22 -0800

36 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:17:01 -0400

24 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 16:18:56 -0800

30 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 16:14:45 -0800

28 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 00:04:22 -0000

28 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 23:47:45 +0100

26 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:42:30 -0000

34 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:39:27 -0800

29 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:29:52 -0000

34 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:18:19 -0800

37 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:07:51 -0000

32 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:28:34 -0800

23 lines

Re: Cubics, Beziers and tools

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 21:08:45 +0100

19 lines

Cubics, Beziers and tools

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 11:37:57 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

does anyone have a snailmail address for Michael Twyman?

Re: does anyone have a snailmail address for Michael Twyman?

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Petra_=C8erne_Oven?= <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 14:36:20 +0100

31 lines

does anyone have a snailmail address for Michael Twyman?

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 14:44:27 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

dsiegel intrigue

Re: dsiegel intrigue

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:44:10 -0800

27 lines

Re: dsiegel intrigue

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:28:05 -0800

25 lines

dsiegel intrigue

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 22:37:40 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

Eric Gill Conference & Exhibitions

Eric Gill Conference & Exhibitions

John F Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:37:21 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

Font request

Re: Font request

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:51:28 -0800

87 lines

Re: Font request

gunnarb <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:24:28 -0700

25 lines

Re: Font request

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 19:52:37 -0800

54 lines

Re: Font request

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:23:52 -0500

27 lines

Re: Font request

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 01:43:30 -0500

22 lines

Re: Font request

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 07:34:49 +0100

29 lines

Re: Font request

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:38:47 -0800

35 lines

Re: Font request

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:22:22 -0800

37 lines

Re: Font request

Norton Amato Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:03:17 -0300

58 lines

Re: Font request

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:23:43 -0800

32 lines

Re: Font request

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 19:16:07 -0200

32 lines

Re: Font request

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:15:31 -0500

41 lines

Re: Font request

Stacy Westbrook <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 12:57:55 -0800

27 lines

Re: Font request

Norton Amato Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 18:55:10 -0300

27 lines

Re: Font request

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 18:33:06 -0200

29 lines

Font request

Norton Amato Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 18:24:01 -0300

21 lines

New Thread

Font sketch

Re: Font sketch

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 09:59:25 -0500

35 lines

Re: Font sketch

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 04:58:49 +0000

53 lines

Re: Font sketch

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:37:02 -0800

27 lines

Re: Font sketch

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 21:55:59 -0800

45 lines

Re: Font sketch

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 15:54:18 -0500

18 lines

Re: Font sketch

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 10:17:22 -0500

21 lines

Re: Font sketch

Heather Minnich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 20:55:22 -0400

33 lines

Re: Font sketch

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 17:40:35 -0800

31 lines

Re: Font sketch

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 20:22:55 -0500

18 lines

Re: Font sketch

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 01:07:43 +0000

23 lines

Re: Font sketch

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 17:03:37 -0800

37 lines

Re: Font sketch

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 16:46:58 -0800

30 lines

Font sketch

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 19:04:48 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Helle Gilderdale <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 23:44:44 +1300

59 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 17:37:37 -0800

25 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 16:14:42 -0800

68 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 18:42:29 -0500

120 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 13:51:48 -0800

92 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 19:24:06 -0200

61 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 16:05:18 -0500

110 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 21:40:36 +0100

32 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 12:11:08 -0800

34 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 19:56:47 +0100

74 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 11:07:50 -0800

89 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:04:48 -0800

49 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 21:40:53 -0500

49 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 23:54:09 +0100

30 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 15:40:01 -0500

52 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 12:25:05 +0100

45 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:56:29 -0800

37 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 12:31:19 -0500

23 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 08:17:15 -0800

25 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:19:03 -0400

33 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 14:14:39 +0100

31 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:53:45 +0100

29 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 02:18:30 -0500

29 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 23:09:28 -0800

28 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 20:52:14 -0500

33 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 17:27:17 -0800

20 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:27:04 -0800

16 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 23:33:58 +0100

40 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:38:34 -0800

18 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 21:20:21 +0000

19 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 12:02:00 -0800

22 lines

Re: Font sketch (Precision Type Font Reference)

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 11:53:59 -0800

42 lines

New Thread

for your interest (especially if in/near NYC): exhibit on 400 years of American handwriting till 3-March-2000 at Columbia Univ.

for your interest (especially if in/near NYC): exhibit on 400 years of American handwriting till 3-March-2000 at Columbia Univ.

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:09:15 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Formal appologies...

Formal appologies...

Norton Amato Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:36:22 -0300

57 lines

New Thread

Fraction Bar

Fraction Bar

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 23:42:12 +0000

15 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: Poltawski typeface: invitation to test (cross-post, sorry)

Re: Fwd: Re: Poltawski typeface: invitation to test (cross-post, sorry)

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:14:34 +0100

35 lines

Fwd: Re: Poltawski typeface: invitation to test (cross-post, sorry)

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 14:23:29 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Ian Petersen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 18:28:54 +0100

21 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:41:41 +0100

27 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 10:15:45 +0100

37 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Jonathan Paterson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 18:43:39 -0500

28 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 08:47:15 -0500

33 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 19:42:51 -0800

26 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:22:33 -0500

26 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 14:44:11 -0800

29 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:07:55 -0500

23 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 12:05:11 -0800

26 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 11:22:41 -0800

20 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 08:25:12 -0800

20 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:11:17 -0500

74 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 14:36:23 +0000

20 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Edward Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 11:33:13 -0800

44 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 19:07:46 -0500

33 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 18:41:20 -0500

34 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 18:32:54 -0500

42 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 23:20:17 +0000

17 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 15:55:14 -0700

42 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 17:36:51 -0500

29 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 14:30:46 -0800

41 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 17:34:24 -0500

37 lines

Re: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 23:32:01 +0100

44 lines

Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 22:04:51 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

handwriting hot-heads: Saturday's Seattle TIMES reports on MDs opposing a bill that would require them to write legibly

handwriting hot-heads: Saturday's Seattle TIMES reports on MDs opposing a bill that would require them to write legibly

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 15:45:42 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

help raise public knowledge! - YOU can combat a serious paleographic error promulgated in this popular USA magazine!

help raise public knowledge! - YOU can combat a serious paleographic error promulgated in this popular USA magazine!

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 14:05:26 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

history-of-writing net-site at the University of Maryland: http://www.wam.umd.edu/~rfradkin/alphapage.html

history-of-writing net-site at the University of Maryland: http://www.wam.umd.edu/~rfradkin/alphapage.html

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 16:40:05 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

Hrant & Emigre

Re: Hrant & Emigre

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:30:41 -0800

18 lines

Hrant & Emigre

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 00:40:21 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

InDesign = URW HZ program?

Re: InDesign = URW HZ program?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:14:08 -0800

22 lines

Re: InDesign = URW HZ program?

Laurence Penney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:10:26 -0500

42 lines

Re: InDesign = URW HZ program?

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:14:57 -0800

19 lines

InDesign = URW HZ program?

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 14:36:38 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

IPA font

Re: IPA font

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 10:49:09 -0500

66 lines

Re: IPA font

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 01:21:07 +0100

15 lines

Re: IPA font

Jonathan Paterson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 18:55:38 -0500

57 lines

IPA font

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 23:04:17 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

ITC's ATypI99

Re: ITC's ATypI99

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 16:54:10 -0800

34 lines

Re: ITC's ATypI99

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 16:34:33 -0800

25 lines

Re: ITC's ATypI99

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 16:13:24 -0800

46 lines

ITC's ATypI99

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:58:40 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

Jill

Re: Jill

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 20:17:34 -0500

27 lines

Re: Jill

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 17:00:37 -0800

36 lines

Re: Jill

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 18:53:39 -0500

56 lines

Jill

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 22:10:41 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

Latin script evolution

Re: Latin script evolution

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 12:31:24 -0800

34 lines

Re: Latin script evolution

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:15:38 -0500

28 lines

Re: Latin script evolution

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:58:13 -0800

25 lines

Re: Latin script evolution

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:23:32 -0800

18 lines

Re: Latin script evolution

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:04:45 -0500

34 lines

Re: Latin script evolution

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 09:45:29 -0800

42 lines

Re: Latin script evolution

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 15:29:17 +0100

36 lines

Latin script evolution

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 05:56:11 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

Lean Beziers

Re: Lean Beziers

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:52:07 -0800

22 lines

Re: Lean Beziers

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:17:03 -0800

15 lines

Re: Lean Beziers

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:12:50 -0800

39 lines

Re: Lean Beziers

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:41:11 -0800

38 lines

Re: Lean Beziers

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:09:00 -0800

25 lines

Re: Lean Beziers

Robert M. McClure <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:58:07 -0700

39 lines

Re: Lean Beziers

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 15:30:45 -0800

29 lines

Re: Lean Beziers

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 21:15:25 -0200

40 lines

Re: Lean Beziers

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 15:01:16 -0800

53 lines

Re: Lean Beziers

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:30:08 -0200

48 lines

Lean Beziers

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:35:27 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

linear B/typography websites

Re: linear B/typography websites

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 00:31:50 -0800

29 lines

Re: linear B/typography websites

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 09:37:57 -0800

31 lines

linear B/typography websites

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 00:06:55 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

Linotype Estienne & Modeling

Re: Linotype Estienne & Modeling

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 18:43:03 -0800

30 lines

Re: Linotype Estienne & Modeling

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 23:41:02 +0100

35 lines

Re: Linotype Estienne & Modeling

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 12:13:46 -0800

26 lines

Re: Linotype Estienne & Modeling

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 11:45:23 -0500

30 lines

Re: Linotype Estienne & Modeling

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 11:12:24 -0300

35 lines

Re: Linotype Estienne & Modeling

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 15:09:41 -0800

23 lines

Re: Linotype Estienne & Modeling

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 17:23:55 -0300

33 lines

Linotype Estienne & Modeling

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 15:46:06 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

macro and breve in IPA

Re: macro and breve in IPA

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 13:01:38 -0500

31 lines

macro and breve in IPA

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:19:01 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Mecanorma?

Re: Mecanorma?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 19:32:04 -0500

20 lines

Re: Mecanorma?

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 21:44:00 +0000

19 lines

Re: Mecanorma?

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 20:39:01 +0100

36 lines

Re: Mecanorma?

michaellynch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:04:06 -0800

37 lines

Re: Mecanorma?

Christopher Cleary <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:52:00 +0000

16 lines

Mecanorma?

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 01:22:54 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

MinionMM crazy kerning?

Re: MinionMM crazy kerning?

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 14:54:30 +0000

25 lines

Re: MinionMM crazy kerning?

David Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 07:36:59 -0500

29 lines

Re: MinionMM crazy kerning?

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 09:15:05 -0800

31 lines

MinionMM crazy kerning?

David Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 10:14:35 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

MM redux (was: InDesign = URW HZ program?)

Re: MM redux (was: InDesign = URW HZ program?)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 11:23:43 -0800

27 lines

MM redux (was: InDesign = URW HZ program?)

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 08:12:12 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

more places to search for font?

Re: more places to search for font?

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:38:02 -0800

24 lines

Re: more places to search for font?

Joshua Darden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:29:01 -0800

32 lines

more places to search for font?

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 17:09:19 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

multimedia teaching position

multimedia teaching position

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:05:30 -0800

93 lines

New Thread

Off-topic: footie taunts

Off-topic: footie taunts

Don Wilkes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:15:35 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

On the Subject of Subjects

Re: On the Subject of Subjects

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 14:37:56 +0100

30 lines

Re: On the Subject of Subjects

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 07:20:05 -0500

23 lines

On the Subject of Subjects

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 05:08:06 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

Orange & Black -- Go Tigers!

Re: Orange & Black -- Go Tigers!

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 13:57:09 -0800

20 lines

Re: Orange & Black -- Go Tigers!

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 15:33:02 EST

26 lines

New Thread

oswald cooper

Re: oswald cooper

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:37:33 -0800

41 lines

Re: oswald cooper

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 15:09:50 +0100

27 lines

Re: oswald cooper

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 23:05:18 -0800

32 lines

oswald cooper

cynthia <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 22:39:08 -0800

15 lines

New Thread

phonetic reference book

phonetic reference book

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:37:48 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Poltawski typeface: invitation to test (cross-post, sorry)

Re: Poltawski typeface: invitation to test (cross-post, sorry)

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 11:16:31 +0100

29 lines

Re: Poltawski typeface: invitation to test (cross-post, sorry)

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 01:07:15 +0100

26 lines

Re: Poltawski typeface: invitation to test (cross-post, sorry)

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:05:51 GMT

26 lines

Re: Poltawski typeface: invitation to test (cross-post, sorry)

Walter Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:29:42 +0100

25 lines

Poltawski typeface: invitation to test (cross-post, sorry)

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 23:00:50 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Precision Type Font Reference

Re: Precision Type Font Reference

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 21:24:12 +0000

21 lines

Re: Precision Type Font Reference

Stephen Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 14:00:23 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

PREPUBLICATION ANNOUNCEMENT - Fritz & Trudi Eberhardt: An Oral History

PREPUBLICATION ANNOUNCEMENT - Fritz & Trudi Eberhardt: An Oral History

Peter Verheyen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:38:08 -0500

160 lines

New Thread

Printing Type on eBay and in San Francisco

Printing Type on eBay and in San Francisco

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 22:35:06 -0500

112 lines

New Thread

RE : Adding Fonts

RE : Adding Fonts

John Bastin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 07:55:32 PST

20 lines

New Thread

Really need this font

Re: Really need this font

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:55:29 -0800

24 lines

Re: Really need this font

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:06:03 +0100

29 lines

Really need this font

Norton Amato Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:05:13 -0300

73 lines

New Thread

research help

Re: research help

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 15:21:50 -0500

40 lines

Re: research help

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 12:05:06 -0800

39 lines

Re: research help

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:55:34 -0800

34 lines

Re: research help

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:06:59 -0500

62 lines

Re: research help

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 01:41:32 -0800

46 lines

Re: research help

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:16:47 +0100

31 lines

Re: research help

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:33:49 -0800

23 lines

Re: research help

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 16:07:10 -0800

33 lines

research help

Gwen J Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 18:05:59 -0600

22 lines

New Thread

Ret: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Ret: Glyph/apostrophe/glyph

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 06:15:18 +0000

58 lines

New Thread

seek help with character-assignment problems in FontLab

seek help with character-assignment problems in FontLab

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 18:31:00 -0500

55 lines

seek help with character-assignment problems in FontLab

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 18:28:00 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

Shockwave Text

Shockwave Text

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:05:56 -0800

44 lines

New Thread

site for fonts that mimic the printing/cursive of various school-handwriting models

site for fonts that mimic the printing/cursive of various school-handwriting models

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:56:40 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

Site navigation

Re: Site navigation

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 16:29:46 -0500

31 lines

Re: Site navigation

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 16:18:32 -0400

57 lines

Re: Site navigation

Jim Rudolf <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 18:49:59 +0100

47 lines

Re: Site navigation

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 10:34:06 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Site navigation; was: Web book info

Site navigation; was: Web book info

Jim Rudolf <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 10:35:30 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

sites for teaching job listing

sites for teaching job listing

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:35:18 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

Small Caps

Small Caps

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:10:09 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

Small Caps & Small Figs

Re: Small Caps & Small Figs

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 21:24:18 +0000

18 lines

Re: Small Caps & Small Figs

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 20:55:20 +0100

26 lines

Re: Small Caps & Small Figs

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 21:06:05 +0100

26 lines

Small Caps & Small Figs

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 18:00:29 +0000

17 lines

New Thread

Small Figs

Re: Small Figs

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 21:48:31 +0000

18 lines

Re: Small Figs

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 13:49:25 -0800

23 lines

Re: Small Figs

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:46:26 -0800

48 lines

Small Figs

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 15:56:43 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used

Re: someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 13:01:38 -0500

28 lines

Re: someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 09:26:27 -0800

23 lines

Re: someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:07:50 -0500

30 lines

Re: someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:20:52 -0500

98 lines

Re: someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 07:29:43 -0500

35 lines

Re: someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:54:52 -0500

48 lines

Re: someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 09:26:59 -0200

33 lines

Re: someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 23:38:07 -0500

62 lines

Re: someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:04:15 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used in

Re: someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used in

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:46:26 -0500

34 lines

Re: someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used in

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:14:09 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used in some dictionaries of English

someone is seeking a font that includes symbols used in some dictionaries of English

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:59:41 -0500

79 lines

New Thread

Splines quadratic and cubic

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:36:10 +0100

34 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:28:01 +0100

35 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:09:18 -0500

48 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 12:42:50 -0500

36 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 09:20:12 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 16:24:07 +0100

31 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:52:48 -0800

30 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:29:12 -0800

48 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Robert M. McClure <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:41:01 -0700

56 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Tom Kacvinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:31:45 -0500

21 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:01:44 -0500

37 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:50:47 -0800

19 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:49:31 -0800

26 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 18:00:16 +0100

40 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 00:24:34 -0500

54 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:09:16 +0000

121 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:45:50 -0800

20 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:24:54 -0800

22 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 17:41:06 +0100

21 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:02:24 -0500

37 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Patrick TJ McPhee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:18:38 -0500

35 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:15:45 -0500

40 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:52:18 -0500

26 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 12:30:04 -0800

51 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 08:48:53 -0500

32 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Barry Stock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 07:03:17 -0500

32 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:04:02 -0500

30 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 11:25:55 -0800

22 lines

Re: Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 11:14:52 -0800

25 lines

Splines quadratic and cubic, was Re: SVG

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:33:57 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

Standard Medium, Bold?

Re: Standard Medium, Bold?

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 09:43:52 -0800

15 lines

Standard Medium, Bold?

David Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:52:13 -0500

13 lines

New Thread

SVG

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:09:25 -0800

22 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:58:53 -0800

24 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:58:38 -0800

31 lines

Re: SVG

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:22:12 -0800

41 lines

Re: SVG

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 16:29:28 +0100

49 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:24:09 -0800

27 lines

Re: SVG

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 09:37:16 -0800

45 lines

Re: SVG

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:16:33 +0100

40 lines

Re: SVG

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 00:12:49 -0800

33 lines

Re: SVG

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 00:12:43 -0800

36 lines

Re: SVG

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 00:04:41 +0000

20 lines

Re: SVG

Peter Ring <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 01:00:55 +0100

40 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:23:44 -0800

22 lines

Re: SVG

Peter Ring <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 00:14:17 +0100

55 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 14:15:03 -0800

39 lines

Re: SVG

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 16:49:11 -0400

59 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 13:40:43 -0800

43 lines

Re: SVG

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 16:09:53 -0400

50 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 12:59:44 -0800

25 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 12:53:18 -0800

49 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 12:41:51 -0800

25 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 12:04:44 -0800

23 lines

Re: SVG

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 20:59:27 +0100

40 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:43:19 -0800

35 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:41:02 -0800

20 lines

Re: SVG

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:51:44 -0800

41 lines

Re: SVG

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 12:41:10 -0400

60 lines

Re: SVG

David Lemon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:08:15 -0800

20 lines

Re: SVG

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 10:37:11 -0400

66 lines

Re: SVG

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 01:51:50 -0800

28 lines

Re: SVG

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 01:51:44 -0800

36 lines

Re: SVG

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 01:51:38 -0800

36 lines

Re: SVG

Peter Ring <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 08:43:52 +0100

81 lines

Re: SVG

Peter Ring <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 08:28:07 +0100

44 lines

Re: SVG

Adam Twardoch (List) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 03:21:41 +0100

28 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:49:36 -0800

41 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:06:21 -0800

30 lines

Re: SVG

Tim Greenzweig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:41:37 -0800

19 lines

Re: SVG

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:30:27 -0400

31 lines

Re: SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:00:44 -0800

41 lines

Re: SVG

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:49:09 -0400

37 lines

SVG

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 12:25:28 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

test: please ignore & delete

test: please ignore & delete

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:57:30 -0800

8 lines

New Thread

Testing: please ignore & delete

Testing: please ignore & delete

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 11:27:03 -0800

12 lines

New Thread

The supposed theft strikes back

Re: The supposed theft strikes back

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:16:42 -0800

23 lines

Re: The supposed theft strikes back

Christina Thiele <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:31:06 -0500

75 lines

The supposed theft strikes back

Norton Amato Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:10:41 -0300

104 lines

New Thread

Them's fightin' words

Re: Them's fightin' words

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 15:26:11 -0500

18 lines

Re: Them's fightin' words

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 14:43:09 -0500

30 lines

Them's fightin' words

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 14:22:05 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

today's WALL STREET JOURNAL (10-Feb-2000) ran a piece on Italic handwriting, by a recent "convert" among their reporters ...

today's WALL STREET JOURNAL (10-Feb-2000) ran a piece on Italic handwriting, by a recent "convert" among their reporters ...

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:52:49 -0500

176 lines

New Thread

Traps, Thorns and MMs

Re: Traps, Thorns and MMs

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 14:39:29 -0800

25 lines

Re: Traps, Thorns and MMs

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 14:26:43 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

type copyright

Re: type copyright

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 15:41:11 -0800

110 lines

type copyright

Jay Rutherford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 17:28:05 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Type Question

Re: Type Question

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 17:29:40 -0500

41 lines

Re: Type Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 13:58:32 -0800

27 lines

Re: Type Question

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 21:37:45 +0100

32 lines

Re: Type Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:26:24 -0800

50 lines

Re: Type Question

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:10:37 -0800

108 lines

Re: Type Question

George E. Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:28:25 -0600

108 lines

New Thread

Type Question...

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:15:51 -0800

21 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:45:56 -0800

18 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:45:48 -0800

139 lines

Re: Type Question...

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 18:47:34 -0800

30 lines

Re: Type Question...

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 00:45:26 +0100

41 lines

Re: Type Question...

Jill Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 12:29:34 -0800

71 lines

Re: Type Question...

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 11:10:30 -0800

40 lines

Re: Type Question...

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 22:53:46 -0800

24 lines

Re: Type Question...

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 21:08:11 -0800

36 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:11:24 -0800

54 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:51:38 -0800

45 lines

Re: Type Question...

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:25:40 -0800

59 lines

Re: Type Question...

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:01:45 +0000

14 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:52:57 -0800

30 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:52:24 -0800

21 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:52:01 -0800

105 lines

Re: Type Question...

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:19:47 -0800

31 lines

Re: Type Question...

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:16:15 -0800

40 lines

Re: Type Question...

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:04:23 -0800

118 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:47:42 -0800

48 lines

Re: Type Question...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 15:54:43 -0500

54 lines

Re: Type Question...

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:23:31 +0100

40 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:24:14 -0800

64 lines

Re: Type Question...

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:32:46 -0800

40 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 13:40:34 -0800

32 lines

Re: Type Question...

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 13:25:03 -0800

23 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:51:18 -0800

29 lines

Re: Type Question...

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:58:08 -0800

77 lines

Re: Type Question...

Jim Rudolf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:52:38 +0100

38 lines

Re: Type Question...

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:09:51 +0100

37 lines

Re: Type Question...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 23:44:11 -0500

54 lines

Re: Type Question...

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 18:28:43 -0800

105 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:42:39 -0800

38 lines

Re: Type Question...

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 00:14:53 +0100

33 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:53:59 -0800

28 lines

Re: Type Question...

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:21:34 -0200

91 lines

Re: Type Question...

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:09:27 -0500

24 lines

Re: Type Question...

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 12:43:31 +0100

49 lines

Re: Type Question...

Rodolfo Capeto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 23:00:05 -0200

44 lines

Re: Type Question...

Roy Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:20:04 +0000

19 lines

Re: Type Question...

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:29:41 -0800

29 lines

Re: Type Question...

Robin Kinross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:26:45 +0100

37 lines

Type Question...

John Falker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 10:42:13 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

Type Question... Revisited

Re: Type Question... Revisited

Nguyen, Phan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 09:41:52 -0800

14 lines

Type Question... Revisited

Antonio Cavedoni <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:22:33 +0100

47 lines

Type Question... Revisited

Antonio Cavedoni <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 16:33:07 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

TYPO-L Digest - 22 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-57)

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 22 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-57)

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 13:44:39 -0800

18 lines

Re: TYPO-L Digest - 22 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-57)

Steven Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 13:36:26 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

typography in Denmark was slovenia

Re: typography in Denmark was slovenia

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 19:46:43 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

typography in slovenia

Re: typography in slovenia

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 16:21:53 +0100

38 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Ian Petersen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 08:34:59 +0100

20 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 19:36:48 -0800

26 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 19:31:45 -0800

27 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 16:58:43 -0500

25 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 23:02:18 +0100

31 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 22:24:10 +0100

38 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 13:18:59 -0800

23 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Ian Petersen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 22:07:22 +0100

26 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Jean-Francois Porchez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 22:17:19 +0100

46 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 10:59:15 -0800

41 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 12:22:02 -0500

33 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 08:59:04 -0500

38 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 04:00:46 -0800

44 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 18:28:52 -0800

30 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 20:49:23 -0500

38 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Giuseppe Carollo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 09:31:45 +0100

37 lines

Re: typography in slovenia

Adam Twardoch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 02:23:19 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Unctionalist finnovation

Re: Unctionalist finnovation

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:38:28 -0800

31 lines

Unctionalist finnovation

Joe Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 12:51:47 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 09:15:02 GMT

68 lines

Unsubscribing from TYPO-L

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:15:02 GMT

68 lines

New Thread

Upsilon

Re: Upsilon

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 11:14:29 -0800

20 lines

Re: Upsilon

Per Olav Walmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:29:34 +0100

30 lines

Re: Upsilon

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 21:19:11 -0800

25 lines

Re: Upsilon

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 22:44:22 -0500

38 lines

Re: Upsilon

Alexios Zavras <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 20:15:11 +0200

53 lines

Re: Upsilon

John Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:44:48 -0800

44 lines

Re: Upsilon

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:40:22 -0500

31 lines

Re: Upsilon

Florian Hars <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 16:28:10 +0100

22 lines

Re: Upsilon

Ulf Tropp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:41:26 SNT

23 lines

Re: Upsilon

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:26:20 -0500

42 lines

Re: Upsilon

Vladimir G Ivanovic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:42:01 -0800

39 lines

Re: Upsilon

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 19:15:50 -0500

28 lines

Re: Upsilon

John Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 09:09:46 -0800

28 lines

Upsilon

Janet N. Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:55:44 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Web book info

Re: Web book info

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 11:50:09 -0500

29 lines

Re: Web book info

tony d <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 09:38:22 -0500

51 lines

Re: Web book info

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 10:15:44 -0800

38 lines

Re: Web book info

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 15:15:18 EST

34 lines

Re: Web book info

ibbetson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 09:18:55 -0500

25 lines

Re: Web book info

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 20:31:39 -0800

41 lines

Re: Web book info

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 05:12:11 +0000

54 lines

Re: Web book info

Randal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 17:10:45 -0400

28 lines

Re: Web book info

tony d <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:09:00 -0500

44 lines

Re: Web book info

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 07:12:51 +1300

33 lines

Re: Web book info

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:02:01 -0800

65 lines

Re: Web book info

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 04:40:39 -0800

38 lines

Re: Web book info

Christopher R. Maden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 04:19:26 -0800

40 lines

Re: Web book info

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 14:13:52 EST

24 lines

Re: Web book info

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 11:08:06 -0800

23 lines

Re: Web book info

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 11:07:55 -0800

19 lines

Re: Web book info

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 16:18:50 -0500

53 lines

Re: Web book info

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 15:20:06 EST

38 lines

Re: Web book info

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 09:13:43 -0800

44 lines

Re: Web book info

Alexios Zavras <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 17:51:44 +0200

28 lines

Re: Web book info

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 12:34:15 -0800

29 lines

Re: Web book info

Curtis Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 12:30:34 -0800

24 lines

Re: Web book info

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 22:17:23 -0500

51 lines

Re: Web book info

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 21:19:56 -0500

34 lines

Re: Web book info

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 17:55:36 -0800

40 lines

Re: Web book info

Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 20:18:50 -0500

46 lines

Re: Web book info

Michael Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 13:57:51 +1300

35 lines

Re: Web book info

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 16:43:28 -0800

36 lines

Re: Web book info

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 16:26:21 -0800

44 lines

Re: Web book info

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 12:46:24 -0800

79 lines

Re: Web book info

Richard Weltz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 14:58:27 EST

30 lines

Re: Web book info

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 23:49:43 +0000

73 lines

Re: Web book info

Stacy Westbrook <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 14:14:13 -0500

21 lines

Re: Web book info

Dean Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 22:39:47 -0800

28 lines

Re: Web book info

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 22:00:32 -0800

24 lines

Re: Web book info

Hannah Mae <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 21:22:40 -0800

40 lines

Re: Web book info

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 22:41:31 -0500

51 lines

Re: Web book info

andy crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 18:09:54 -0800

24 lines

Re: Web book info

Tim Greenzweig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 17:49:07 -0800

21 lines

Re: Web book info

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 17:43:48 -0800

36 lines

Re: Web book info

Tim Greenzweig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 17:29:23 -0800

56 lines

Re: Web book info

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 04:58:49 +0000

42 lines

Re: Web book info

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 12:19:39 -0800

24 lines

Web book info

Rolf F. Rehe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 21:03:45 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

What will those guys in Redmond think of next?

What will those guys in Redmond think of next?

Michael Brady <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:19:19 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

where to ask type ID question?

Re: where to ask type ID question?

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:25:57 -0800

25 lines

Re: where to ask type ID question?

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:53:50 -0800

28 lines

Re: where to ask type ID question?

Rodger Whitlock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 16:44:57 +0000

71 lines

Re: where to ask type ID question?

Peter Stanbridge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 17:38:25 -0500

35 lines

Re: where to ask type ID question?

Andy Crewdson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 14:30:42 -0800

25 lines

Re: where to ask type ID question?

Gary Munch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 16:33:07 -0500

34 lines

Re: where to ask type ID question?

Hrant H. Papazian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:40:51 -0800

24 lines

Re: where to ask type ID question?

michaellynch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 00:13:55 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

x-height lining figures

x-height lining figures

Christopher Cleary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 17:23:02 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

you can help research! (handwriting-researcher is creating a data-base of *all* existing handwriting-methods/-models/-programs)

you can help research! (handwriting-researcher is creating a data-base of *all* existing handwriting-methods/-models/-programs)

Kate Gladstone & Andrew S. Haber <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 15:11:41 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

[WD]: name this font

[WD]: name this font

Ron Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 12:51:53 -0500

41 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
August 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
February 1994
January 1994
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.HEANET.IE

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager